Overestimation of the second time interval replaces time-shrinking when the difference between two adjacent time intervals increases

When the onsets of three successive sound bursts mark two adjacent time intervals, the second time interval can be underestimated when it is physically longer than the first time interval by up to 100 ms. This illusion, time-shrinking, is very stable when the first time interval is 200 ms or shorter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in human neuroscience 2014-05, Vol.8, p.281-281
Main Authors: Nakajima, Yoshitaka, Hasuo, Emi, Yamashita, Miki, Haraguchi, Yuki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Assimilation
audition
contrast
empty interval
Experiments
Music
Neuroscience
Perceptions
Phonetics
Sound
Temporal perception
Time
Time Perception
time-shrinking
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:When the onsets of three successive sound bursts mark two adjacent time intervals, the second time interval can be underestimated when it is physically longer than the first time interval by up to 100 ms. This illusion, time-shrinking, is very stable when the first time interval is 200 ms or shorter (Nakajima et al., 2004, Perception, 33). Time-shrinking had been considered a kind of perceptual assimilation to make the first and the second time interval more similar to each other. Here we investigated whether the underestimation of the second time interval was replaced by an overestimation if the physical difference between the neighboring time intervals was too large for the assimilation to take place; this was a typical situation in which a perceptual contrast could be expected. Three experiments to measure the overestimation/underestimation of the second time interval by the method of adjustment were conducted. The first time interval was varied from 40 to 280 ms, and such overestimations indeed took place when the first time interval was 80-280 ms. The overestimations were robust when the second time interval was longer than the first time interval by 240 ms or more, and the magnitude of the overestimation was larger than 100 ms in some conditions. Thus, a perceptual contrast to replace time-shrinking was established. An additional experiment indicated that this contrast did not affect the perception of the first time interval substantially: The contrast in the present conditions seemed unilateral.
ISSN:1662-5161
1662-5161
DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00281