Loading…

Larger workers outperform smaller workers across resource environments: An evaluation of demographic data using functional linear models

Behavior and organization of social groups is thought to be vital to the functioning of societies, yet the contributions of various roles within social groups toward population growth and dynamics have been difficult to quantify. A common approach to quantifying these role‐based contributions is eva...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and evolution 2021-03, Vol.11 (6), p.2814-2827
Main Authors: Kerr, Natalie Z., Malfi, Rosemary L., Williams, Neal M., Crone, Elizabeth E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5099-9388b63958b4461fe5a09040861ac2a8cbb44d95e43f589a2f8470678bddcabe3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5099-9388b63958b4461fe5a09040861ac2a8cbb44d95e43f589a2f8470678bddcabe3
container_end_page 2827
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2814
container_title Ecology and evolution
container_volume 11
creator Kerr, Natalie Z.
Malfi, Rosemary L.
Williams, Neal M.
Crone, Elizabeth E.
description Behavior and organization of social groups is thought to be vital to the functioning of societies, yet the contributions of various roles within social groups toward population growth and dynamics have been difficult to quantify. A common approach to quantifying these role‐based contributions is evaluating the number of individuals conducting certain roles, which ignores how behavior might scale up to effects at the population‐level. Manipulative experiments are another common approach to determine population‐level effects, but they often ignore potential feedbacks associated with these various roles. Here, we evaluate the effects of worker size distribution in bumblebee colonies on worker production in 24 observational colonies across three environments, using functional linear models. Functional linear models are an underused correlative technique that has been used to assess lag effects of environmental drivers on plant performance. We demonstrate potential applications of this technique for exploring high‐dimensional ecological systems, such as the contributions of individuals with different traits to colony dynamics. We found that more larger workers had mostly positive effects and more smaller workers had negative effects on worker production. Most of these effects were only detected under low or fluctuating resource environments suggesting that the advantage of colonies with larger‐bodied workers becomes more apparent under stressful conditions. We also demonstrate the wider ecological application of functional linear models. We highlight the advantages and limitations when considering these models, and how they are a valuable complement to many of these performance‐based and manipulative experiments. Functional linear models are an under‐utilized correlative statistical method that uses observational data to explore high dimensional ecological systems. Here, we evaluated how the number of workers of different sizes affect worker production in bumblebee colonies. Overall, we found larger workers outperform smaller workers in colonies across three resource environments
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ece3.7239
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b0ff96391deb4e62b451147b076895d1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b0ff96391deb4e62b451147b076895d1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2506284070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5099-9388b63958b4461fe5a09040861ac2a8cbb44d95e43f589a2f8470678bddcabe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks1uEzEQgFcIRKvSAy-ALHGhh7T-2R-bA1IVBVopEhc4W7Pe2dTBawd7N1XfgMfGSdoqRcIXWzOfPo89UxTvGb1klPIrNCguGy7Uq-KU07KaNU0lXx-dT4rzlNY0r5rykjZvixMhmrqRQp4Wf5YQVxjJfYi_MCYSpnGDsQ9xIGkA545SYGJIiURMYYoGCfqtjcEP6Mf0mVx7gltwE4w2eBJ60uEQVhE2d9aQDkYgU7J-RfrJmx0CjjjrESIZQocuvSve9OASnj_uZ8XPr4sf85vZ8vu32_n1cmYqqtRMCSnbWqhKtmVZsx4roIqWVNYMDAdp2hzvVIWl6CupgPeybGh-bNt1BloUZ8XtwdsFWOtNtAPEBx3A6n0gxJWGOFrjULe071W-i3XYlljztqwYK5uWNrVUVcey68vBtZnaATuTfyKCeyF9mfH2Tq_CVjdKMk5FFnx6FMTwe8I06sEmg86BxzAlzStac5l7RjP68R90nduQv3FPCaYyxzN1caD2vYrYPxfDqN6Ni96Ni96NS2Y_HFf_TD4NRwauDsC9dfjwf5NezBdir_wLH_DMHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2503192842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Larger workers outperform smaller workers across resource environments: An evaluation of demographic data using functional linear models</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kerr, Natalie Z. ; Malfi, Rosemary L. ; Williams, Neal M. ; Crone, Elizabeth E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Natalie Z. ; Malfi, Rosemary L. ; Williams, Neal M. ; Crone, Elizabeth E.</creatorcontrib><description>Behavior and organization of social groups is thought to be vital to the functioning of societies, yet the contributions of various roles within social groups toward population growth and dynamics have been difficult to quantify. A common approach to quantifying these role‐based contributions is evaluating the number of individuals conducting certain roles, which ignores how behavior might scale up to effects at the population‐level. Manipulative experiments are another common approach to determine population‐level effects, but they often ignore potential feedbacks associated with these various roles. Here, we evaluate the effects of worker size distribution in bumblebee colonies on worker production in 24 observational colonies across three environments, using functional linear models. Functional linear models are an underused correlative technique that has been used to assess lag effects of environmental drivers on plant performance. We demonstrate potential applications of this technique for exploring high‐dimensional ecological systems, such as the contributions of individuals with different traits to colony dynamics. We found that more larger workers had mostly positive effects and more smaller workers had negative effects on worker production. Most