Fatal Attraction: Argiope Spiders Lure Male Hemileuca Moth Prey with the Promise of Sex

Predator-prey coevolution, particularly chemo-ecological arms races, is challenging to study as it requires the integration of behavioral, chemical ecology, and phylogenetic studies in an amenable system. Moths of the genus (Saturniidae) are colorful, diurnal, and fast and often fly well above the v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Insects (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2024-01, Vol.15 (1), p.53
Main Authors: Warren, Andrew D, Severns, Paul M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Araneidae
Argiope
Butterflies & moths
Chemical ecology
Coevolution
Females
Homing behavior
Males
mate location
Mating
pheromone lure
Pheromone traps
Pheromones
Phylogeny
Predation
Predators
predator–prey
Prey
Resource allocation
Saturniidae
Species
Spiders
Webs
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Predator-prey coevolution, particularly chemo-ecological arms races, is challenging to study as it requires the integration of behavioral, chemical ecology, and phylogenetic studies in an amenable system. Moths of the genus (Saturniidae) are colorful, diurnal, and fast and often fly well above the vegetation canopy layer. However, several species have been reported as being captured in spider webs, specifically species (Araneidae). Female are known to produce mating pheromones and spiders of the Araneidae family are known to use pheromone lures to attract lepidopteran prey. We presented primarily female , which are attractive to male (Saturniidae), to different populations of species across the southern and western United States to categorize the homing response strength of different species of male . When we mapped these lure attraction strength categories onto the most recently published phylogeny, the behavioral patterns suggested a potential co-evolutionary arms race between predators and prey. Males of , , and (all in the same clade) appeared to have no attraction to , while and (within a different, separate clade) appeared to be strongly attracted to , but (also within the and clade) displayed no attraction. Furthermore, (yet a different clade) displayed strong, weak, and no attraction to , depending on the population. These apparent clade partitioning patterns of lure effectiveness and within-species variation in lure responses suggest a predator-prey coevolutionary history of measures and countermeasures.
ISSN:2075-4450
2075-4450
DOI:10.3390/insects15010053