Loading…
TactiGraph: An Asynchronous Graph Neural Network for Contact Angle Prediction Using Neuromorphic Vision-Based Tactile Sensing
Vision-based tactile sensors (VBTSs) have become the de facto method for giving robots the ability to obtain tactile feedback from their environment. Unlike other solutions to tactile sensing, VBTSs offer high spatial resolution feedback without compromising on instrumentation costs or incurring add...
Saved in:
Published in: | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2023-07, Vol.23 (14), p.6451 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Vision-based tactile sensors (VBTSs) have become the de facto method for giving robots the ability to obtain tactile feedback from their environment. Unlike other solutions to tactile sensing, VBTSs offer high spatial resolution feedback without compromising on instrumentation costs or incurring additional maintenance expenses. However, conventional cameras used in VBTS have a fixed update rate and output redundant data, leading to computational overhead.In this work, we present a neuromorphic vision-based tactile sensor (N-VBTS) that employs observations from an event-based camera for contact angle prediction. In particular, we design and develop a novel graph neural network, dubbed TactiGraph, that asynchronously operates on graphs constructed from raw N-VBTS streams exploiting their spatiotemporal correlations to perform predictions. Although conventional VBTSs use an internal illumination source, TactiGraph is reported to perform efficiently in both scenarios (with and without an internal illumination source) thus further reducing instrumentation costs. Rigorous experimental results revealed that TactiGraph achieved a mean absolute error of 0.62∘ in predicting the contact angle and was faster and more efficient than both conventional VBTS and other N-VBTS, with lower instrumentation costs. Specifically, N-VBTS requires only 5.5% of the computing time needed by VBTS when both are tested on the same scenario. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1424-8220 1424-8220 |
DOI: | 10.3390/s23146451 |