Loading…
Why are frailty indices not used systematically during preoperative spine consultations?
Introduction: Frailty indices are highly predictive of major medical and mechanical complications, lengths of hospital stay, and mortality rates after spine procedures. However, several barriers limit the extent to which spine surgeons employ these indices. The main purposes of the current study wer...
Saved in:
Published in: | Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba 2022-12, Vol.79 (4), p.347-352 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2799-550e5630dadab6ca026f3c5217f2e021c9ca125825486fbc19725bd7c840f03c3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 352 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 347 |
container_title | Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba |
container_volume | 79 |
creator | Pereira Duarte, Matias Camino Willhuber, Gaston Valacco, Marcelo Falavigna, Asdrubal Asghar, Jahangir Guiroy, Alfredo |
description | Introduction: Frailty indices are highly predictive of major medical and mechanical complications, lengths of hospital stay, and mortality rates after spine procedures. However, several barriers limit the extent to which spine surgeons employ these indices. The main purposes of the current study were to assess the use of frailty indices by Latin-American spine surgeons and identify the main barriers perceived to restrict their clinical application.
Methods: For this cross-sectional survey, a questionnaire evaluating the demographic characteristics of participating surgeons and their utilization of frailty indices were created in Google form and sent by e-mail to every registered member of AO Spine Latin America between October and November 2020.
Results: Of the 1047 surgeons sent the survey, 293 responded (response rate=28%). Half of the surgeons (51.7%) said they were unfamiliar with the terms ¨frailty´ and ¨frailty index”, while 70.3% claimed not to use any frailty scale during their pre-operative assessments. The most frequently utilized index was the modified Frailty Index (mFI) (18%). The most important perceived barrier was the excessive amount of time required to calculate each patient’s frailty score. Ninety-two percent of the spine surgeons felt sure that these scores could influence their therapeutic decisions, while 91% desired an easier-to-use risk-prevention scale.
Conclusion: The main perceived barriers restricting the use of frailty indices were the time required to complete them, lack of index validation, and need for specific instruments to calculate the index score. |
doi_str_mv | 10.31053/1853.0605.v79.n4.37815 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b5230ee179074967b0886849032a676a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b5230ee179074967b0886849032a676a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9987299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2799-550e5630dadab6ca026f3c5217f2e021c9ca125825486fbc19725bd7c840f03c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkd1q3DAQRkVpaZY0z1C9gN2RZP3dJISQtoFAbhLSOyHL442CVzaSd8FvX-9uKUQ3I76POQwcQr4zqAUDKX4wI0UNCmR90LZOTS20YfIT2RyL6lh8JhsA1lRKc35Brkp5h_Upq0Dpr-RCKNlwqfWG_Hl9W6jPSPvs4zAvNKYuBiw0jTPdF-xoWcqMOz_H4Idhod0-x7SlU8ZxwrzGB6RliglpGFPZD_MarZ-bb-RL74eCV__mJXn5ef9897t6fPr1cHf7WAWura2kBJRKQOc736rggateBMmZ7jkCZ8EGz7g0XDZG9W1gVnPZdjqYBnoQQVyShzO3G_27m3Lc-by40Ud3Csa8dT6vxw_oWskFIDJtQTdW6RaMUaaxILhXWvmVdX1mTft2h13ANGc_fIB-bFJ8c9vx4Kw1mlu7AvQZEPJYSsb-_y4Dd3LnjorcUZFb3bnUuJM78RdZsI0x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why are frailty indices not used systematically during preoperative spine consultations?</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>Pereira Duarte, Matias ; Camino Willhuber, Gaston ; Valacco, Marcelo ; Falavigna, Asdrubal ; Asghar, Jahangir ; Guiroy, Alfredo</creator><creatorcontrib>Pereira Duarte, Matias ; Camino Willhuber, Gaston ; Valacco, Marcelo ; Falavigna, Asdrubal ; Asghar, Jahangir ; Guiroy, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Frailty indices are highly predictive of major medical and mechanical complications, lengths of hospital stay, and mortality rates after spine procedures. However, several barriers limit the extent to which spine surgeons employ these indices. The main purposes of the current study were to assess the use of frailty indices by Latin-American spine surgeons and identify the main barriers perceived to restrict their clinical application.
Methods: For this cross-sectional survey, a questionnaire evaluating the demographic characteristics of participating surgeons and their utilization of frailty indices were created in Google form and sent by e-mail to every registered member of AO Spine Latin America between October and November 2020.
Results: Of the 1047 surgeons sent the survey, 293 responded (response rate=28%). Half of the surgeons (51.7%) said they were unfamiliar with the terms ¨frailty´ and ¨frailty index”, while 70.3% claimed not to use any frailty scale during their pre-operative assessments. The most frequently utilized index was the modified Frailty Index (mFI) (18%). The most important perceived barrier was the excessive amount of time required to calculate each patient’s frailty score. Ninety-two percent of the spine surgeons felt sure that these scores could influence their therapeutic decisions, while 91% desired an easier-to-use risk-prevention scale.
Conclusion: The main perceived barriers restricting the use of frailty indices were the time required to complete them, lack of index validation, and need for specific instruments to calculate the index score.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-6722</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1853-0605</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.31053/1853.0605.v79.n4.37815</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36542577</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Argentina postmaster@ucbscm.edu.ar, postmaster@bfcmcb.sld.ar, cielo@fcmcb.sld.ar, bfcmcb@biomed.uncor.ar: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba</publisher><subject>Artículos Originales ; frailty ; latin america ; postoperative complications ; spine</subject><ispartof>Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba, 2022-12, Vol.79 (4), p.347-352</ispartof><rights>Universidad Nacional de Córdoba</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2799-550e5630dadab6ca026f3c5217f2e021c9ca125825486fbc19725bd7c840f03c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987299/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987299/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pereira Duarte, Matias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camino Willhuber, Gaston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valacco, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falavigna, Asdrubal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asghar, Jahangir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guiroy, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><title>Why are frailty indices not used systematically during preoperative spine consultations?</title><title>Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba</title><description>Introduction: Frailty indices are highly predictive of major medical and mechanical complications, lengths of hospital stay, and mortality rates after spine procedures. However, several barriers limit the extent to which spine surgeons employ these indices. The main purposes of the current study were to assess the use of frailty indices by Latin-American spine surgeons and identify the main barriers perceived to restrict their clinical application.
Methods: For this cross-sectional survey, a questionnaire evaluating the demographic characteristics of participating surgeons and their utilization of frailty indices were created in Google form and sent by e-mail to every registered member of AO Spine Latin America between October and November 2020.
Results: Of the 1047 surgeons sent the survey, 293 responded (response rate=28%). Half of the surgeons (51.7%) said they were unfamiliar with the terms ¨frailty´ and ¨frailty index”, while 70.3% claimed not to use any frailty scale during their pre-operative assessments. The most frequently utilized index was the modified Frailty Index (mFI) (18%). The most important perceived barrier was the excessive amount of time required to calculate each patient’s frailty score. Ninety-two percent of the spine surgeons felt sure that these scores could influence their therapeutic decisions, while 91% desired an easier-to-use risk-prevention scale.
Conclusion: The main perceived barriers restricting the use of frailty indices were the time required to complete them, lack of index validation, and need for specific instruments to calculate the index score.</description><subject>Artículos Originales</subject><subject>frailty</subject><subject>latin america</subject><subject>postoperative complications</subject><subject>spine</subject><issn>0014-6722</issn><issn>1853-0605</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkd1q3DAQRkVpaZY0z1C9gN2RZP3dJISQtoFAbhLSOyHL442CVzaSd8FvX-9uKUQ3I76POQwcQr4zqAUDKX4wI0UNCmR90LZOTS20YfIT2RyL6lh8JhsA1lRKc35Brkp5h_Upq0Dpr-RCKNlwqfWG_Hl9W6jPSPvs4zAvNKYuBiw0jTPdF-xoWcqMOz_H4Idhod0-x7SlU8ZxwrzGB6RliglpGFPZD_MarZ-bb-RL74eCV__mJXn5ef9897t6fPr1cHf7WAWura2kBJRKQOc736rggateBMmZ7jkCZ8EGz7g0XDZG9W1gVnPZdjqYBnoQQVyShzO3G_27m3Lc-by40Ud3Csa8dT6vxw_oWskFIDJtQTdW6RaMUaaxILhXWvmVdX1mTft2h13ANGc_fIB-bFJ8c9vx4Kw1mlu7AvQZEPJYSsb-_y4Dd3LnjorcUZFb3bnUuJM78RdZsI0x</recordid><startdate>20221221</startdate><enddate>20221221</enddate><creator>Pereira Duarte, Matias</creator><creator>Camino Willhuber, Gaston</creator><creator>Valacco, Marcelo</creator><creator>Falavigna, Asdrubal</creator><creator>Asghar, Jahangir</creator><creator>Guiroy, Alfredo</creator><general>Universidad Nacional de Córdoba</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221221</creationdate><title>Why are frailty indices not used systematically during preoperative spine consultations?</title><author>Pereira Duarte, Matias ; Camino Willhuber, Gaston ; Valacco, Marcelo ; Falavigna, Asdrubal ; Asghar, Jahangir ; Guiroy, Alfredo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2799-550e5630dadab6ca026f3c5217f2e021c9ca125825486fbc19725bd7c840f03c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Artículos Originales</topic><topic>frailty</topic><topic>latin america</topic><topic>postoperative complications</topic><topic>spine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pereira Duarte, Matias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camino Willhuber, Gaston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valacco, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falavigna, Asdrubal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asghar, Jahangir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guiroy, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pereira Duarte, Matias</au><au>Camino Willhuber, Gaston</au><au>Valacco, Marcelo</au><au>Falavigna, Asdrubal</au><au>Asghar, Jahangir</au><au>Guiroy, Alfredo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why are frailty indices not used systematically during preoperative spine consultations?</atitle><jtitle>Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba</jtitle><date>2022-12-21</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>352</epage><pages>347-352</pages><issn>0014-6722</issn><eissn>1853-0605</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Frailty indices are highly predictive of major medical and mechanical complications, lengths of hospital stay, and mortality rates after spine procedures. However, several barriers limit the extent to which spine surgeons employ these indices. The main purposes of the current study were to assess the use of frailty indices by Latin-American spine surgeons and identify the main barriers perceived to restrict their clinical application.
Methods: For this cross-sectional survey, a questionnaire evaluating the demographic characteristics of participating surgeons and their utilization of frailty indices were created in Google form and sent by e-mail to every registered member of AO Spine Latin America between October and November 2020.
Results: Of the 1047 surgeons sent the survey, 293 responded (response rate=28%). Half of the surgeons (51.7%) said they were unfamiliar with the terms ¨frailty´ and ¨frailty index”, while 70.3% claimed not to use any frailty scale during their pre-operative assessments. The most frequently utilized index was the modified Frailty Index (mFI) (18%). The most important perceived barrier was the excessive amount of time required to calculate each patient’s frailty score. Ninety-two percent of the spine surgeons felt sure that these scores could influence their therapeutic decisions, while 91% desired an easier-to-use risk-prevention scale.
Conclusion: The main perceived barriers restricting the use of frailty indices were the time required to complete them, lack of index validation, and need for specific instruments to calculate the index score.</abstract><cop>Argentina postmaster@ucbscm.edu.ar, postmaster@bfcmcb.sld.ar, cielo@fcmcb.sld.ar, bfcmcb@biomed.uncor.ar</cop><pub>Universidad Nacional de Córdoba</pub><pmid>36542577</pmid><doi>10.31053/1853.0605.v79.n4.37815</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-6722 |
ispartof | Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba, 2022-12, Vol.79 (4), p.347-352 |
issn | 0014-6722 1853-0605 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b5230ee179074967b0886849032a676a |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central |
subjects | Artículos Originales frailty latin america postoperative complications spine |
title | Why are frailty indices not used systematically during preoperative spine consultations? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T17%3A10%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20are%20frailty%20indices%20not%20used%20systematically%20during%20preoperative%20spine%20consultations?&rft.jtitle=Revista%20de%20la%20Facultad%20de%20Ciencias%20M%C3%A9dicas%20de%20C%C3%B3rdoba&rft.au=Pereira%20Duarte,%20Matias&rft.date=2022-12-21&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=352&rft.pages=347-352&rft.issn=0014-6722&rft.eissn=1853-0605&rft_id=info:doi/10.31053/1853.0605.v79.n4.37815&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_doaj_%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9987299%3C/pubmedcentral_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2799-550e5630dadab6ca026f3c5217f2e021c9ca125825486fbc19725bd7c840f03c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/36542577&rfr_iscdi=true |