Loading…
Measuring the effect of environmental stress on inbreeding depression alone obscures the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions on overall fitness in Callosobruchus maculatus
Environmental stress can have a profound effect on inbreeding depression. Quantifying this effect is of particular importance in threatened populations, which are often simultaneously subject to both inbreeding and environmental stress. But while the prevalence of inbreeding–stress interactions is w...
Saved in:
Published in: | Evolutionary applications 2020-12, Vol.13 (10), p.2597-2609 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4520-8e5d540bb3e387b4eaa39c3ea946f95286addaa6a0d41083b568c69d7f05623a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4520-8e5d540bb3e387b4eaa39c3ea946f95286addaa6a0d41083b568c69d7f05623a3 |
container_end_page | 2609 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2597 |
container_title | Evolutionary applications |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Springer, Amy L. Messina, Frank J. Gompert, Zachariah |
description | Environmental stress can have a profound effect on inbreeding depression. Quantifying this effect is of particular importance in threatened populations, which are often simultaneously subject to both inbreeding and environmental stress. But while the prevalence of inbreeding–stress interactions is well known, the importance and broader applicability of such interactions in conservation are not clearly understood. We used seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus, as a model system to quantify how environmental stressors (here host quality and temperature stress) interact with inbreeding as measured by changes in the magnitude of inbreeding depression, δ, as well as the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions to overall fitness. We found that while both environmental stressors caused substantial inbreeding–stress interactions as measured by change in δ, the relative importance of these interactions to overall survival was modest. This suggests that assessing inbreeding–stress interactions within the framework of δ alone may give an inaccurate representation of the relevance of interactions to population persistence. Furthermore, we found that the effect of environmental stress on fitness, but not inbreeding depression, varied strongly among populations. These results suggest that the outcomes of inbreeding–stress interactions are not easily generalized, an important consideration in conservation settings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/eva.13060 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b8565a6c34d84ca48792c250c4a71adc</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b8565a6c34d84ca48792c250c4a71adc</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2464483136</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4520-8e5d540bb3e387b4eaa39c3ea946f95286addaa6a0d41083b568c69d7f05623a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstu1DAUQCMEoqWw4AeQJTawmNaOH3E2SNWoQKUiNsDWunFuZjzK2IOdTNUd_8AH8S98CZ7JUFok8MKP63OPH7pF8ZzRU5bbGW7hlHGq6IPimFWynAlZsYd35kfFk5RWNBOKl4-LI87LWlDGjosfHxDSGJ1fkGGJBLsO7UBCR9BvXQx-jX6AnqQhYkokeOJ8ExHbXUKLm13U5Sj0wSMJTbJjDu1VEXsY3BaJW29CHMBb3Hn_5P_89v2gdX7ACHbIpv0ZYZuXfU86N_hpn8zzOqTQxNEux0TWYMesH9PT4lEHfcJnh_Gk-Pz24tP8_ezq47vL-fnVzApZ0plG2UpBm4Yj11UjEIDXliPUQnW1LLWCtgVQQFvBqOaNVNqquq06KlXJgZ8Ul5O3DbAym-jWEG9MAGf2gRAXBuLgbI-m0VJJUJaLVgsLQld1aUtJrYCKQWuz683k2ozNGlubvzg_9570_o53S7MIW1Opmgmps-DVQRDD1xHTYNYuWex78BjGZEqhtFKl0CqjL_9CV2GMPn-V4ZQzkTvF_kdllxCaM75zvZ4oG0NKEbvbKzNqdoVociGafSFm9sXdN96SvysvA2cTcO16vPm3yVx8OZ-UvwDcFO4F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2464483136</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring the effect of environmental stress on inbreeding depression alone obscures the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions on overall fitness in Callosobruchus maculatus</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Springer, Amy L. ; Messina, Frank J. ; Gompert, Zachariah</creator><creatorcontrib>Springer, Amy L. ; Messina, Frank J. ; Gompert, Zachariah</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental stress can have a profound effect on inbreeding depression. Quantifying this effect is of particular importance in threatened populations, which are often simultaneously subject to both inbreeding and environmental stress. But while the prevalence of inbreeding–stress interactions is well known, the importance and broader applicability of such interactions in conservation are not clearly understood. We used seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus, as a model system to quantify how environmental stressors (here host quality and temperature stress) interact with inbreeding as measured by changes in the magnitude of inbreeding depression, δ, as well as the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions to overall fitness. We found that while both environmental stressors caused substantial inbreeding–stress interactions as measured by change in δ, the relative importance of these interactions to overall survival was modest. This