Recombinant human thrombopoietin in alleviating endothelial cell injury in sepsis

• Published in: Journal of intensive medicine 2024-07, Vol.4 (3), p.384-392
• Main Authors: Xie, Yun, Lv, Hui, Chen, Daonan, Huang, Peijie, Wu, Shaohong, Shi, Hongchao, Zhao, Qi, Wang, Ruilan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Endothelial cells; Sepsis; Thrombopoietin
• ISSN: 2667-100X; 2667-100X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jointm.2023.12.006

To evaluate the effect of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) on clinical prognosis by exploring changes in endothelial cell injury markers and inflammatory factors in patients with sepsis after treatment with rhTPO. This retrospective observational study involved patients with sepsis (diagnosed according to Sepsis 3.0) admitted to Shanghai General Hospital intensive care unit from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2022. Patients were divided into two groups (control and rhTPO) according to whether they received rhTPO. Baseline information, clinical data, prognosis, and survival status of the patients, as well as inflammatory factors and immune function indicators were collected. The main monitoring indicators were endothelial cell-specific molecule (ESM-1), human heparin-binding protein (HBP), and CD31; secondary monitoring indicators were interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, extravascular lung water index, platelet, antithrombin III, fibrinogen, and international normalized ratio. We used intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to establish a mouse model of sepsis. Mice were randomly divided into four groups: normal saline, LPS, LPS + rhTPO, and LPS + rhTPO + LY294002. Plasma indicators in mice were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A total of 84 patients were included in the study. After 7 days of treatment, ESM-1 decreased more significantly in the rhTPO group than in the control group compared with day 1 (median=38.6 [interquartile range, IQR: 7.2 to 67.8] pg/mL vs. median=23.0 [IQR: −15.7 to 51.5] pg/mL, P=0.008). HBP and CD31 also decreased significantly in the rhTPO group compared with the control group (median=59.6 [IQR: −1.9 to 91.9] pg/mL vs. median=2.4 [IQR: −23.2 to 43.2] pg/mL; median=2.4 [IQR: 0.4 to 3.5] pg/mL vs. median=−0.6 [IQR: −2.2 to 0.8] pg/mL, P