Loading…
QoE Models for Adaptive Streaming: A Comprehensive Evaluation
Adaptive streaming has become a key technology for various multimedia services, such as online learning, mobile streaming, Internet TV, etc. However, because of throughput fluctuations, video quality may be dramatically varying during a streaming session. In addition, stalling events may occur when...
Saved in:
Published in: | Future internet 2022-05, Vol.14 (5), p.151 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-74f6fc7af92c8cbf830c257f7f4db884e181dd8eaee4099cb09feffe231e2ee53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-74f6fc7af92c8cbf830c257f7f4db884e181dd8eaee4099cb09feffe231e2ee53 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 151 |
container_title | Future internet |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Nguyen, Duc Pham Ngoc, Nam Thang, Truong Cong |
description | Adaptive streaming has become a key technology for various multimedia services, such as online learning, mobile streaming, Internet TV, etc. However, because of throughput fluctuations, video quality may be dramatically varying during a streaming session. In addition, stalling events may occur when segments do not reach the user device before their playback deadlines. It is well-known that quality variations and stalling events cause negative impacts on Quality of Experience (QoE). Therefore, a main challenge in adaptive streaming is how to evaluate the QoE of streaming sessions taking into account the influences of these factors. Thus far, many models have been proposed to tackle this issue. In addition, a lot of QoE databases have been publicly available. However, there have been no extensive evaluations of existing models using various databases. To fill this gap, in this study, we conduct an extensive evaluation of thirteen models on twelve databases with different characteristics of viewing devices, codecs, and session durations. Through experiment results, important findings are provided with regard to QoE prediction of streaming sessions. In addition, some suggestions on the effective employment of QoE models are presented. The findings and suggestions are expected to be useful for researchers and service providers to make QoE assessments and improvements of streaming solutions in adaptive streaming. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/fi14050151 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b72cfad0e3d64ac49aecd45dbc05082e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b72cfad0e3d64ac49aecd45dbc05082e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2670152501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-74f6fc7af92c8cbf830c257f7f4db884e181dd8eaee4099cb09feffe231e2ee53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9LAzEQxYMoWGovfoIFb8Jq_m42godSqhYqIuo5ZJNJ3bLdrMm24Ld3a0Wdywwzj_eGH0LnBF8xpvC1rwnHAhNBjtCIKKVyoTA7_jefoklKazwUU7Qo5AjdPod59hgcNCnzIWZTZ7q-3kH20kcwm7pd3WTTbBY2XYR3aNP-NN-ZZmv6OrRn6MSbJsHkp4_R2938dfaQL5_uF7PpMrdMyD6X3BfeSuMVtaWtfMmwpUJ66bmrypIDKYlzJRgAjpWyFVYevAfKCFAAwcZocfB1wax1F-uNiZ86mFp_L0JcaRP72jagK0mtNw4DcwU3lisD1nHhKjugKSkMXhcHry6Gjy2kXq_DNrbD-5oWcqBHB4SD6vKgsjGkFMH_phKs97T1H232Bc9Bcao</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2670152501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>QoE Models for Adaptive Streaming: A Comprehensive Evaluation</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Nguyen, Duc ; Pham Ngoc, Nam ; Thang, Truong Cong</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Duc ; Pham Ngoc, Nam ; Thang, Truong Cong</creatorcontrib><description>Adaptive streaming has become a key technology for various multimedia services, such as online learning, mobile streaming, Internet TV, etc. However, because of throughput fluctuations, video quality may be dramatically varying during a streaming session. In addition, stalling events may occur when segments do not reach the user device before their playback deadlines. It is well-known that quality variations and stalling events cause negative impacts on Quality of Experience (QoE). Therefore, a main challenge in adaptive streaming is how to evaluate the QoE of streaming sessions taking into account the influences of these factors. Thus far, many models have been proposed to tackle this issue. In addition, a lot of QoE databases have been publicly available. However, there have been no extensive evaluations of existing models using various databases. To fill this gap, in this study, we conduct an extensive evaluation of thirteen models on twelve databases with different characteristics of viewing devices, codecs, and session durations. Through experiment results, important findings are provided with regard to QoE prediction of streaming sessions. In addition, some suggestions on the effective employment of QoE models are presented. The findings and suggestions are expected to be useful for researchers and service providers to make QoE assessments and improvements of streaming solutions in adaptive streaming.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1999-5903</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1999-5903</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/fi14050151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>adaptive streaming ; Codec ; Distance learning ; Evaluation ; Internet ; Machine learning ; Multimedia ; multimedia services ; Neural networks ; quality model ; quality of experience ; Stalling</subject><ispartof>Future internet, 2022-05, Vol.14 (5), p.151</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-74f6fc7af92c8cbf830c257f7f4db884e181dd8eaee4099cb09feffe231e2ee53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-74f6fc7af92c8cbf830c257f7f4db884e181dd8eaee4099cb09feffe231e2ee53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1122-0650</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2670152501/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2670152501?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11687,25752,27923,27924,36059,37011,44362,44589,74766,74997</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Duc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pham Ngoc, Nam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thang, Truong Cong</creatorcontrib><title>QoE Models for Adaptive Streaming: A Comprehensive Evaluation</title><title>Future internet</title><description>Adaptive streaming has become a key technology for various multimedia services, such as online learning, mobile streaming, Internet TV, etc. However, because of throughput fluctuations, video quality may be dramatically varying during a streaming session. In addition, stalling events may occur when segments do not reach the user device before their playback deadlines. It is well-known that quality variations and stalling events cause negative impacts on Quality of Experience (QoE). Therefore, a main challenge in adaptive streaming is how to evaluate the QoE of streaming sessions taking into account the influences of these factors. Thus far, many models have been proposed to tackle this issue. In addition, a lot of QoE databases have been publicly available. However, there have been no extensive evaluations of existing models using various databases. To fill this gap, in this study, we conduct an extensive evaluation of thirteen models on twelve databases with different characteristics of viewing devices, codecs, and session durations. Through experiment results, important findings are provided with regard to QoE prediction of streaming sessions. In addition, some suggestions on the effective employment of QoE models are presented. The findings and suggestions are expected to be useful for researchers and service providers to make QoE assessments and improvements of streaming solutions in adaptive streaming.</description><subject>adaptive streaming</subject><subject>Codec</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Multimedia</subject><subject>multimedia services</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>quality model</subject><subject>quality of experience</subject><subject>Stalling</subject><issn>1999-5903</issn><issn>1999-5903</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9LAzEQxYMoWGovfoIFb8Jq_m42godSqhYqIuo5ZJNJ3bLdrMm24Ld3a0Wdywwzj_eGH0LnBF8xpvC1rwnHAhNBjtCIKKVyoTA7_jefoklKazwUU7Qo5AjdPod59hgcNCnzIWZTZ7q-3kH20kcwm7pd3WTTbBY2XYR3aNP-NN-ZZmv6OrRn6MSbJsHkp4_R2938dfaQL5_uF7PpMrdMyD6X3BfeSuMVtaWtfMmwpUJ66bmrypIDKYlzJRgAjpWyFVYevAfKCFAAwcZocfB1wax1F-uNiZ86mFp_L0JcaRP72jagK0mtNw4DcwU3lisD1nHhKjugKSkMXhcHry6Gjy2kXq_DNrbD-5oWcqBHB4SD6vKgsjGkFMH_phKs97T1H232Bc9Bcao</recordid><startdate>20220513</startdate><enddate>20220513</enddate><creator>Nguyen, Duc</creator><creator>Pham Ngoc, Nam</creator><creator>Thang, Truong Cong</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1122-0650</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220513</creationdate><title>QoE Models for Adaptive Streaming: A Comprehensive Evaluation</title><author>Nguyen, Duc ; Pham Ngoc, Nam ; Thang, Truong Cong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-74f6fc7af92c8cbf830c257f7f4db884e181dd8eaee4099cb09feffe231e2ee53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>adaptive streaming</topic><topic>Codec</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Multimedia</topic><topic>multimedia services</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>quality model</topic><topic>quality of experience</topic><topic>Stalling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Duc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pham Ngoc, Nam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thang, Truong Cong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Future internet</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen, Duc</au><au>Pham Ngoc, Nam</au><au>Thang, Truong Cong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>QoE Models for Adaptive Streaming: A Comprehensive Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Future internet</jtitle><date>2022-05-13</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>151</spage><pages>151-</pages><issn>1999-5903</issn><eissn>1999-5903</eissn><abstract>Adaptive streaming has become a key technology for various multimedia services, such as online learning, mobile streaming, Internet TV, etc. However, because of throughput fluctuations, video quality may be dramatically varying during a streaming session. In addition, stalling events may occur when segments do not reach the user device before their playback deadlines. It is well-known that quality variations and stalling events cause negative impacts on Quality of Experience (QoE). Therefore, a main challenge in adaptive streaming is how to evaluate the QoE of streaming sessions taking into account the influences of these factors. Thus far, many models have been proposed to tackle this issue. In addition, a lot of QoE databases have been publicly available. However, there have been no extensive evaluations of existing models using various databases. To fill this gap, in this study, we conduct an extensive evaluation of thirteen models on twelve databases with different characteristics of viewing devices, codecs, and session durations. Through experiment results, important findings are provided with regard to QoE prediction of streaming sessions. In addition, some suggestions on the effective employment of QoE models are presented. The findings and suggestions are expected to be useful for researchers and service providers to make QoE assessments and improvements of streaming solutions in adaptive streaming.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/fi14050151</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1122-0650</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1999-5903 |
ispartof | Future internet, 2022-05, Vol.14 (5), p.151 |
issn | 1999-5903 1999-5903 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b72cfad0e3d64ac49aecd45dbc05082e |
source | ABI/INFORM Global; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | adaptive streaming Codec Distance learning Evaluation Internet Machine learning Multimedia multimedia services Neural networks quality model quality of experience Stalling |
title | QoE Models for Adaptive Streaming: A Comprehensive Evaluation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A48%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=QoE%20Models%20for%20Adaptive%20Streaming:%20A%20Comprehensive%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=Future%20internet&rft.au=Nguyen,%20Duc&rft.date=2022-05-13&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=151&rft.pages=151-&rft.issn=1999-5903&rft.eissn=1999-5903&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/fi14050151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2670152501%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-74f6fc7af92c8cbf830c257f7f4db884e181dd8eaee4099cb09feffe231e2ee53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2670152501&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |