Implementation and Evaluation of COVIDCare@Home, a Family Medicine–Led Remote Monitoring Program for Patients With COVID-19: Multimethod Cross-sectional Study

• Published in: JMIR human factors 2022-06, Vol.9 (2), p.e35091-e35091
• Main Authors: Laur, Celia, Agarwal, Payal, Thai, Kelly, Kishimoto, Vanessa, Kelly, Shawna, Liang, Kyle, Bhatia, R Sacha, Bhattacharyya, Onil, Martin, Danielle, Mukerji, Geetha
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Advisors; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Cross-sectional studies; Data collection; Equity; Focus groups; Hospitals; Interviews; Medical records; Medical research; Medicine; Multimedia; Original Paper; Patients; Population; Primary care; Social exclusion; Software; Stakeholders
• ISSN: 2292-9495; 2292-9495
• DOI: 10.2196/35091

Background: COVIDCare@Home (CC@H) is a multifaceted, interprofessional team-based remote monitoring program led by family medicine for patients diagnosed with COVID-19, based at Women’s College Hospital (WCH), an ambulatory academic center in Toronto, Canada. CC@H offers virtual visits (phone and video) to address the clinical needs and broader social determinants of the health of patients during the acute phase of COVID-19 infection, including finding a primary care provider (PCP) and support for food insecurity. Objective: The objective of this evaluation is to understand the implementation and quality outcomes of CC@H within the Quadruple Aim framework of patient experience, provider experience, cost, and population health. Methods: This multimethod cross-sectional evaluation follows the Quadruple Aim framework to focus on implementation and service quality outcomes, including feasibility, adoption, safety, effectiveness, equity, and patient centeredness. These measures were explored using clinical and service utilization data, patient experience data (an online survey and a postdischarge questionnaire), provider experience data (surveys, interviews, and focus groups), and stakeholder interviews. Descriptive analysis was conducted for surveys and utilization data. Deductive analysis was conducted for interviews and focus groups, mapping to implementation and quality domains. The Ontario Marginalization Index (ON-Marg) measured the proportion of underserved patients accessing CC@H. Results: In total, 3412 visits were conducted in the first 8 months of the program (April 8-December 8, 2020) for 616 discrete patients, including 2114 (62.0%) visits with family physician staff/residents and 149 (4.4%) visits with social workers/mental health professionals. There was a median of 5 (IQR 4) visits per patient, with a median follow-up of 7 days (IQR 27). The net promoter score was 77. In addition, 144 (23.3%) of the patients were in the most marginalized populations based on the residential postal code (as per ON-Marg). Interviews with providers and stakeholders indicated that the program continued to adapt to meet the needs of patients and the health care system. Conclusions: Future remote monitoring should integrate support for addressing the social determinants of health and ensure patient-centered care through comprehensive care teams.