Loading…
Comparison of Turbocharging and Pressure Wave Supercharging of a Natural Gas Engine for Light Commercial Trucks and Vans
To increase the efficiency of a natural gas engine, the use of a Miller camshaft was analysed. To avoid a decline in the low-end torque and also in the transient response, a pressure wave supercharger (Comprex™) was compared to the conventional single-stage turbocharger. The analyses for this concep...
Saved in:
Published in: | Energies (Basel) 2021-09, Vol.14 (17), p.5306 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-7f211ec189d8d0e2d91ec6ce3aa49ac0b3ebf1ea4041dbf31a3152ddc968b90d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-7f211ec189d8d0e2d91ec6ce3aa49ac0b3ebf1ea4041dbf31a3152ddc968b90d3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 17 |
container_start_page | 5306 |
container_title | Energies (Basel) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Zsiga, Norbert Skopil, Mario A. Wang, Moyu Klein, Daniel Soltic, Patrik |
description | To increase the efficiency of a natural gas engine, the use of a Miller camshaft was analysed. To avoid a decline in the low-end torque and also in the transient response, a pressure wave supercharger (Comprex™) was compared to the conventional single-stage turbocharger. The analyses for this conceptual comparison were performed experimentally, and the data were then used to run simulations of driving cycles for light commercial vehicles. A torque increase of 49% resulted at 1250 rpm when the Comprex™ was used in combination with a Miller camshaft. Despite the Miller camshaft, the Comprex™ transient response was still faster than the turbocharged engine. Using the same camshaft, the turbocharged engine took 2.5-times as long to reach the same torque. Water injection was used to increase the peak power output while respecting the temperature limitations. As the Comprex™ enables engine braking by design, we show that the use of friction brakes was reduced by two-thirds. Finally, a six-times faster catalyst warmup and an up to 90 °C higher exhaust gas temperature at the three-way catalytic converter added to the benefits of using the Comprex™ supercharger. The known drawbacks of the Comprex™ superchargers were solved due to a complete redesign of the machine, which is described in detail. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/en14175306 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_baf81de4873e4b2eba8f311bfca9e405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_baf81de4873e4b2eba8f311bfca9e405</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2571059915</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-7f211ec189d8d0e2d91ec6ce3aa49ac0b3ebf1ea4041dbf31a3152ddc968b90d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU1PGzEQhleolUDAhV9giVulFM96N7s-VhEfkSKo1LQ9WmN7HDYk6zDeRfDvMQTRzmU-32dGmqI4A_ldKS0vqIcKmlrJ6UFxBFpPJyAb9eW_-LA4TWktsykFSqmj4nkWtzvkLsVexCCWI9vo7pFXXb8S2HvxkymlkUn8xScSv8Yd8Wc_C1Dc4jAybsQ1JnHZ5zqJEFksutX9IDJ9mwVd7i95dA_pnfkH-3RSfA24SXT64Y-L31eXy9nNZHF3PZ_9WExcqWGYNKEEIAet9q2XVHqds6kjhVhpdNIqsgEIK1mBt0EBKqhL752etlZLr46L-Z7rI67Njrst8ouJ2Jn3QuSVQR46tyFjMbTgqWobRZUtyWKbgWCDQ02VrDPrfM_acXwcKQ1mHUfu8_mmrBuQtdbwNvVtP-U4psQUPreCNG-PMv8epV4BQ0mG1A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2571059915</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Turbocharging and Pressure Wave Supercharging of a Natural Gas Engine for Light Commercial Trucks and Vans</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Zsiga, Norbert ; Skopil, Mario A. ; Wang, Moyu ; Klein, Daniel ; Soltic, Patrik</creator><creatorcontrib>Zsiga, Norbert ; Skopil, Mario A. ; Wang, Moyu ; Klein, Daniel ; Soltic, Patrik</creatorcontrib><description>To increase the efficiency of a natural gas engine, the use of a Miller camshaft was analysed. To avoid a decline in the low-end torque and also in the transient response, a pressure wave supercharger (Comprex™) was compared to the conventional single-stage turbocharger. The analyses for this conceptual comparison were performed experimentally, and the data were then used to run simulations of driving cycles for light commercial vehicles. A torque increase of 49% resulted at 1250 rpm when the Comprex™ was used in combination with a Miller camshaft. Despite the Miller camshaft, the Comprex™ transient response was still faster than the turbocharged engine. Using the same camshaft, the turbocharged engine took 2.5-times as long to reach the same torque. Water injection was used to increase the peak power output while respecting the temperature limitations. As the Comprex™ enables engine braking by design, we show that the use of friction brakes was reduced by two-thirds. Finally, a six-times faster catalyst warmup and an up to 90 °C higher exhaust gas temperature at the three-way catalytic converter added to the benefits of using the Comprex™ supercharger. The known drawbacks of the Comprex™ superchargers were solved due to a complete redesign of the machine, which is described in detail.