Management and Outcomes of Tibial Eminence Fractures in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review

• Published in: Children (Basel) 2023-08, Vol.10 (8), p.1379
• Main Authors: Limone, Beatrice, Zambianchi, Francesco, Cacciola, Giorgio, Seracchioli, Stefano, Catani, Fabio, Tarallo, Luigi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: arthroscopic; Care and treatment; children; Clinical trials; Fractures; Injuries; Internal fixation in fractures; Knee; Ligaments; open reduction; Patients; Pediatrics; Surgery; Surgical techniques; Systematic Review; tibial eminence fractures; Trauma
• ISSN: 2227-9067; 2227-9067
• DOI: 10.3390/children10081379

Background: Tibial eminence fractures (TEF) of Meyers–McKeever type II-III-IV usually require surgical management. No consensus in the literature has been achieved regarding the best treatment option. The aims of the present systematic review were (1) to analyze the current literature and describe the outcomes of surgical treatment for TEF; and (2) to compare the outcomes of different surgical options using arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) with sutures or screws and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Methods: A search was carried out with Pubmed, Medline, and Cochrane. Key terms were used “tibial” AND “eminence” or “spine” or “intercondylar” AND “paediatric” or “children” AND “fracture” or “avulsion” AND “treatment”. Twelve articles met the inclusion criteria. Demographic data, clinical outcomes, and complication rates were evaluated for each study. Means/standard deviation and sum/percentage were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Chi-square or t-student tests were applied. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: ORIF showed superior clinical outcomes (Tegner (p < 0.05) and Lysholm (p < 0.001) scores) relative to ARIF and a lower incidence of arthrofibrosis (p < 0.05) and implant removal (p < 0.01). The Tegner, IKDC, and Lysholm scores showed statistically significant superior results following arthroscopic sutures compared to arthroscopic screws (p < 0.001). The incidence of arthrofibrosis was higher after arthroscopic sutures (p < 0.05), the implant removal was higher after screw fixation (p < 0.001) Conclusions: Better clinical results with low complication rates were achieved with ORIF surgery rather than ARIF; arthroscopic suture fixation resulted in higher clinical results compared to arthroscopic screw fixation and reduced the incidence of postoperative complications.