Loading…
Incomplete Penetrance of Population-Based Genetic Screening Results in Electronic Health Record
The clinical value of population-based genetic screening projects depends on the actions taken on the findings. The Healthy Nevada Project (HNP) is an all-comer genetic screening and research project based in northern Nevada. HNP participants with CDC Tier 1 findings of hereditary breast and ovarian...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in genetics 2022-04, Vol.13, p.866169-866169 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-d879a25474b7fa0a3a68ed95c4d294668e1259fed9bd2373c84be39b854114793 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-d879a25474b7fa0a3a68ed95c4d294668e1259fed9bd2373c84be39b854114793 |
container_end_page | 866169 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 866169 |
container_title | Frontiers in genetics |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Elhanan, Gai Kiser, Daniel Neveux, Iva Dabe, Shaun Bolze, Alexandre Metcalf, William J Lu, James T Grzymski, Joseph J |
description | The clinical value of population-based genetic screening projects depends on the actions taken on the findings. The Healthy Nevada Project (HNP) is an all-comer genetic screening and research project based in northern Nevada. HNP participants with CDC Tier 1 findings of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC), Lynch syndrome (LS), or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are notified and provided with genetic counseling. However, the HNP subsequently takes a "hands-off" approach: it is the responsibility of notified participants to share their findings with their healthcare providers, and providers are expected to implement the recommended action plans. Thus, the HNP presents an opportunity to evaluate the efficiency of participant and provider responses to notification of important genetic findings, using electronic health records (EHRs) at Renown Health (a large regional hospital in northern Nevada). Out of 520 HNP participants with findings, we identified 250 participants who were notified of their findings and who had an EHR. 107 of these participants responded to a survey, with 76 (71%) indicating that they had shared their findings with their healthcare providers. However, a sufficiently specific genetic diagnosis appeared in the EHRs and problem lists of only 22 and 10%, respectively, of participants without prior knowledge. Furthermore, review of participant EHRs provided evidence of possible relevant changes in clinical care for only a handful of participants. Up to 19% of participants would have benefited from earlier screening due to prior presentation of their condition. These results suggest that continuous support for both participants and their providers is necessary to maximize the benefit of population-based genetic screening. We recommend that genetic screening projects require participants' consent to directly document their genetic findings in their EHRs. Additionally, we recommend that they provide healthcare providers with ongoing training regarding documentation of findings and with clinical decision support regarding subsequent care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fgene.2022.866169 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bc9646b773b44a2cb3eefecdab40e264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_bc9646b773b44a2cb3eefecdab40e264</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2665107884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-d879a25474b7fa0a3a68ed95c4d294668e1259fed9bd2373c84be39b854114793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkctuFDEQRS0EItGQD2CDesmmB78fGySIQjJSJCIea8t2V0868tiD3R2Jv8eTCVHijV11XadKdRF6T_CaMW0-jVtIsKaY0rWWkkjzCp0SKXmvMSWvn71P0Fmtd7gdbhhj_C06YUIogqk4RXaTQt7tI8zQ3TTgXFwK0OWxu8n7Jbp5yqn_6ioM3eVBnkL3MxSANKVt9wPqEufaTam7iBDmklPTr8DF-baJIZfhHXozuljh7PFeod_fLn6dX_XX3y8351-u-8CMmPtBK-Oo4Ip7NTrsmJMaBiMCH6jhsgWECjO2lB8oUyxo7oEZrwUnhCvDVmhz5A7Z3dl9mXau_LXZTfYhkcvWutKmj2B9MJJLrxTznDsaPAMYIQzOcwxU8sb6fGTtF7-DIUBqW4kvoC-VNN3abb63BhtC2o5X6OMjoOQ_C9TZ7qYaIEaXIC_VUikFwUrrQy9y_BpKrrXA-NSGYHvw2T74bA8-26PPrebD8_meKv67yv4Bk7OmDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2665107884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incomplete Penetrance of Population-Based Genetic Screening Results in Electronic Health Record</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Elhanan, Gai ; Kiser, Daniel ; Neveux, Iva ; Dabe, Shaun ; Bolze, Alexandre ; Metcalf, William J ; Lu, James T ; Grzymski, Joseph J</creator><creatorcontrib>Elhanan, Gai ; Kiser, Daniel ; Neveux, Iva ; Dabe, Shaun ; Bolze, Alexandre ; Metcalf, William J ; Lu, James T ; Grzymski, Joseph J</creatorcontrib><description>The clinical value of population-based genetic screening projects depends on the actions taken on the findings. The Healthy Nevada Project (HNP) is an all-comer genetic screening and research project based in northern Nevada. HNP participants with CDC Tier 1 findings of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC), Lynch syndrome (LS), or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are notified and provided with genetic counseling. However, the HNP subsequently takes a "hands-off" approach: it is the responsibility of notified participants to share their findings with their healthcare providers, and providers are expected to implement the recommended