Loading…
Intercomparison of slant column measurements of NO2 and O4 by MAX-DOAS and zenith-sky UV and visible spectrometers
In June 2009, 22 spectrometers from 14 institutes measured tropospheric and stratospheric NO2 from the ground for more than 11 days during the Cabauw Intercomparison Campaign of Nitrogen Dioxide measuring Instruments (CINDI), at Cabauw, NL (51.97° N, 4.93° E). All visible instruments used a common w...
Saved in:
Published in: | Atmospheric measurement techniques 2010-11, Vol.3 (6), p.1629-1646 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1646 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1629 |
container_title | Atmospheric measurement techniques |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Roscoe, H K Van Roozendael, M Fayt, C Piesanie, A du Abuhassan, N Adams, C Akrami, M Cede, A Chong, J Clémer, K Friess, U Ojeda, M Gil Goutail, F Graves, R Griesfeller, A Grossmann, K Hemerijckx, G Hendrick, F Herman, J Hermans, C Irie, H Johnston, P V Kanaya, Y Kreher, K Leigh, R Merlaud, A Mount, G H Navarro, M Oetjen, H Pazmino, A Perez-Camacho, M Peters, E Pinardi, G Puentedura, O Richter, A Schönhardt, A Shaiganfar, R Spinei, E Strong, K Takashima, H Vlemmix, T Vrekoussis, M Wagner, T Wittrock, F Yela, M Yilmaz, S Boersma, F Hains, J Kroon, M Piters, A Kim, Y J |
description | In June 2009, 22 spectrometers from 14 institutes measured tropospheric and stratospheric NO2 from the ground for more than 11 days during the Cabauw Intercomparison Campaign of Nitrogen Dioxide measuring Instruments (CINDI), at Cabauw, NL (51.97° N, 4.93° E). All visible instruments used a common wavelength range and set of cross sections for the spectral analysis. Most of the instruments were of the multi-axis design with analysis by differential spectroscopy software (MAX-DOAS), whose non-zenith slant columns were compared by examining slopes of their least-squares straight line fits to mean values of a selection of instruments, after taking 30-min averages. Zenith slant columns near twilight were compared by fits to interpolated values of a reference instrument, then normalised by the mean of the slopes of the best instruments. For visible MAX-DOAS instruments, the means of the fitted slopes for NO2 and O4 of all except one instrument were within 10% of unity at almost all non-zenith elevations, and most were within 5%. Values for UV MAX-DOAS instruments were almost as good, being 12% and 7%, respectively. For visible instruments at zenith near twilight, the means of the fitted slopes of all instruments were within 5% of unity. This level of agreement is as good as that of previous intercomparisons, despite the site not being ideal for zenith twilight measurements. It bodes well for the future of measurements of tropospheric NO2 , as previous intercomparisons were only for zenith instruments focussing on stratospheric NO2 , with their longer heritage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5194/amt-3-1629-2010 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b122bcaa49024306b0bc3131fab21834</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b122bcaa49024306b0bc3131fab21834</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2246886381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d197t-ecb86cd5576f22b6af1ed86fb1b6442e99c0b1daaea33a6a7db8c1ee2f87337b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVjz1v2zAQhoUiBZqPzl2Jbh3Y8EiKH6ORpo0BJx7aFN2EI0U1ciXRIekA7q-PYmfJdIfnXjwvrqo-Aftag5WXOBYqKChuKWfA3lWnYJSmppbm5HUHYeBDdZbzhjElQfPTKi2nEpKP4xZTn-NEYkfygFMhPg67cSJjwLxLYQxTyS_HuzUnOLVkLYnbk9vFH_ptvfh5QP_D1JcHmv_tyf3vA3nqc--GQPI2-JLiGOaufFG973DI4ePrPK_uv1__urqhq_WP5dViRVuwutDgnVG-rWutOs6dwg5Ca1TnwCkpebDWMwctYkAhUKFunfEQAu-MFkI7cV4tj9424qbZpn7EtG8i9s0BxPS3wVR6P4TGwdzgEaVlXAqmHHNegIAOHQcj5Oz6cnQ94PBGdbNYNS-MsVpYDvoJ5uznY3ab4uMu5NJs4i5N86uNkcpqy40Sz60Og7o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>846979286</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intercomparison of slant column measurements of NO2 and O4 by MAX-DOAS and zenith-sky UV and visible spectrometers</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>ProQuest Publicly Available Content database</source><creator>Roscoe, H K ; Van Roozendael, M ; Fayt, C ; Piesanie, A du ; Abuhassan, N ; Adams, C ; Akrami, M ; Cede, A ; Chong, J ; Clémer, K ; Friess, U ; Ojeda, M Gil ; Goutail, F ; Graves, R ; Griesfeller, A ; Grossmann, K ; Hemerijckx, G ; Hendrick, F ; Herman, J ; Hermans, C ; Irie, H ; Johnston, P V ; Kanaya, Y ; Kreher, K ; Leigh, R ; Merlaud, A ; Mount, G H ; Navarro, M ; Oetjen, H ; Pazmino, A ; Perez-Camacho, M ; Peters, E ; Pinardi, G ; Puentedura, O ; Richter, A ; Schönhardt, A ; Shaiganfar, R ; Spinei, E ; Strong, K ; Takashima, H ; Vlemmix, T ; Vrekoussis, M ; Wagner, T ; Wittrock, F ; Yela, M ; Yilmaz, S ; Boersma, F ; Hains, J ; Kroon, M ; Piters, A ; Kim, Y J</creator><creatorcontrib>Roscoe, H K ; Van Roozendael, M ; Fayt, C ; Piesanie, A du ; Abuhassan, N ; Adams, C ; Akrami, M ; Cede, A ; Chong, J ; Clémer, K ; Friess, U ; Ojeda, M Gil ; Goutail, F ; Graves, R ; Griesfeller, A ; Grossmann, K ; Hemerijckx, G ; Hendrick, F ; Herman, J ; Hermans, C ; Irie, H ; Johnston, P V ; Kanaya, Y ; Kreher, K ; Leigh, R ; Merlaud, A ; Mount, G H ; Navarro, M ; Oetjen, H ; Pazmino, A ; Perez-Camacho, M ; Peters, E ; Pinardi, G ; Puentedura, O ; Richter, A ; Schönhardt, A ; Shaiganfar, R ; Spinei, E ; Strong, K ; Takashima, H ; Vlemmix, T ; Vrekoussis, M ; Wagner, T ; Wittrock, F ; Yela, M ; Yilmaz, S ; Boersma, F ; Hains, J ; Kroon, M ; Piters, A ; Kim, Y J</creatorcontrib><description>In June 2009, 22 spectrometers from 14 institutes measured tropospheric and stratospheric NO2 from the ground for more than 11 days during the Cabauw Intercomparison Campaign of Nitrogen Dioxide measuring Instruments (CINDI), at Cabauw, NL (51.97° N, 4.93° E). All visible instruments used a common wavelength range and set of cross sections for the spectral analysis. Most of the instruments were of the multi-axis design with analysis by differential spectroscopy software (MAX-DOAS), whose non-zenith slant columns were compared by examining slopes of their least-squares straight line fits to mean values of a selection of instruments, after taking 30-min averages. Zenith slant columns near twilight were compared by fits to interpolated values of a reference instrument, then normalised by the mean of the slopes of the best instruments. For visible MAX-DOAS instruments, the means of the fitted slopes for NO2 and O4 of all except one instrument were within 10% of unity at almost all non-zenith elevations, and most were within 5%. Values for UV MAX-DOAS instruments were almost as good, being 12% and 7%, respectively. For visible instruments at zenith near twilight, the means of the fitted slopes of all instruments were within 5% of unity. This level of agreement is as good as that of previous intercomparisons, despite the site not being ideal for zenith twilight measurements. It bodes well for the future of measurements of tropospheric NO2 , as previous intercomparisons were only for zenith instruments focussing on stratospheric NO2 , with their longer heritage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1867-1381</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1867-8548</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5194/amt-3-1629-2010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Katlenburg-Lindau: Copernicus GmbH</publisher><subject>Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics ; Ocean, Atmosphere ; Physics ; Sciences of the Universe</subject><ispartof>Atmospheric measurement techniques, 2010-11, Vol.3 (6), p.1629-1646</ispartof><rights>Copyright Copernicus GmbH 2010</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-1431-1542</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/846979286/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/846979286?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,864,885,2102,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00539217$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roscoe, H K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Roozendael, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fayt, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piesanie, A du</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abuhassan, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akrami, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cede, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clémer, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friess, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojeda, M Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goutail, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griesfeller, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossmann, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemerijckx, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendrick, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermans, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irie, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, P V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanaya, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreher, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leigh, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merlaud, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mount, G