Loading…

Introducing a novel catheter–tissue contact feedback feature in robotic navigated catheter ablation: Utility, feasibility, and safetyKey Findings

Background: The quality of catheter–tissue contact is one of the most important determinants of catheter ablation (CA) success. The absence of catheter–tissue contact feedback has been regarded a major limitation of remote magnetic navigation (RMN)–guided CA. The e-Contact module (ECM) is a novel fe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Heart rhythm O2 2020-06, Vol.1 (2), p.103-110
Main Authors: Anna Maria Elisabeth Noten, MD, Tamas Géczy, MD, PhD, Sing-Chien Yap, MD, PhD, Zsuzsanna Kis, MD, Tamas Szili-Torok, MD, PhD, FHRS
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 110
container_issue 2
container_start_page 103
container_title Heart rhythm O2
container_volume 1
creator Anna Maria Elisabeth Noten, MD
Tamas Géczy, MD, PhD
Sing-Chien Yap, MD, PhD
Zsuzsanna Kis, MD
Tamas Szili-Torok, MD, PhD, FHRS
description Background: The quality of catheter–tissue contact is one of the most important determinants of catheter ablation (CA) success. The absence of catheter–tissue contact feedback has been regarded a major limitation of remote magnetic navigation (RMN)–guided CA. The e-Contact module (ECM) is a novel feature designed for RMN that measures the quality of catheter–tissue contact. Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the first clinical experience with this feature and to test its effect on procedural parameters and interference with other ablation equipment during CA procedures as well as its safety. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, 2-phase study investigating ECM use during complex RMN procedures in 30 patients. Impact of ECM on procedural parameters was evaluated in the feasibility phase (FP), and its interference with other equipment was tested in the interference phase (IP) using pacing maneuvers at 3 randomly selected right atrial sites. Intracardiac electrograms were evaluated for disturbances by 2 independent electrophysiologists. Results: For FP, mean procedural time was 162 ± 66 minutes, fluoroscopy time 21 ± 9 minutes, and ablation time 34 ± 21 minutes. For IP, no significant differences in pacing capture or thresholds were found (ECM– vs ECM+: site 1: 2.05 vs 2.21 mA; P = .320; site 2: 2.15 vs 2.12 mA; P = .873; site 3: 2.51 vs 2.50 mA; P = .976). Electrogram disturbances did not significantly differ between ECM– and ECM+. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: The ECM is a novel catheter–tissue contact technology designed for RMN-guided CA. Our study suggests that this feature is feasible and does not interfere with other electrophysiology equipment while maintaining an excellent safety profile.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b43b4531026f481c8ad388573b8df0ee</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b43b4531026f481c8ad388573b8df0ee</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_b43b4531026f481c8ad388573b8df0ee</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b43b4531026f481c8ad388573b8df0ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqtjl1KA0EQhBdRMGju0AcwMPubia9iMPiqz0vPTO_acZ2Rmd7AvnmH3NCTuEoQD-BTfVVQRZ1li6JpmlWtcn3-hy-zZUp7pVRR5_lmvVlkx52XGNxo2feA4MOBBrAoLyQUPz-OwimNBDZ4QSvQETmD9nUGlDESsIcYTBC24PHAPQq53z6gGVA4-Ft4Fh5YppvvYmJzMugdJOxIpkeaYMvezTfSdXbR4ZBoedKrbLe9f7p7WLmA-_Y98hvGqQ3I7U8QYt9inB8M1JqqNFVd5qpoukrnVqMrta7XpdGuU0Tlf259ARPZdUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Introducing a novel catheter–tissue contact feedback feature in robotic navigated catheter ablation: Utility, feasibility, and safetyKey Findings</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Anna Maria Elisabeth Noten, MD ; Tamas Géczy, MD, PhD ; Sing-Chien Yap, MD, PhD ; Zsuzsanna Kis, MD ; Tamas Szili-Torok, MD, PhD, FHRS</creator><creatorcontrib>Anna Maria Elisabeth Noten, MD ; Tamas Géczy, MD, PhD ; Sing-Chien Yap, MD, PhD ; Zsuzsanna Kis, MD ; Tamas Szili-Torok, MD, PhD, FHRS</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The quality of catheter–tissue contact is one of the most important determinants of catheter ablation (CA) success. The absence of catheter–tissue contact feedback has been regarded a major limitation of remote magnetic navigation (RMN)–guided CA. The e-Contact module (ECM) is a novel feature designed for RMN that measures the quality of catheter–tissue contact. Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the first clinical experience with this feature and to test its effect on procedural parameters and interference with other ablation equipment during CA procedures as well as its safety. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, 2-phase study investigating ECM use during complex RMN procedures in 30 patients. Impact of ECM on procedural parameters was evaluated in the feasibility phase (FP), and its interference with other equipment was tested in the interference phase (IP) using pacing maneuvers at 3 randomly selected right atrial sites. Intracardiac electrograms were evaluated for disturbances by 2 independent electrophysiologists. Results: For FP, mean procedural time was 162 ± 66 minutes, fluoroscopy time 21 ± 9 minutes, and ablation time 34 ± 21 minutes. For IP, no significant differences in pacing capture or thresholds were found (ECM– vs ECM+: site 1: 2.05 vs 2.21 mA; P = .320; site 2: 2.15 vs 2.12 mA; P = .873; site 3: 2.51 vs 2.50 mA; P = .976). Electrogram disturbances did not significantly differ between ECM– and ECM+. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: The ECM is a novel catheter–tissue contact technology designed for RMN-guided CA. Our study suggests that this feature is feasible and does not interfere with other electrophysiology equipment while maintaining an excellent safety profile.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2666-5018</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2666-5018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier</publisher><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia ; Catheter ablation ; Contact feedback ; Remote magnetic navigation ; Robotic navigation</subject><ispartof>Heart rhythm O2, 2020-06, Vol.1 (2), p.103-110</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anna Maria Elisabeth Noten, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamas Géczy, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sing-Chien Yap, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zsuzsanna Kis, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamas Szili-Torok, MD, PhD, FHRS</creatorcontrib><title>Introducing a novel catheter–tissue contact feedback feature in robotic navigated catheter ablation: Utility, feasibility, and safetyKey Findings</title><title>Heart rhythm O2</title><description>Background: The quality of catheter–tissue contact is one of the most important determinants of catheter ablation (CA) success. The absence of catheter–tissue contact feedback has been regarded a major limitation of remote magnetic navigation (RMN)–guided CA. The e-Contact module (ECM) is a novel feature designed for RMN that measures the quality of catheter–tissue contact. Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the first clinical experience with this feature and to test its effect on procedural parameters and interference with other ablation equipment during CA procedures as well as its safety. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, 2-phase study investigating ECM use during complex RMN procedures in 30 patients. Impact of ECM on procedural parameters was evaluated in the feasibility phase (FP), and its interference with other equipment was tested in the interference phase (IP) using pacing maneuvers at 3 randomly selected right atrial sites. Intracardiac electrograms were evaluated for disturbances by 2 independent electrophysiologists. Results: For FP, mean procedural time was 162 ± 66 minutes, fluoroscopy time 21 ± 9 minutes, and ablation time 34 ± 21 minutes. For IP, no significant differences in pacing capture or thresholds were found (ECM– vs ECM+: site 1: 2.05 vs 2.21 mA; P = .320; site 2: 2.15 vs 2.12 mA; P = .873; site 3: 2.51 vs 2.50 mA; P = .976). Electrogram disturbances did not significantly differ between ECM– and ECM+. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: The ECM is a novel catheter–tissue contact technology designed for RMN-guided CA. Our study suggests that this feature is feasible and does not interfere with other electrophysiology equipment while maintaining an excellent safety profile.</description><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Catheter ablation</subject><subject>Contact feedback</subject><subject>Remote magnetic navigation</subject><subject>Robotic navigation</subject><issn>2666-5018</issn><issn>2666-5018</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqtjl1KA0EQhBdRMGju0AcwMPubia9iMPiqz0vPTO_acZ2Rmd7AvnmH3NCTuEoQD-BTfVVQRZ1li6JpmlWtcn3-hy-zZUp7pVRR5_lmvVlkx52XGNxo2feA4MOBBrAoLyQUPz-OwimNBDZ4QSvQETmD9nUGlDESsIcYTBC24PHAPQq53z6gGVA4-Ft4Fh5YppvvYmJzMugdJOxIpkeaYMvezTfSdXbR4ZBoedKrbLe9f7p7WLmA-_Y98hvGqQ3I7U8QYt9inB8M1JqqNFVd5qpoukrnVqMrta7XpdGuU0Tlf259ARPZdUg</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Anna Maria Elisabeth Noten, MD</creator><creator>Tamas Géczy, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Sing-Chien Yap, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Zsuzsanna Kis, MD</creator><creator>Tamas