Loading…

Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in tumor size: Evaluation of equality in advanced cervical cancer patients

Background: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide. In Indonesia, cervical cancer is the second most frequent disease related to cancer. Based on staging system criteria, clinical findings are the main criteria to determine cervical cancer stage. In the revised versio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of medical ultrasound 2022-01, Vol.30 (1), p.41-44
Main Authors: Purbadi, Sigit, Novianti, Lisa, Tanamas, Gregorius, Siregar, Trifonia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461s-1f8d92e5d23dc1e813a46fe429439f21fe726d682e4234f6e92bedd2c37e893b3
container_end_page 44
container_issue 1
container_start_page 41
container_title Journal of medical ultrasound
container_volume 30
creator Purbadi, Sigit
Novianti, Lisa
Tanamas, Gregorius
Siregar, Trifonia
description Background: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide. In Indonesia, cervical cancer is the second most frequent disease related to cancer. Based on staging system criteria, clinical findings are the main criteria to determine cervical cancer stage. In the revised version of the Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system criteria for cervical cancer, radiological examination for pretreatment evaluation in gynecological malignancies has been used in routine modalities. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (USG) are commonly used in the presurgery determination of tumor size and the follow-up of cervical cancer patients. Tumor size determines cancer stage which influences the treatment and the survival. The equality of diagnostic accuracy was compared for MRI and ultrasound in this study for tumor size evaluation of cervical cancer patients. Methods: This was a prospective study including 195 patients with cervical cancer Stage IIIB in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital from 2016 to 2018. The tumor sizes and stages of cervical cancer were assessed on MRI and ultrasound. This study evaluated diagnostic accuracy between MRI and US. The sensitivity and specificity were compared by using McNemar test. Results: The result of the study showed that from 195 patients, 76 patients fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. There is a significant difference in assessing tumor size in cervical cancer patients between ultrasound and MRI (mean, 1.72 cm; P < 0.0001). US had 82% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 82% diagnostic accuracy (P = 0.003, McNemar test). Conclusion: Ultrasound examination showed a comparable accuracy to MRI for assessing tumor size in cervical cancer. US is an affordable and feasible diagnostic staging tool with accuracy comparable to MRI.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/JMU.JMU_2_21
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b809600666514329a672b82e83325de2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b809600666514329a672b82e83325de2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2655107526</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461s-1f8d92e5d23dc1e813a46fe429439f21fe726d682e4234f6e92bedd2c37e893b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks1uEzEURkcIRENhxxp5yYIU-_onYySQUFSgqIgNXVuOfSd164xTeyZReQFeG6dpKiqxsCx_Pjr2tW_TvGb0RDDK33__cXFShwED7EkzAWAwZVLC02ZCNeipEoIdNS9KuaJUKK3F8-aIS6GkojBp_szTam1zKKknqSMru-xxCI5krIntHZJQs9Avie09GeOQbd1Iy2zXl7ck9GQYVymTEn7jB3K6sXG0Q9i78Ga0MQx3lPWbncwTh3kTnI3E7daZrCuO_VBeNs86Gwu-up-Pm4svp7_m36bnP7-ezT-fT51QrExZ13oNKD1w7xi2jFuhOhSgBdcdsA5noLxqoUZcdAo1LNB7cHyGreYLftyc7b0-2SuzzrW6fGuSDeYuSHlpbK4PENEsWqoVpUopyQQHbdUMFtXccg7SI1TXp71rPS5W6F2tI9v4SPp4pw-XZpk2RlNOuWRV8PZekNPNiGUwq1Acxmh7TGMxoKRkdCZBVfTdHnU5lZKxeziGUbPrA7PrgUMfVPzNv1d7gA8fX4GPe2Cb4oC5XMdxi9lU9rpP2_9Ka2IO3cL_Avyxxt8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2655107526</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in tumor size: Evaluation of equality in advanced cervical cancer patients</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Purbadi, Sigit ; Novianti, Lisa ; Tanamas, Gregorius ; Siregar, Trifonia</creator><creatorcontrib>Purbadi, Sigit ; Novianti, Lisa ; Tanamas, Gregorius ; Siregar, Trifonia</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide. In Indonesia, cervical cancer is the second most frequent disease related to cancer. Based on staging system criteria, clinical findings are the main criteria to determine cervical cancer stage. In the revised version of the Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system criteria for cervical cancer, radiological examination for pretreatment evaluation in gynecological malignancies has been used in routine modalities. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (USG) are commonly used in the presurgery determination of tumor size and the follow-up of cervical cancer patients. Tumor size determines cancer stage which influences the treatment and the survival. The equality of diagnostic accuracy was compared for MRI and ultrasound in this study for tumor size evaluation of cervical cancer patients. Methods: This was a prospective study including 195 patients with cervical cancer Stage IIIB in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital from 2016 to 2018. The tumor sizes and stages of cervical cancer were assessed on MRI and ultrasound. This study evaluated diagnostic accuracy between MRI and US. The sensitivity and specificity were compared by using McNemar test. Results: The result of the study showed that from 195 patients, 76 patients fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. There is a significant difference in assessing tumor size in cervical cancer patients between ultrasound and MRI (mean, 1.72 cm; P &lt; 0.0001). US had 82% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 82% diagnostic accuracy (P = 0.003, McNemar test). Conclusion: Ultrasound examination showed a comparable accuracy to MRI for assessing tumor size in cervical cancer. US is an affordable and feasible diagnostic staging tool with accuracy comparable to MRI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0929-6441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2212-1552</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_2_21</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35465602</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>cervical cancer ; imaging modality ; magnetic resonance imaging ; Original ; staging ; ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical ultrasound, 2022-01, Vol.30 (1), p.41-44</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Medical Ultrasound.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Medical Ultrasound 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461s-1f8d92e5d23dc1e813a46fe429439f21fe726d682e4234f6e92bedd2c37e893b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9030351/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9030351/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35465602$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Purbadi, Sigit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novianti, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanamas, Gregorius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siregar, Trifonia</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in tumor size: Evaluation of equality in advanced cervical cancer patients</title><title>Journal of medical ultrasound</title><addtitle>J Med Ultrasound</addtitle><description>Background: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide. In Indonesia, cervical cancer is the second most frequent disease related to cancer. Based on staging system criteria, clinical findings are the main criteria to determine cervical cancer stage. In the revised version of the Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system criteria for cervical cancer, radiological examination for pretreatment evaluation in gynecological malignancies has been used in routine modalities. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (USG) are commonly used in the presurgery determination of tumor size and the follow-up of cervical cancer patients. Tumor size determines cancer stage which influences the treatment and the survival. The equality of diagnostic accuracy was compared for MRI and ultrasound in this study for tumor size evaluation of cervical cancer patients. Methods: This was a prospective study including 195 patients with cervical cancer Stage IIIB in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital from 2016 to 2018. The tumor sizes and stages of cervical cancer were assessed on MRI and ultrasound. This study evaluated diagnostic accuracy between MRI and US. The sensitivity and specificity were compared by using McNemar test. Results: The result of the study showed that from 195 patients, 76 patients fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. There is a significant difference in assessing tumor size in cervical cancer patients between ultrasound and MRI (mean, 1.72 cm; P &lt; 0.0001). US had 82% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 82% diagnostic accuracy (P = 0.003, McNemar test). Conclusion: Ultrasound examination showed a comparable accuracy to MRI for assessing tumor size in cervical cancer. US is an affordable and feasible diagnostic staging tool with accuracy comparable to MRI.