suggests that assessing inbreeding–stress interactions within the framework of δ alone may give an inaccurate representation of the relevance of interactions to population persistence. Furthermore, we found that the effect of environmental stress on fitness, but not inbreeding depression, varied strongly among populations. These results suggest that the outcomes of inbreeding–stress interactions are not easily generalized, an important consideration in conservation settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-4571</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-4571</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/eva.13060</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33294011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Callosobruchus maculatus ; Conservation ; Environmental stress ; Fitness ; hierarchical Bayesian models ; Inbreeding ; Inbreeding depression ; Laboratories ; Legumes ; Original ; Population ; population management ; Reproductive fitness ; Seeds</subject><ispartof>Evolutionary applications, 2020-12, Vol.13 (10), p.2597-2609</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4520-8e5d540bb3e387b4eaa39c3ea946f95286addaa6a0d41083b568c69d7f05623a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4520-8e5d540bb3e387b4eaa39c3ea946f95286addaa6a0d41083b568c69d7f05623a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2248-2488 ; 0000-0002-4511-4576 ; 0000-0002-9242-5318</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3031430361/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3031430361?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,46052,46476,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294011$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Springer, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messina, Frank J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gompert, Zachariah</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring the effect of environmental stress on inbreeding depression alone obscures the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions on overall fitness in Callosobruchus maculatus</title><title>Evolutionary applications</title><addtitle>Evol Appl</addtitle><description>Environmental stress can have a profound effect on inbreeding depression. Quantifying this effect is of particular importance in threatened populations, which are often simultaneously subject to both inbreeding and environmental stress. But while the prevalence of inbreeding–stress interactions is well known, the importance and broader applicability of such interactions in conservation are not clearly understood. We used seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus, as a model system to quantify how environmental stressors (here host quality and temperature stress) interact with inbreeding as measured by changes in the magnitude of inbreeding depression, δ, as well as the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions to overall fitness. We found that while both environmental stressors caused substantial inbreeding–stress interactions as measured by change in δ, the relative importance of these interactions to overall survival was modest. This suggests that assessing inbreeding–stress interactions within the framework of δ alone may give an inaccurate representation of the relevance of interactions to population persistence. Furthermore, we found that the effect of environmental stress on fitness, but not inbreeding depression, varied strongly among populations. These results suggest that the outcomes of inbreeding–stress interactions are not easily generalized, an important consideration in conservation settings.</description><subject>Callosobruchus maculatus</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Environmental stress</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>hierarchical Bayesian models</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>Inbreeding depression</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>population management</subject><subject>Reproductive fitness</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><issn>1752-4571</issn><issn>1752-4571</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstu1DAUQCMEoqWw4AeQJTawmNaOH3E2SNWoQKUiNsDWunFuZjzK2IOdTNUd_8AH8S98CZ7JUFok8MKP63OPH7pF8ZzRU5bbGW7hlHGq6IPimFWynAlZsYd35kfFk5RWNBOKl4-LI87LWlDGjosfHxDSGJ1fkGGJBLsO7UBCR9BvXQx-jX6AnqQhYkokeOJ8ExHbXUKLm13U5Sj0wSMJTbJjDu1VEXsY3BaJW29CHMBb3Hn_5P_89v2gdX7ACHbIpv0ZYZuXfU86N_hpn8zzOqTQxNEux0TWYMesH9PT4lEHfcJnh_Gk-Pz24tP8_ezq47vL-fnVzApZ0plG2UpBm4Yj11UjEIDXliPUQnW1LLWCtgVQQFvBqOaNVNqquq06KlXJgZ8Ul5O3DbAym-jWEG9MAGf2gRAXBuLgbI-m0VJJUJaLVgsLQld1aUtJrYCKQWuz683k2ozNGlubvzg_9570_o53S7MIW1Opmgmps-DVQRDD1xHTYNYuWex78BjGZEqhtFKl0CqjL_9CV2GMPn-V4ZQzkTvF_kdllxCaM75zvZ4oG0NKEbvbKzNqdoVociGafSFm9sXdN96SvysvA2cTcO16vPm3yVx8OZ-UvwDcFO4F</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Springer, Amy L.</creator><creator>Messina, Frank J.