New methodical approaches to justify selection explosive for destruction of solid rocks

The article developed a mathematical model to justify selection the type of explosive for destruction of solid rocks. The problem is solved using the analytical hierarchy method (AHM). In the process, many criteria, both quantitative and qualitative, were considered, their importance in selecting th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:E3S web of conferences 2019-01, Vol.109, p.32
Main Authors: Ishchenko, Kostiantyn, Us, Svitlana, Ishchenko, Oleksii, Koba, Dmytro
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adequacy
Costs
Destruction
Explosives
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Rocks
Vectors (mathematics)
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 32
container_title E3S web of conferences
container_volume 109
creator Ishchenko, Kostiantyn
Us, Svitlana
Ishchenko, Oleksii
Koba, Dmytro
description The article developed a mathematical model to justify selection the type of explosive for destruction of solid rocks. The problem is solved using the analytical hierarchy method (AHM). In the process, many criteria, both quantitative and qualitative, were considered, their importance in selecting the type of explosives and their consistency with the opinions of experts. The following indicators were used as criteria: technological, economic, social, environmental, etc. According to the results, priority vectors were obtained for each hierarchy, which contributed to a reasonable approach to selection type of explosives. The established priorities made it possible to carry out a systematic approach to solve the problem, considering not only technological advantages, but also the costs of using various types of explosives. The factors characterizing the costs in the formation of well charges with various types of explosives are also considered. The results of mathematical modeling showed the adequacy of chosen model for selection of alternative types of explosives for the destruction of solid rocks of complex structure.
doi_str_mv 10.1051/e3sconf/201910900032
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ba18353e1bc047f4aba4825385f38515</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ba18353e1bc047f4aba4825385f38515</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2301946903</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2552-600f70342641bf9541848acb8182819f5f2e6404c9f3db4164cc8e4b1a018ac83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUU1PwzAMrRBITGP_gEMkzmVxPrr0iCY-Jk1wAXGM0jRhKd1SkhbYvyfQCe1g2bKfnp_9suwS8DVgDnNDo_Y7OycYSsAlxpiSk2xCSLHIgTByelSfZ7MYmwQBwgXDbJK9PpovtDX9xtdOqxaprgte6Y2JqPeoGWLv7B5F0xrdO79D5rtrfXSfBlkfUG1iH4Zx4i2KvnU1Cl6_x4vszKo2mtkhT7OXu9vn5UO-frpfLW_WuSack7zA2C4wZaRgUNmSMxBMKF0JEERAabklpkhCdWlpXTEomNbCsAoUhoQTdJqtRt7aq0Z2wW1V2EuvnPxr-PAmVeidbo2sFAjKqYFKY7awTFWKCcKp4DYF8MR1NXKlF3wM6TTZ-CHsknxJaPouK0pME4qNKB18jMHY_62A5a8j8uCIPHaE_gCAm37d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2301946903</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New methodical approaches to justify selection explosive for destruction of solid rocks</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Ishchenko, Kostiantyn ; Us, Svitlana ; Ishchenko, Oleksii ; Koba, Dmytro</creator><contributor>Liu, B. ; Heyets, V. ; Kryzhanivskyi, Y. ; Voloshyn, O. ; Bulat, A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ishchenko, Kostiantyn ; Us, Svitlana ; Ishchenko, Oleksii ; Koba, Dmytro ; Liu, B. ; Heyets, V. ; Kryzhanivskyi, Y. ; Voloshyn, O. ; Bulat, A.</creatorcontrib><description>The article developed a mathematical model to justify selection the type of explosive for destruction of solid rocks. The problem is solved using the analytical hierarchy method (AHM). In the process, many criteria, both quantitative and qualitative, were considered, their importance in selecting the type of explosives and their consistency with the opinions of experts. The following indicators were used as criteria: technological, economic, social, environmental, etc. According to the results, priority vectors were obtained for each hierarchy, which contributed to a reasonable approach to selection type of explosives. The established priorities made it possible to carry out a systematic approach to solve the problem, considering not only technological advantages, but also the costs of using various types of explosives. The factors characterizing the costs in the formation of well charges with various types of explosives are also considered. The results of mathematical modeling showed the adequacy of chosen model for selection of alternative types of explosives for the destruction of solid rocks of complex structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2267-1242</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2555-0403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2267-1242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/201910900032</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Les Ulis: EDP Sciences</publisher><subject>Adequacy ; Costs ; Destruction ; Explosives ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Rocks ; Vectors (mathematics)</subject><ispartof>E3S web of conferences, 2019-01, Vol.109, p.32</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2301946903?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23910,23911,25119,25732,27903,27904,36991,44569</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Liu, B.</contributor><contributor>Heyets, V.</contributor><contributor>Kryzhanivskyi, Y.</contributor><contributor>Voloshyn, O.