H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oetjen, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pazmino, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez-Camacho, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinardi, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puentedura, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schönhardt, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaiganfar, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spinei, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strong, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takashima, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vlemmix, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrekoussis, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittrock, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yela, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boersma, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hains, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroon, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piters, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Y J</creatorcontrib><title>Intercomparison of slant column measurements of NO2 and O4 by MAX-DOAS and zenith-sky UV and visible spectrometers</title><title>Atmospheric measurement techniques</title><description>In June 2009, 22 spectrometers from 14 institutes measured tropospheric and stratospheric NO2 from the ground for more than 11 days during the Cabauw Intercomparison Campaign of Nitrogen Dioxide measuring Instruments (CINDI), at Cabauw, NL (51.97° N, 4.93° E). All visible instruments used a common wavelength range and set of cross sections for the spectral analysis. Most of the instruments were of the multi-axis design with analysis by differential spectroscopy software (MAX-DOAS), whose non-zenith slant columns were compared by examining slopes of their least-squares straight line fits to mean values of a selection of instruments, after taking 30-min averages. Zenith slant columns near twilight were compared by fits to interpolated values of a reference instrument, then normalised by the mean of the slopes of the best instruments. For visible MAX-DOAS instruments, the means of the fitted slopes for NO2 and O4 of all except one instrument were within 10% of unity at almost all non-zenith elevations, and most were within 5%. Values for UV MAX-DOAS instruments were almost as good, being 12% and 7%, respectively. For visible instruments at zenith near twilight, the means of the fitted slopes of all instruments were within 5% of unity. This level of agreement is as good as that of previous intercomparisons, despite the site not being ideal for zenith twilight measurements. It bodes well for the future of measurements of tropospheric NO2 , as previous intercomparisons were only for zenith instruments focussing on stratospheric NO2 , with their longer heritage.</description><subject>Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics</subject><subject>Ocean, Atmosphere</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><issn>1867-1381</issn><issn>1867-8548</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVjz1v2zAQhoUiBZqPzl2Jbh3Y8EiKH6ORpo0BJx7aFN2EI0U1ciXRIekA7q-PYmfJdIfnXjwvrqo-Aftag5WXOBYqKChuKWfA3lWnYJSmppbm5HUHYeBDdZbzhjElQfPTKi2nEpKP4xZTn-NEYkfygFMhPg67cSJjwLxLYQxTyS_HuzUnOLVkLYnbk9vFH_ptvfh5QP_D1JcHmv_tyf3vA3nqc--GQPI2-JLiGOaufFG973DI4ePrPK_uv1__urqhq_WP5dViRVuwutDgnVG-rWutOs6dwg5Ca1TnwCkpebDWMwctYkAhUKFunfEQAu-MFkI7cV4tj9424qbZpn7EtG8i9s0BxPS3wVR6P4TGwdzgEaVlXAqmHHNegIAOHQcj5Oz6cnQ94PBGdbNYNS-MsVpYDvoJ5uznY3ab4uMu5NJs4i5N86uNkcpqy40Sz60Og7o</recordid><startdate>20101101</startdate><enddate>20101101</enddate><creator>Roscoe, H K</creator><creator>Van Roozendael, M</creator><creator>Fayt, C</creator><creator>Piesanie, A du</creator><creator>Abuhassan, N</creator><creator>Adams, C</creator><creator>Akrami, M</creator><creator>Cede, A</creator><creator>Chong, J</creator><creator>Clémer, K</creator><creator>Friess, U</creator><creator>Ojeda, M Gil</creator><creator>Goutail, F</creator><creator>Graves, R</creator><creator>Griesfeller, A</creator><creator>Grossmann, K</creator><creator>Hemerijckx, G</creator><creator>Hendrick, F</creator><creator>Herman, J</creator><creator>Hermans, C</creator><creator>Irie, H</creator><creator>Johnston, P V</creator><creator>Kanaya, Y</creator><creator>Kreher, K</creator><creator>Leigh, R</creator><creator>Merlaud, A</creator><creator>Mount, G