Loading…

QoE Models for Adaptive Streaming: A Comprehensive Evaluation

Adaptive streaming has become a key technology for various multimedia services, such as online learning, mobile streaming, Internet TV, etc. However, because of throughput fluctuations, video quality may be dramatically varying during a streaming session. In addition, stalling events may occur when...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Future internet 2022-05, Vol.14 (5), p.151
Main Authors: Nguyen, Duc, Pham Ngoc, Nam, Thang, Truong Cong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-74f6fc7af92c8cbf830c257f7f4db884e181dd8eaee4099cb09feffe231e2ee53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-74f6fc7af92c8cbf830c257f7f4db884e181dd8eaee4099cb09feffe231e2ee53
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 151
container_title Future internet
container_volume 14
creator Nguyen, Duc
Pham Ngoc, Nam
Thang, Truong Cong
description Adaptive streaming has become a key technology for various multimedia services, such as online learning, mobile streaming, Internet TV, etc. However, because of throughput fluctuations, video quality may be dramatically varying during a streaming session. In addition, stalling events may occur when segments do not reach the user device before their playback deadlines. It is well-known that quality variations and stalling events cause negative impacts on Quality of Experience (QoE). Therefore, a main challenge in adaptive streaming is how to evaluate the QoE of streaming sessions taking into account the influences of these factors. Thus far, many models have been proposed to tackle this issue. In addition, a lot of QoE databases have been publicly available. However, there have been no extensive evaluations of existing models using various databases. To fill this gap, in this study, we conduct an extensive evaluation of thirteen models on twelve databases with different characteristics of viewing devices, codecs, and session durations. Through experiment results, important findings are provided with regard to QoE prediction of streaming sessions. In addition, some suggestions on the effective employment of QoE models are presented. The findings and suggestions are expected to be useful for researchers and service providers to make QoE assessments and improvements of streaming solutions in adaptive streaming.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/fi14050151
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b72cfad0e3d64ac49aecd45dbc05082e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b72cfad0e3d64ac49aecd45dbc05082e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2670152501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-74f6fc7af92c8cbf830c257f7f4db884e181dd8eaee4099cb09feffe231e2ee53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9LAzEQxYMoWGovfoIFb8Jq_m42godSqhYqIuo5ZJNJ3bLdrMm24Ld3a0Wdywwzj_eGH0LnBF8xpvC1rwnHAhNBjtCIKKVyoTA7_jefoklKazwUU7Qo5AjdPod59hgcNCnzIWZTZ7q-3kH20kcwm7pd3WTTbBY2XYR3aNP-NN-ZZmv6OrRn6MSbJsHkp4_R2938dfaQL5_uF7PpMrdMyD6X3BfeSuMVtaWtfMmwpUJ66bmrypIDKYlzJRgAjpWyFVYevAfKCFAAwcZocfB1wax1F-uNiZ86mFp_L0JcaRP72jagK0mtNw4DcwU3lisD1nHhKjugKSkMXhcHry6Gjy2kXq_DNrbD-5oWcqBHB4SD6vKgsjGkFMH_phKs97T1H232Bc9Bcao</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2670152501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>QoE Models for Adaptive Streaming: A Comprehensive Evaluation</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Nguyen, Duc ; Pham Ngoc, Nam ; Thang, Truong Cong</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Duc ; Pham Ngoc, Nam ; Thang, Truong Cong</creatorcontrib><description>Adaptive streaming has become a key technology for various multimedia services, such as online learning, mobile streaming, Internet TV, etc. However, because of throughput fluctuations, video quality may be dramatically varying during a streaming session. In addition, stalling events may occur when segments do not reach the user device before their playback deadlines. It is well-known that quality variations and stalling events cause negative impacts on Quality of Experience (QoE). Therefore, a main challenge in adaptive streaming is how to evaluate the QoE of streaming sessions taking into account the influences of these factors. Thus far, many models have been proposed to tackle this issue. In addition, a lot of QoE databases have been publicly available. However, there have been no extensive evaluations of existing models using various databases. To fill this gap, in this study, we conduct an extensive evaluation of thirteen models on twelve databases with different characteristics of viewing devices, codecs, and session durations. Through experiment results, important findings are provided with regard to QoE prediction of streaming sessions. In addition, some suggestions on the effective employment of QoE models are presented. The findings and suggestions are expected to be useful for researchers and service providers to make QoE assessments and improvements of streaming solutions in adaptive streaming.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1999-5903</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1999-5903</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/fi14050151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>adaptive streaming ; Codec ; Distance learning ; Evaluation ; Internet ; Machine learning ; Multimedia ; multimedia services ; Neural networks ; quality model ; quality of experience ; Stalling</subject><ispartof>Future internet, 2022-05, Vol.14 (5), p.151</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-74f6fc7af92c8cbf830c257f7f4db884e181dd8eaee4099cb09feffe231e2ee53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-74f6fc7af92c8cbf830c257f7f4db884e181dd8eaee4099cb09feffe231e2ee53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1122-0650</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2670152501/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2670152501?