Loading…
Multidimensional Evaluation Methods for Deep Learning Models in Target Detection for SAR Images
As artificial intelligence technology advances, the application of object detection technology in the field of SAR (synthetic aperture radar) imagery is becoming increasingly widespread. However, it also faces challenges such as resource limitations in spaceborne environments and significant uncerta...
Saved in:
Published in: | Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2024-03, Vol.16 (6), p.1097 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-47aa450148e1a1078dc3b57625f1c0acc0da79c8571ab50712359956933050573 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1097 |
container_title | Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Wang, Pengcheng Liu, Huanyu Zhou, Xinrui Xue, Zhijun Ni, Liang Han, Qi Li, Junbao |
description | As artificial intelligence technology advances, the application of object detection technology in the field of SAR (synthetic aperture radar) imagery is becoming increasingly widespread. However, it also faces challenges such as resource limitations in spaceborne environments and significant uncertainty in the intensity of interference in application scenarios. These factors make the performance evaluation of object detection key to ensuring the smooth execution of tasks. In the face of such complex and harsh application scenarios, methods that rely on single-dimensional evaluation to assess models have had their limitations highlighted. Therefore, this paper proposes a multi-dimensional evaluation method for deep learning models used in SAR image object detection. This method evaluates models in a multi-dimensional manner, covering the training, testing, and application stages of the model, and constructs a multi-dimensional evaluation index system. The training stage includes assessing training efficiency and the impact of training samples; the testing stage includes model performance evaluation, application-based evaluation, and task-based evaluation; and the application stage includes model operation evaluation and model deployment evaluation. The evaluations of these three stages constitute the key links in the performance evaluation of deep learning models. Furthermore, this paper proposes a multi-indicator comprehensive evaluation method based on entropy weight correlation scaling, which calculates the weights of each evaluation indicator through test data, thereby providing a balanced and comprehensive evaluation mechanism for model performance. In the experiments, we designed specific interferences for SAR images in the testing stage and tested three models from the YOLO series. Finally, we constructed a multi-dimensional performance profile diagram for deep learning object detection models, providing a new visualization method to comprehensively characterize model performance in complex application scenarios. This can provide more accurate and comprehensive model performance evaluation for remote sensing data processing, thereby guiding model selection and optimization. The evaluation method proposed in this study adopts a multi-dimensional perspective, comprehensively assessing the three core stages of a model’s lifecycle: training, testing, and application. This framework demonstrates significant versatility and adaptability, enabling it to tra |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/rs16061097 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bab20cb41a2c4db0b4ee6736c4cb669e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A788253402</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_bab20cb41a2c4db0b4ee6736c4cb669e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A788253402</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-47aa450148e1a1078dc3b57625f1c0acc0da79c8571ab50712359956933050573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUU1vEzEQXSEqUZVe-AWWuCGlHX-t18eoFIiUCAnaszXrnV0cbdbBdpD497hNBXgOno_3nkZvmuYdhxspLdymzFtoOVjzqrkUYMRKCSte_5e_aa5z3kN9UnIL6rJxu9NcwhAOtOQQF5zZ_S-cT1hqwXZUfsQhszEm9pHoyLaEaQnLxHZxoDmzsLAHTBOVOi7kn0lP4O_rb2xzwIny2-ZixDnT9ct_1Tx-un-4-7Lafv28uVtvV15qW1bKICoNXHXEkYPpBi97bVqhR-4BvYcBjfWdNhx7DYaLSrO6tVKCBm3kVbM56w4R9-6YwgHTbxcxuOdGTJPDVIKfyfXYC_C94ii8GnroFVFrZOuV79vWUtV6f9Y6pvjzRLm4fTyl6k12sjqnqnPQVdTNGTVhFQ3LGEtCX2OgQ_BxoTHU_tp0ndBSgaiED2eCTzHnROPfNTm4pwO6fweUfwCMQYsc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3003419008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multidimensional Evaluation Methods for Deep Learning Models in Target Detection for SAR Images</title><source>ProQuest Publicly Available Content database</source><creator>Wang, Pengcheng ; Liu, Huanyu ; Zhou, Xinrui ; Xue, Zhijun ; Ni, Liang ; Han, Qi ; Li, Junbao</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Pengcheng ; Liu, Huanyu ; Zhou, Xinrui ; Xue, Zhijun ; Ni, Liang ; Han, Qi ; Li, Junbao</creatorcontrib><description>As artificial intelligence technology advances, the application of object detection technology in the field of SAR (synthetic aperture radar) imagery is becoming increasingly widespread. However, it also faces challenges such as resource limitations in spaceborne environments and significant uncertainty in the intensity of interference in application scenarios. These factors make the performance evaluation of object detection key to ensuring the smooth execution of tasks. In the face of such complex and harsh application scenarios, methods that rely on single-dimensional evaluation to assess models have had their limitations highlighted. Therefore, this paper proposes a multi-dimensional evaluation method for deep learning models used in SAR image object detection. This method evaluates models in a multi-dimensional manner, covering the training, testing, and application stages of the model, and constructs a multi-dimensional evaluation index system. The training stage includes assessing training efficiency and the impact of training samples; the testing stage includes model performance evaluation, application-based evaluation, and task-based evaluation; and the application stage includes model operation evaluation and model deployment evaluation. The evaluations of these three stages constitute the key links in the performance evaluation of deep learning models. Furthermore, this paper proposes a multi-indicator comprehensive evaluation method based on entropy weight correlation scaling, which