Loading…

Measuring the effect of environmental stress on inbreeding depression alone obscures the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions on overall fitness in Callosobruchus maculatus

Environmental stress can have a profound effect on inbreeding depression. Quantifying this effect is of particular importance in threatened populations, which are often simultaneously subject to both inbreeding and environmental stress. But while the prevalence of inbreeding–stress interactions is w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Evolutionary applications 2020-12, Vol.13 (10), p.2597-2609
Main Authors: Springer, Amy L., Messina, Frank J., Gompert, Zachariah
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4520-8e5d540bb3e387b4eaa39c3ea946f95286addaa6a0d41083b568c69d7f05623a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4520-8e5d540bb3e387b4eaa39c3ea946f95286addaa6a0d41083b568c69d7f05623a3
container_end_page 2609
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2597
container_title Evolutionary applications
container_volume 13
creator Springer, Amy L.
Messina, Frank J.
Gompert, Zachariah
description Environmental stress can have a profound effect on inbreeding depression. Quantifying this effect is of particular importance in threatened populations, which are often simultaneously subject to both inbreeding and environmental stress. But while the prevalence of inbreeding–stress interactions is well known, the importance and broader applicability of such interactions in conservation are not clearly understood. We used seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus, as a model system to quantify how environmental stressors (here host quality and temperature stress) interact with inbreeding as measured by changes in the magnitude of inbreeding depression, δ, as well as the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions to overall fitness. We found that while both environmental stressors caused substantial inbreeding–stress interactions as measured by change in δ, the relative importance of these interactions to overall survival was modest. This suggests that assessing inbreeding–stress interactions within the framework of δ alone may give an inaccurate representation of the relevance of interactions to population persistence. Furthermore, we found that the effect of environmental stress on fitness, but not inbreeding depression, varied strongly among populations. These results suggest that the outcomes of inbreeding–stress interactions are not easily generalized, an important consideration in conservation settings.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/eva.13060
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b8565a6c34d84ca48792c250c4a71adc</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b8565a6c34d84ca48792c250c4a71adc</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2464483136</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4520-8e5d540bb3e387b4eaa39c3ea946f95286addaa6a0d41083b568c69d7f05623a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstu1DAUQCMEoqWw4AeQJTawmNaOH3E2SNWoQKUiNsDWunFuZjzK2IOdTNUd_8AH8S98CZ7JUFok8MKP63OPH7pF8ZzRU5bbGW7hlHGq6IPimFWynAlZsYd35kfFk5RWNBOKl4-LI87LWlDGjosfHxDSGJ1fkGGJBLsO7UBCR9BvXQx-jX6AnqQhYkokeOJ8ExHbXUKLm13U5Sj0wSMJTbJjDu1VEXsY3BaJW29CHMBb3Hn_5P_89v2gdX7ACHbIpv0ZYZuXfU86N_hpn8zzOqTQxNEux0TWYMesH9PT4lEHfcJnh_Gk-Pz24tP8_ezq47vL-fnVzApZ0plG2UpBm4Yj11UjEIDXliPUQnW1LLWCtgVQQFvBqOaNVNqquq06KlXJgZ8Ul5O3DbAym-jWEG9MAGf2gRAXBuLgbI-m0VJJUJaLVgsLQld1aUtJrYCKQWuz683k2ozNGlubvzg_9570_o53S7MIW1Opmgmps-DVQRDD1xHTYNYuWex78BjGZEqhtFKl0CqjL_9CV2GMPn-V4ZQzkTvF_kdllxCaM75zvZ4oG0NKEbvbKzNqdoVociGafSFm9sXdN96SvysvA2cTcO16vPm3yVx8OZ-UvwDcFO4F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2464483136</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring the effect of environmental stress on inbreeding depression alone obscures the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions on overall fitness in Callosobruchus maculatus</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Springer, Amy L. ; Messina, Frank J. ; Gompert, Zachariah</creator><creatorcontrib>Springer, Amy L. ; Messina, Frank J. ; Gompert, Zachariah</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental stress can have a profound effect on inbreeding depression. Quantifying this effect is of particular importance in threatened populations, which are often simultaneously subject to both inbreeding and environmental stress. But while the prevalence of inbreeding–stress interactions is well known, the importance and broader applicability of such interactions in conservation are not clearly understood. We used seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus, as a model system to quantify how environmental stressors (here host quality and temperature stress) interact with inbreeding as measured by changes in the magnitude of inbreeding depression, δ, as well as the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions to overall fitness. We found that while both environmental stressors caused substantial inbreeding–stress interactions as measured by change in δ, the relative importance of these