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11687,25752,27923,27924,36059,37011,44362,44589,74766,74997</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Duc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pham Ngoc, Nam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thang, Truong Cong</creatorcontrib><title>QoE Models for Adaptive Streaming: A Comprehensive Evaluation</title><title>Future internet</title><description>Adaptive streaming has become a key technology for various multimedia services, such as online learning, mobile streaming, Internet TV, etc. However, because of throughput fluctuations, video quality may be dramatically varying during a streaming session. In addition, stalling events may occur when segments do not reach the user device before their playback deadlines. It is well-known that quality variations and stalling events cause negative impacts on Quality of Experience (QoE). Therefore, a main challenge in adaptive streaming is how to evaluate the QoE of streaming sessions taking into account the influences of these factors. Thus far, many models have been proposed to tackle this issue. In addition, a lot of QoE databases have been publicly available. However, there have been no extensive evaluations of existing models using various databases. To fill this gap, in this study, we conduct an extensive evaluation of thirteen models on twelve databases with different characteristics of viewing devices, codecs, and session durations. Through experiment results, important findings are provided with regard to QoE prediction of streaming sessions. In addition, some suggestions on the effective employment of QoE models are presented. The findings and suggestions are expected to be useful for researchers and service providers to make QoE assessments and improvements of streaming solutions in adaptive streaming.</description><subject>adaptive streaming</subject><subject>Codec</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Multimedia</subject><subject>multimedia services</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>quality model</subject><subject>quality of experience</subject><subject>Stalling</subject><issn>1999-5903</issn><issn>1999-5903</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9LAzEQxYMoWGovfoIFb8Jq_m42godSqhYqIuo5ZJNJ3bLdrMm24Ld3a0Wdywwzj_eGH0LnBF8xpvC1rwnHAhNBjtCIKKVyoTA7_jefoklKazwUU7Qo5AjdPod59hgcNCnzIWZTZ7q-3kH20kcwm7pd3WTTbBY2XYR3aNP-NN-ZZmv6OrRn6MSbJsHkp4_R2938dfaQL5_uF7PpMrdMyD6X3BfeSuMVtaWtfMmwpUJ66bmrypIDKYlzJRgAjpWyFVYevAfKCFAAwcZocfB1wax1F-uNiZ86mFp_L0JcaRP72jagK0mtNw4DcwU3lisD1nHhKjugKSkMXhcHry6Gjy2kXq_DNrbD-5oWcqBHB4SD6vKgsjGkFMH_phKs97T1H232Bc9Bcao</recordid><startdate>20220513</startdate><enddate>20220513</enddate><creator>Nguyen, Duc</creator><creator>Pham Ngoc, Nam</creator><creator>Thang, Truong Cong</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1122-0650</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220513</creationdate><title>QoE Models for Adaptive Streaming: A Comprehensive Evaluation</title><author>Nguyen, Duc ; Pham Ngoc, Nam ; Thang, Truong Cong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-74f6fc7af92c8cbf830c257f7f4db884e181dd8eaee4099cb09feffe231e2ee53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>adaptive streaming</topic><topic>Codec</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Multimedia</topic><topic>multimedia services</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>quality model</topic><topic>quality of experience</topic><topic>Stalling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Duc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pham Ngoc, Nam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thang, Truong Cong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Future internet</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen, Duc</au><au>Pham Ngoc, Nam</au><au>Thang, Truong Cong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>QoE Models for Adaptive Streaming: A Comprehensive Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Future internet</jtitle><date>2022-05-13</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>151</spage><pages>151-</pages><issn>1999-5903</issn><eissn>1999-5903</eissn><abstract>Adaptive streaming has become a key technology for various multimedia services, such as online learning, mobile streaming, Internet TV, etc. However, because of throughput fluctuations, video quality may be dramatically varying during a streaming session. In addition, stalling events may occur when segments do not reach the user device before their playback deadlines. It is well-known that quality variations and stalling events cause negative impacts on Quality of Experience (QoE). Therefore, a main challenge in adaptive streaming is how to evaluate the QoE of streaming sessions taking into account the influences of these factors. Thus far, many models have been proposed to tackle this issue. In addition, a lot of QoE databases have been publicly available. However, there have been no extensive evaluations of existing models using various databases. To fill this gap, in this study, we conduct an extensive evaluation of thirteen models on twelve databases with different characteristics of viewing devices, codecs, and session durations. Through experiment results, important findings are provided with regard to QoE prediction of streaming sessions. In addition, some suggestions on the effective employment of QoE models are presented. The findings and suggestions are expected to be useful for researchers and service providers to make QoE assessments and improvements of streaming solutions in adaptive streaming.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/fi14050151</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1122-0650</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1999-5903
ispartof Future internet, 2022-05, Vol.14 (5), p.151
issn 1999-5903
1999-5903
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b72cfad0e3d64ac49aecd45dbc05082e
source ABI/INFORM Global; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects adaptive streaming
Codec
Distance learning
Evaluation
Internet
Machine learning
Multimedia
multimedia services
Neural networks
quality model
quality of experience
Stalling
title QoE Models for Adaptive Streaming: A Comprehensive Evaluation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A48%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=QoE%20Models%20for%20Adaptive%20Streaming:%20A%20Comprehensive%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=Future%20internet&rft.au=Nguyen,%20Duc&rft.date=2022-05-13&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=151&rft.pages=151-&rft.issn=1999-5903&rft.eissn=1999-5903&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/fi14050151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2670152501%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-74f6fc7af92c8cbf830c257f7f4db884e181dd8eaee4099cb09feffe231e2ee53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2670152501&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true