</contributor><contributor>Bulat, A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ishchenko, Kostiantyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Us, Svitlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishchenko, Oleksii</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koba, Dmytro</creatorcontrib><title>New methodical approaches to justify selection explosive for destruction of solid rocks</title><title>E3S web of conferences</title><description>The article developed a mathematical model to justify selection the type of explosive for destruction of solid rocks. The problem is solved using the analytical hierarchy method (AHM). In the process, many criteria, both quantitative and qualitative, were considered, their importance in selecting the type of explosives and their consistency with the opinions of experts. The following indicators were used as criteria: technological, economic, social, environmental, etc. According to the results, priority vectors were obtained for each hierarchy, which contributed to a reasonable approach to selection type of explosives. The established priorities made it possible to carry out a systematic approach to solve the problem, considering not only technological advantages, but also the costs of using various types of explosives. The factors characterizing the costs in the formation of well charges with various types of explosives are also considered. The results of mathematical modeling showed the adequacy of chosen model for selection of alternative types of explosives for the destruction of solid rocks of complex structure.</description><subject>Adequacy</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Destruction</subject><subject>Explosives</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Vectors (mathematics)</subject><issn>2267-1242</issn><issn>2555-0403</issn><issn>2267-1242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUU1PwzAMrRBITGP_gEMkzmVxPrr0iCY-Jk1wAXGM0jRhKd1SkhbYvyfQCe1g2bKfnp_9suwS8DVgDnNDo_Y7OycYSsAlxpiSk2xCSLHIgTByelSfZ7MYmwQBwgXDbJK9PpovtDX9xtdOqxaprgte6Y2JqPeoGWLv7B5F0xrdO79D5rtrfXSfBlkfUG1iH4Zx4i2KvnU1Cl6_x4vszKo2mtkhT7OXu9vn5UO-frpfLW_WuSack7zA2C4wZaRgUNmSMxBMKF0JEERAabklpkhCdWlpXTEomNbCsAoUhoQTdJqtRt7aq0Z2wW1V2EuvnPxr-PAmVeidbo2sFAjKqYFKY7awTFWKCcKp4DYF8MR1NXKlF3wM6TTZ-CHsknxJaPouK0pME4qNKB18jMHY_62A5a8j8uCIPHaE_gCAm37d</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Ishchenko, Kostiantyn</creator><creator>Us, Svitlana</creator><creator>Ishchenko, Oleksii</creator><creator>Koba, Dmytro</creator><general>EDP Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>New methodical approaches to justify selection explosive for destruction of solid rocks</title><author>Ishchenko, Kostiantyn ; Us, Svitlana ; Ishchenko, Oleksii ; Koba, Dmytro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2552-600f70342641bf9541848acb8182819f5f2e6404c9f3db4164cc8e4b1a018ac83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adequacy</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Destruction</topic><topic>Explosives</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Vectors (mathematics)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ishchenko, Kostiantyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Us, Svitlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishchenko, Oleksii</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koba, Dmytro</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>E3S web of conferences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ishchenko, Kostiantyn</au><au>Us, Svitlana</au><au>Ishchenko, Oleksii</au><au>Koba, Dmytro</au><au>Liu, B.</au><au>Heyets, V.</au><au>Kryzhanivskyi, Y.</au><au>Voloshyn, O.</au><au>Bulat, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New methodical approaches to justify selection explosive for destruction of solid rocks</atitle><jtitle>E3S web of conferences</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>109</volume><spage>32</spage><pages>32-</pages><issn>2267-1242</issn><issn>2555-0403</issn><eissn>2267-1242</eissn><abstract>The article developed a mathematical model to justify selection the type of explosive for destruction of solid rocks. The problem is solved using the analytical hierarchy method (AHM). In the process, many criteria, both quantitative and qualitative, were considered, their importance in selecting the type of explosives and their consistency with the opinions of experts. The following indicators were used as criteria: technological, economic, social, environmental, etc. According to the results, priority vectors were obtained for each hierarchy, which contributed to a reasonable approach to selection type of explosives. The established priorities made it possible to carry out a systematic approach to solve the problem, considering not only technological advantages, but also the costs of using various types of explosives. The factors characterizing the costs in the formation of well charges with various types of explosives are also considered. The results of mathematical modeling showed the adequacy of chosen model for selection of alternative types of explosives for the destruction of solid rocks of complex structure.</abstract><cop>Les Ulis</cop><pub>EDP Sciences</pub><doi>10.1051/e3sconf/201910900032</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2267-1242
ispartof E3S web of conferences, 2019-01, Vol.109, p.32
issn 2267-1242
2555-0403
2267-1242
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ba18353e1bc047f4aba4825385f38515
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Adequacy
Costs
Destruction
Explosives
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Rocks
Vectors (mathematics)
title New methodical approaches to justify selection explosive for destruction of solid rocks
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A24%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20methodical%20approaches%20to%20justify%20selection%20explosive%20for%20destruction%20of%20solid%20rocks&rft.jtitle=E3S%20web%20of%20conferences&rft.au=Ishchenko,%20Kostiantyn&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=109&rft.spage=32&rft.pages=32-&rft.issn=2267-1242&rft.eissn=2267-1242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1051/e3sconf/201910900032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2301946903%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2552-600f70342641bf9541848acb8182819f5f2e6404c9f3db4164cc8e4b1a018ac83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2301946903&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true