Szili-Torok, MD, PhD, FHRS</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Introducing a novel catheter–tissue contact feedback feature in robotic navigated catheter ablation: Utility, feasibility, and safetyKey Findings</title><author>Anna Maria Elisabeth Noten, MD ; Tamas Géczy, MD, PhD ; Sing-Chien Yap, MD, PhD ; Zsuzsanna Kis, MD ; Tamas Szili-Torok, MD, PhD, FHRS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b43b4531026f481c8ad388573b8df0ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Catheter ablation</topic><topic>Contact feedback</topic><topic>Remote magnetic navigation</topic><topic>Robotic navigation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anna Maria Elisabeth Noten, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamas Géczy, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sing-Chien Yap, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zsuzsanna Kis, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamas Szili-Torok, MD, PhD, FHRS</creatorcontrib><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Heart rhythm O2</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anna Maria Elisabeth Noten, MD</au><au>Tamas Géczy, MD, PhD</au><au>Sing-Chien Yap, MD, PhD</au><au>Zsuzsanna Kis, MD</au><au>Tamas Szili-Torok, MD, PhD, FHRS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Introducing a novel catheter–tissue contact feedback feature in robotic navigated catheter ablation: Utility, feasibility, and safetyKey Findings</atitle><jtitle>Heart rhythm O2</jtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>103-110</pages><issn>2666-5018</issn><eissn>2666-5018</eissn><abstract>Background: The quality of catheter–tissue contact is one of the most important determinants of catheter ablation (CA) success. The absence of catheter–tissue contact feedback has been regarded a major limitation of remote magnetic navigation (RMN)–guided CA. The e-Contact module (ECM) is a novel feature designed for RMN that measures the quality of catheter–tissue contact. Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the first clinical experience with this feature and to test its effect on procedural parameters and interference with other ablation equipment during CA procedures as well as its safety. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, 2-phase study investigating ECM use during complex RMN procedures in 30 patients. Impact of ECM on procedural parameters was evaluated in the feasibility phase (FP), and its interference with other equipment was tested in the interference phase (IP) using pacing maneuvers at 3 randomly selected right atrial sites. Intracardiac electrograms were evaluated for disturbances by 2 independent electrophysiologists. Results: For FP, mean procedural time was 162 ± 66 minutes, fluoroscopy time 21 ± 9 minutes, and ablation time 34 ± 21 minutes. For IP, no significant differences in pacing capture or thresholds were found (ECM– vs ECM+: site 1: 2.05 vs 2.21 mA; P = .320; site 2: 2.15 vs 2.12 mA; P = .873; site 3: 2.51 vs 2.50 mA; P = .976). Electrogram disturbances did not significantly differ between ECM– and ECM+. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: The ECM is a novel catheter–tissue contact technology designed for RMN-guided CA. Our study suggests that this feature is feasible and does not interfere with other electrophysiology equipment while maintaining an excellent safety profile.</abstract><pub>Elsevier</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2666-5018
ispartof Heart rhythm O2, 2020-06, Vol.1 (2), p.103-110
issn 2666-5018
2666-5018
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b43b4531026f481c8ad388573b8df0ee
source PubMed Central Free; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cardiac arrhythmia
Catheter ablation
Contact feedback
Remote magnetic navigation
Robotic navigation
title Introducing a novel catheter–tissue contact feedback feature in robotic navigated catheter ablation: Utility, feasibility, and safetyKey Findings
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T07%3A18%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Introducing%20a%20novel%20catheter%E2%80%93tissue%20contact%20feedback%20feature%20in%20robotic%20navigated%20catheter%20ablation:%20Utility,%20feasibility,%20and%20safetyKey%20Findings&rft.jtitle=Heart%20rhythm%20O2&rft.au=Anna%20Maria%20Elisabeth%20Noten,%20MD&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=103-110&rft.issn=2666-5018&rft.eissn=2666-5018&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_b43b4531026f481c8ad388573b8df0ee%3C/doaj%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b43b4531026f481c8ad388573b8df0ee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true