calculates the weights of each evaluation indicator through test data, thereby providing a balanced and comprehensive evaluation mechanism for model performance. In the experiments, we designed specific interferences for SAR images in the testing stage and tested three models from the YOLO series. Finally, we constructed a multi-dimensional performance profile diagram for deep learning object detection models, providing a new visualization method to comprehensively characterize model performance in complex application scenarios. This can provide more accurate and comprehensive model performance evaluation for remote sensing data processing, thereby guiding model selection and optimization. The evaluation method proposed in this study adopts a multi-dimensional perspective, comprehensively assessing the three core stages of a model’s lifecycle: training, testing, and application. This framework demonstrates significant versatility and adaptability, enabling it to transcend the boundaries of remote sensing technology and provide support for a wide range of model evaluation and optimization tasks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/rs16061097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adaptability ; Algorithms ; Artificial intelligence ; Artificial satellites in remote sensing ; Data processing ; Datasets ; Deep learning ; Energy consumption ; evaluation metrics ; Experiments ; Methods ; multidimensional evaluation ; Multidimensional methods ; Object recognition ; Optimization ; Performance evaluation ; Radar imaging ; Remote sensing ; Researchers ; SAR images ; Synthetic aperture radar ; Target detection ; Task complexity ; Training ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2024-03, Vol.16 (6), p.1097</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-47aa450148e1a1078dc3b57625f1c0acc0da79c8571ab50712359956933050573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3003419008/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3003419008?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Pengcheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Huanyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xinrui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Zhijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Junbao</creatorcontrib><title>Multidimensional Evaluation Methods for Deep Learning Models in Target Detection for SAR Images</title><title>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</title><description>As artificial intelligence technology advances, the application of object detection technology in the field of SAR (synthetic aperture radar) imagery is becoming increasingly widespread. However, it also faces challenges such as resource limitations in spaceborne environments and significant uncertainty in the intensity of interference in application scenarios. These factors make the performance evaluation of object detection key to ensuring the smooth execution of tasks. In the face of such complex and harsh application scenarios, methods that rely on single-dimensional evaluation to assess models have had their limitations highlighted. Therefore, this paper proposes a multi-dimensional evaluation method for deep learning models used in SAR image object detection. This method evaluates models in a multi-dimensional manner, covering the training, testing, and application stages of the model, and constructs a multi-dimensional evaluation index system. The training stage includes assessing training efficiency and the impact of training samples; the testing stage includes model performance evaluation, application-based evaluation, and task-based evaluation; and the application stage includes model operation evaluation and model deployment evaluation. The evaluations of these three stages constitute the key links in the performance evaluation of deep learning models. Furthermore, this paper proposes a multi-indicator comprehensive evaluation method based on entropy weight correlation scaling, which calculates the weights of each evaluation indicator through test data, thereby providing a balanced and comprehensive evaluation mechanism for model performance. In the experiments, we designed specific interferences for SAR images in the testing stage and tested three models from the YOLO series. Finally, we constructed a multi-dimensional performance profile diagram for deep learning object detection models, providing a new visualization method to comprehensively characterize model performance in complex application scenarios. This can provide more accurate and comprehensive model performance evaluation for remote sensing data processing, thereby guiding model selection and optimization. The evaluation method proposed in this study adopts a multi-dimensional perspective, comprehensively assessing the three core stages of a model’s lifecycle: training, testing, and application. This framework demonstrates significant versatility and adaptability, enabling it to transcend the boundaries of remote sensing technology and provide support for a wide range of model evaluation and optimization tasks.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adaptability</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Artificial satellites in remote sensing</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>evaluation metrics</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>multidimensional evaluation</subject><subject>Multidimensional methods</subject><subject>Object recognition</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Radar imaging</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>SAR images</subject><subject>Synthetic aperture radar</subject><subject>Target detection</subject><subject>Task complexity</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>2072-4292</issn><issn>2072-4292</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUU1vEzEQXSEqUZVe-AWWuCGlHX-t18eoFIiUCAnaszXrnV0cbdbBdpD497hNBXgOno_3nkZvmuYdhxspLdymzFtoOVjzqrkUYMRKCSte_5e_aa5z3kN9UnIL6rJxu9NcwhAOtOQQF5zZ_S-cT1hqwXZUfsQhszEm9pHoyLaEaQnLxHZxoDmzsLAHTBOVOi7kn0lP4O_rb2xzwIny2-ZixDnT9ct_1Tx-un-4-7Lafv28uVtvV15qW1bKICoNXHXEkYPpBi97bVqhR-4BvYcBjfWdNhx7DYaLSrO6tVKCBm3kVbM56w4R9-6YwgHTbxcxuOdGTJPDVIKfyfXYC_C94ii8GnroFVFrZOuV79vWUtV6f9Y6pvjzRLm4fTyl6k12sjqnqnPQVdTNGTVhFQ3LGEtCX2OgQ_BxoTHU_tp0ndBSgaiED2eCTzHnROPfNTm4pwO6fweUfwCMQYsc</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Wang, Pengcheng</creator><creator>Liu, Huanyu</creator><creator>Zhou, Xinrui</creator><creator>Xue, Zhijun</creator><creator>Ni, Liang</creator><creator>Han, Qi</creator><creator>Li, Junbao</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Multidimensional