Loading…

Predictors of Mortality in Elder Patients With Proximal Humeral Fracture

Background: Known possible consequences of proximal humerus fractures include impaired shoulder function, decreased independence, and increased risk for mortality. The purpose of this report is to describe the survival and independence of elderly patients with fractures of the proximal humerus, trea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation 2018, Vol.9, p.2151458517728155-2151458517728155
Main Authors: Myeroff, Chad M., Anderson, Jeffrey P., Sveom, Daniel S., Switzer, Julie A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-107aed019206fe57bc5727ac66eb67372612f58c8305a2e659d186ab62180e083
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-107aed019206fe57bc5727ac66eb67372612f58c8305a2e659d186ab62180e083
container_end_page 2151458517728155
container_issue
container_start_page 2151458517728155
container_title Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation
container_volume 9
creator Myeroff, Chad M.
Anderson, Jeffrey P.
Sveom, Daniel S.
Switzer, Julie A.
description Background: Known possible consequences of proximal humerus fractures include impaired shoulder function, decreased independence, and increased risk for mortality. The purpose of this report is to describe the survival and independence of elderly patients with fractures of the proximal humerus, treated in our institution, relative to patient characteristics and treatment method. Methods: Retrospective cohort study from 2006 to 2012. Setting: Community-based hospital with level 1 designation. Patients/Participants: Three hundred nineteen patients ≥60 years who presented to the emergency department with an isolated fracture of the proximal humerus were either admitted to the inpatient ward for the organization and provision of immediate definitive care or discharged with the expectation of coordination of their care as an outpatient. Treatment was nonoperative or operative. Outcome Measures: One- and 2-year mortality. Results: Significant predictors of mortality at 1 year included Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; continuous, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.86), body mass index (BMI;
doi_str_mv 10.1177/2151458517728155
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b0e7d148ca3748648e81deadf7b58e71</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2151458517728155</sage_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b0e7d148ca3748648e81deadf7b58e71</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2313732703</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-107aed019206fe57bc5727ac66eb67372612f58c8305a2e659d186ab62180e083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1P3DAQhq2qVUHAvacqUi-9pHjs-COXShUCFgnEHlr1aDnOZPEqG1Pbqcq_x8tSCkj1ZUbjd575IuQD0C8ASh0zENAILYrPNAjxhuxvQ3UjWv72mb9HjlJa0_IayblQ78kea4WkTDf7ZLGM2HuXQ0xVGKqrELMdfb6r_FSdjj3Gammzxymn6qfPN9Uyhj9-Y8dqMW8wFnsWrctzxEPybrBjwqNHe0B-nJ1-P1nUl9fnFyffLmsnmM41UGWxp9AyKgcUqnNCMWWdlNhJxRWTwAahneZUWIZStD1oaTvJQFOkmh-Qix23D3ZtbmNpJt6ZYL15CIS4MjZm70Y0HUXVQ6Od5arRstGooUfbD6oTGhUU1tcd63buNti7MmYZ6QX05c_kb8wq_DbbrQPlBfD5ERDDrxlTNhufHI6jnTDMyTAKUnDWtm2RfnolXYc5TmVVhnHgijP1AKQ7lYshpYjDUzNAzfbq5vXVS8rH50M8Jfy9cRHUO0GyK_xX9b_AexGCsnY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2313732703</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictors of Mortality in Elder Patients With Proximal Humeral Fracture</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Myeroff, Chad M. ; Anderson, Jeffrey P. ; Sveom, Daniel S. ; Switzer, Julie A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Myeroff, Chad M. ; Anderson, Jeffrey P. ; Sveom, Daniel S. ; Switzer, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Known possible consequences of proximal humerus fractures include impaired shoulder function, decreased independence, and increased risk for mortality. The purpose of this report is to describe the survival and independence of elderly patients with fractures of the proximal humerus, treated in our institution, relative to patient characteristics and treatment method. Methods: Retrospective cohort study from 2006 to 2012. Setting: Community-based hospital with level 1 designation. Patients/Participants: Three hundred nineteen patients ≥60 years who presented to the emergency department with an isolated fracture of the proximal humerus were either admitted to the inpatient ward for the organization and provision of immediate definitive care or discharged with the expectation of coordination of their care as an outpatient. Treatment was nonoperative or operative. Outcome Measures: One- and 2-year mortality. Results: Significant predictors of mortality at 1 year included Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; continuous, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.86), body mass index (BMI; &lt;25 vs ≥25; HR = 3.43; 95% CI: 1.45-8.14), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) disease severity score (3-4 vs 1-2; HR = 4.48; 95% CI: 1.21-16.55). In addition to CCI and BMI, reliance on a cane/walker/wheelchair at the time of fracture predicted mortality at 2 years (vs unassisted ambulation; HR = 3.13; 95% CI: 1.59-5.88). Although the Neer classification of fracture severity significantly correlated with inpatient admission (P &lt; .001), it was not significantly associated with mortality or with loss of living or ambulatory independence. Among admitted patients, 64% were discharged to a facility with a higher level of care than their prefracture living facility. Twenty percent of study patients experienced a loss in ambulatory status by at least 1 level at 1 year postfracture. Conclusion: In a cohort of elderly patients with fractures of the proximal humerus, patient characteristics including comorbidities, ASA classification, and lower BMI were associated with increased mortality. Specifically, those admitted at the time of fracture and treated nonoperatively had the highest mortality rate and, likely, represent the frailest cohort. Those initially treated as outpatients and later treated operatively had the lowest mortality and, likely, represent the healthiest cohort. These data are inherently biased by prefracture comorbidities but help stratify our patients’ mortality risk at the time of injury.