Loading…

Why are frailty indices not used systematically during preoperative spine consultations?

Introduction: Frailty indices are highly predictive of major medical and mechanical complications, lengths of hospital stay, and mortality rates after spine procedures. However, several barriers limit the extent to which spine surgeons employ these indices. The main purposes of the current study wer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba 2022-12, Vol.79 (4), p.347-352
Main Authors: Pereira Duarte, Matias, Camino Willhuber, Gaston, Valacco, Marcelo, Falavigna, Asdrubal, Asghar, Jahangir, Guiroy, Alfredo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2799-550e5630dadab6ca026f3c5217f2e021c9ca125825486fbc19725bd7c840f03c3
cites
container_end_page 352
container_issue 4
container_start_page 347
container_title Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba
container_volume 79
creator Pereira Duarte, Matias
Camino Willhuber, Gaston
Valacco, Marcelo
Falavigna, Asdrubal
Asghar, Jahangir
Guiroy, Alfredo
description Introduction: Frailty indices are highly predictive of major medical and mechanical complications, lengths of hospital stay, and mortality rates after spine procedures. However, several barriers limit the extent to which spine surgeons employ these indices. The main purposes of the current study were to assess the use of frailty indices by Latin-American spine surgeons and identify the main barriers perceived to restrict their clinical application. Methods: For this cross-sectional survey, a questionnaire evaluating the demographic characteristics of participating surgeons and their utilization of frailty indices were created in Google form and sent by e-mail to every registered member of AO Spine Latin America between October and November 2020. Results: Of the 1047 surgeons sent the survey, 293 responded (response rate=28%). Half of the surgeons (51.7%) said they were unfamiliar with the terms ¨frailty´ and ¨frailty index”, while 70.3% claimed not to use any frailty scale during their pre-operative assessments. The most frequently utilized index was the modified Frailty Index (mFI) (18%). The most important perceived barrier was the excessive amount of time required to calculate each patient’s frailty score. Ninety-two percent of the spine surgeons felt sure that these scores could influence their therapeutic decisions, while 91% desired an easier-to-use risk-prevention scale. Conclusion: The main perceived barriers restricting the use of frailty indices were the time required to complete them, lack of index validation, and need for specific instruments to calculate the index score.
doi_str_mv 10.31053/1853.0605.v79.n4.37815
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b5230ee179074967b0886849032a676a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b5230ee179074967b0886849032a676a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9987299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2799-550e5630dadab6ca026f3c5217f2e021c9ca125825486fbc19725bd7c840f03c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkd1q3DAQRkVpaZY0z1C9gN2RZP3dJISQtoFAbhLSOyHL442CVzaSd8FvX-9uKUQ3I76POQwcQr4zqAUDKX4wI0UNCmR90LZOTS20YfIT2RyL6lh8JhsA1lRKc35Brkp5h_Upq0Dpr-RCKNlwqfWG_Hl9W6jPSPvs4zAvNKYuBiw0jTPdF-xoWcqMOz_H4Idhod0-x7SlU8ZxwrzGB6RliglpGFPZD_MarZ-bb-RL74eCV__mJXn5ef9897t6fPr1cHf7WAWura2kBJRKQOc736rggateBMmZ7jkCZ8EGz7g0XDZG9W1gVnPZdjqYBnoQQVyShzO3G_27m3Lc-by40Ud3Csa8dT6vxw_oWskFIDJtQTdW6RaMUaaxILhXWvmVdX1mTft2h13ANGc_fIB-bFJ8c9vx4Kw1mlu7AvQZEPJYSsb-_y4Dd3LnjorcUZFb3bnUuJM78RdZsI0x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why are frailty indices not used systematically during preoperative spine consultations?</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>Pereira Duarte, Matias ; Camino Willhuber, Gaston ; Valacco, Marcelo ; Falavigna, Asdrubal ; Asghar, Jahangir ; Guiroy, Alfredo</creator><creatorcontrib>Pereira Duarte, Matias ; Camino Willhuber, Gaston ; Valacco, Marcelo ; Falavigna, Asdrubal ; Asghar, Jahangir ; Guiroy, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Frailty indices are highly predictive of major medical and mechanical complications, lengths of hospital stay, and mortality rates after spine procedures. However, several barriers limit the extent to which spine surgeons employ these indices. The main purposes of the current study were to assess the use of frailty indices by Latin-American spine surgeons and identify the main barriers perceived to restrict their clinical application. Methods: For this cross-sectional survey, a questionnaire evaluating the demographic characteristics of participating surgeons and their utilization of frailty indices were created in Google form and sent by e-mail to every registered member of AO Spine Latin America between October and November 2020. Results: Of the 1047 surgeons sent the survey, 293 responded (response rate=28%). Half of the surgeons (51.7%) said they were unfamiliar with the terms ¨frailty´ and ¨frailty index”, while 70.3% claimed not to use any frailty scale during their pre-operative assessments. The most frequently utilized index was the modified Frailty Index (mFI) (18%). The most important perceived barrier was the excessive amount of time required to calculate each patient’s frailty score. Ninety-two percent of the spine surgeons felt sure that these scores could influence their therapeutic decisions, while 91% desired an easier-to-use risk-prevention scale. Conclusion: The main perceived barriers restricting the use of frailty indices were the time required to complete them, lack of index validation, and need for specific instruments to calculate the index score.