interactions to overall survival was modest. This suggests that assessing inbreeding–stress interactions within the framework of δ alone may give an inaccurate representation of the relevance of interactions to population persistence. Furthermore, we found that the effect of environmental stress on fitness, but not inbreeding depression, varied strongly among populations. These results suggest that the outcomes of inbreeding–stress interactions are not easily generalized, an important consideration in conservation settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-4571</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-4571</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/eva.13060</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33294011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Callosobruchus maculatus ; Conservation ; Environmental stress ; Fitness ; hierarchical Bayesian models ; Inbreeding ; Inbreeding depression ; Laboratories ; Legumes ; Original ; Population ; population management ; Reproductive fitness ; Seeds</subject><ispartof>Evolutionary applications, 2020-12, Vol.13 (10), p.2597-2609</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4520-8e5d540bb3e387b4eaa39c3ea946f95286addaa6a0d41083b568c69d7f05623a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4520-8e5d540bb3e387b4eaa39c3ea946f95286addaa6a0d41083b568c69d7f05623a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2248-2488 ; 0000-0002-4511-4576 ; 0000-0002-9242-5318</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3031430361/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3031430361?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,46052,46476,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294011$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Springer, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messina, Frank J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gompert, Zachariah</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring the effect of environmental stress on inbreeding depression alone obscures the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions on overall fitness in Callosobruchus maculatus</title><title>Evolutionary applications</title><addtitle>Evol Appl</addtitle><description>Environmental stress can have a profound effect on inbreeding depression. Quantifying this effect is of particular importance in threatened populations, which are often simultaneously subject to both inbreeding and environmental stress. But while the prevalence of inbreeding–stress interactions is well known, the importance and broader applicability of such interactions in conservation are not clearly understood. We used seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus, as a model system to quantify how environmental stressors (here host quality and temperature stress) interact with inbreeding as measured by changes in the magnitude of inbreeding depression, δ, as well as the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions to overall fitness. We found that while both environmental stressors caused substantial inbreeding–stress interactions as measured by change in δ, the relative importance of these interactions to overall survival was modest. This suggests that assessing inbreeding–stress interactions within the framework of δ alone may give an inaccurate representation of the relevance of interactions to population persistence. Furthermore, we found that the effect of environmental stress on fitness, but not inbreeding depression, varied strongly among populations. These results suggest that the outcomes of inbreeding–stress interactions are not easily generalized, an important consideration in conservation settings.</description><subject>Callosobruchus maculatus</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Environmental stress</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>hierarchical Bayesian models</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>Inbreeding depression</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>population management</subject><subject>Reproductive fitness</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><issn>1752-4571</issn><issn>1752-4571</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstu1DAUQCMEoqWw4AeQJTawmNaOH3E2SNWoQKUiNsDWunFuZjzK2IOdTNUd_8AH8S98CZ7JUFok8MKP63OPH7pF8ZzRU5bbGW7hlHGq6IPimFWynAlZsYd35kfFk5RWNBOKl4-LI87LWlDGjosfHxDSGJ1fkGGJBLsO7UBCR9BvXQx-jX6AnqQhYkokeOJ8ExHbXUKLm13U5Sj0wSMJTbJjDu1VEXsY3BaJW29CHMBb3Hn_5P_89v2gdX7ACHbIpv0ZYZuXfU86N_hpn8zzOqTQxNEux0TWYMesH9PT4lEHfcJnh_Gk-Pz24tP8_ezq47vL-fnVzApZ0plG2UpBm4Yj11UjEIDXliPUQnW1LLWCtgVQQFvBqOaNVNqquq06KlXJgZ8Ul5O3DbAym-jWEG9MAGf2gRAXBuLgbI-m0VJJUJaLVgsLQld1aUtJrYCKQWuz683k2ozNGlubvzg_9570_o53S7MIW1Opmgmps-DVQRDD1xHTYNYuWex78BjGZEqhtFKl0CqjL_9CV2GMPn-V4ZQzkTvF_kdllxCaM75zvZ4oG0NKEbvbKzNqdoVociGafSFm9sXdN96SvysvA2cTcO16vPm3yVx8OZ-UvwDcFO4F</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Springer, Amy L.</creator><creator>Messina, Frank J.