Loading…

Implementing an appropriate metric for the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production: A national case study

•The effect of methane is assessed on climate impact of livestock production.•Climate impact is quantified using the new global warning potential (GWP*).•Livestock products show substantially lower climate impacts when assessed by GWP*.•Reducing methane from livestock helps to tackle global warming...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal (Cambridge, England) England), 2022-10, Vol.16 (10), p.100638-100638, Article 100638
Main Authors: Hörtenhuber, S.J., Seiringer, M., Theurl, M.C., Größbacher, V., Piringer, G., Kral, I., Zollitsch, W.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-ca06f8e3db8d6a54871efe42ff76c6da2dad16fb441bcf6cd0671e1f5ea49d893
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-ca06f8e3db8d6a54871efe42ff76c6da2dad16fb441bcf6cd0671e1f5ea49d893
container_end_page 100638
container_issue 10
container_start_page 100638
container_title Animal (Cambridge, England)
container_volume 16
creator Hörtenhuber, S.J.
Seiringer, M.
Theurl, M.C.
Größbacher, V.
Piringer, G.
Kral, I.
Zollitsch, W.J.
description •The effect of methane is assessed on climate impact of livestock production.•Climate impact is quantified using the new global warning potential (GWP*).•Livestock products show substantially lower climate impacts when assessed by GWP*.•Reducing methane from livestock helps to tackle global warming in the short term.•For Austria, this effect is 2.5 times higher than that of CO2 sequestration. Livestock farming is of major economic relevance but also severely contributes to environmental impacts, especially greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions such as methane (CH4; particularly from ruminant production) and nitrous oxide (N2O; mainly from manure management and soil cultivated for feed production). In this study, we analyse the impact of GHG emissions from Austrian livestock production, using two metrics: a) the commonly used global warming potential (GWP) over 100 years (GWP100 in CO2-equivalents, CO2-e), and b) the recently introduced metric GWP*, which describes additional warming as a function of the timeline of short-lived GHG emissions (unit CO2 warming equivalents, CO2-we). We first compiled the sectoral (i.e. only direct emissions without upstream processes) GWP100 for different livestock categories with a focus on dairy cattle, beef cattle and pigs in Austria between 1990 and 2019. We also estimated product-related (i.e. per kg carcass weight or per litre of milk) GWP100 values, including upstream processes. We then calculated the corresponding GWP* metrics, both sectoral and product-related, and compared them with the GWP100 values. Decreasing livestock numbers and improved production efficiency were found to result in strong sectoral emission reductions from dairy production (–32 % of GWP100 from 1990 to 2019) and from pigs (–32 % CO2-e). This contrasts with low reductions from other livestock categories and even increases for cattle other than dairy cows (+3 % CO2-e), mainly due to rising suckler cow numbers. Allocated results per kg milk and kg body mass show quite similar results. Using the GWP* metric, the climate impacts of Austrian livestock production are less severe. When assuming constant management and emission intensity over a period of at least 20 years, the CO2-we (GWP*) is almost 50 % less than CO2-e (GWP100) per kg Austrian raw milk due to the different impacts of the short-lived CH4. A similar trend applies to an average cattle carcass (-40 % warming impact). The emission reductions of the shrinking Austrian livestock population represen
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100638
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b528bafd0e804231b6ad99ef62ee2d2f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1751731122001951</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b528bafd0e804231b6ad99ef62ee2d2f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2720424430</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-ca06f8e3db8d6a54871efe42ff76c6da2dad16fb441bcf6cd0671e1f5ea49d893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFu1DAQjRBIlMIfcPCRyy624zgJB6SqorBSJS4gcbMm9njrJbEXj7dSr3w5XlL12NOMZt579pvXNO8F3wou9MfDFmJYYN5KLmUdcd0OL5oL0Xdi07fy18unXojXzRuiA-fdKJS6aP7uluOMC8YS4p5BZHA85nTMAQqyBUsOlvmUWblDBkRIdMay5Nk-I8a7dCJkeyCGSyAKKRLzOS1sDvdIJdnfrMq5ky119YldsQjnDmZmoRKpnNzD2-aVh5nw3WO9bH7efPlx_W1z-_3r7vrqdmNVJ8rGAtd-wNZNg9PQqaEX6FFJ73tttQPpwAntJ6XEZL22juuKEL5DUKMbxvay2a26LsHBVIsL5AeTIJj_g5T3BnIJdkYzdXKYwDuOA1eyFZMGN47otUSUTvqq9WHVqu7-nKpTU-1bnGeIWE9iZC8rUamWV6haoTYnooz-6WnBzTk-czBrfOYcn1njq7TPKw3rSe4DZkM2YLToQkZb6p_D8wL_AJUsqY4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2720424430</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementing an appropriate metric for the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production: A national case study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hörtenhuber, S.J. ; Seiringer, M. ; Theurl, M.C. ; Größbacher, V. ; Piringer, G. ; Kral, I. ; Zollitsch, W.