action plans. Thus, the HNP presents an opportunity to evaluate the efficiency of participant and provider responses to notification of important genetic findings, using electronic health records (EHRs) at Renown Health (a large regional hospital in northern Nevada). Out of 520 HNP participants with findings, we identified 250 participants who were notified of their findings and who had an EHR. 107 of these participants responded to a survey, with 76 (71%) indicating that they had shared their findings with their healthcare providers. However, a sufficiently specific genetic diagnosis appeared in the EHRs and problem lists of only 22 and 10%, respectively, of participants without prior knowledge. Furthermore, review of participant EHRs provided evidence of possible relevant changes in clinical care for only a handful of participants. Up to 19% of participants would have benefited from earlier screening due to prior presentation of their condition. These results suggest that continuous support for both participants and their providers is necessary to maximize the benefit of population-based genetic screening. We recommend that genetic screening projects require participants' consent to directly document their genetic findings in their EHRs. Additionally, we recommend that they provide healthcare providers with ongoing training regarding documentation of findings and with clinical decision support regarding subsequent care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-8021</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-8021</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.866169</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35571025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>BRCA ; CDC Tier 1 ; EHR ; familial hypercholesterolemia ; Genetics ; HBOC ; Lynch</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in genetics, 2022-04, Vol.13, p.866169-866169</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elhanan, Kiser, Neveux, Dabe, Bolze, Metcalf, Lu and Grzymski.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elhanan, Kiser, Neveux, Dabe, Bolze, Metcalf, Lu and Grzymski. 2022 Elhanan, Kiser, Neveux, Dabe, Bolze, Metcalf, Lu and Grzymski</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-d879a25474b7fa0a3a68ed95c4d294668e1259fed9bd2373c84be39b854114793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-d879a25474b7fa0a3a68ed95c4d294668e1259fed9bd2373c84be39b854114793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9091193/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9091193/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35571025$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elhanan, Gai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiser, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neveux, Iva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dabe, Shaun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolze, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalf, William J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, James T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grzymski, Joseph J</creatorcontrib><title>Incomplete Penetrance of Population-Based Genetic Screening Results in Electronic Health Record</title><title>Frontiers in genetics</title><addtitle>Front Genet</addtitle><description>The clinical value of population-based genetic screening projects depends on the actions taken on the findings. The Healthy Nevada Project (HNP) is an all-comer genetic screening and research project based in northern Nevada. HNP participants with CDC Tier 1 findings of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC), Lynch syndrome (LS), or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are notified and provided with genetic counseling. However, the HNP subsequently takes a "hands-off" approach: it is the responsibility of notified participants to share their findings with their healthcare providers, and providers are expected to implement the recommended action plans. Thus, the HNP presents an opportunity to evaluate the efficiency of participant and provider responses to notification of important genetic findings, using electronic health records (EHRs) at Renown Health (a large regional hospital in northern Nevada). Out of 520 HNP participants with findings, we identified 250 participants who were notified of their findings and who had an EHR. 107 of these participants responded to a survey, with 76 (71%) indicating that they had shared their findings with their healthcare providers. However, a sufficiently specific genetic diagnosis appeared in the EHRs and problem lists of only 22 and 10%, respectively, of participants without prior knowledge. Furthermore, review of participant EHRs provided evidence of possible relevant changes in clinical care for only a handful of participants. Up to 19% of participants would have benefited from earlier screening due to prior presentation of their condition. These results suggest that continuous support for both participants and their providers is necessary to maximize the benefit of population-based genetic screening. We recommend that genetic screening projects require participants' consent to directly document their genetic findings in their EHRs. Additionally, we recommend that they provide healthcare providers with ongoing training regarding documentation of findings and with clinical decision support regarding subsequent care.