</description><subject>cervical cancer</subject><subject>imaging modality</subject><subject>magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>staging</subject><subject>ultrasonography</subject><issn>0929-6441</issn><issn>2212-1552</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptks1uEzEURkcIRENhxxp5yYIU-_onYySQUFSgqIgNXVuOfSd164xTeyZReQFeG6dpKiqxsCx_Pjr2tW_TvGb0RDDK33__cXFShwED7EkzAWAwZVLC02ZCNeipEoIdNS9KuaJUKK3F8-aIS6GkojBp_szTam1zKKknqSMru-xxCI5krIntHZJQs9Avie09GeOQbd1Iy2zXl7ck9GQYVymTEn7jB3K6sXG0Q9i78Ga0MQx3lPWbncwTh3kTnI3E7daZrCuO_VBeNs86Gwu-up-Pm4svp7_m36bnP7-ezT-fT51QrExZ13oNKD1w7xi2jFuhOhSgBdcdsA5noLxqoUZcdAo1LNB7cHyGreYLftyc7b0-2SuzzrW6fGuSDeYuSHlpbK4PENEsWqoVpUopyQQHbdUMFtXccg7SI1TXp71rPS5W6F2tI9v4SPp4pw-XZpk2RlNOuWRV8PZekNPNiGUwq1Acxmh7TGMxoKRkdCZBVfTdHnU5lZKxeziGUbPrA7PrgUMfVPzNv1d7gA8fX4GPe2Cb4oC5XMdxi9lU9rpP2_9Ka2IO3cL_Avyxxt8</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Purbadi, Sigit</creator><creator>Novianti, Lisa</creator><creator>Tanamas, Gregorius</creator><creator>Siregar, Trifonia</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in tumor size: Evaluation of equality in advanced cervical cancer patients</title><author>Purbadi, Sigit ; Novianti, Lisa ; Tanamas, Gregorius ; Siregar, Trifonia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461s-1f8d92e5d23dc1e813a46fe429439f21fe726d682e4234f6e92bedd2c37e893b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>cervical cancer</topic><topic>imaging modality</topic><topic>magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>staging</topic><topic>ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Purbadi, Sigit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novianti, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanamas, Gregorius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siregar, Trifonia</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical ultrasound</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Purbadi, Sigit</au><au>Novianti, Lisa</au><au>Tanamas, Gregorius</au><au>Siregar, Trifonia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in tumor size: Evaluation of equality in advanced cervical cancer patients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical ultrasound</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Ultrasound</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>44</epage><pages>41-44</pages><issn>0929-6441</issn><eissn>2212-1552</eissn><abstract>Background: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide. In Indonesia, cervical cancer is the second most frequent disease related to cancer. Based on staging system criteria, clinical findings are the main criteria to determine cervical cancer stage. In the revised version of the Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system criteria for cervical cancer, radiological examination for pretreatment evaluation in gynecological malignancies has been used in routine modalities. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (USG) are commonly used in the presurgery determination of tumor size and the follow-up of cervical cancer patients. Tumor size determines cancer stage which influences the treatment and the survival. The equality of diagnostic accuracy was compared for MRI and ultrasound in this study for tumor size evaluation of cervical cancer patients. Methods: This was a prospective study including 195 patients with cervical cancer Stage IIIB in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital from 2016 to 2018. The tumor sizes and stages of cervical cancer were assessed on MRI and ultrasound. This study evaluated diagnostic accuracy between MRI and US. The sensitivity and specificity were compared by using McNemar test. Results: The result of the study showed that from 195 patients, 76 patients fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. There is a significant difference in assessing tumor size in cervical cancer patients between ultrasound and MRI (mean, 1.72 cm; P &lt; 0.0001). US had 82% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 82% diagnostic accuracy (P = 0.003, McNemar test). Conclusion: Ultrasound examination showed a comparable accuracy to MRI for assessing tumor size in cervical cancer. US is an affordable and feasible diagnostic staging tool with accuracy comparable to MRI.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>35465602</pmid><doi>10.4103/JMU.JMU_2_21</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0929-6441
ispartof Journal of medical ultrasound, 2022-01, Vol.30 (1), p.41-44
issn 0929-6441
2212-1552
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b809600666514329a672b82e83325de2
source PubMed Central Free
subjects cervical cancer
imaging modality
magnetic resonance imaging
Original
staging
ultrasonography
title Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in tumor size: Evaluation of equality in advanced cervical cancer patients
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T14%3A43%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20and%20ultrasonography%20in%20tumor%20size:%20Evaluation%20of%20equality%20in%20advanced%20cervical%20cancer%20patients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20ultrasound&rft.au=Purbadi,%20Sigit&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=44&rft.pages=41-44&rft.issn=0929-6441&rft.eissn=2212-1552&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/JMU.JMU_2_21&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2655107526%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461s-1f8d92e5d23dc1e813a46fe429439f21fe726d682e4234f6e92bedd2c37e893b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2655107526&rft_id=info:pmid/35465602&rfr_iscdi=true