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/en14175306</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Automobiles ; Automotive parts ; boosting ; Catalysts ; Catalytic converters ; Cold ; Diesel engines ; Elastic waves ; Emission control equipment ; Engines ; exhaust aftertreatment ; Exhaust gases ; Exhaust systems ; Friction reduction ; Gas flow ; Gas temperature ; Gases ; low-end torque ; Miller valve timing ; Natural gas ; pressure wave supercharging ; Redesign ; Thrust bearings ; Torque ; Transient response ; Trucks ; turbocharging ; Vans ; Water injection</subject><ispartof>Energies (Basel), 2021-09, Vol.14 (17), p.5306</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-7f211ec189d8d0e2d91ec6ce3aa49ac0b3ebf1ea4041dbf31a3152ddc968b90d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-7f211ec189d8d0e2d91ec6ce3aa49ac0b3ebf1ea4041dbf31a3152ddc968b90d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7498-4768 ; 0000-0003-1937-1074 ; 0000-0003-2289-7608</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2571059915/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2571059915?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zsiga, Norbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skopil, Mario A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Moyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltic, Patrik</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Turbocharging and Pressure Wave Supercharging of a Natural Gas Engine for Light Commercial Trucks and Vans</title><title>Energies (Basel)</title><description>To increase the efficiency of a natural gas engine, the use of a Miller camshaft was analysed. To avoid a decline in the low-end torque and also in the transient response, a pressure wave supercharger (Comprex™) was compared to the conventional single-stage turbocharger. The analyses for this conceptual comparison were performed experimentally, and the data were then used to run simulations of driving cycles for light commercial vehicles. A torque increase of 49% resulted at 1250 rpm when the Comprex™ was used in combination with a Miller camshaft. Despite the Miller camshaft, the Comprex™ transient response was still faster than the turbocharged engine. Using the same camshaft, the turbocharged engine took 2.5-times as long to reach the same torque. Water injection was used to increase the peak power output while respecting the temperature limitations. As the Comprex™ enables engine braking by design, we show that the use of friction brakes was reduced by two-thirds. Finally, a six-times faster catalyst warmup and an up to 90 °C higher exhaust gas temperature at the three-way catalytic converter added to the benefits of using the Comprex™ supercharger. The known drawbacks of the Comprex™ superchargers were solved due to a complete redesign of the machine, which is described in detail.</description><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Automotive parts</subject><subject>boosting</subject><subject>Catalysts</subject><subject>Catalytic converters</subject><subject>Cold</subject><subject>Diesel engines</subject><subject>Elastic waves</subject><subject>Emission control equipment</subject><subject>Engines</subject><subject>exhaust aftertreatment</subject><subject>Exhaust gases</subject><subject>Exhaust systems</subject><subject>Friction reduction</subject><subject>Gas flow</subject><subject>Gas temperature</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>low-end torque</subject><subject>Miller valve timing</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>pressure wave supercharging</subject><subject>Redesign</subject><subject>Thrust bearings</subject><subject>Torque</subject><subject>Transient response</subject><subject>Trucks</subject><subject>turbocharging</subject><subject>Vans</subject><subject>Water injection</subject><issn>1996-1073</issn><issn>1996-1073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU1PGzEQhleolUDAhV9giVulFM96N7s-VhEfkSKo1LQ9WmN7HDYk6zDeRfDvMQTRzmU-32dGmqI4A_ldKS0vqIcKmlrJ6UFxBFpPJyAb9eW_-LA4TWktsykFSqmj4nkWtzvkLsVexCCWI9vo7pFXXb8S2HvxkymlkUn8xScSv8Yd8Wc_C1Dc4jAybsQ1JnHZ5zqJEFksutX9IDJ9mwVd7i95dA_pnfkH-3RSfA24SXT64Y-L31eXy9nNZHF3PZ_9WExcqWGYNKEEIAet9q2XVHqds6kjhVhpdNIqsgEIK1mBt0EBKqhL752etlZLr46L-Z7rI67Njrst8ouJ2Jn3QuSVQR46tyFjMbTgqWobRZUtyWKbgWCDQ02VrDPrfM_acXwcKQ1mHUfu8_mmrBuQtdbwNvVtP-U4psQUPreCNG-PMv8epV4BQ0mG1A</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Zsiga, Norbert</creator><creator>Skopil, Mario A.