Prediction of Mean Responses of RC Bridges Considering the Incident Angle of Ground Motions and Displacement Directions

• Published in: Applied sciences 2021-03, Vol.11 (6), p.2462
• Main Authors: Tehrani, Payam, Mitchell, Denis
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bridges; Concrete bridges; different averaging methods; directionality effects; Directivity; Displacement; Earthquakes; Ground motion; incident angle; nonlinear time history analysis; Predictions; Reinforced concrete; Seismic activity; Seismic design; Seismic engineering; Seismic response; Spectrum analysis; Two dimensional analysis; Two dimensional models
• ISSN: 2076-3417; 2076-3417
• DOI: 10.3390/app11062462

Inelastic dynamic analyses were carried out using 3D and 2D models to predict the mean seismic response of four-span reinforced concrete (RC) bridges considering directionality effects. Two averaging methods, including an advanced method considering displacement direction, were used for the prediction of the mean responses to account for different incident angles of ground motion records. A method was developed to predict the variability of the mean displacement predictions due to variability in the incident angles of the records for different averaging methods. When the concepts of averaging in different directions were used, significantly different predictions were obtained for the directionality effects. The accuracy of the results obtained using 2D and 3D analyses with and without the application of the combination rules for the prediction of the mean seismic demands considering the incident angle of the records was investigated. The predictions from different methods to account for the records incident angles were evaluated probabilistically. Recommendations were made for the use of the combination rules to account for the directivity effects of the records and to predict the actual maximum displacement, referred to as the maximum radial displacement.