Loading…

Simultaneous Detection of Ammonium and Nitrate in Environmental Samples Using on Ion-Selective Electrode and Comparison with Portable Colorimetric Assays

Simple, robust, and low-cost nitrate- and ammonium-selective electrodes were made using substrate prepared from household materials. We explored phosphonium-based ILs and poly (methyl methacrylate)/poly(decyl methacrylate)(MMA-DMA) copolymer as matrix materials alternative to classical PVC-based mem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2018-10, Vol.18 (10), p.3555
Main Authors: Choosang, Jittima, Numnuam, Apon, Thavarungkul, Panote, Kanatharana, Proespichaya, Radu, Tanja, Ullah, Sami, Radu, Aleksandar
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Simple, robust, and low-cost nitrate- and ammonium-selective electrodes were made using substrate prepared from household materials. We explored phosphonium-based ILs and poly (methyl methacrylate)/poly(decyl methacrylate)(MMA-DMA) copolymer as matrix materials alternative to classical PVC-based membranes. IL-based membranes showed suitability only for nitrate-selective electrode exhibiting linear concentration range between 5.0 × 10 and 2.5 × 10 M with a detection limit of 5.5 × 10 M. On the other hand, MMA-DMA-based membranes showed suitability for both ammonium- and nitrate-selective electrodes, and were successfully applied to detect NO₃ and NH₄⁺ in water and soil samples. The proposed ISEs exhibited near-Nernstian potentiometric responses to NO₃ and NH₄⁺ with the linear range concentration between 5.0 × 10 and 5.0 × 10 M (LOD = 11.3 µM) and 5.0 × 10 and 1.0 × 10 M (LOD = 1.2 µM), respectively. The power of ISEs to detect NO₃ and NH₄⁺ in water and soils was tested by comparison with traditional, portable colorimetric techniques. Procedures required for analysis by each technique from the perspective of a non-trained person (e.g., farmer) and the convenience of the use on the field are compared and contrasted.
ISSN:1424-8220
1424-8220
DOI:10.3390/s18103555