Early outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with a modern modular femoral revision stem in 65 consecutive cases

• Published in: Arthroplasty today 2019-03, Vol.5 (1), p.106-112
• Main Authors: Pelt, Christopher E., Stagg, Marissa L., Van Dine, Christin, Anderson, Mike B., Peters, Christopher L., Gililland, Jeremy M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aseptic loosening; Competing risks survival; Femoral bone loss; Modular femoral implants; Original Research; Revision total hip arthroplasty
• ISSN: 2352-3441; 2352-3441
• DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2018.10.004

We evaluated the early outcomes, including all-cause revisions, aseptic revisions, and reoperations after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a single modern modular femoral stem design. A retrospective cohort study on a consecutive series of 62 patients (65 hips) who underwent revision THA with a modern modular femoral stem system, between January 2011 and October 2015, at a single academic medical center was performed. A cumulative incidence competing risk model was used to evaluate the cumulative incidence of failure with death as the competing risk. The cumulative incidence rate of all-cause revision THA was 14.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6%–24%) at 2 years when accounting for the competing risk of death. The rate of aseptic revisions was 6.8% (95% CI, 0.1%–13%), and the rate of all-cause reoperations was 21.6% (95% CI, 11%–31%). Ten THA cases (15%) underwent re-revision THA for any reason: five for infection and five for aseptic failures. The mean time to re-revision was 1 year (range, 0.04–5.34). Patients with a preoperative Mallory classification of 3 or more were at greater risk for reoperation (sub-hazard rate, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.54–9.53; P = .004). Although the high incidence of reoperation illustrates the complexity of the revision THA population, particularly related to infection and joint instability, the relatively low rate of aseptic failures, minimal radiographic subsidence, and the lack of modular junctional failures suggest that the use of this modular revision THA system may provide adequate fixation and could be considered as a viable treatment option in the setting of revision THA.