Loading…
No-Tillering System: Is It Worth Conducting Soil Scarification as an Option for “Field Reform”?
The adoption of a no-till system presents difficulties in maintaining the potential crop yield under long-term conditions when compacted soil layers are observed in the field. The research objective was to assess the benefits of soil intervention in a traditional area of no-till system while conside...
Saved in:
Published in: | Agriculture (Basel) 2024-08, Vol.14 (8), p.1434 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1434 |
container_title | Agriculture (Basel) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | de Carvalho Machione, Eduardo de Queiroz, Renata Fernandes Lopes, Afonso Furlani, Carlos Eduardo Angeli Canata, Tatiana Fernanda |
description | The adoption of a no-till system presents difficulties in maintaining the potential crop yield under long-term conditions when compacted soil layers are observed in the field. The research objective was to assess the benefits of soil intervention in a traditional area of no-till system while considering the production parameters of corn (Zea mays L.) under tropical conditions. The area was installed considering 24 experimental units, including 6 treatments, a 3 × 2 scheme, and 4 repetitions (3 soil management systems and 2 crop hybrids). The soil scarification was carried out at two depths, 0.15 m and 0.30 m, to compare its influence on corn yield. The number of days of plants’ emergence, seed depth, longitudinal distribution of seedlings, phytotechnical parameters, and crop yield in the field were evaluated. The dataset was subjected to the F Test and Tukey test (p < 0.05) to compare the means by each attribute and treatment. The adopted hybrids, as well as soil-management systems in the experimental area, did not interfere with the quality of the sowing and quantitative parameters of the crop (CV = 15% for normal distribution on plants’ spacing within rows). So, there is no need to scarify soil with the aim of increasing corn yield under the evaluated field conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/agriculture14081434 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b11e86235c0d4b6d872d7eca2fe71d1f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A807406961</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b11e86235c0d4b6d872d7eca2fe71d1f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A807406961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d263t-a67c560353cf7baf9554937dd7666bcd84c0b13dabd6fd1cee185f7dab00d4e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNjk1OwzAQhSMEElXpCdhYYp1ix46dsEFVRSFSRSVaxDJy_BNcJXFxnEV3PQhcrifBalkws5h5M28-TRTdIjjFOIf3vHZGDI0fnEIEZohgchGNEshYDAlLLv_119Gk77cwRI5wBukoEq823pimUc50NVjve6_aB1D0oPDgwzr_Cea2k4Pwp7U1DVgL7ow2gntjO8B7wDuw2p2Etg4cD98LoxoJ3lSQ7fHw83gTXWne9GryV8fR--JpM3-Jl6vnYj5bxjKh2MecMpFSiFMsNKu4ztOU5JhJySillZAZEbBCWPJKUi2RUAplqWZBQyiJQngcFWeutHxb7pxpuduXlpvyNLCuLrnzRjSqrBBSGU1wKsJpRWXGEsmU4IlWDEmkA-vuzNo5-zWo3pdbO7guvF9imLMMohSy4JqeXTUPUNNp6x0XIaVqjbCd0ibMZxlkBNKcIvwLPYiF7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3097801507</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>No-Tillering System: Is It Worth Conducting Soil Scarification as an Option for “Field Reform”?</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>de Carvalho Machione, Eduardo ; de Queiroz, Renata Fernandes ; Lopes, Afonso ; Furlani, Carlos Eduardo Angeli ; Canata, Tatiana Fernanda</creator><creatorcontrib>de Carvalho Machione, Eduardo ; de Queiroz, Renata Fernandes ; Lopes, Afonso ; Furlani, Carlos Eduardo Angeli ; Canata, Tatiana Fernanda</creatorcontrib><description>The adoption of a no-till system presents difficulties in maintaining the potential crop yield under long-term conditions when compacted soil layers are observed in the field. The research objective was to assess the benefits of soil intervention in a traditional area of no-till system while considering the production parameters of corn (Zea mays L.) under tropical conditions. The area was installed considering 24 experimental units, including 6 treatments, a 3 × 2 scheme, and 4 repetitions (3 soil management systems and 2 crop hybrids). The soil scarification was carried out at two depths, 0.15 m and 0.30 m, to compare its influence on corn yield. The number of days of plants’ emergence, seed depth, longitudinal distribution of seedlings, phytotechnical parameters, and crop yield in the field were evaluated. The dataset was subjected to the F Test and Tukey test (p < 0.05) to compare the means by each attribute and treatment. The adopted hybrids, as well as soil-management systems in the experimental area, did not interfere with the quality of the sowing and quantitative parameters of the crop (CV = 15% for normal distribution on plants’ spacing within rows). So, there is no need to scarify soil with the aim of increasing corn yield under the evaluated field conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0472</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/agriculture14081434</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Corn ; Crop rotation ; Crop yield ; Crop yields ; Crops ; Environmental protection ; Farm machinery ; Grain ; grain yield ; Humidity ; Hybrids ; Management systems ; No-till cropping ; Normal distribution ; Parameters ; Seedlings ; Soil compaction ; Soil conservation ; Soil fertility ; Soil layers ; Soil management ; soil management systems ; soil scarification ; tropical agriculture ; Wheels</subject><ispartof>Agriculture (Basel), 2024-08, Vol.14 (8), p.1434</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3097801507/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3097801507?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Carvalho Machione, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Queiroz, Renata Fernandes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Afonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furlani, Carlos Eduardo Angeli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canata, Tatiana Fernanda</creatorcontrib><title>No-Tillering System: Is It Worth Conducting Soil Scarification as an Option for “Field Reform”?</title><title>Agriculture (Basel)</title><description>The adoption of a no-till system presents difficulties in maintaining the potential crop yield under long-term conditions when compacted soil layers are observed in the field. The research objective was to assess the benefits of soil intervention in a traditional area of no-till system while considering the production parameters of corn (Zea mays L.) under tropical conditions. The area was installed considering 24 experimental units, including 6 treatments, a 3 × 2 scheme, and 4 repetitions (3 soil management systems and 2 crop hybrids). The soil scarification was carried out at two depths, 0.15 m and 0.30 m, to compare its influence on corn yield. The number of days of plants’ emergence, seed depth, longitudinal distribution of seedlings, phytotechnical parameters, and crop yield in the field were evaluated. The dataset was subjected to the F Test and Tukey test (p < 0.05) to compare the means by each attribute and treatment. The adopted hybrids, as well as soil-management systems in the experimental area, did not interfere with the quality of the sowing and quantitative parameters of the crop (CV = 15% for normal distribution on plants’ spacing within rows). So, there is no need to scarify soil with the aim of increasing corn yield under the evaluated field conditions.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crop yields</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Farm machinery</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>grain yield</subject><subject>Humidity</subject><subject>Hybrids</subject><subject>Management systems</subject><subject>No-till cropping</subject><subject>Normal distribution</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Soil compaction</subject><subject>Soil conservation</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil layers</subject><subject>Soil management</subject><subject>soil management systems</subject><subject>soil scarification</subject><subject>tropical agriculture</subject><subject>Wheels</subject><issn>2077-0472</issn><issn>2077-0472</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNjk1OwzAQhSMEElXpCdhYYp1ix46dsEFVRSFSRSVaxDJy_BNcJXFxnEV3PQhcrifBalkws5h5M28-TRTdIjjFOIf3vHZGDI0fnEIEZohgchGNEshYDAlLLv_119Gk77cwRI5wBukoEq823pimUc50NVjve6_aB1D0oPDgwzr_Cea2k4Pwp7U1DVgL7ow2gntjO8B7wDuw2p2Etg4cD98LoxoJ3lSQ7fHw83gTXWne9GryV8fR--JpM3-Jl6vnYj5bxjKh2MecMpFSiFMsNKu4ztOU5JhJySillZAZEbBCWPJKUi2RUAplqWZBQyiJQngcFWeutHxb7pxpuduXlpvyNLCuLrnzRjSqrBBSGU1wKsJpRWXGEsmU4IlWDEmkA-vuzNo5-zWo3pdbO7guvF9imLMMohSy4JqeXTUPUNNp6x0XIaVqjbCd0ibMZxlkBNKcIvwLPYiF7A</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>de Carvalho Machione, Eduardo</creator><creator>de Queiroz, Renata Fernandes</creator><creator>Lopes, Afonso</creator><creator>Furlani, Carlos Eduardo Angeli</creator><creator>Canata, Tatiana Fernanda</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>No-Tillering System: Is It Worth Conducting Soil Scarification as an Option for “Field Reform”?</title><author>de Carvalho Machione, Eduardo ; de Queiroz, Renata Fernandes ; Lopes, Afonso ; Furlani, Carlos Eduardo Angeli ; Canata, Tatiana Fernanda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d263t-a67c560353cf7baf9554937dd7666bcd84c0b13dabd6fd1cee185f7dab00d4e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crop yields</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Farm machinery</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>grain yield</topic><topic>Humidity</topic><topic>Hybrids</topic><topic>Management systems</topic><topic>No-till cropping</topic><topic>Normal distribution</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Soil compaction</topic><topic>Soil conservation</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil layers</topic><topic>Soil management</topic><topic>soil management systems</topic><topic>soil scarification</topic><topic>tropical agriculture</topic><topic>Wheels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Carvalho Machione, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Queiroz, Renata Fernandes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Afonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furlani, Carlos Eduardo Angeli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canata, Tatiana Fernanda</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Agriculture (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Carvalho Machione, Eduardo</au><au>de Queiroz, Renata Fernandes</au><au>Lopes, Afonso</au><au>Furlani, Carlos Eduardo Angeli</au><au>Canata, Tatiana Fernanda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>No-Tillering System: Is It Worth Conducting Soil Scarification as an Option for “Field Reform”?</atitle><jtitle>Agriculture (Basel)</jtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1434</spage><pages>1434-</pages><issn>2077-0472</issn><eissn>2077-0472</eissn><abstract>The adoption of a no-till system presents difficulties in maintaining the potential crop yield under long-term conditions when compacted soil layers are observed in the field. The research objective was to assess the benefits of soil intervention in a traditional area of no-till system while considering the production parameters of corn (Zea mays L.) under tropical conditions. The area was installed considering 24 experimental units, including 6 treatments, a 3 × 2 scheme, and 4 repetitions (3 soil management systems and 2 crop hybrids). The soil scarification was carried out at two depths, 0.15 m and 0.30 m, to compare its influence on corn yield. The number of days of plants’ emergence, seed depth, longitudinal distribution of seedlings, phytotechnical parameters, and crop yield in the field were evaluated. The dataset was subjected to the F Test and Tukey test (p < 0.05) to compare the means by each attribute and treatment. The adopted hybrids, as well as soil-management systems in the experimental area, did not interfere with the quality of the sowing and quantitative parameters of the crop (CV = 15% for normal distribution on plants’ spacing within rows). So, there is no need to scarify soil with the aim of increasing corn yield under the evaluated field conditions.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/agriculture14081434</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2077-0472 |
ispartof | Agriculture (Basel), 2024-08, Vol.14 (8), p.1434 |
issn | 2077-0472 2077-0472 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b11e86235c0d4b6d872d7eca2fe71d1f |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Agricultural production Corn Crop rotation Crop yield Crop yields Crops Environmental protection Farm machinery Grain grain yield Humidity Hybrids Management systems No-till cropping Normal distribution Parameters Seedlings Soil compaction Soil conservation Soil fertility Soil layers Soil management soil management systems soil scarification tropical agriculture Wheels |
title | No-Tillering System: Is It Worth Conducting Soil Scarification as an Option for “Field Reform”? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A03%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No-Tillering%20System:%20Is%20It%20Worth%20Conducting%20Soil%20Scarification%20as%20an%20Option%20for%20%E2%80%9CField%20Reform%E2%80%9D?&rft.jtitle=Agriculture%20(Basel)&rft.au=de%20Carvalho%20Machione,%20Eduardo&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1434&rft.pages=1434-&rft.issn=2077-0472&rft.eissn=2077-0472&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/agriculture14081434&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA807406961%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d263t-a67c560353cf7baf9554937dd7666bcd84c0b13dabd6fd1cee185f7dab00d4e13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3097801507&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A807406961&rfr_iscdi=true |