of these effects were only detected under low or fluctuating resource environments suggesting that the advantage of colonies with larger‐bodied workers becomes more apparent under stressful conditions. We also demonstrate the wider ecological application of functional linear models. We highlight the advantages and limitations when considering these models, and how they are a valuable complement to many of these performance‐based and manipulative experiments. Functional linear models are an under‐utilized correlative statistical method that uses observational data to explore high dimensional ecological systems. Here, we evaluated how the number of workers of different sizes affect worker production in bumblebee colonies. Overall, we found larger workers outperform smaller workers in colonies across three resource environments</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7239</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33767838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Animal behavior ; Bombus vosnesenskii ; Bumblebees ; callow size ; Colonies ; colony age ; development ; egg production ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental effects ; Foraging behavior ; functional linear models ; Laboratories ; larval survival ; Older workers ; Original Research ; Population growth ; Size distribution ; Social behavior ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2021-03, Vol.11 (6), p.2814-2827</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5099-9388b63958b4461fe5a09040861ac2a8cbb44d95e43f589a2f8470678bddcabe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5099-9388b63958b4461fe5a09040861ac2a8cbb44d95e43f589a2f8470678bddcabe3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4227-2031 ; 0000-0003-3053-8445 ; 0000-0003-0144-5928 ; 0000-0002-5287-221X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2503192842/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2503192842?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,46052,46476,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33767838$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Natalie Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malfi, Rosemary L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Neal M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crone, Elizabeth E.</creatorcontrib><title>Larger workers outperform smaller workers across resource environments: An evaluation of demographic data using functional linear models</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Behavior and organization of social groups is thought to be vital to the functioning of societies, yet the contributions of various roles within social groups toward population growth and dynamics have been difficult to quantify. A common approach to quantifying these role‐based contributions is evaluating the number of individuals conducting certain roles, which ignores how behavior might scale up to effects at the population‐level. Manipulative experiments are another common approach to determine population‐level effects, but they often ignore potential feedbacks associated with these various roles. Here, we evaluate the effects of worker size distribution in bumblebee colonies on worker production in 24 observational colonies across three environments, using functional linear models. Functional linear models are an underused correlative technique that has been used to assess lag effects of environmental drivers on plant performance. We demonstrate potential applications of this technique for exploring high‐dimensional ecological systems, such as the contributions of individuals with different traits to colony dynamics. We found that more larger workers had mostly positive effects and more smaller workers had negative effects on worker production. Most of these effects were only detected under low or fluctuating resource environments suggesting that the advantage of colonies with larger‐bodied workers becomes more apparent under stressful conditions. We also demonstrate the wider ecological application of functional linear models. We highlight the advantages and limitations when considering these models, and how they are a valuable complement to many of these performance‐based and manipulative experiments. Functional linear models are an under‐utilized correlative statistical method that uses observational data to explore high dimensional ecological systems. Here, we evaluated how the number of workers of different sizes affect worker production in bumblebee colonies. Overall, we found larger workers outperform smaller workers in colonies across three resource environments</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Bombus vosnesenskii</subject><subject>Bumblebees</subject><subject>callow size</subject><subject>Colonies</subject><subject>colony age</subject><subject>development</subject><subject>egg production</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental effects</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>functional linear models</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>larval survival</subject><subject>Older workers</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Size distribution</subject><subject>Social behavior</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ks1uEzEQgFcIRKvSAy-ALHGhh7T-2R-bA1IVBVopEhc4W7Pe2dTBawd7N1XfgMfGSdoqRcIXWzOfPo89UxTvGb1klPIrNCguGy7Uq-KU07KaNU0lXx-dT4rzlNY0r5rykjZvixMhmrqRQp4Wf5YQVxjJfYi_MCYSpnGDsQ9xIGkA545SYGJIiURMYYoGCfqtjcEP6Mf0mVx7gltwE4w2eBJ60uEQVhE2d9aQDkYgU7J-RfrJmx0CjjjrESIZQocuvSve9OASnj_uZ8XPr4sf85vZ8vu32_n1cmYqqtRMCSnbWqhKtmVZsx4roIqWVNYMDAdp2hzvVIWl6CupgPeybGh-bNt1BloUZ8XtwdsFWOtNtAPEBx3A6n0gxJWGOFrjULe071W-i3XYlljztqwYK5uWNrVUVcey68vBtZnaATuTfyKCeyF9mfH2Tq_CVjdKMk5FFnx6FMTwe8I06sEmg86BxzAlzStac5l7RjP68R90nduQv3FPCaYyxzN1caD2vYrYPxfDqN6Ni96Ni96NS2Y_HFf_TD4NRwauDsC9dfjwf5NezBdir_wLH_DMHQ</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Kerr, Natalie Z.</creator><creator>Malfi, Rosemary L.</creator><creator>Williams, Neal M.</creator><creator>Crone, Elizabeth E.