Loading…
Is Environmental Enrichment Ready for Clinical Application in Human Post-stroke Rehabilitation?
Environmental enrichment (EE) has been widely used as a means to enhance brain plasticity mechanisms (e.g., increased dendritic branching, synaptogenesis, etc.) and improve behavioral function in both normal and brain-damaged animals. In spite of the demonstrated efficacy of EE for enhancing brain p...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience 2018-07, Vol.12, p.135-135 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-a6f97fa54e96f1d52e0b4d52d86ffaebacb60ad3bc23c35092f5e6d9f41b8a3a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-a6f97fa54e96f1d52e0b4d52d86ffaebacb60ad3bc23c35092f5e6d9f41b8a3a3 |
container_end_page | 135 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 135 |
container_title | Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | McDonald, Matthew W Hayward, Kathryn S Rosbergen, Ingrid C M Jeffers, Matthew S Corbett, Dale |
description | Environmental enrichment (EE) has been widely used as a means to enhance brain plasticity mechanisms (e.g., increased dendritic branching, synaptogenesis, etc.) and improve behavioral function in both normal and brain-damaged animals. In spite of the demonstrated efficacy of EE for enhancing brain plasticity, it has largely remained a laboratory phenomenon with little translation to the clinical setting. Impediments to the implementation of enrichment as an intervention for human stroke rehabilitation and a lack of clinical translation can be attributed to a number of factors not limited to: (i) concerns that EE is actually the "normal state" for animals, whereas standard housing is a form of impoverishment; (ii) difficulty in standardizing EE conditions across clinical sites; (iii) the exact mechanisms underlying the beneficial actions of enrichment are largely correlative in nature; (iv) a lack of knowledge concerning what aspects of enrichment (e.g., exercise, socialization, cognitive stimulation) represent the critical or active ingredients for enhancing brain plasticity; and (v) the required "dose" of enrichment is unknown, since most laboratory studies employ continuous periods of enrichment, a condition that most clinicians view as impractical. In this review article, we summarize preclinical stroke recovery studies that have successfully utilized EE to promote functional recovery and highlight the potential underlying mechanisms. Subsequently, we discuss how EE is being applied in a clinical setting and address differences in preclinical and clinical EE work to date. It is argued that the best way forward is through the careful alignment of preclinical and clinical rehabilitation research. A combination of both approaches will allow research to fully address gaps in knowledge and facilitate the implementation of EE to the clinical setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00135 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b5f33ed846b7490ba57fd10f8a8b1d91</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b5f33ed846b7490ba57fd10f8a8b1d91</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2299521597</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-a6f97fa54e96f1d52e0b4d52d86ffaebacb60ad3bc23c35092f5e6d9f41b8a3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUktv1DAQjhCIPuDOCUXiwiWLH7ETX0DVqo-VKlFVcLbGr66XxF7spFL_Pd7dtmo5zYznm2_sz19VfcJoQWkvvrmg7HpBEO4XCGHK3lTHmHPSMMzo2xf5UXWS8wYhTnjbva-OKEIMtZgfV3KV6_Nw71MMow0TDKVKXq93RX1rwTzULqZ6OfjgdemebbdDSSYfQ-1DfTWPEOqbmKcmTyn-sWVmDcoPftpjfnyo3jkYsv34GE-r3xfnv5ZXzfXPy9Xy7LrRrUBTA9yJzgFrreAOG0YsUm0JpufOgVWgFUdgqNKEasqQII5ZboRrseqBAj2tVgdeE2Ejt8mPkB5kBC_3BzHdSUiT14OVijlKrelbrrqyXAHrnMHI9dArbAQuXN8PXNtZjdboIkWC4RXp607wa3kX7yUvqlK-I_j6SJDi39nmSY4-azsMEGycsySo61kneiEK9Mt_0E2cUyhSSUKEYAQz0RUUOqB0ijkn654vg5HcOUHunSB3TpB7J5SRzy8f8Tzw9PX0H14cseQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2299521597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Environmental Enrichment Ready for Clinical Application in Human Post-stroke Rehabilitation?</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>McDonald, Matthew W ; Hayward, Kathryn S ; Rosbergen, Ingrid C M ; Jeffers, Matthew S ; Corbett, Dale</creator><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Matthew W ; Hayward, Kathryn S ; Rosbergen, Ingrid C M ; Jeffers, Matthew S ; Corbett, Dale</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental enrichment (EE) has been widely used as a means to enhance brain plasticity mechanisms (e.g., increased dendritic branching, synaptogenesis, etc.) and improve behavioral function in both normal and brain-damaged animals. In spite of the demonstrated efficacy of EE for enhancing brain plasticity, it has largely remained a laboratory phenomenon with little translation to the clinical setting. Impediments to the implementation of enrichment as an intervention for human stroke rehabilitation and a lack of clinical translation can be attributed to a number of factors not limited to: (i) concerns that EE is actually the "normal state" for animals, whereas standard housing is a form of impoverishment; (ii) difficulty in standardizing EE conditions across clinical sites; (iii) the exact mechanisms underlying the beneficial actions of enrichment are largely correlative in nature; (iv) a lack of knowledge concerning what aspects of enrichment (e.g., exercise, socialization, cognitive stimulation) represent the critical or active ingredients for enhancing brain plasticity; and (v) the required "dose" of enrichment is unknown, since most laboratory studies employ continuous periods of enrichment, a condition that most clinicians view as impractical. In this review article, we summarize preclinical stroke recovery studies that have successfully utilized EE to promote functional recovery and highlight the potential underlying mechanisms. Subsequently, we discuss how EE is being applied in a clinical setting and address differences in preclinical and clinical EE work to date. It is argued that the best way forward is through the careful alignment of preclinical and clinical rehabilitation research. A combination of both approaches will allow research to fully address gaps in knowledge and facilitate the implementation of EE to the clinical setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1662-5153</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1662-5153</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00135</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30050416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Research Foundation</publisher><subject>Angiogenesis ; Animal cognition ; Brain injury ; Brain research ; clinical translation ; Cognitive ability ; Dendritic branching ; Dendritic plasticity ; Enrichment ; environmental enrichment ; Exercise ; Housing ; Ischemia ; Laboratories ; Memory ; Neurogenesis ; neuroplasticity ; Neuroscience ; Physical fitness ; recovery ; Recovery of function ; Rehabilitation ; Stroke ; Synaptogenesis ; Translation ; Traumatic brain injury</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2018-07, Vol.12, p.135-135</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 McDonald, Hayward, Rosbergen, Jeffers and Corbett. 2018 McDonald, Hayward, Rosbergen, Jeffers and Corbett</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-a6f97fa54e96f1d52e0b4d52d86ffaebacb60ad3bc23c35092f5e6d9f41b8a3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-a6f97fa54e96f1d52e0b4d52d86ffaebacb60ad3bc23c35092f5e6d9f41b8a3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2299521597/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2299521597?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30050416$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Matthew W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, Kathryn S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosbergen, Ingrid C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffers, Matthew S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbett, Dale</creatorcontrib><title>Is Environmental Enrichment Ready for Clinical Application in Human Post-stroke Rehabilitation?</title><title>Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience</title><addtitle>Front Behav Neurosci</addtitle><description>Environmental enrichment (EE) has been widely used as a means to enhance brain plasticity mechanisms (e.g., increased dendritic branching, synaptogenesis, etc.) and improve behavioral function in both normal and brain-damaged animals. In spite of the demonstrated efficacy of EE for enhancing brain plasticity, it has largely remained a laboratory phenomenon with little translation to the clinical setting. Impediments to the implementation of enrichment as an intervention for human stroke rehabilitation and a lack of clinical translation can be attributed to a number of factors not limited to: (i) concerns that EE is actually the "normal state" for animals, whereas standard housing is a form of impoverishment; (ii) difficulty in standardizing EE conditions across clinical sites; (iii) the exact mechanisms underlying the beneficial actions of enrichment are largely correlative in nature; (iv) a lack of knowledge concerning what aspects of enrichment (e.g., exercise, socialization, cognitive stimulation) represent the critical or active ingredients for enhancing brain plasticity; and (v) the required "dose" of enrichment is unknown, since most laboratory studies employ continuous periods of enrichment, a condition that most clinicians view as impractical. In this review article, we summarize preclinical stroke recovery studies that have successfully utilized EE to promote functional recovery and highlight the potential underlying mechanisms. Subsequently, we discuss how EE is being applied in a clinical setting and address differences in preclinical and clinical EE work to date. It is argued that the best way forward is through the careful alignment of preclinical and clinical rehabilitation research. A combination of both approaches will allow research to fully address gaps in knowledge and facilitate the implementation of EE to the clinical setting.</description><subject>Angiogenesis</subject><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Brain injury</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>clinical translation</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Dendritic branching</subject><subject>Dendritic plasticity</subject><subject>Enrichment</subject><subject>environmental enrichment</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Neurogenesis</subject><subject>neuroplasticity</subject><subject>Neuroscience</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>recovery</subject><subject>Recovery of function</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Synaptogenesis</subject><subject>Translation</subject><subject>Traumatic brain injury</subject><issn>1662-5153</issn><issn>1662-5153</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUktv1DAQjhCIPuDOCUXiwiWLH7ETX0DVqo-VKlFVcLbGr66XxF7spFL_Pd7dtmo5zYznm2_sz19VfcJoQWkvvrmg7HpBEO4XCGHK3lTHmHPSMMzo2xf5UXWS8wYhTnjbva-OKEIMtZgfV3KV6_Nw71MMow0TDKVKXq93RX1rwTzULqZ6OfjgdemebbdDSSYfQ-1DfTWPEOqbmKcmTyn-sWVmDcoPftpjfnyo3jkYsv34GE-r3xfnv5ZXzfXPy9Xy7LrRrUBTA9yJzgFrreAOG0YsUm0JpufOgVWgFUdgqNKEasqQII5ZboRrseqBAj2tVgdeE2Ejt8mPkB5kBC_3BzHdSUiT14OVijlKrelbrrqyXAHrnMHI9dArbAQuXN8PXNtZjdboIkWC4RXp607wa3kX7yUvqlK-I_j6SJDi39nmSY4-azsMEGycsySo61kneiEK9Mt_0E2cUyhSSUKEYAQz0RUUOqB0ijkn654vg5HcOUHunSB3TpB7J5SRzy8f8Tzw9PX0H14cseQ</recordid><startdate>20180711</startdate><enddate>20180711</enddate><creator>McDonald, Matthew W</creator><creator>Hayward, Kathryn S</creator><creator>Rosbergen, Ingrid C M</creator><creator>Jeffers, Matthew S</creator><creator>Corbett, Dale</creator><general>Frontiers Research Foundation</general><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180711</creationdate><title>Is Environmental Enrichment Ready for Clinical Application in Human Post-stroke Rehabilitation?</title><author>McDonald, Matthew W ; Hayward, Kathryn S ; Rosbergen, Ingrid C M ; Jeffers, Matthew S ; Corbett, Dale</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-a6f97fa54e96f1d52e0b4d52d86ffaebacb60ad3bc23c35092f5e6d9f41b8a3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Angiogenesis</topic><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Brain injury</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>clinical translation</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Dendritic branching</topic><topic>Dendritic plasticity</topic><topic>Enrichment</topic><topic>environmental enrichment</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Neurogenesis</topic><topic>neuroplasticity</topic><topic>Neuroscience</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>recovery</topic><topic>Recovery of function</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Synaptogenesis</topic><topic>Translation</topic><topic>Traumatic brain injury</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Matthew W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, Kathryn S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosbergen, Ingrid C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffers, Matthew S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbett, Dale</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McDonald, Matthew W</au><au>Hayward, Kathryn S</au><au>Rosbergen, Ingrid C M</au><au>Jeffers, Matthew S</au><au>Corbett, Dale</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Environmental Enrichment Ready for Clinical Application in Human Post-stroke Rehabilitation?</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>Front Behav Neurosci</addtitle><date>2018-07-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>135</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>135-135</pages><issn>1662-5153</issn><eissn>1662-5153</eissn><abstract>Environmental enrichment (EE) has been widely used as a means to enhance brain plasticity mechanisms (e.g., increased dendritic branching, synaptogenesis, etc.) and improve behavioral function in both normal and brain-damaged animals. In spite of the demonstrated efficacy of EE for enhancing brain plasticity, it has largely remained a laboratory phenomenon with little translation to the clinical setting. Impediments to the implementation of enrichment as an intervention for human stroke rehabilitation and a lack of clinical translation can be attributed to a number of factors not limited to: (i) concerns that EE is actually the "normal state" for animals, whereas standard housing is a form of impoverishment; (ii) difficulty in standardizing EE conditions across clinical sites; (iii) the exact mechanisms underlying the beneficial actions of enrichment are largely correlative in nature; (iv) a lack of knowledge concerning what aspects of enrichment (e.g., exercise, socialization, cognitive stimulation) represent the critical or active ingredients for enhancing brain plasticity; and (v) the required "dose" of enrichment is unknown, since most laboratory studies employ continuous periods of enrichment, a condition that most clinicians view as impractical. In this review article, we summarize preclinical stroke recovery studies that have successfully utilized EE to promote functional recovery and highlight the potential underlying mechanisms. Subsequently, we discuss how EE is being applied in a clinical setting and address differences in preclinical and clinical EE work to date. It is argued that the best way forward is through the careful alignment of preclinical and clinical rehabilitation research. A combination of both approaches will allow research to fully address gaps in knowledge and facilitate the implementation of EE to the clinical setting.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Research Foundation</pub><pmid>30050416</pmid><doi>10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00135</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1662-5153 |
ispartof | Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2018-07, Vol.12, p.135-135 |
issn | 1662-5153 1662-5153 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b5f33ed846b7490ba57fd10f8a8b1d91 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central Free |
subjects | Angiogenesis Animal cognition Brain injury Brain research clinical translation Cognitive ability Dendritic branching Dendritic plasticity Enrichment environmental enrichment Exercise Housing Ischemia Laboratories Memory Neurogenesis neuroplasticity Neuroscience Physical fitness recovery Recovery of function Rehabilitation Stroke Synaptogenesis Translation Traumatic brain injury |
title | Is Environmental Enrichment Ready for Clinical Application in Human Post-stroke Rehabilitation? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T22%3A24%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Environmental%20Enrichment%20Ready%20for%20Clinical%20Application%20in%20Human%20Post-stroke%20Rehabilitation?&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20behavioral%20neuroscience&rft.au=McDonald,%20Matthew%20W&rft.date=2018-07-11&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=135-135&rft.issn=1662-5153&rft.eissn=1662-5153&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00135&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2299521597%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-a6f97fa54e96f1d52e0b4d52d86ffaebacb60ad3bc23c35092f5e6d9f41b8a3a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2299521597&rft_id=info:pmid/30050416&rfr_iscdi=true |