Online Information of Vaccines: Information Quality, Not Only Privacy, Is an Ethical Responsibility of Search Engines

• Published in: Frontiers in medicine 2020-08, Vol.7, p.400-400
• Main Authors: Ghezzi, Pietro, Bannister, Peter G., Casino, Gonzalo, Catalani, Alessia, Goldman, Michel, Morley, Jessica, Neunez, Marie, Prados-Bo, Andreu, Smeesters, Pierre R., Taddeo, Mariarosaria, Vanzolini, Tania, Floridi, Luciano
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: health information; information quality; Medicine; misinformation; privacy; search engines; vaccines
• ISSN: 2296-858X; 2296-858X
• DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00400

The fact that Internet companies may record our personal data and track our online behavior for commercial or political purpose has emphasized aspects related to online privacy. This has also led to the development of search engines that promise no tracking and privacy. Search engines also have a major role in spreading low-quality health information such as that of anti-vaccine websites. This study investigates the relationship between search engines' approach to privacy and the scientific quality of the information they return. We analyzed the first 30 webpages returned searching “vaccines autism” in English, Spanish, Italian, and French. The results show that not only “alternative” search engines (Duckduckgo, Ecosia, Qwant, Swisscows, and Mojeek) but also other commercial engines (Bing, Yahoo) often return more anti-vaccine pages (10–53%) than Google.com (0%). Some localized versions of Google, however, returned more anti-vaccine webpages (up to 10%) than Google.com . Health information returned by search engines has an impact on public health and, specifically, in the acceptance of vaccines. The issue of information quality when seeking information for making health-related decisions also impact the ethical aspect represented by the right to an informed consent. Our study suggests that designing a search engine that is privacy savvy and avoids issues with filter bubbles that can result from user-tracking is necessary but insufficient; instead, mechanisms should be developed to test search engines from the perspective of information quality (particularly for health-related webpages) before they can be deemed trustworthy providers of public health information.