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hörtenhuber, S.J. ; Seiringer, M. ; Theurl, M.C. ; Größbacher, V. ; Piringer, G. ; Kral, I. ; Zollitsch, W.J.</creatorcontrib><description>•The effect of methane is assessed on climate impact of livestock production.•Climate impact is quantified using the new global warning potential (GWP*).•Livestock products show substantially lower climate impacts when assessed by GWP*.•Reducing methane from livestock helps to tackle global warming in the short term.•For Austria, this effect is 2.5 times higher than that of CO2 sequestration. Livestock farming is of major economic relevance but also severely contributes to environmental impacts, especially greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions such as methane (CH4; particularly from ruminant production) and nitrous oxide (N2O; mainly from manure management and soil cultivated for feed production). In this study, we analyse the impact of GHG emissions from Austrian livestock production, using two metrics: a) the commonly used global warming potential (GWP) over 100 years (GWP100 in CO2-equivalents, CO2-e), and b) the recently introduced metric GWP*, which describes additional warming as a function of the timeline of short-lived GHG emissions (unit CO2 warming equivalents, CO2-we). We first compiled the sectoral (i.e. only direct emissions without upstream processes) GWP100 for different livestock categories with a focus on dairy cattle, beef cattle and pigs in Austria between 1990 and 2019. We also estimated product-related (i.e. per kg carcass weight or per litre of milk) GWP100 values, including upstream processes. We then calculated the corresponding GWP* metrics, both sectoral and product-related, and compared them with the GWP100 values. Decreasing livestock numbers and improved production efficiency were found to result in strong sectoral emission reductions from dairy production (–32 % of GWP100 from 1990 to 2019) and from pigs (–32 % CO2-e). This contrasts with low reductions from other livestock categories and even increases for cattle other than dairy cows (+3 % CO2-e), mainly due to rising suckler cow numbers. Allocated results per kg milk and kg body mass show quite similar results. Using the GWP* metric, the climate impacts of Austrian livestock production are less severe. When assuming constant management and emission intensity over a period of at least 20 years, the CO2-we (GWP*) is almost 50 % less than CO2-e (GWP100) per kg Austrian raw milk due to the different impacts of the short-lived CH4. A similar trend applies to an average cattle carcass (-40 % warming impact). The emission reductions of the shrinking Austrian livestock population represent an important contribution to a climate-neutral agriculture: The CH4 reductions of livestock production during the past 20 years reduce the current total Austrian CO2-we by 16 %. Continuous CH4 reduction, as we show it here for Austrian livestock, is an effective option to tackle the climate crisis in the short term. It shall be stressed that a relatively low GWP* should not be interpreted as a concession for further CH4 emissions but as an actual reduction of (additional) warming.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-7311</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-732X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100638</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Animal ; Global warming ; GWP ; GWP100</subject><ispartof>Animal (Cambridge, England), 2022-10, Vol.16 (10), p.100638-100638, Article 100638</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-ca06f8e3db8d6a54871efe42ff76c6da2dad16fb441bcf6cd0671e1f5ea49d893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-ca06f8e3db8d6a54871efe42ff76c6da2dad16fb441bcf6cd0671e1f5ea49d893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731122001951$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3547,27922,27923,45778</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hörtenhuber, S.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seiringer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theurl, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Größbacher, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piringer, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kral, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zollitsch, W.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Implementing an appropriate metric for the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production: A national case study</title><title>Animal (Cambridge, England)</title><description>•The effect of methane is assessed on climate impact of livestock production.•Climate impact is quantified using the new global warning potential (GWP*).•Livestock products show substantially lower climate impacts when assessed by GWP*.