</creator><creator>Gompert, Zachariah</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2248-2488</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4511-4576</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9242-5318</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Measuring the effect of environmental stress on inbreeding depression alone obscures the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions on overall fitness in Callosobruchus maculatus</title><author>Springer, Amy L. ; Messina, Frank J. ; Gompert, Zachariah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4520-8e5d540bb3e387b4eaa39c3ea946f95286addaa6a0d41083b568c69d7f05623a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Callosobruchus maculatus</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Environmental stress</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>hierarchical Bayesian models</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>Inbreeding depression</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>population management</topic><topic>Reproductive fitness</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Springer, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messina, Frank J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gompert, Zachariah</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Evolutionary applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Springer, Amy L.</au><au>Messina, Frank J.</au><au>Gompert, Zachariah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring the effect of environmental stress on inbreeding depression alone obscures the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions on overall fitness in Callosobruchus maculatus</atitle><jtitle>Evolutionary applications</jtitle><addtitle>Evol Appl</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2597</spage><epage>2609</epage><pages>2597-2609</pages><issn>1752-4571</issn><eissn>1752-4571</eissn><abstract>Environmental stress can have a profound effect on inbreeding depression. Quantifying this effect is of particular importance in threatened populations, which are often simultaneously subject to both inbreeding and environmental stress. But while the prevalence of inbreeding–stress interactions is well known, the importance and broader applicability of such interactions in conservation are not clearly understood. We used seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus, as a model system to quantify how environmental stressors (here host quality and temperature stress) interact with inbreeding as measured by changes in the magnitude of inbreeding depression, δ, as well as the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions to overall fitness. We found that while both environmental stressors caused substantial inbreeding–stress interactions as measured by change in δ, the relative importance of these interactions to overall survival was modest. This suggests that assessing inbreeding–stress interactions within the framework of δ alone may give an inaccurate representation of the relevance of interactions to population persistence. Furthermore, we found that the effect of environmental stress on fitness, but not inbreeding depression, varied strongly among populations. These results suggest that the outcomes of inbreeding–stress interactions are not easily generalized, an important consideration in conservation settings.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33294011</pmid><doi>10.1111/eva.13060</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2248-2488</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4511-4576</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9242-5318</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1752-4571
ispartof Evolutionary applications, 2020-12, Vol.13 (10), p.2597-2609
issn 1752-4571
1752-4571
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b8565a6c34d84ca48792c250c4a71adc
source PubMed (Medline); Wiley Online Library Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Callosobruchus maculatus
Conservation
Environmental stress
Fitness
hierarchical Bayesian models
Inbreeding
Inbreeding depression
Laboratories
Legumes
Original
Population
population management
Reproductive fitness
Seeds
title Measuring the effect of environmental stress on inbreeding depression alone obscures the relative importance of inbreeding–stress interactions on overall fitness in Callosobruchus maculatus
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A12%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20the%20effect%20of%20environmental%20stress%20on%20inbreeding%20depression%20alone%20obscures%20the%20relative%20importance%20of%20inbreeding%E2%80%93stress%20interactions%20on%20overall%20fitness%20in%20Callosobruchus%20maculatus&rft.jtitle=Evolutionary%20applications&rft.au=Springer,%20Amy%20L.&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2597&rft.epage=2609&rft.pages=2597-2609&rft.issn=1752-4571&rft.eissn=1752-4571&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/eva.13060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2464483136%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4520-8e5d540bb3e387b4eaa39c3ea946f95286addaa6a0d41083b568c69d7f05623a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2464483136&rft_id=info:pmid/33294011&rfr_iscdi=true