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2151-4593</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2151-4585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-4593</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2151458517728155</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29560284</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Body mass index ; Mortality ; Original ; Osteoporosis ; Patients</subject><ispartof>Geriatric orthopaedic surgery &amp; rehabilitation, 2018, Vol.9, p.2151458517728155-2151458517728155</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017 2017 SAGE Publications Inc unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-107aed019206fe57bc5727ac66eb67372612f58c8305a2e659d186ab62180e083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-107aed019206fe57bc5727ac66eb67372612f58c8305a2e659d186ab62180e083</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4834-1643</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851103/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2313732703?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,21966,25753,27853,27923,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29560284$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Myeroff, Chad M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Jeffrey P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveom, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Switzer, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><title>Predictors of Mortality in Elder Patients With Proximal Humeral Fracture</title><title>Geriatric orthopaedic surgery &amp; rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil</addtitle><description>Background: Known possible consequences of proximal humerus fractures include impaired shoulder function, decreased independence, and increased risk for mortality. The purpose of this report is to describe the survival and independence of elderly patients with fractures of the proximal humerus, treated in our institution, relative to patient characteristics and treatment method. Methods: Retrospective cohort study from 2006 to 2012. Setting: Community-based hospital with level 1 designation. Patients/Participants: Three hundred nineteen patients ≥60 years who presented to the emergency department with an isolated fracture of the proximal humerus were either admitted to the inpatient ward for the organization and provision of immediate definitive care or discharged with the expectation of coordination of their care as an outpatient. Treatment was nonoperative or operative. Outcome Measures: One- and 2-year mortality. Results: Significant predictors of mortality at 1 year included Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; continuous, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.86), body mass index (BMI; &lt;25 vs ≥25; HR = 3.43; 95% CI: 1.45-8.14), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) disease severity score (3-4 vs 1-2; HR = 4.48; 95% CI: 1.21-16.55). In addition to CCI and BMI, reliance on a cane/walker/wheelchair at the time of fracture predicted mortality at 2 years (vs unassisted ambulation; HR = 3.13; 95% CI: 1.59-5.88). Although the Neer classification of fracture severity significantly correlated with inpatient admission (P &lt; .001), it was not significantly associated with mortality or with loss of living or ambulatory independence. Among admitted patients, 64% were discharged to a facility with a higher level of care than their prefracture living facility. Twenty percent of study patients experienced a loss in ambulatory status by at least 1 level at 1 year postfracture. Conclusion: In a cohort of elderly patients with fractures of the proximal humerus, patient characteristics including comorbidities, ASA classification, and lower BMI were associated with increased mortality. Specifically, those admitted at the time of fracture and treated nonoperatively had the highest mortality rate and, likely, represent the frailest cohort. Those initially treated as outpatients and later treated operatively had the lowest mortality and, likely, represent the healthiest cohort. These data are inherently biased by prefracture comorbidities but help stratify our patients’ mortality risk at the time of injury.</description><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><issn>2151-4593</issn><issn>2151-4585</issn><issn>2151-4593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1P3DAQhq2qVUHAvacqUi-9pHjs-COXShUCFgnEHlr1aDnOZPEqG1Pbqcq_x8tSCkj1ZUbjd575IuQD0C8ASh0zENAILYrPNAjxhuxvQ3UjWv72mb9HjlJa0_IayblQ78kea4WkTDf7ZLGM2HuXQ0xVGKqrELMdfb6r_FSdjj3Gammzxymn6qfPN9Uyhj9-Y8dqMW8wFnsWrctzxEPybrBjwqNHe0B-nJ1-P1nUl9fnFyffLmsnmM41UGWxp9AyKgcUqnNCMWWdlNhJxRWTwAahneZUWIZStD1oaTvJQFOkmh-Qix23D3ZtbmNpJt6ZYL15CIS4MjZm70Y0HUXVQ6Od5arRstGooUfbD6oTGhUU1tcd63buNti7MmYZ6QX05c_kb8wq_DbbrQPlBfD5ERDDrxlTNhufHI6jnTDMyTAKUnDWtm2RfnolXYc5TmVVhnHgijP1AKQ7lYshpYjDUzNAzfbq5vXVS8rH50M8Jfy9cRHUO0GyK_xX9b_AexGCsnY</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Myeroff, Chad M.