•Reducing methane from livestock helps to tackle global warming in the short term.•For Austria, this effect is 2.5 times higher than that of CO2 sequestration. Livestock farming is of major economic relevance but also severely contributes to environmental impacts, especially greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions such as methane (CH4; particularly from ruminant production) and nitrous oxide (N2O; mainly from manure management and soil cultivated for feed production). In this study, we analyse the impact of GHG emissions from Austrian livestock production, using two metrics: a) the commonly used global warming potential (GWP) over 100 years (GWP100 in CO2-equivalents, CO2-e), and b) the recently introduced metric GWP*, which describes additional warming as a function of the timeline of short-lived GHG emissions (unit CO2 warming equivalents, CO2-we). We first compiled the sectoral (i.e. only direct emissions without upstream processes) GWP100 for different livestock categories with a focus on dairy cattle, beef cattle and pigs in Austria between 1990 and 2019. We also estimated product-related (i.e. per kg carcass weight or per litre of milk) GWP100 values, including upstream processes. We then calculated the corresponding GWP* metrics, both sectoral and product-related, and compared them with the GWP100 values. Decreasing livestock numbers and improved production efficiency were found to result in strong sectoral emission reductions from dairy production (–32 % of GWP100 from 1990 to 2019) and from pigs (–32 % CO2-e). This contrasts with low reductions from other livestock categories and even increases for cattle other than dairy cows (+3 % CO2-e), mainly due to rising suckler cow numbers. Allocated results per kg milk and kg body mass show quite similar results. Using the GWP* metric, the climate impacts of Austrian livestock production are less severe. When assuming constant management and emission intensity over a period of at least 20 years, the CO2-we (GWP*) is almost 50 % less than CO2-e (GWP100) per kg Austrian raw milk due to the different impacts of the short-lived CH4. A similar trend applies to an average cattle carcass (-40 % warming impact). The emission reductions of the shrinking Austrian livestock population represent an important contribution to a climate-neutral agriculture: The CH4 reductions of livestock production during the past 20 years reduce the current total Austrian CO2-we by 16 %. Continuous CH4 reduction, as we show it here for Austrian livestock, is an effective option to tackle the climate crisis in the short term. It shall be stressed that a relatively low GWP* should not be interpreted as a concession for further CH4 emissions but as an actual reduction of (additional) warming.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animal</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>GWP</subject><subject>GWP100</subject><issn>1751-7311</issn><issn>1751-732X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcFu1DAQjRBIlMIfcPCRyy624zgJB6SqorBSJS4gcbMm9njrJbEXj7dSr3w5XlL12NOMZt579pvXNO8F3wou9MfDFmJYYN5KLmUdcd0OL5oL0Xdi07fy18unXojXzRuiA-fdKJS6aP7uluOMC8YS4p5BZHA85nTMAQqyBUsOlvmUWblDBkRIdMay5Nk-I8a7dCJkeyCGSyAKKRLzOS1sDvdIJdnfrMq5ky119YldsQjnDmZmoRKpnNzD2-aVh5nw3WO9bH7efPlx_W1z-_3r7vrqdmNVJ8rGAtd-wNZNg9PQqaEX6FFJ73tttQPpwAntJ6XEZL22juuKEL5DUKMbxvay2a26LsHBVIsL5AeTIJj_g5T3BnIJdkYzdXKYwDuOA1eyFZMGN47otUSUTvqq9WHVqu7-nKpTU-1bnGeIWE9iZC8rUamWV6haoTYnooz-6WnBzTk-czBrfOYcn1njq7TPKw3rSe4DZkM2YLToQkZb6p_D8wL_AJUsqY4</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Hörtenhuber, S.J.</creator><creator>Seiringer, M.</creator><creator>Theurl, M.C.</creator><creator>Größbacher, V.</creator><creator>Piringer, G.</creator><creator>Kral, I.</creator><creator>Zollitsch, W.J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Implementing an appropriate metric for the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production: A national case study</title><author>Hörtenhuber, S.J. ; Seiringer, M. ; Theurl, M.C. ; Größbacher, V. ; Piringer, G. ; Kral, I. ; Zollitsch, W.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-ca06f8e3db8d6a54871efe42ff76c6da2dad16fb441bcf6cd0671e1f5ea49d893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animal</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>GWP</topic><topic>GWP100</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hörtenhuber, S.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seiringer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theurl, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Größbacher, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piringer, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kral, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zollitsch, W.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Animal (Cambridge, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hörtenhuber, S.J.</au><au>Seiringer, M.