</creator><creator>Gompert, Zachariah</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2248-2488</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4511-4576</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9242-5318</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Measuring the effect of environmental stress on inbreeding depression alone obscures the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions on overall fitness in Callosobruchus maculatus</title><author>Springer, Amy L. ; Messina, Frank J. ; Gompert, Zachariah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4520-8e5d540bb3e387b4eaa39c3ea946f95286addaa6a0d41083b568c69d7f05623a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Callosobruchus maculatus</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Environmental stress</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>hierarchical Bayesian models</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>Inbreeding depression</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>population management</topic><topic>Reproductive fitness</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Springer, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messina, Frank J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gompert, Zachariah</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Evolutionary applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Springer, Amy L.</au><au>Messina, Frank J.</au><au>Gompert, Zachariah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring the effect of environmental stress on inbreeding depression alone obscures the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions on overall fitness in Callosobruchus maculatus</atitle><jtitle>Evolutionary applications</jtitle><addtitle>Evol Appl</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2597</spage><epage>2609</epage><pages>2597-2609</pages><issn>1752-4571</issn><eissn>1752-4571</eissn><abstract>Environmental stress can have a profound effect on inbreeding depression. Quantifying this effect is of particular importance in threatened populations, which are often simultaneously subject to both inbreeding and environmental stress. But while the prevalence of inbreeding–stress interactions is well known, the importance and broader applicability of such interactions in conservation are not clearly understood. We used seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus, as a model system to quantify how environmental stressors (here host quality and temperature stress) interact with inbreeding as measured by changes in the magnitude of inbreeding depression, δ, as well as the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions to overall fitness. We found that while both environmental stressors caused substantial inbreeding–stress interactions as measured by change in δ, the relative importance of these interactions to overall survival was modest. This suggests that assessing inbreeding–stress interactions within the framework of δ alone may give an inaccurate representation of the relevance of interactions to population persistence. Furthermore, we found that the effect of environmental stress on fitness, but not inbreeding depression, varied strongly among populations. These results suggest that the outcomes of inbreeding–stress interactions are not easily generalized, an important consideration in conservation settings.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33294011</pmid><doi>10.1111/eva.13060</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2248-2488</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4511-4576</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9242-5318</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1752-4571 |
ispartof | Evolutionary applications, 2020-12, Vol.13 (10), p.2597-2609 |
issn | 1752-4571 1752-4571 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b8565a6c34d84ca48792c250c4a71adc |
source | PubMed (Medline); Wiley Online Library Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Callosobruchus maculatus Conservation Environmental stress Fitness hierarchical Bayesian models Inbreeding Inbreeding depression Laboratories Legumes Original Population population management Reproductive fitness Seeds |
title | Measuring the effect of environmental stress on inbreeding depression alone obscures the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions on overall fitness in Callosobruchus maculatus |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A12%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20the%20effect%20of%20environmental%20stress%20on%20inbreeding%20depression%20alone%20obscures%20the%20relative%20importance%20of%20inbreeding%E2%80%93stress%20interactions%20on%20overall%20fitness%20in%20Callosobruchus%20maculatus&rft.jtitle=Evolutionary%20applications&rft.au=Springer,%20Amy%20L.&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2597&rft.epage=2609&rft.pages=2597-2609&rft.issn=1752-4571&rft.eissn=1752-4571&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/eva.13060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2464483136%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4520-8e5d540bb3e387b4eaa39c3ea946f95286addaa6a0d41083b568c69d7f05623a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2464483136&rft_id=info:pmid/33294011&rfr_iscdi=true |