Assessment of apically extruded debris and irrigant produced by different nickel-titanium instrument systems

• Published in: Brazilian oral research 2015-01, Vol.29 (1), p.1-6
• Main Authors: Küçükyilmaz, Ebru, Savas, Selcuk, Saygili, Gokhan, Uysal, Banu
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis of Variance; Dental Instruments; Dental Instruments /Instrumentation; Dentistry; DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE; Equipment Design; Humans; Materials Testing; Nickel; Reference Values; Reproducibility of Results; Root Canal Irrigants; Root Canal Irrigants - therapeutic use; Root Canal Preparation; Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation; Root Canal Preparation - methods; Time Factors; Titanium; Tooth Apex
• ISSN: 1806-8324; 1807-3107; 1807-3107
• DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0002

The aim of this study was to evaluate the preparation time and the amounts of apically extruded debris and irrigant using different nickel-titanium instrumentation systems. Forty-five extracted single-rooted mandibular premolar teeth were selected and divided into three groups. The root canals were instrumented according to the manufacturers' instructions, using a reciprocating single-file system, a single-file rotary system and a multiple-file rotary system. Bidistilled water was used as the irrigant solution. The apically extruded debris and irrigant were collected into preweighed Eppendorf tubes. The amounts of extruded debris and irrigant were assessed with a precision micro-balance. The Eppendorf tubes were incubated at 37°C for 15 days. After the incubation period, they were weighed again to assess the debris extrusion. The time required to prepare the canals was also recorded. The results were statistically analyzed using MANOVA and Bonferroni's adjustment. Considering the apically extruded debris and irrigant, there were no statistically significant differences among the groups (p > 0.05). The Reciproc group produced the highest debris (0.000632 ± 0.000162 gr) and irrigant (0.844587 ± 0.437814 ml) extrusion values. While the least extruded debris was observed with OneShape (0,000431 ± 0,000171 gr), the least extruded irrigant was observed with ProTaper system (0.564147 ± 0.370596 ml). Instrumentation was faster using the Reciproc than the other two instruments (70.27 ± 13.38 s) (p < 0.05). All of the instrumentation systems used in this study produced apical debris and irrigant extrusion. The reciprocating single-file system tended to produce more debris and irrigant extrusion, compared with the rotary systems. Considering the preparation time, the single-file systems appeared to be advantageous due to their working time.