Inequity in maternal health-care services : evidence from home-based skilled-birth-attendant programmes in Bangladesh

• Published in: Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2008-04, Vol.86 (4), p.252-259
• Main Authors: ANWAR, I, SAMI, M, AKHTAR, N, CHOWDHURY, M. E, SALMA, U, RAHMAN, M, KOBLINSKY, M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bangladesh; Biological and medical sciences; Cesarean Section; Community; Cross-Sectional Studies; Data collection; Epidemiology; Female; General aspects; Health facilities; Healthcare Disparities; Home Childbirth; Hospitals; Humans; Husbands; Indigent care; Maternal & child health; Maternal Health Services - economics; Maternal Health Services - statistics & numerical data; Maternal mortality; Maternal Mortality - trends; Maternal Welfare; Medical sciences; Midwifery; Miscellaneous; NGOs; Nongovernmental organizations; Nurses; Obstetrics; Paramedics; Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation; Polls & surveys; Postpartum period; Pregnancy; Prenatal care; Public health. Hygiene; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine; Questionnaires; Socioeconomic Factors; Womens health
• ISSN: 0042-9686; 1564-0604
• DOI: 10.2471/BLT.07.042754

To explore use-inequity in maternal health-care services in home-based skilled-birth-attendant (SBA) programme areas in Bangladesh. Data from a community survey, conducted from February to May 2006, were analysed to examine inequities in use of SBAs, caesarean sections for deliveries and postnatal care services according to key socioeconomic factors. Of 2164 deliveries, 35% had an SBA, 22.8% were in health facilities and 10.8% were by caesarean section. Rates of uptake of antenatal and postnatal care were 93% and 28%, respectively. There were substantial use-inequities in maternal health by asset quintiles, distance, and area of residence, and education of both the woman and her husband. However, not all inequities were the same. After adjusting for other determinants, the differences in the use of maternal health-care services for poor and rich people remained substantial [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.51 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.68-3.76) for skilled attendance; OR 2.58 (95% CI: 1.28-5.19) for use of caesarean sections and OR 1.53 (95% CI: 1.05-2.25) for use of postnatal care services]. Complications during pregnancy influenced use of SBAs, caesarean-section delivery and postnatal care services. The number of antenatal care visits was a significant predictor for use of SBAs and postnatal care, but not for caesarean sections. Use of maternity care services was higher in the study areas than national averages, but a tremendous use-inequity persists. Interventions to overcome financial barriers are recommended to address inequity in maternal health. A greater focus is needed on the implementation and evaluation of maternal-health interventions for poor people.