H</creator><creator>Navarro, M</creator><creator>Oetjen, H</creator><creator>Pazmino, A</creator><creator>Perez-Camacho, M</creator><creator>Peters, E</creator><creator>Pinardi, G</creator><creator>Puentedura, O</creator><creator>Richter, A</creator><creator>Schönhardt, A</creator><creator>Shaiganfar, R</creator><creator>Spinei, E</creator><creator>Strong, K</creator><creator>Takashima, H</creator><creator>Vlemmix, T</creator><creator>Vrekoussis, M</creator><creator>Wagner, T</creator><creator>Wittrock, F</creator><creator>Yela, M</creator><creator>Yilmaz, S</creator><creator>Boersma, F</creator><creator>Hains, J</creator><creator>Kroon, M</creator><creator>Piters, A</creator><creator>Kim, Y J</creator><general>Copernicus GmbH</general><general>European Geosciences Union</general><general>Copernicus Publications</general><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1431-1542</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20101101</creationdate><title>Intercomparison of slant column measurements of NO2 and O4 by MAX-DOAS and zenith-sky UV and visible spectrometers</title><author>Roscoe, H K ; Van Roozendael, M ; Fayt, C ; Piesanie, A du ; Abuhassan, N ; Adams, C ; Akrami, M ; Cede, A ; Chong, J ; Clémer, K ; Friess, U ; Ojeda, M Gil ; Goutail, F ; Graves, R ; Griesfeller, A ; Grossmann, K ; Hemerijckx, G ; Hendrick, F ; Herman, J ; Hermans, C ; Irie, H ; Johnston, P V ; Kanaya, Y ; Kreher, K ; Leigh, R ; Merlaud, A ; Mount, G H ; Navarro, M ; Oetjen, H ; Pazmino, A ; Perez-Camacho, M ; Peters, E ; Pinardi, G ; Puentedura, O ; Richter, A ; Schönhardt, A ; Shaiganfar, R ; Spinei, E ; Strong, K ; Takashima, H ; Vlemmix, T ; Vrekoussis, M ; Wagner, T ; Wittrock, F ; Yela, M ; Yilmaz, S ; Boersma, F ; Hains, J ; Kroon, M ; Piters, A ; Kim, Y J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d197t-ecb86cd5576f22b6af1ed86fb1b6442e99c0b1daaea33a6a7db8c1ee2f87337b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics</topic><topic>Ocean, Atmosphere</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roscoe, H K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Roozendael, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fayt, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piesanie, A du</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abuhassan, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akrami, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cede, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clémer, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friess, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojeda, M Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goutail, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griesfeller, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossmann, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemerijckx, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendrick, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermans, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irie, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, P V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanaya, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreher, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leigh, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merlaud, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mount, G H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oetjen, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pazmino, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez-Camacho, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinardi, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puentedura, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schönhardt, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaiganfar, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spinei, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strong, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takashima, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vlemmix, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrekoussis, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittrock, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yela, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boersma, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hains, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroon, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piters, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Y J</creatorcontrib><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Publicly Available Content database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric measurement