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-6722</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1853-0605</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.31053/1853.0605.v79.n4.37815</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36542577</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Argentina postmaster@ucbscm.edu.ar, postmaster@bfcmcb.sld.ar, cielo@fcmcb.sld.ar, bfcmcb@biomed.uncor.ar: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba</publisher><subject>Artículos Originales ; frailty ; latin america ; postoperative complications ; spine</subject><ispartof>Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba, 2022-12, Vol.79 (4), p.347-352</ispartof><rights>Universidad Nacional de Córdoba</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2799-550e5630dadab6ca026f3c5217f2e021c9ca125825486fbc19725bd7c840f03c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987299/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987299/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pereira Duarte, Matias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camino Willhuber, Gaston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valacco, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falavigna, Asdrubal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asghar, Jahangir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guiroy, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><title>Why are frailty indices not used systematically during preoperative spine consultations?</title><title>Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba</title><description>Introduction: Frailty indices are highly predictive of major medical and mechanical complications, lengths of hospital stay, and mortality rates after spine procedures. However, several barriers limit the extent to which spine surgeons employ these indices. The main purposes of the current study were to assess the use of frailty indices by Latin-American spine surgeons and identify the main barriers perceived to restrict their clinical application. Methods: For this cross-sectional survey, a questionnaire evaluating the demographic characteristics of participating surgeons and their utilization of frailty indices were created in Google form and sent by e-mail to every registered member of AO Spine Latin America between October and November 2020. Results: Of the 1047 surgeons sent the survey, 293 responded (response rate=28%). Half of the surgeons (51.7%) said they were unfamiliar with the terms ¨frailty´ and ¨frailty index”, while 70.3% claimed not to use any frailty scale during their pre-operative assessments. The most frequently utilized index was the modified Frailty Index (mFI) (18%). The most important perceived barrier was the excessive amount of time required to calculate each patient’s frailty score. Ninety-two percent of the spine surgeons felt sure that these scores could influence their therapeutic decisions, while 91% desired an easier-to-use risk-prevention scale. Conclusion: The main perceived barriers restricting the use of frailty indices were the time required to complete them, lack of index validation, and need for specific instruments to calculate the index score.</description><subject>Artículos Originales</subject><subject>frailty</subject><subject>latin america</subject><subject>postoperative complications</subject><subject>spine</subject><issn>0014-6722</issn><issn>1853-0605</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkd1q3DAQRkVpaZY0z1C9gN2RZP3dJISQtoFAbhLSOyHL442CVzaSd8FvX-9uKUQ3I76POQwcQr4zqAUDKX4wI0UNCmR90LZOTS20YfIT2RyL6lh8JhsA1lRKc35Brkp5h_Upq0Dpr-RCKNlwqfWG_Hl9W6jPSPvs4zAvNKYuBiw0jTPdF-xoWcqMOz_H4Idhod0-x7SlU8ZxwrzGB6RliglpGFPZD_MarZ-bb-RL74eCV__mJXn5ef9897t6fPr1cHf7WAWura2kBJRKQOc736rggateBMmZ7jkCZ8EGz7g0XDZG9W1gVnPZdjqYBnoQQVyShzO3G_27m3Lc-by40Ud3Csa8dT6vxw_oWskFIDJtQTdW6RaMUaaxILhXWvmVdX1mTft2h13ANGc_fIB-bFJ8c9vx4Kw1mlu7AvQZEPJYSsb-_y4Dd3LnjorcUZFb3bnUuJM78RdZsI0x</recordid><startdate>20221221</startdate><enddate>20221221</enddate><creator>Pereira Duarte, Matias</creator><creator>Camino Willhuber, Gaston</creator><creator>Valacco, Marcelo</creator><creator>Falavigna, Asdrubal</creator><creator>Asghar, Jahangir</creator><creator>Guiroy, Alfredo</creator><general>Universidad Nacional de Córdoba</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221221</creationdate><title>Why are frailty indices not used systematically during preoperative spine consultations?</title><author>Pereira Duarte, Matias ; Camino Willhuber, Gaston ; Valacco, Marcelo ; Falavigna, Asdrubal ; Asghar, Jahangir ; Guiroy, Alfredo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2799-550e5630dadab6ca026f3c5217f2e021c9ca125825486fbc19725bd7c840f03c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Artículos Originales</topic><topic>frailty</topic><topic>latin america</topic><topic>postoperative complications</topic><topic>spine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pereira Duarte, Matias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camino Willhuber, Gaston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valacco, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falavigna, Asdrubal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asghar, Jahangir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guiroy, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pereira Duarte, Matias</au><au>Camino Willhuber, Gaston</au><au>Valacco, Marcelo</au><au>Falavigna, Asdrubal</au><au>Asghar, Jahangir</au><au>Guiroy, Alfredo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why are frailty indices not used systematically during preoperative spine consultations?</atitle><jtitle>Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba</jtitle><date>2022-12-21</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>352</epage><pages>347-352</pages><issn>0014-6722</issn><eissn>1853-0605</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Frailty indices are highly predictive of major medical and mechanical complications, lengths of hospital stay, and mortality rates after spine procedures. However, several barriers limit the extent to which spine surgeons employ these indices. The main purposes of the current study were to assess the use of frailty indices by Latin-American spine surgeons and identify the main barriers perceived to restrict their clinical application. Methods: For this cross-sectional survey, a questionnaire evaluating the demographic characteristics of participating surgeons and their utilization of frailty indices were created in Google form and sent by e-mail to every registered member of AO Spine Latin America between October and November 2020. Results: Of the 1047 surgeons sent the survey, 293 responded (response rate=28%). Half of the surgeons (51.7%) said they were unfamiliar with the terms ¨frailty´ and ¨frailty index”, while 70.3% claimed not to use any frailty scale during their pre-operative assessments. The most frequently utilized index was the modified Frailty Index (mFI) (18%). The most important perceived barrier was the excessive amount of time required to calculate each patient’s frailty score. Ninety-two percent of the spine surgeons felt sure that these scores could influence their therapeutic decisions, while 91% desired an easier-to-use risk-prevention scale. Conclusion: The main perceived barriers restricting the use of frailty indices were the time required to complete them, lack of index validation, and need for specific instruments to calculate the index score.</abstract><cop>Argentina postmaster@ucbscm.edu.ar, postmaster@bfcmcb.sld.ar, cielo@fcmcb.sld.ar, bfcmcb@biomed.uncor.ar</cop><pub>Universidad Nacional de Córdoba</pub><pmid>36542577</pmid><doi>10.31053/1853.0605.v79.n4.37815</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-6722
ispartof Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba, 2022-12, Vol.79 (4), p.347-352
issn 0014-6722
1853-0605
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b5230ee179074967b0886849032a676a
source Open Access: PubMed Central
subjects Artículos Originales
frailty
latin america
postoperative complications
spine
title Why are frailty indices not used systematically during preoperative spine consultations?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T17%3A10%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20are%20frailty%20indices%20not%20used%20systematically%20during%20preoperative%20spine%20consultations?&rft.jtitle=Revista%20de%20la%20Facultad%20de%20Ciencias%20M%C3%A9dicas%20de%20C%C3%B3rdoba&rft.au=Pereira%20Duarte,%20Matias&rft.date=2022-12-21&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=352&rft.pages=347-352&rft.issn=0014-6722&rft.eissn=1853-0605&rft_id=info:doi/10.31053/1853.0605.v79.n4.37815&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_doaj_%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9987299%3C/pubmedcentral_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2799-550e5630dadab6ca026f3c5217f2e021c9ca125825486fbc19725bd7c840f03c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/36542577&rfr_iscdi=true