Early Simultaneous Cross Facial Nerve Graft and Masseteric Nerve Transfer for Facial Paralysis after Tumor Resection

• Published in: Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open 2023-03, Vol.11 (3), p.e4869-e4869
• Main Authors: Sergesketter, Amanda R., Shammas, Ronnie L., Massa, Lisa A., Phillips, Brett T., Marcus, Jeffrey R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Original; Reconstructive
• ISSN: 2169-7574; 2169-7574
• DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004869

We describe a new approach for facial reanimation after skull base tumor resection with known facial nerve sacrifice, involving simultaneous masseter nerve transfer with selective cross facial nerve grafting (CFNG) within days after tumor surgery. This preliminary study compared outcomes of this approach versus a staged procedure involving a masseter nerve "babysitter" performed in a delayed timeline. Patients undergoing masseter nerve transfer and CFNG for facial paralysis after skull base tumor resection were consented to participate in video interviews. Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) Scale (0-100) patient-reported outcome, eFACE, and Facial Grading Scale scores were compared. Nine patients had unilateral facial paralysis from resection of a schwannoma (56%), acoustic neuroma (33%), or vascular malformation (11%). Five underwent early simultaneous CFNG and masseter nerve transfer (mean 3.6 days after resection), whereas four underwent two-stage reanimation including a babysitter procedure (mean 218 days after resection). Postoperative FaCE scale and Facial Grading Scale scores were similar in both groups ( > 0.05). Postoperative mean eFACE scores were similar for both groups for smile (early: 71.5 versus delayed: 75.5; = 0.08), static (76.3 versus 82.1; = 0.32), and dynamic scores (59.7 versus 64.9; = 0.19); however, synkinesis scores were inferior in the early group (76.4 versus 91.1; = 0.04). Early simultaneous masseter nerve transfer and CFNG provides reanimated movement sooner and in fewer stages than a staged approach in a delayed timeline. The early technique appears to result in similar clinician- and patient-reported outcomes compared with delayed procedures; however, in this preliminary study, the early approach was associated with greater synkinesis, meriting further investigation.