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4227-2031</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3053-8445</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0144-5928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5287-221X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Larger workers outperform smaller workers across resource environments: An evaluation of demographic data using functional linear models</title><author>Kerr, Natalie Z. ; Malfi, Rosemary L. ; Williams, Neal M. ; Crone, Elizabeth E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5099-9388b63958b4461fe5a09040861ac2a8cbb44d95e43f589a2f8470678bddcabe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Bombus vosnesenskii</topic><topic>Bumblebees</topic><topic>callow size</topic><topic>Colonies</topic><topic>colony age</topic><topic>development</topic><topic>egg production</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental effects</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>functional linear models</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>larval survival</topic><topic>Older workers</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Size distribution</topic><topic>Social behavior</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Natalie Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malfi, Rosemary L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Neal M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crone, Elizabeth E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kerr, Natalie Z.</au><au>Malfi, Rosemary L.</au><au>Williams, Neal M.</au><au>Crone, Elizabeth E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Larger workers outperform smaller workers across resource environments: An evaluation of demographic data using functional linear models</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2814</spage><epage>2827</epage><pages>2814-2827</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>Behavior and organization of social groups is thought to be vital to the functioning of societies, yet the contributions of various roles within social groups toward population growth and dynamics have been difficult to quantify. A common approach to quantifying these role‐based contributions is evaluating the number of individuals conducting certain roles, which ignores how behavior might scale up to effects at the population‐level. Manipulative experiments are another common approach to determine population‐level effects, but they often ignore potential feedbacks associated with these various roles. Here, we evaluate the effects of worker size distribution in bumblebee colonies on worker production in 24 observational colonies across three environments, using functional linear models. Functional linear models are an underused correlative technique that has been used to assess lag effects of environmental drivers on plant performance. We demonstrate potential applications of this technique for exploring high‐dimensional ecological systems, such as the contributions of individuals with different traits to colony dynamics. We found that more larger workers had mostly positive effects and more smaller workers had negative effects on worker production. Most of these effects were only detected under low or fluctuating resource environments suggesting that the advantage of colonies with larger‐bodied workers becomes more apparent under stressful conditions. We also demonstrate the wider ecological application of functional linear models. We highlight the advantages and limitations when considering these models, and how they are a valuable complement to many of these performance‐based and manipulative experiments. Functional linear models are an under‐utilized correlative statistical method that uses observational data to explore high dimensional ecological systems. Here, we evaluated how the number of workers of different sizes affect worker production in bumblebee colonies. Overall, we found larger workers outperform smaller workers in colonies across three resource environments</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33767838</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.7239</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4227-2031</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3053-8445</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0144-5928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5287-221X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-7758
ispartof Ecology and evolution, 2021-03, Vol.11 (6), p.2814-2827
issn 2045-7758
2045-7758
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b0ff96391deb4e62b451147b076895d1
source Publicly Available Content Database; Wiley Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Age
Animal behavior
Bombus vosnesenskii
Bumblebees
callow size
Colonies
colony age
development
egg production
Environmental conditions
Environmental effects
Foraging behavior
functional linear models
Laboratories
larval survival
Older workers
Original Research
Population growth
Size distribution
Social behavior
Workers
title Larger workers outperform smaller workers across resource environments: An evaluation of demographic data using functional linear models
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A59%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Larger%20workers%20outperform%20smaller%20workers%20across%20resource%20environments:%20An%20evaluation%20of%20demographic%20data%20using%20functional%20linear%20models&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Kerr,%20Natalie%20Z.&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2814&rft.epage=2827&rft.pages=2814-2827&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.7239&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2506284070%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5099-9388b63958b4461fe5a09040861ac2a8cbb44d95e43f589a2f8470678bddcabe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2503192842&rft_id=info:pmid/33767838&rfr_iscdi=true