Loading…
Ralstonia solanacearum and R. pseudosolanacearum on Eucalyptus : Opportunists or Primary Pathogens?
and are well known primary pathogens of herbaceous crops. Reports of wilt caused by these pathogens in tree species are limited other than on species. Despite the widespread occurrence of so-called bacterial wilt on eucalypts in tropical and sub-tropical parts of Africa, Asia, and the Americas, ther...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in plant science 2017-05, Vol.8, p.761-761 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | and
are well known primary pathogens of herbaceous crops. Reports of wilt caused by these pathogens in tree species are limited other than on
species. Despite the widespread occurrence of so-called bacterial wilt on eucalypts in tropical and sub-tropical parts of Africa, Asia, and the Americas, there remain many contradictions relating to the disease. Our field observations over many years in most regions where the disease occurs on
show that it is always associated with trees that have been subjected to severe stress. The disease is typically diagnosed by immersing cut stems in water and observing bacterial streaming, but the identity of the bacteria within this suspension is seldom considered. To add to the confusion, pathogenicity tests on susceptible species or clones are rarely successful. When they do work, they are on small plants in greenhouse trials. It has become all to easy to attribute
death exclusively to
infection. Our data strongly suggest that
species and probably other bacteria are latent colonists commonly occurring in healthy and particularly clonally propagated eucalypts. The onset of stress factors provide the bacteria with an opportunity to develop. We believe that the resulting stress weakens the defense systems of the trees allowing
and bacterial endophytes to proliferate. Overall our research suggests that
and
are not primary pathogens of
. Short of clear evidence that they are primary pathogens of
it is inappropriate to attribute this disease solely to infection by
species. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1664-462X 1664-462X |
DOI: | 10.3389/fpls.2017.00761 |