</au><au>Theurl, M.C.</au><au>Größbacher, V.</au><au>Piringer, G.</au><au>Kral, I.</au><au>Zollitsch, W.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementing an appropriate metric for the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production: A national case study</atitle><jtitle>Animal (Cambridge, England)</jtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>100638</spage><epage>100638</epage><pages>100638-100638</pages><artnum>100638</artnum><issn>1751-7311</issn><eissn>1751-732X</eissn><abstract>•The effect of methane is assessed on climate impact of livestock production.•Climate impact is quantified using the new global warning potential (GWP*).•Livestock products show substantially lower climate impacts when assessed by GWP*.•Reducing methane from livestock helps to tackle global warming in the short term.•For Austria, this effect is 2.5 times higher than that of CO2 sequestration. Livestock farming is of major economic relevance but also severely contributes to environmental impacts, especially greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions such as methane (CH4; particularly from ruminant production) and nitrous oxide (N2O; mainly from manure management and soil cultivated for feed production). In this study, we analyse the impact of GHG emissions from Austrian livestock production, using two metrics: a) the commonly used global warming potential (GWP) over 100 years (GWP100 in CO2-equivalents, CO2-e), and b) the recently introduced metric GWP*, which describes additional warming as a function of the timeline of short-lived GHG emissions (unit CO2 warming equivalents, CO2-we). We first compiled the sectoral (i.e. only direct emissions without upstream processes) GWP100 for different livestock categories with a focus on dairy cattle, beef cattle and pigs in Austria between 1990 and 2019. We also estimated product-related (i.e. per kg carcass weight or per litre of milk) GWP100 values, including upstream processes. We then calculated the corresponding GWP* metrics, both sectoral and product-related, and compared them with the GWP100 values. Decreasing livestock numbers and improved production efficiency were found to result in strong sectoral emission reductions from dairy production (–32 % of GWP100 from 1990 to 2019) and from pigs (–32 % CO2-e). This contrasts with low reductions from other livestock categories and even increases for cattle other than dairy cows (+3 % CO2-e), mainly due to rising suckler cow numbers. Allocated results per kg milk and kg body mass show quite similar results. Using the GWP* metric, the climate impacts of Austrian livestock production are less severe. When assuming constant management and emission intensity over a period of at least 20 years, the CO2-we (GWP*) is almost 50 % less than CO2-e (GWP100) per kg Austrian raw milk due to the different impacts of the short-lived CH4. A similar trend applies to an average cattle carcass (-40 % warming impact). The emission reductions of the shrinking Austrian livestock population represent an important contribution to a climate-neutral agriculture: The CH4 reductions of livestock production during the past 20 years reduce the current total Austrian CO2-we by 16 %. Continuous CH4 reduction, as we show it here for Austrian livestock, is an effective option to tackle the climate crisis in the short term. It shall be stressed that a relatively low GWP* should not be interpreted as a concession for further CH4 emissions but as an actual reduction of (additional) warming.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.animal.2022.100638</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1751-7311
ispartof Animal (Cambridge, England), 2022-10, Vol.16 (10), p.100638-100638, Article 100638
issn 1751-7311
1751-732X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b528bafd0e804231b6ad99ef62ee2d2f
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Agriculture
Animal
Global warming
GWP
GWP100
title Implementing an appropriate metric for the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production: A national case study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A25%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementing%20an%20appropriate%20metric%20for%20the%20assessment%20of%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20from%20livestock%20production:%20A%20national%20case%20study&rft.jtitle=Animal%20(Cambridge,%20England)&rft.au=H%C3%B6rtenhuber,%20S.J.&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=100638&rft.epage=100638&rft.pages=100638-100638&rft.artnum=100638&rft.issn=1751-7311&rft.eissn=1751-732X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.animal.2022.100638&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2720424430%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-ca06f8e3db8d6a54871efe42ff76c6da2dad16fb441bcf6cd0671e1f5ea49d893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2720424430&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true