</creator><creator>Anderson, Jeffrey P.</creator><creator>Sveom, Daniel S.</creator><creator>Switzer, Julie A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4834-1643</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Predictors of Mortality in Elder Patients With Proximal Humeral Fracture</title><author>Myeroff, Chad M. ; Anderson, Jeffrey P. ; Sveom, Daniel S. ; Switzer, Julie A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-107aed019206fe57bc5727ac66eb67372612f58c8305a2e659d186ab62180e083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Myeroff, Chad M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Jeffrey P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveom, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Switzer, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Geriatric orthopaedic surgery &amp; rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Myeroff, Chad M.</au><au>Anderson, Jeffrey P.</au><au>Sveom, Daniel S.</au><au>Switzer, Julie A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictors of Mortality in Elder Patients With Proximal Humeral Fracture</atitle><jtitle>Geriatric orthopaedic surgery &amp; rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>2151458517728155</spage><epage>2151458517728155</epage><pages>2151458517728155-2151458517728155</pages><issn>2151-4593</issn><issn>2151-4585</issn><eissn>2151-4593</eissn><abstract>Background: Known possible consequences of proximal humerus fractures include impaired shoulder function, decreased independence, and increased risk for mortality. The purpose of this report is to describe the survival and independence of elderly patients with fractures of the proximal humerus, treated in our institution, relative to patient characteristics and treatment method. Methods: Retrospective cohort study from 2006 to 2012. Setting: Community-based hospital with level 1 designation. Patients/Participants: Three hundred nineteen patients ≥60 years who presented to the emergency department with an isolated fracture of the proximal humerus were either admitted to the inpatient ward for the organization and provision of immediate definitive care or discharged with the expectation of coordination of their care as an outpatient. Treatment was nonoperative or operative. Outcome Measures: One- and 2-year mortality. Results: Significant predictors of mortality at 1 year included Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; continuous, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.86), body mass index (BMI; &lt;25 vs ≥25; HR = 3.43; 95% CI: 1.45-8.14), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) disease severity score (3-4 vs 1-2; HR = 4.48; 95% CI: 1.21-16.55). In addition to CCI and BMI, reliance on a cane/walker/wheelchair at the time of fracture predicted mortality at 2 years (vs unassisted ambulation; HR = 3.13; 95% CI: 1.59-5.88). Although the Neer classification of fracture severity significantly correlated with inpatient admission (P &lt; .001), it was not significantly associated with mortality or with loss of living or ambulatory independence. Among admitted patients, 64% were discharged to a facility with a higher level of care than their prefracture living facility. Twenty percent of study patients experienced a loss in ambulatory status by at least 1 level at 1 year postfracture. Conclusion: In a cohort of elderly patients with fractures of the proximal humerus, patient characteristics including comorbidities, ASA classification, and lower BMI were associated with increased mortality. Specifically, those admitted at the time of fracture and treated nonoperatively had the highest mortality rate and, likely, represent the frailest cohort. Those initially treated as outpatients and later treated operatively had the lowest mortality and, likely, represent the healthiest cohort. These data are inherently biased by prefracture comorbidities but help stratify our patients’ mortality risk at the time of injury.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>29560284</pmid><doi>10.1177/2151458517728155</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4834-1643</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2151-4593
ispartof Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation, 2018, Vol.9, p.2151458517728155-2151458517728155
issn 2151-4593
2151-4585
2151-4593
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b0e7d148ca3748648e81deadf7b58e71
source Publicly Available Content Database; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; PubMed Central
subjects Body mass index
Mortality
Original
Osteoporosis
Patients
title Predictors of Mortality in Elder Patients With Proximal Humeral Fracture
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A57%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictors%20of%20Mortality%20in%20Elder%20Patients%20With%20Proximal%20Humeral%20Fracture&rft.jtitle=Geriatric%20orthopaedic%20surgery%20&%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Myeroff,%20Chad%20M.&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=2151458517728155&rft.epage=2151458517728155&rft.pages=2151458517728155-2151458517728155&rft.issn=2151-4593&rft.eissn=2151-4593&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2151458517728155&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2313732703%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-107aed019206fe57bc5727ac66eb67372612f58c8305a2e659d186ab62180e083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2313732703&rft_id=info:pmid/29560284&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2151458517728155&rfr_iscdi=true