</creator><creator>Wang, Moyu</creator><creator>Klein, Daniel</creator><creator>Soltic, Patrik</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7498-4768</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1937-1074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2289-7608</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Comparison of Turbocharging and Pressure Wave Supercharging of a Natural Gas Engine for Light Commercial Trucks and Vans</title><author>Zsiga, Norbert ; Skopil, Mario A. ; Wang, Moyu ; Klein, Daniel ; Soltic, Patrik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-7f211ec189d8d0e2d91ec6ce3aa49ac0b3ebf1ea4041dbf31a3152ddc968b90d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Automotive parts</topic><topic>boosting</topic><topic>Catalysts</topic><topic>Catalytic converters</topic><topic>Cold</topic><topic>Diesel engines</topic><topic>Elastic waves</topic><topic>Emission control equipment</topic><topic>Engines</topic><topic>exhaust aftertreatment</topic><topic>Exhaust gases</topic><topic>Exhaust systems</topic><topic>Friction reduction</topic><topic>Gas flow</topic><topic>Gas temperature</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>low-end torque</topic><topic>Miller valve timing</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>pressure wave supercharging</topic><topic>Redesign</topic><topic>Thrust bearings</topic><topic>Torque</topic><topic>Transient response</topic><topic>Trucks</topic><topic>turbocharging</topic><topic>Vans</topic><topic>Water injection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zsiga, Norbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skopil, Mario A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Moyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltic, Patrik</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zsiga, Norbert</au><au>Skopil, Mario A.</au><au>Wang, Moyu</au><au>Klein, Daniel</au><au>Soltic, Patrik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Turbocharging and Pressure Wave Supercharging of a Natural Gas Engine for Light Commercial Trucks and Vans</atitle><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>5306</spage><pages>5306-</pages><issn>1996-1073</issn><eissn>1996-1073</eissn><abstract>To increase the efficiency of a natural gas engine, the use of a Miller camshaft was analysed. To avoid a decline in the low-end torque and also in the transient response, a pressure wave supercharger (Comprex™) was compared to the conventional single-stage turbocharger. The analyses for this conceptual comparison were performed experimentally, and the data were then used to run simulations of driving cycles for light commercial vehicles. A torque increase of 49% resulted at 1250 rpm when the Comprex™ was used in combination with a Miller camshaft. Despite the Miller camshaft, the Comprex™ transient response was still faster than the turbocharged engine. Using the same camshaft, the turbocharged engine took 2.5-times as long to reach the same torque. Water injection was used to increase the peak power output while respecting the temperature limitations. As the Comprex™ enables engine braking by design, we show that the use of friction brakes was reduced by two-thirds. Finally, a six-times faster catalyst warmup and an up to 90 °C higher exhaust gas temperature at the three-way catalytic converter added to the benefits of using the Comprex™ supercharger. The known drawbacks of the Comprex™ superchargers were solved due to a complete redesign of the machine, which is described in detail.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/en14175306</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7498-4768</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1937-1074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2289-7608</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1996-1073 |
ispartof | Energies (Basel), 2021-09, Vol.14 (17), p.5306 |
issn | 1996-1073 1996-1073 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_baf81de4873e4b2eba8f311bfca9e405 |
source | ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Automobiles Automotive parts boosting Catalysts Catalytic converters Cold Diesel engines Elastic waves Emission control equipment Engines exhaust aftertreatment Exhaust gases Exhaust systems Friction reduction Gas flow Gas temperature Gases low-end torque Miller valve timing Natural gas pressure wave supercharging Redesign Thrust bearings Torque Transient response Trucks turbocharging Vans Water injection |
title | Comparison of Turbocharging and Pressure Wave Supercharging of a Natural Gas Engine for Light Commercial Trucks and Vans |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T10%3A41%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Turbocharging%20and%20Pressure%20Wave%20Supercharging%20of%20a%20Natural%20Gas%20Engine%20for%20Light%20Commercial%20Trucks%20and%20Vans&rft.jtitle=Energies%20(Basel)&rft.au=Zsiga,%20Norbert&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=5306&rft.pages=5306-&rft.issn=1996-1073&rft.eissn=1996-1073&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/en14175306&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2571059915%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-7f211ec189d8d0e2d91ec6ce3aa49ac0b3ebf1ea4041dbf31a3152ddc968b90d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2571059915&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |