Loading…

Incomplete Penetrance of Population-Based Genetic Screening Results in Electronic Health Record

The clinical value of population-based genetic screening projects depends on the actions taken on the findings. The Healthy Nevada Project (HNP) is an all-comer genetic screening and research project based in northern Nevada. HNP participants with CDC Tier 1 findings of hereditary breast and ovarian...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in genetics 2022-04, Vol.13, p.866169-866169
Main Authors: Elhanan, Gai, Kiser, Daniel, Neveux, Iva, Dabe, Shaun, Bolze, Alexandre, Metcalf, William J, Lu, James T, Grzymski, Joseph J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-d879a25474b7fa0a3a68ed95c4d294668e1259fed9bd2373c84be39b854114793
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-d879a25474b7fa0a3a68ed95c4d294668e1259fed9bd2373c84be39b854114793
container_end_page 866169
container_issue
container_start_page 866169
container_title Frontiers in genetics
container_volume 13
creator Elhanan, Gai
Kiser, Daniel
Neveux, Iva
Dabe, Shaun
Bolze, Alexandre
Metcalf, William J
Lu, James T
Grzymski, Joseph J
description The clinical value of population-based genetic screening projects depends on the actions taken on the findings. The Healthy Nevada Project (HNP) is an all-comer genetic screening and research project based in northern Nevada. HNP participants with CDC Tier 1 findings of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC), Lynch syndrome (LS), or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are notified and provided with genetic counseling. However, the HNP subsequently takes a "hands-off" approach: it is the responsibility of notified participants to share their findings with their healthcare providers, and providers are expected to implement the recommended action plans. Thus, the HNP presents an opportunity to evaluate the efficiency of participant and provider responses to notification of important genetic findings, using electronic health records (EHRs) at Renown Health (a large regional hospital in northern Nevada). Out of 520 HNP participants with findings, we identified 250 participants who were notified of their findings and who had an EHR. 107 of these participants responded to a survey, with 76 (71%) indicating that they had shared their findings with their healthcare providers. However, a sufficiently specific genetic diagnosis appeared in the EHRs and problem lists of only 22 and 10%, respectively, of participants without prior knowledge. Furthermore, review of participant EHRs provided evidence of possible relevant changes in clinical care for only a handful of participants. Up to 19% of participants would have benefited from earlier screening due to prior presentation of their condition. These results suggest that continuous support for both participants and their providers is necessary to maximize the benefit of population-based genetic screening. We recommend that genetic screening projects require participants' consent to directly document their genetic findings in their EHRs. Additionally, we recommend that they provide healthcare providers with ongoing training regarding documentation of findings and with clinical decision support regarding subsequent care.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fgene.2022.866169
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bc9646b773b44a2cb3eefecdab40e264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_bc9646b773b44a2cb3eefecdab40e264</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2665107884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-d879a25474b7fa0a3a68ed95c4d294668e1259fed9bd2373c84be39b854114793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkctuFDEQRS0EItGQD2CDesmmB78fGySIQjJSJCIea8t2V0868tiD3R2Jv8eTCVHijV11XadKdRF6T_CaMW0-jVtIsKaY0rWWkkjzCp0SKXmvMSWvn71P0Fmtd7gdbhhj_C06YUIogqk4RXaTQt7tI8zQ3TTgXFwK0OWxu8n7Jbp5yqn_6ioM3eVBnkL3MxSANKVt9wPqEufaTam7iBDmklPTr8DF-baJIZfhHXozuljh7PFeod_fLn6dX_XX3y8351-u-8CMmPtBK-Oo4Ip7NTrsmJMaBiMCH6jhsgWECjO2lB8oUyxo7oEZrwUnhCvDVmhz5A7Z3dl9mXau_LXZTfYhkcvWutKmj2B9MJJLrxTznDsaPAMYIQzOcwxU8sb6fGTtF7-DIUBqW4kvoC-VNN3abb63BhtC2o5X6OMjoOQ_C9TZ7qYaIEaXIC_VUikFwUrrQy9y_BpKrrXA-NSGYHvw2T74bA8-26PPrebD8_meKv67yv4Bk7OmDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2665107884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incomplete Penetrance of Population-Based Genetic Screening Results in Electronic Health Record</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Elhanan, Gai ; Kiser, Daniel ; Neveux, Iva ; Dabe, Shaun ; Bolze, Alexandre ; Metcalf, William J ; Lu, James T ; Grzymski, Joseph J</creator><creatorcontrib>Elhanan, Gai ; Kiser, Daniel ; Neveux, Iva ; Dabe, Shaun ; Bolze, Alexandre ; Metcalf, William J ; Lu, James T ; Grzymski, Joseph J</creatorcontrib><description>The clinical value of population-based genetic screening projects depends on the actions taken on the findings. The Healthy Nevada Project (HNP) is an all-comer genetic screening and research project based in northern Nevada. HNP participants with CDC Tier 1 findings of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC), Lynch syndrome (LS), or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are notified and provided with genetic counseling. However, the HNP subsequently takes a "hands-off" approach: it is the responsibility of notified participants to share their findings with their healthcare providers, and providers are expected to implement the recommended action plans. Thus, the HNP presents an opportunity to evaluate the efficiency of participant and provider responses to notification of important genetic findings, using electronic health records (EHRs) at Renown Health (a large regional hospital in northern Nevada). Out of 520 HNP participants with findings, we identified 250 participants who were notified of their findings and who had an EHR. 107 of these participants responded to a survey, with 76 (71%) indicating that they had shared their findings with their healthcare providers. However, a sufficiently specific genetic diagnosis appeared in the EHRs and problem lists of only 22 and 10%, respectively, of participants without prior knowledge. Furthermore, review of participant EHRs provided evidence of possible relevant changes in clinical care for only a handful of participants. Up to 19% of participants would have benefited from earlier screening due to prior presentation of their condition. These results suggest that continuous support for both participants and their providers is necessary to maximize the benefit of population-based genetic screening. We recommend that genetic screening projects require participants' consent to directly document their genetic findings in their EHRs. Additionally, we recommend that they provide healthcare providers with ongoing training regarding documentation of findings and with clinical decision support regarding subsequent care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-8021</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-8021</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.866169</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35571025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>BRCA ; CDC Tier 1 ; EHR ; familial hypercholesterolemia ; Genetics ; HBOC ; Lynch</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in genetics, 2022-04, Vol.13, p.866169-866169</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elhanan, Kiser, Neveux, Dabe, Bolze, Metcalf, Lu and Grzymski.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elhanan, Kiser, Neveux, Dabe, Bolze, Metcalf, Lu and Grzymski. 2022 Elhanan, Kiser, Neveux, Dabe, Bolze, Metcalf, Lu and Grzymski</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-d879a25474b7fa0a3a68ed95c4d294668e1259fed9bd2373c84be39b854114793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-d879a25474b7fa0a3a68ed95c4d294668e1259fed9bd2373c84be39b854114793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9091193/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9091193/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35571025$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elhanan, Gai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiser, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neveux, Iva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dabe, Shaun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolze, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalf, William J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, James T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grzymski, Joseph J</creatorcontrib><title>Incomplete Penetrance of Population-Based Genetic Screening Results in Electronic Health Record</title><title>Frontiers in genetics</title><addtitle>Front Genet</addtitle><description>The clinical value of population-based genetic screening projects depends on the actions taken on the findings. The Healthy Nevada Project (HNP) is an all-comer genetic screening and research project based in northern Nevada. HNP participants with CDC Tier 1 findings of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC), Lynch syndrome (LS), or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are notified and provided with genetic counseling. However, the HNP subsequently takes a "hands-off" approach: it is the responsibility of notified participants to share their findings with their healthcare providers, and providers are expected to implement the recommended action plans. Thus, the HNP presents an opportunity to evaluate the efficiency of participant and provider responses to notification of important genetic findings, using electronic health records (EHRs) at Renown Health (a large regional hospital in northern Nevada). Out of 520 HNP participants with findings, we identified 250 participants who were notified of their findings and who had an EHR. 107 of these participants responded to a survey, with 76 (71%) indicating that they had shared their findings with their healthcare providers. However, a sufficiently specific genetic diagnosis appeared in the EHRs and problem lists of only 22 and 10%, respectively, of participants without prior knowledge. Furthermore, review of participant EHRs provided evidence of possible relevant changes in clinical care for only a handful of participants. Up to 19% of participants would have benefited from earlier screening due to prior presentation of their condition. These results suggest that continuous support for both participants and their providers is necessary to maximize the benefit of population-based genetic screening. We recommend that genetic screening projects require participants' consent to directly document their genetic findings in their EHRs. Additionally, we recommend that they provide healthcare providers with ongoing training regarding documentation of findings and with clinical decision support regarding subsequent care.</description><subject>BRCA</subject><subject>CDC Tier 1</subject><subject>EHR</subject><subject>familial hypercholesterolemia</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>HBOC</subject><subject>Lynch</subject><issn>1664-8021</issn><issn>1664-8021</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkctuFDEQRS0EItGQD2CDesmmB78fGySIQjJSJCIea8t2V0868tiD3R2Jv8eTCVHijV11XadKdRF6T_CaMW0-jVtIsKaY0rWWkkjzCp0SKXmvMSWvn71P0Fmtd7gdbhhj_C06YUIogqk4RXaTQt7tI8zQ3TTgXFwK0OWxu8n7Jbp5yqn_6ioM3eVBnkL3MxSANKVt9wPqEufaTam7iBDmklPTr8DF-baJIZfhHXozuljh7PFeod_fLn6dX_XX3y8351-u-8CMmPtBK-Oo4Ip7NTrsmJMaBiMCH6jhsgWECjO2lB8oUyxo7oEZrwUnhCvDVmhz5A7Z3dl9mXau_LXZTfYhkcvWutKmj2B9MJJLrxTznDsaPAMYIQzOcwxU8sb6fGTtF7-DIUBqW4kvoC-VNN3abb63BhtC2o5X6OMjoOQ_C9TZ7qYaIEaXIC_VUikFwUrrQy9y_BpKrrXA-NSGYHvw2T74bA8-26PPrebD8_meKv67yv4Bk7OmDA</recordid><startdate>20220427</startdate><enddate>20220427</enddate><creator>Elhanan, Gai</creator><creator>Kiser, Daniel</creator><creator>Neveux, Iva</creator><creator>Dabe, Shaun</creator><creator>Bolze, Alexandre</creator><creator>Metcalf, William J</creator><creator>Lu, James T</creator><creator>Grzymski, Joseph J</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220427</creationdate><title>Incomplete Penetrance of Population-Based Genetic Screening Results in Electronic Health Record</title><author>Elhanan, Gai ; Kiser, Daniel ; Neveux, Iva ; Dabe, Shaun ; Bolze, Alexandre ; Metcalf, William J ; Lu, James T ; Grzymski, Joseph J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-d879a25474b7fa0a3a68ed95c4d294668e1259fed9bd2373c84be39b854114793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>BRCA</topic><topic>CDC Tier 1</topic><topic>EHR</topic><topic>familial hypercholesterolemia</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>HBOC</topic><topic>Lynch</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elhanan, Gai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiser, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neveux, Iva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dabe, Shaun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolze, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalf, William J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, James T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grzymski, Joseph J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elhanan, Gai</au><au>Kiser, Daniel</au><au>Neveux, Iva</au><au>Dabe, Shaun</au><au>Bolze, Alexandre</au><au>Metcalf, William J</au><au>Lu, James T</au><au>Grzymski, Joseph J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incomplete Penetrance of Population-Based Genetic Screening Results in Electronic Health Record</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in genetics</jtitle><addtitle>Front Genet</addtitle><date>2022-04-27</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><spage>866169</spage><epage>866169</epage><pages>866169-866169</pages><issn>1664-8021</issn><eissn>1664-8021</eissn><abstract>The clinical value of population-based genetic screening projects depends on the actions taken on the findings. The Healthy Nevada Project (HNP) is an all-comer genetic screening and research project based in northern Nevada. HNP participants with CDC Tier 1 findings of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC), Lynch syndrome (LS), or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are notified and provided with genetic counseling. However, the HNP subsequently takes a "hands-off" approach: it is the responsibility of notified participants to share their findings with their healthcare providers, and providers are expected to implement the recommended action plans. Thus, the HNP presents an opportunity to evaluate the efficiency of participant and provider responses to notification of important genetic findings, using electronic health records (EHRs) at Renown Health (a large regional hospital in northern Nevada). Out of 520 HNP participants with findings, we identified 250 participants who were notified of their findings and who had an EHR. 107 of these participants responded to a survey, with 76 (71%) indicating that they had shared their findings with their healthcare providers. However, a sufficiently specific genetic diagnosis appeared in the EHRs and problem lists of only 22 and 10%, respectively, of participants without prior knowledge. Furthermore, review of participant EHRs provided evidence of possible relevant changes in clinical care for only a handful of participants. Up to 19% of participants would have benefited from earlier screening due to prior presentation of their condition. These results suggest that continuous support for both participants and their providers is necessary to maximize the benefit of population-based genetic screening. We recommend that genetic screening projects require participants' consent to directly document their genetic findings in their EHRs. Additionally, we recommend that they provide healthcare providers with ongoing training regarding documentation of findings and with clinical decision support regarding subsequent care.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>35571025</pmid><doi>10.3389/fgene.2022.866169</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-8021
ispartof Frontiers in genetics, 2022-04, Vol.13, p.866169-866169
issn 1664-8021
1664-8021
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bc9646b773b44a2cb3eefecdab40e264
source PubMed Central Free
subjects BRCA
CDC Tier 1
EHR
familial hypercholesterolemia
Genetics
HBOC
Lynch
title Incomplete Penetrance of Population-Based Genetic Screening Results in Electronic Health Record
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T20%3A17%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incomplete%20Penetrance%20of%20Population-Based%20Genetic%20Screening%20Results%20in%20Electronic%20Health%20Record&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20genetics&rft.au=Elhanan,%20Gai&rft.date=2022-04-27&rft.volume=13&rft.spage=866169&rft.epage=866169&rft.pages=866169-866169&rft.issn=1664-8021&rft.eissn=1664-8021&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fgene.2022.866169&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2665107884%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-d879a25474b7fa0a3a68ed95c4d294668e1259fed9bd2373c84be39b854114793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2665107884&rft_id=info:pmid/35571025&rfr_iscdi=true