Integrating training in evidence-based medicine and shared decision-making: a qualitative study of junior doctors and consultants

• Published in: BMC medical education 2024-04, Vol.24 (1), p.418-418, Article 418
• Main Authors: Simons, Mary, Fisher, Georgia, Spanos, Samantha, Zurynski, Yvonne, Davidson, Andrew, Stoodley, Marcus, Rapport, Frances, Ellis, Louise A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Attitude of Health Personnel; Attitudes; Clinical decision making; Clinical medicine; Consultants; Decision Making; Decision-making, Group; Education; Educational Environment; Evidence-based medicine; Evidence-Based Medicine - education; Graduate medical education; Health sciences; Hospitals; Humans; Learning Theories; Medical education; Medical practice; Medical Staff, Hospital; Methods; Patient-centered care; Person-centered care; Physicians; Postgraduate medical education; Qualitative Research; Residents (Medicine); Shared decision-making; Teachers; Teaching; Teaching Methods; Training
• ISSN: 1472-6920; 1472-6920
• DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05409-y

In the past, evidence-based medicine (EBM) and shared decision-making (SDM) have been taught separately in health sciences and medical education. However, recognition is increasing of the importance of EBM training that includes SDM, whereby practitioners incorporate all steps of EBM, including person-centered decision-making using SDM. However, there are few empirical investigations into the benefits of training that integrates EBM and SDM (EBM-SDM) for junior doctors, and their influencing factors. This study aimed to explore how integrated EBM-SDM training can influence junior doctors' attitudes to and practice of EBM and SDM; to identify the barriers and facilitators associated with junior doctors' EBM-SDM learning and practice; and to examine how supervising consultants' attitudes and authority impact on junior doctors' opportunities for EBM-SDM learning and practice. We developed and ran a series of EBM-SDM courses for junior doctors within a private healthcare setting with protected time for educational activities. Using an emergent qualitative design, we first conducted pre- and post-course semi-structured interviews with 12 junior doctors and thematically analysed the influence of an EBM-SDM course on their attitudes and practice of both EBM and SDM, and the barriers and facilitators to the integrated learning and practice of EBM and SDM. Based on the responses of junior doctors, we then conducted interviews with ten of their supervising consultants and used a second thematic analysis to understand the influence of consultants on junior doctors' EBM-SDM learning and practice. Junior doctors appreciated EBM-SDM training that involved patient participation. After the training course, they intended to improve their skills in person-centered decision-making including SDM. However, junior doctors identified medical hierarchy, time factors, and lack of prior training as barriers to the learning and practice of EBM-SDM, whilst the private healthcare setting with protected learning time and supportive consultants were considered facilitators. Consultants had mixed attitudes towards EBM and SDM and varied perceptions of the role of junior doctors in either practice, both of which influenced the practice of junior doctors. These findings suggested that future medical education and research should include training that integrates EBM and SDM that acknowledges the complex environment in which this training must be put into practice, and considers strategies t