Practical Considerations for Engaging Youth With Lived And/or Living Experience of Substance Use as Youth Advisors and Co-Researchers

• Published in: Journal of participatory research methods 2022-10, Vol.3 (3)
• Main Authors: Turuba, Roxanne, Irving, Sarah, Turnbull, Haley, Amarasekera, Anurada, Howard, Amanda Madeleine, Brockmann, Violet, Tallon, Corinne, Mathias, Steve, Henderson, Joanna, Barbic, Skye
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 2688-0261; 2688-0261
• DOI: 10.35844/001c.38683

# Background Although youth participatory action research (YPAR) has been gaining popularity in the context of substance use research over the last decade, few studies report on how to apply these methods effectively with youth. To address this gap, this paper describes how we engaged youth as advisors and research assistants in a qualitative research study, as well as our key learnings and practical considerations for engaging youth with lived and/or living experience of substance use. # Methods We applied YPAR methods by partnering with youth from across BC who have lived and/or living experience of substance use to form a project youth advisory that co-designed the research protocol and materials. Three members became youth research assistants to facilitate focus groups and qualitative interviews with other youth with lived/living experience and peer support workers who work with youth, and support with data analysis and the dissemination of research findings. Mid- and end-point surveys were distributed to evaluate and improve our youth engagement methods over the course of the study. # Results The positive impact of engaging youth with lived/living experience over the course of the study was reflected by study participant responses to the quality and relevance of the focus group/interview questions and positive experiences with the youth facilitators. Youth partners also described developing new skills in research, group facilitation, leadership, communication, and professionalism. Lessons learned and considerations for engaging youth in substance use research included: an equitable hiring process; proper compensation; communication, transparency, and accountability; safe spaces; flexibility; and youth capacity building. # Conclusion This study demonstrates varying ways of engaging youth with lived and/or living experience of substance in research and how youth contributions can improve the relevance, quality, and validity of the research. Lessons learned from this study can be applied by other researchers considering engaging youth with lived/living experience or other marginalized populations.