Do work ability and life satisfaction matter for return to work? Predictive ability of the work ability index and life satisfaction questionnaire among women with long-term musculoskeletal pain

• Published in: BMC public health 2021-03, Vol.21 (1), p.584-584, Article 584
• Main Authors: Rashid, Mamunur, Heiden, Marina, Nilsson, Annika, Kristofferzon, Marja-Leena
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Back pain; Backache; Chronic pain; Disability pensions; Employability; Employee benefits; Employment; Health aspects; Health problems; Influence; Insurance agencies; Musculoskeletal disorders; Neck; Neck pain; Occupational health; Pain; Population studies; Public health; Quality of life; Questionnaires; Rehabilitation; Satisfaction; Shoulder; Shoulder pain; Sick leave; Sickness absence; Social aspects; Surveys; Womens health; Work capacity; Work status; Workers; Working women
• ISSN: 1471-2458; 1471-2458
• DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10510-8

Impaired work ability and reduced life satisfaction due to long-term musculoskeletal pain, particularly in neck, shoulders and back, are considered occupational health problems that can result in workers taking sick leave. The aim of the study was to determine whether work ability and life satisfaction predict return to work (RTW) among women with long-term neck/shoulder and/or back pain, and to assess the ability of the Work Ability Index (WAI) and the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LiSat-11) to discriminate between those who did RTW and those who did not RTW (NRTW). This is a cohort study with 1-year follow-up. A survey was sent to 600 women receiving sick leave benefits from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency. In total, 208 women responded at baseline, and 141 at a 1-year follow-up. To identify whether work ability and life satisfaction predicted RTW, multiple logistic regression analyses were performed with and without adjustment for type of work and pain intensity. To assess the discriminative ability of the WAI and the LiSat-11 for women who did RTW and those who did NRTW, receiver operating characteristic curves were fitted. Work ability predicted RTW, and the results remained significant after adjusting for type of work and pain intensity (OR 1.12, 95% CI: 1.04-1.22). Life satisfaction was not significant. The WAI at baseline adequately discriminated between RTW and NRTW after 1 year (Area under curve 0.78, 95% CI: 0.70-0.86), but the LiSat-11 did not. This study supports a relationship between work ability and RTW among women on sick leave for long-term neck/shoulder and/or back pain. The results indicate that the WAI, but not the LiSat-11, can discriminate between RTW and NRTW in the population under study. Although the discriminative ability of the WAI needs to be verified in new samples before it can be recommended for use in rehabilitation settings, we suggest that healthcare professionals consider how women perceive their work ability in order to better support them in their RTW.