Loading…

Comparison of Turbocharging and Pressure Wave Supercharging of a Natural Gas Engine for Light Commercial Trucks and Vans

To increase the efficiency of a natural gas engine, the use of a Miller camshaft was analysed. To avoid a decline in the low-end torque and also in the transient response, a pressure wave supercharger (Comprex™) was compared to the conventional single-stage turbocharger. The analyses for this concep...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energies (Basel) 2021-09, Vol.14 (17), p.5306
Main Authors: Zsiga, Norbert, Skopil, Mario A., Wang, Moyu, Klein, Daniel, Soltic, Patrik
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-7f211ec189d8d0e2d91ec6ce3aa49ac0b3ebf1ea4041dbf31a3152ddc968b90d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-7f211ec189d8d0e2d91ec6ce3aa49ac0b3ebf1ea4041dbf31a3152ddc968b90d3
container_end_page
container_issue 17
container_start_page 5306
container_title Energies (Basel)
container_volume 14
creator Zsiga, Norbert
Skopil, Mario A.
Wang, Moyu
Klein, Daniel
Soltic, Patrik
description To increase the efficiency of a natural gas engine, the use of a Miller camshaft was analysed. To avoid a decline in the low-end torque and also in the transient response, a pressure wave supercharger (Comprex™) was compared to the conventional single-stage turbocharger. The analyses for this conceptual comparison were performed experimentally, and the data were then used to run simulations of driving cycles for light commercial vehicles. A torque increase of 49% resulted at 1250 rpm when the Comprex™ was used in combination with a Miller camshaft. Despite the Miller camshaft, the Comprex™ transient response was still faster than the turbocharged engine. Using the same camshaft, the turbocharged engine took 2.5-times as long to reach the same torque. Water injection was used to increase the peak power output while respecting the temperature limitations. As the Comprex™ enables engine braking by design, we show that the use of friction brakes was reduced by two-thirds. Finally, a six-times faster catalyst warmup and an up to 90 °C higher exhaust gas temperature at the three-way catalytic converter added to the benefits of using the Comprex™ supercharger. The known drawbacks of the Comprex™ superchargers were solved due to a complete redesign of the machine, which is described in detail.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/en14175306
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_baf81de4873e4b2eba8f311bfca9e405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_baf81de4873e4b2eba8f311bfca9e405</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2571059915</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-7f211ec189d8d0e2d91ec6ce3aa49ac0b3ebf1ea4041dbf31a3152ddc968b90d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU1PGzEQhleolUDAhV9giVulFM96N7s-VhEfkSKo1LQ9WmN7HDYk6zDeRfDvMQTRzmU-32dGmqI4A_ldKS0vqIcKmlrJ6UFxBFpPJyAb9eW_-LA4TWktsykFSqmj4nkWtzvkLsVexCCWI9vo7pFXXb8S2HvxkymlkUn8xScSv8Yd8Wc_C1Dc4jAybsQ1JnHZ5zqJEFksutX9IDJ9mwVd7i95dA_pnfkH-3RSfA24SXT64Y-L31eXy9nNZHF3PZ_9WExcqWGYNKEEIAet9q2XVHqds6kjhVhpdNIqsgEIK1mBt0EBKqhL752etlZLr46L-Z7rI67Njrst8ouJ2Jn3QuSVQR46tyFjMbTgqWobRZUtyWKbgWCDQ02VrDPrfM_acXwcKQ1mHUfu8_mmrBuQtdbwNvVtP-U4psQUPreCNG-PMv8epV4BQ0mG1A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2571059915</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Turbocharging and Pressure Wave Supercharging of a Natural Gas Engine for Light Commercial Trucks and Vans</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Zsiga, Norbert ; Skopil, Mario A. ; Wang, Moyu ; Klein, Daniel ; Soltic, Patrik</creator><creatorcontrib>Zsiga, Norbert ; Skopil, Mario A. ; Wang, Moyu ; Klein, Daniel ; Soltic, Patrik</creatorcontrib><description>To increase the efficiency of a natural gas engine, the use of a Miller camshaft was analysed. To avoid a decline in the low-end torque and also in the transient response, a pressure wave supercharger (Comprex™) was compared to the conventional single-stage turbocharger. The analyses for this conceptual comparison were performed experimentally, and the data were then used to run simulations of driving cycles for light commercial vehicles. A torque increase of 49% resulted at 1250 rpm when the Comprex™ was used in combination with a Miller camshaft. Despite the Miller camshaft, the Comprex™ transient response was still faster than the turbocharged engine. Using the same camshaft, the turbocharged engine took 2.5-times as long to reach the same torque. Water injection was used to increase the peak power output while respecting the temperature limitations. As the Comprex™ enables engine braking by design, we show that the use of friction brakes was reduced by two-thirds. Finally, a six-times faster catalyst warmup and an up to 90 °C higher exhaust gas temperature at the three-way catalytic converter added to the benefits of using the Comprex™ supercharger. The known drawbacks of the Comprex™ superchargers were solved due to a complete redesign of the machine, which is described in detail.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/en14175306</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Automobiles ; Automotive parts ; boosting ; Catalysts ; Catalytic converters ; Cold ; Diesel engines ; Elastic waves ; Emission control equipment ; Engines ; exhaust aftertreatment ; Exhaust gases ; Exhaust systems ; Friction reduction ; Gas flow ; Gas temperature ; Gases ; low-end torque ; Miller valve timing ; Natural gas ; pressure wave supercharging ; Redesign ; Thrust bearings ; Torque ; Transient response ; Trucks ; turbocharging ; Vans ; Water injection</subject><ispartof>Energies (Basel), 2021-09, Vol.14 (17), p.5306</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-7f211ec189d8d0e2d91ec6ce3aa49ac0b3ebf1ea4041dbf31a3152ddc968b90d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-7f211ec189d8d0e2d91ec6ce3aa49ac0b3ebf1ea4041dbf31a3152ddc968b90d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7498-4768 ; 0000-0003-1937-1074 ; 0000-0003-2289-7608</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2571059915/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2571059915?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zsiga, Norbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skopil, Mario A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Moyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltic, Patrik</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Turbocharging and Pressure Wave Supercharging of a Natural Gas Engine for Light Commercial Trucks and Vans</title><title>Energies (Basel)</title><description>To increase the efficiency of a natural gas engine, the use of a Miller camshaft was analysed. To avoid a decline in the low-end torque and also in the transient response, a pressure wave supercharger (Comprex™) was compared to the conventional single-stage turbocharger. The analyses for this conceptual comparison were performed experimentally, and the data were then used to run simulations of driving cycles for light commercial vehicles. A torque increase of 49% resulted at 1250 rpm when the Comprex™ was used in combination with a Miller camshaft. Despite the Miller camshaft, the Comprex™ transient response was still faster than the turbocharged engine. Using the same camshaft, the turbocharged engine took 2.5-times as long to reach the same torque. Water injection was used to increase the peak power output while respecting the temperature limitations. As the Comprex™ enables engine braking by design, we show that the use of friction brakes was reduced by two-thirds. Finally, a six-times faster catalyst warmup and an up to 90 °C higher exhaust gas temperature at the three-way catalytic converter added to the benefits of using the Comprex™ supercharger. The known drawbacks of the Comprex™ superchargers were solved due to a complete redesign of the machine, which is described in detail.</description><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Automotive parts</subject><subject>boosting</subject><subject>Catalysts</subject><subject>Catalytic converters</subject><subject>Cold</subject><subject>Diesel engines</subject><subject>Elastic waves</subject><subject>Emission control equipment</subject><subject>Engines</subject><subject>exhaust aftertreatment</subject><subject>Exhaust gases</subject><subject>Exhaust systems</subject><subject>Friction reduction</subject><subject>Gas flow</subject><subject>Gas temperature</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>low-end torque</subject><subject>Miller valve timing</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>pressure wave supercharging</subject><subject>Redesign</subject><subject>Thrust bearings</subject><subject>Torque</subject><subject>Transient response</subject><subject>Trucks</subject><subject>turbocharging</subject><subject>Vans</subject><subject>Water injection</subject><issn>1996-1073</issn><issn>1996-1073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU1PGzEQhleolUDAhV9giVulFM96N7s-VhEfkSKo1LQ9WmN7HDYk6zDeRfDvMQTRzmU-32dGmqI4A_ldKS0vqIcKmlrJ6UFxBFpPJyAb9eW_-LA4TWktsykFSqmj4nkWtzvkLsVexCCWI9vo7pFXXb8S2HvxkymlkUn8xScSv8Yd8Wc_C1Dc4jAybsQ1JnHZ5zqJEFksutX9IDJ9mwVd7i95dA_pnfkH-3RSfA24SXT64Y-L31eXy9nNZHF3PZ_9WExcqWGYNKEEIAet9q2XVHqds6kjhVhpdNIqsgEIK1mBt0EBKqhL752etlZLr46L-Z7rI67Njrst8ouJ2Jn3QuSVQR46tyFjMbTgqWobRZUtyWKbgWCDQ02VrDPrfM_acXwcKQ1mHUfu8_mmrBuQtdbwNvVtP-U4psQUPreCNG-PMv8epV4BQ0mG1A</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Zsiga, Norbert</creator><creator>Skopil, Mario A.</creator><creator>Wang, Moyu</creator><creator>Klein, Daniel</creator><creator>Soltic, Patrik</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7498-4768</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1937-1074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2289-7608</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Comparison of Turbocharging and Pressure Wave Supercharging of a Natural Gas Engine for Light Commercial Trucks and Vans</title><author>Zsiga, Norbert ; Skopil, Mario A. ; Wang, Moyu ; Klein, Daniel ; Soltic, Patrik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-7f211ec189d8d0e2d91ec6ce3aa49ac0b3ebf1ea4041dbf31a3152ddc968b90d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Automotive parts</topic><topic>boosting</topic><topic>Catalysts</topic><topic>Catalytic converters</topic><topic>Cold</topic><topic>Diesel engines</topic><topic>Elastic waves</topic><topic>Emission control equipment</topic><topic>Engines</topic><topic>exhaust aftertreatment</topic><topic>Exhaust gases</topic><topic>Exhaust systems</topic><topic>Friction reduction</topic><topic>Gas flow</topic><topic>Gas temperature</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>low-end torque</topic><topic>Miller valve timing</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>pressure wave supercharging</topic><topic>Redesign</topic><topic>Thrust bearings</topic><topic>Torque</topic><topic>Transient response</topic><topic>Trucks</topic><topic>turbocharging</topic><topic>Vans</topic><topic>Water injection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zsiga, Norbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skopil, Mario A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Moyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltic, Patrik</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zsiga, Norbert</au><au>Skopil, Mario A.</au><au>Wang, Moyu</au><au>Klein, Daniel</au><au>Soltic, Patrik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Turbocharging and Pressure Wave Supercharging of a Natural Gas Engine for Light Commercial Trucks and Vans</atitle><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>5306</spage><pages>5306-</pages><issn>1996-1073</issn><eissn>1996-1073</eissn><abstract>To increase the efficiency of a natural gas engine, the use of a Miller camshaft was analysed. To avoid a decline in the low-end torque and also in the transient response, a pressure wave supercharger (Comprex™) was compared to the conventional single-stage turbocharger. The analyses for this conceptual comparison were performed experimentally, and the data were then used to run simulations of driving cycles for light commercial vehicles. A torque increase of 49% resulted at 1250 rpm when the Comprex™ was used in combination with a Miller camshaft. Despite the Miller camshaft, the Comprex™ transient response was still faster than the turbocharged engine. Using the same camshaft, the turbocharged engine took 2.5-times as long to reach the same torque. Water injection was used to increase the peak power output while respecting the temperature limitations. As the Comprex™ enables engine braking by design, we show that the use of friction brakes was reduced by two-thirds. Finally, a six-times faster catalyst warmup and an up to 90 °C higher exhaust gas temperature at the three-way catalytic converter added to the benefits of using the Comprex™ supercharger. The known drawbacks of the Comprex™ superchargers were solved due to a complete redesign of the machine, which is described in detail.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/en14175306</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7498-4768</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1937-1074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2289-7608</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1996-1073
ispartof Energies (Basel), 2021-09, Vol.14 (17), p.5306
issn 1996-1073
1996-1073
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_baf81de4873e4b2eba8f311bfca9e405
source ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Automobiles
Automotive parts
boosting
Catalysts
Catalytic converters
Cold
Diesel engines
Elastic waves
Emission control equipment
Engines
exhaust aftertreatment
Exhaust gases
Exhaust systems
Friction reduction
Gas flow
Gas temperature
Gases
low-end torque
Miller valve timing
Natural gas
pressure wave supercharging
Redesign
Thrust bearings
Torque
Transient response
Trucks
turbocharging
Vans
Water injection
title Comparison of Turbocharging and Pressure Wave Supercharging of a Natural Gas Engine for Light Commercial Trucks and Vans
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T10%3A41%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Turbocharging%20and%20Pressure%20Wave%20Supercharging%20of%20a%20Natural%20Gas%20Engine%20for%20Light%20Commercial%20Trucks%20and%20Vans&rft.jtitle=Energies%20(Basel)&rft.au=Zsiga,%20Norbert&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=5306&rft.pages=5306-&rft.issn=1996-1073&rft.eissn=1996-1073&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/en14175306&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2571059915%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-7f211ec189d8d0e2d91ec6ce3aa49ac0b3ebf1ea4041dbf31a3152ddc968b90d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2571059915&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true