techniques</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roscoe, H K</au><au>Van Roozendael, M</au><au>Fayt, C</au><au>Piesanie, A du</au><au>Abuhassan, N</au><au>Adams, C</au><au>Akrami, M</au><au>Cede, A</au><au>Chong, J</au><au>Clémer, K</au><au>Friess, U</au><au>Ojeda, M Gil</au><au>Goutail, F</au><au>Graves, R</au><au>Griesfeller, A</au><au>Grossmann, K</au><au>Hemerijckx, G</au><au>Hendrick, F</au><au>Herman, J</au><au>Hermans, C</au><au>Irie, H</au><au>Johnston, P V</au><au>Kanaya, Y</au><au>Kreher, K</au><au>Leigh, R</au><au>Merlaud, A</au><au>Mount, G H</au><au>Navarro, M</au><au>Oetjen, H</au><au>Pazmino, A</au><au>Perez-Camacho, M</au><au>Peters, E</au><au>Pinardi, G</au><au>Puentedura, O</au><au>Richter, A</au><au>Schönhardt, A</au><au>Shaiganfar, R</au><au>Spinei, E</au><au>Strong, K</au><au>Takashima, H</au><au>Vlemmix, T</au><au>Vrekoussis, M</au><au>Wagner, T</au><au>Wittrock, F</au><au>Yela, M</au><au>Yilmaz, S</au><au>Boersma, F</au><au>Hains, J</au><au>Kroon, M</au><au>Piters, A</au><au>Kim, Y J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intercomparison of slant column measurements of NO2 and O4 by MAX-DOAS and zenith-sky UV and visible spectrometers</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric measurement techniques</jtitle><date>2010-11-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1629</spage><epage>1646</epage><pages>1629-1646</pages><issn>1867-1381</issn><eissn>1867-8548</eissn><abstract>In June 2009, 22 spectrometers from 14 institutes measured tropospheric and stratospheric NO2 from the ground for more than 11 days during the Cabauw Intercomparison Campaign of Nitrogen Dioxide measuring Instruments (CINDI), at Cabauw, NL (51.97° N, 4.93° E). All visible instruments used a common wavelength range and set of cross sections for the spectral analysis. Most of the instruments were of the multi-axis design with analysis by differential spectroscopy software (MAX-DOAS), whose non-zenith slant columns were compared by examining slopes of their least-squares straight line fits to mean values of a selection of instruments, after taking 30-min averages. Zenith slant columns near twilight were compared by fits to interpolated values of a reference instrument, then normalised by the mean of the slopes of the best instruments. For visible MAX-DOAS instruments, the means of the fitted slopes for NO2 and O4 of all except one instrument were within 10% of unity at almost all non-zenith elevations, and most were within 5%. Values for UV MAX-DOAS instruments were almost as good, being 12% and 7%, respectively. For visible instruments at zenith near twilight, the means of the fitted slopes of all instruments were within 5% of unity. This level of agreement is as good as that of previous intercomparisons, despite the site not being ideal for zenith twilight measurements. It bodes well for the future of measurements of tropospheric NO2 , as previous intercomparisons were only for zenith instruments focussing on stratospheric NO2 , with their longer heritage.</abstract><cop>Katlenburg-Lindau</cop><pub>Copernicus GmbH</pub><doi>10.5194/amt-3-1629-2010</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1431-1542</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1867-1381 |
ispartof | Atmospheric measurement techniques, 2010-11, Vol.3 (6), p.1629-1646 |
issn | 1867-1381 1867-8548 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b122bcaa49024306b0bc3131fab21834 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; ProQuest Publicly Available Content database |
subjects | Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics Ocean, Atmosphere Physics Sciences of the Universe |
title | Intercomparison of slant column measurements of NO2 and O4 by MAX-DOAS and zenith-sky UV and visible spectrometers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A48%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intercomparison%20of%20slant%20column%20measurements%20of%20NO2%20and%20O4%20by%20MAX-DOAS%20and%20zenith-sky%20UV%20and%20visible%20spectrometers&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20measurement%20techniques&rft.au=Roscoe,%20H%20K&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1629&rft.epage=1646&rft.pages=1629-1646&rft.issn=1867-1381&rft.eissn=1867-8548&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194/amt-3-1629-2010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2246886381%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d197t-ecb86cd5576f22b6af1ed86fb1b6442e99c0b1daaea33a6a7db8c1ee2f87337b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=846979286&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |