Neural Mechanisms of the Contextual Interference Effect and Parameter Similarity on Motor Learning in Older Adults: An EEG Study

• Published in: Frontiers in aging neuroscience 2020-06, Vol.12, p.173-173
• Main Authors: Beik, Meysam, Taheri, Hamidreza, Saberi Kakhki, Alireza, Ghoshuni, Majid
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Algorithms; Brain research; Cognitive style; contextual interference effect; EEG; Electroencephalography; Frontal lobe; Hypotheses; Intertrial interval; Medical imaging; motor learning; Motor skill learning; Neuroscience; older adults; Older people; optimal error; parameter similarity; Sensorimotor system; Transcranial magnetic stimulation
• ISSN: 1663-4365; 1663-4365
• DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00173

The purpose of this study was to investigate the neural mechanisms of the contextual interference effect and parameter similarity on motor learning in older adults. Sixty older adults (mean age, 67.68 ± 3.95 years) were randomly assigned into one of six experimental groups: blocked-similar, algorithm-similar, random-similar, blocked-dissimilar, algorithm-dissimilar, and random-dissimilar. Algorithm practice was a hybrid practice schedule (a combination of blocked, serial, and random practice) that switching between practice schedules was based on error trial number, ≤ 33%. The sequential motor task was used to record the absolute timing for the absolute timing goals (ATGs). In similar conditions, the participants’ performance was near ATGs (1350, 1500, 1650 ms) and in dissimilar conditions, they performed far ATGs (1050, 1500, 1950 ms) with the same spatial sequence for all groups. EEG signals were continuously collected during the acquisition phase and delayed retention. Data were analyzed in different bands (alpha and beta) and scalp locations (frontal: Fp1, Fp2, F3, F4; central: C3, C4; and parietal: P3, P4) with repeated measures on the last factor. The analyses were included motor preparation and intertrial interval (motor evaluation) periods in the first six blocks and the last six blocks, respectively. The results of behavioural data indicated that algorithm practice resulted in medium error related to classic blocked and random practice during the acquisition, however, algorithm practice outperformed the classic blocked and random practice in delayed retention test. The results of EEG data demonstrated that algorithm practice, due to optimal activity in frontal lobe (medium alpha and beta activation at prefrontal), resulted in increased activity of sensorimotor areas (high alpha activation at C3 and P4) in older adults. Also, EEG data showed that the similar conditions could affect intertrial interval period (medium alpha and beta activation in frontal in the last six-block), while the dissimilar conditions could affect motor preparation period (medium alpha and beta activation in frontal in the first six-block). In conclusion, algorithm practice can enhance motor learning and optimize the efficiency of brain activity, resulting in the achievement of a desirable goal in older adults.