Loading…

HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE NON-HUMAN BLACK BODY

When a black student threw faeces at a statue of British imperialist Cecil John Rhodes at the University of Cape Town in South Africa, it sparked the formation of #RhodesMustFall, a black radical student movement that sought to address systemic racism at the white liberal university through its dema...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sur : international journal on human rights 2018-12, Vol.15 (28), p.119-126
Main Author: A. Kayum Ahmed
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 126
container_issue 28
container_start_page 119
container_title Sur : international journal on human rights
container_volume 15
creator A. Kayum Ahmed
description When a black student threw faeces at a statue of British imperialist Cecil John Rhodes at the University of Cape Town in South Africa, it sparked the formation of #RhodesMustFall, a black radical student movement that sought to address systemic racism at the white liberal university through its demand to decolonize the institution. #RhodesMustFall adopted a decolonial framework centred on Black Consciousness, Pan-Africanism and Black radical feminism, but simultaneously rejected human rights discourses embedded in South Africa’s progressive constitution. This paper examines the arguments developed by #RhodesMustFall in its rejection of human rights, including the idea that human rights is incapable of contemplating the non-human: an entity, often a black body, that takes on human characteristics but is not recognized as human. Drawing on empirical data, including 46 interviews with #RhodesMustFall student activists, this article considers how social movements shape conceptualisations of race in post-apartheid South Africa.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b5927749b61b43eb8965fa9a78d821c2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b5927749b61b43eb8965fa9a78d821c2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_b5927749b61b43eb8965fa9a78d821c2</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b5927749b61b43eb8965fa9a78d821c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0tLQw1jU2NjFiAbItDMx0zUxMTDkYuIqLswwMTEwMLS05GTQ9Qn0d_RSCPN09QoIVHP1cFEI8XBX8_P10IRJOPo7O3gpO_i6RPAysaYk5xam8UJqbwdPNNcTZQzclPzErvqAoMzexqDI-PzEzHiyQX5Qen1hUkpmckxqfZGppZG5uYplkZphkYpyaZGFpZpqWaJlobpFiYWSYbGRMTbMAkjtGrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE NON-HUMAN BLACK BODY</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>A. Kayum Ahmed</creator><creatorcontrib>A. Kayum Ahmed</creatorcontrib><description>When a black student threw faeces at a statue of British imperialist Cecil John Rhodes at the University of Cape Town in South Africa, it sparked the formation of #RhodesMustFall, a black radical student movement that sought to address systemic racism at the white liberal university through its demand to decolonize the institution. #RhodesMustFall adopted a decolonial framework centred on Black Consciousness, Pan-Africanism and Black radical feminism, but simultaneously rejected human rights discourses embedded in South Africa’s progressive constitution. This paper examines the arguments developed by #RhodesMustFall in its rejection of human rights, including the idea that human rights is incapable of contemplating the non-human: an entity, often a black body, that takes on human characteristics but is not recognized as human. Drawing on empirical data, including 46 interviews with #RhodesMustFall student activists, this article considers how social movements shape conceptualisations of race in post-apartheid South Africa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1806-6445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1983-3342</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Associação Direitos Humanos em Rede</publisher><subject>black body ; human rights ; non-human ; rhodesmustfall ; social movements</subject><ispartof>Sur : international journal on human rights, 2018-12, Vol.15 (28), p.119-126</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>A. Kayum Ahmed</creatorcontrib><title>HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE NON-HUMAN BLACK BODY</title><title>Sur : international journal on human rights</title><description>When a black student threw faeces at a statue of British imperialist Cecil John Rhodes at the University of Cape Town in South Africa, it sparked the formation of #RhodesMustFall, a black radical student movement that sought to address systemic racism at the white liberal university through its demand to decolonize the institution. #RhodesMustFall adopted a decolonial framework centred on Black Consciousness, Pan-Africanism and Black radical feminism, but simultaneously rejected human rights discourses embedded in South Africa’s progressive constitution. This paper examines the arguments developed by #RhodesMustFall in its rejection of human rights, including the idea that human rights is incapable of contemplating the non-human: an entity, often a black body, that takes on human characteristics but is not recognized as human. Drawing on empirical data, including 46 interviews with #RhodesMustFall student activists, this article considers how social movements shape conceptualisations of race in post-apartheid South Africa.</description><subject>black body</subject><subject>human rights</subject><subject>non-human</subject><subject>rhodesmustfall</subject><subject>social movements</subject><issn>1806-6445</issn><issn>1983-3342</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0tLQw1jU2NjFiAbItDMx0zUxMTDkYuIqLswwMTEwMLS05GTQ9Qn0d_RSCPN09QoIVHP1cFEI8XBX8_P10IRJOPo7O3gpO_i6RPAysaYk5xam8UJqbwdPNNcTZQzclPzErvqAoMzexqDI-PzEzHiyQX5Qen1hUkpmckxqfZGppZG5uYplkZphkYpyaZGFpZpqWaJlobpFiYWSYbGRMTbMAkjtGrg</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>A. Kayum Ahmed</creator><general>Associação Direitos Humanos em Rede</general><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE NON-HUMAN BLACK BODY</title><author>A. Kayum Ahmed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b5927749b61b43eb8965fa9a78d821c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>black body</topic><topic>human rights</topic><topic>non-human</topic><topic>rhodesmustfall</topic><topic>social movements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>A. Kayum Ahmed</creatorcontrib><collection>DAOJ: Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Sur : international journal on human rights</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>A. Kayum Ahmed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE NON-HUMAN BLACK BODY</atitle><jtitle>Sur : international journal on human rights</jtitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>28</issue><spage>119</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>119-126</pages><issn>1806-6445</issn><eissn>1983-3342</eissn><abstract>When a black student threw faeces at a statue of British imperialist Cecil John Rhodes at the University of Cape Town in South Africa, it sparked the formation of #RhodesMustFall, a black radical student movement that sought to address systemic racism at the white liberal university through its demand to decolonize the institution. #RhodesMustFall adopted a decolonial framework centred on Black Consciousness, Pan-Africanism and Black radical feminism, but simultaneously rejected human rights discourses embedded in South Africa’s progressive constitution. This paper examines the arguments developed by #RhodesMustFall in its rejection of human rights, including the idea that human rights is incapable of contemplating the non-human: an entity, often a black body, that takes on human characteristics but is not recognized as human. Drawing on empirical data, including 46 interviews with #RhodesMustFall student activists, this article considers how social movements shape conceptualisations of race in post-apartheid South Africa.</abstract><pub>Associação Direitos Humanos em Rede</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1806-6445
ispartof Sur : international journal on human rights, 2018-12, Vol.15 (28), p.119-126
issn 1806-6445
1983-3342
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b5927749b61b43eb8965fa9a78d821c2
source Publicly Available Content Database; Politics Collection; Sociology Collection; ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection
subjects black body
human rights
non-human
rhodesmustfall
social movements
title HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE NON-HUMAN BLACK BODY
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T09%3A57%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HUMAN%20RIGHTS%20AND%20THE%20NON-HUMAN%20BLACK%20BODY&rft.jtitle=Sur%20:%20international%20journal%20on%20human%20rights&rft.au=A.%20Kayum%20Ahmed&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=28&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=119-126&rft.issn=1806-6445&rft.eissn=1983-3342&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_b5927749b61b43eb8965fa9a78d821c2%3C/doaj%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b5927749b61b43eb8965fa9a78d821c23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true