Evaluation Methods for Deep Learning Models in Target Detection for SAR Images</title><author>Wang, Pengcheng ; Liu, Huanyu ; Zhou, Xinrui ; Xue, Zhijun ; Ni, Liang ; Han, Qi ; Li, Junbao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-47aa450148e1a1078dc3b57625f1c0acc0da79c8571ab50712359956933050573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adaptability</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Artificial satellites in remote sensing</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>evaluation metrics</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>multidimensional evaluation</topic><topic>Multidimensional methods</topic><topic>Object recognition</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Radar imaging</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>SAR images</topic><topic>Synthetic aperture radar</topic><topic>Target detection</topic><topic>Task complexity</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Pengcheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Huanyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xinrui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Zhijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Junbao</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Publicly Available Content database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Pengcheng</au><au>Liu, Huanyu</au><au>Zhou, Xinrui</au><au>Xue, Zhijun</au><au>Ni, Liang</au><au>Han, Qi</au><au>Li, Junbao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multidimensional Evaluation Methods for Deep Learning Models in Target Detection for SAR Images</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1097</spage><pages>1097-</pages><issn>2072-4292</issn><eissn>2072-4292</eissn><abstract>As artificial intelligence technology advances, the application of object detection technology in the field of SAR (synthetic aperture radar) imagery is becoming increasingly widespread. However, it also faces challenges such as resource limitations in spaceborne environments and significant uncertainty in the intensity of interference in application scenarios. These factors make the performance evaluation of object detection key to ensuring the smooth execution of tasks. In the face of such complex and harsh application scenarios, methods that rely on single-dimensional evaluation to assess models have had their limitations highlighted. Therefore, this paper proposes a multi-dimensional evaluation method for deep learning models used in SAR image object detection. This method evaluates models in a multi-dimensional manner, covering the training, testing, and application stages of the model, and constructs a multi-dimensional evaluation index system. The training stage includes assessing training efficiency and the impact of training samples; the testing stage includes model performance evaluation, application-based evaluation, and task-based evaluation; and the application stage includes model operation evaluation and model deployment evaluation. The evaluations of these three stages constitute the key links in the performance evaluation of deep learning models. Furthermore, this paper proposes a multi-indicator comprehensive evaluation method based on entropy weight correlation scaling, which calculates the weights of each evaluation indicator through test data, thereby providing a balanced and comprehensive evaluation mechanism for model performance. In the experiments, we designed specific interferences for SAR images in the testing stage and tested three models from the YOLO series. Finally, we constructed a multi-dimensional performance profile diagram for deep learning object detection models, providing a new visualization method to comprehensively characterize model performance in complex application scenarios. This can provide more accurate and comprehensive model performance evaluation for remote sensing data processing, thereby guiding model selection and optimization. The evaluation method proposed in this study adopts a multi-dimensional perspective, comprehensively assessing the three core stages of a model’s lifecycle: training, testing, and application. This framework demonstrates significant versatility and adaptability, enabling it to transcend the boundaries of remote sensing technology and provide support for a wide range of model evaluation and optimization tasks.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/rs16061097</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2072-4292 |
ispartof | Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2024-03, Vol.16 (6), p.1097 |
issn | 2072-4292 2072-4292 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bab20cb41a2c4db0b4ee6736c4cb669e |
source | ProQuest Publicly Available Content database |
subjects | Accuracy Adaptability Algorithms Artificial intelligence Artificial satellites in remote sensing Data processing Datasets Deep learning Energy consumption evaluation metrics Experiments Methods multidimensional evaluation Multidimensional methods Object recognition Optimization Performance evaluation Radar imaging Remote sensing Researchers SAR images Synthetic aperture radar Target detection Task complexity Training Ultrasonic imaging |
title | Multidimensional Evaluation Methods for Deep Learning Models in Target Detection for SAR Images |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T02%3A50%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multidimensional%20Evaluation%20Methods%20for%20Deep%20Learning%20Models%20in%20Target%20Detection%20for%20SAR%20Images&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Wang,%20Pengcheng&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1097&rft.pages=1097-&rft.issn=2072-4292&rft.eissn=2072-4292&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/rs16061097&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA788253402%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-47aa450148e1a1078dc3b57625f1c0acc0da79c8571ab50712359956933050573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3003419008&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A788253402&rfr_iscdi=true |