</description><subject>BRCA</subject><subject>CDC Tier 1</subject><subject>EHR</subject><subject>familial hypercholesterolemia</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>HBOC</subject><subject>Lynch</subject><issn>1664-8021</issn><issn>1664-8021</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkctuFDEQRS0EItGQD2CDesmmB78fGySIQjJSJCIea8t2V0868tiD3R2Jv8eTCVHijV11XadKdRF6T_CaMW0-jVtIsKaY0rWWkkjzCp0SKXmvMSWvn71P0Fmtd7gdbhhj_C06YUIogqk4RXaTQt7tI8zQ3TTgXFwK0OWxu8n7Jbp5yqn_6ioM3eVBnkL3MxSANKVt9wPqEufaTam7iBDmklPTr8DF-baJIZfhHXozuljh7PFeod_fLn6dX_XX3y8351-u-8CMmPtBK-Oo4Ip7NTrsmJMaBiMCH6jhsgWECjO2lB8oUyxo7oEZrwUnhCvDVmhz5A7Z3dl9mXau_LXZTfYhkcvWutKmj2B9MJJLrxTznDsaPAMYIQzOcwxU8sb6fGTtF7-DIUBqW4kvoC-VNN3abb63BhtC2o5X6OMjoOQ_C9TZ7qYaIEaXIC_VUikFwUrrQy9y_BpKrrXA-NSGYHvw2T74bA8-26PPrebD8_meKv67yv4Bk7OmDA</recordid><startdate>20220427</startdate><enddate>20220427</enddate><creator>Elhanan, Gai</creator><creator>Kiser, Daniel</creator><creator>Neveux, Iva</creator><creator>Dabe, Shaun</creator><creator>Bolze, Alexandre</creator><creator>Metcalf, William J</creator><creator>Lu, James T</creator><creator>Grzymski, Joseph J</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220427</creationdate><title>Incomplete Penetrance of Population-Based Genetic Screening Results in Electronic Health Record</title><author>Elhanan, Gai ; Kiser, Daniel ; Neveux, Iva ; Dabe, Shaun ; Bolze, Alexandre ; Metcalf, William J ; Lu, James T ; Grzymski, Joseph J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-d879a25474b7fa0a3a68ed95c4d294668e1259fed9bd2373c84be39b854114793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>BRCA</topic><topic>CDC Tier 1</topic><topic>EHR</topic><topic>familial hypercholesterolemia</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>HBOC</topic><topic>Lynch</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elhanan, Gai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiser, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neveux, Iva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dabe, Shaun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolze, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalf, William J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, James T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grzymski, Joseph J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elhanan, Gai</au><au>Kiser, Daniel</au><au>Neveux, Iva</au><au>Dabe, Shaun</au><au>Bolze, Alexandre</au><au>Metcalf, William J</au><au>Lu, James T</au><au>Grzymski, Joseph J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incomplete Penetrance of Population-Based Genetic Screening Results in Electronic Health Record</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in genetics</jtitle><addtitle>Front Genet</addtitle><date>2022-04-27</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><spage>866169</spage><epage>866169</epage><pages>866169-866169</pages><issn>1664-8021</issn><eissn>1664-8021</eissn><abstract>The clinical value of population-based genetic screening projects depends on the actions taken on the findings. The Healthy Nevada Project (HNP) is an all-comer genetic screening and research project based in northern Nevada. HNP participants with CDC Tier 1 findings of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC), Lynch syndrome (LS), or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are notified and provided with genetic counseling. However, the HNP subsequently takes a "hands-off" approach: it is the responsibility of notified participants to share their findings with their healthcare providers, and providers are expected to implement the recommended action plans. Thus, the HNP presents an opportunity to evaluate the efficiency of participant and provider responses to notification of important genetic findings, using electronic health records (EHRs) at Renown Health (a large regional hospital in northern Nevada). Out of 520 HNP participants with findings, we identified 250 participants who were notified of their findings and who had an EHR. 107 of these participants responded to a survey, with 76 (71%) indicating that they had shared their findings with their healthcare providers. However, a sufficiently specific genetic diagnosis appeared in the EHRs and problem lists of only 22 and 10%, respectively, of participants without prior knowledge. Furthermore, review of participant EHRs provided evidence of possible relevant changes in clinical care for only a handful of participants. Up to 19% of participants would have benefited from earlier screening due to prior presentation of their condition. These results suggest that continuous support for both participants and their providers is necessary to maximize the benefit of population-based genetic screening. We recommend that genetic screening projects require participants' consent to directly document their genetic findings in their EHRs. Additionally, we recommend that they provide healthcare providers with ongoing training regarding documentation of findings and with clinical decision support regarding subsequent care.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>35571025</pmid><doi>10.3389/fgene.2022.866169</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1664-8021 |
ispartof | Frontiers in genetics, 2022-04, Vol.13, p.866169-866169 |
issn | 1664-8021 1664-8021 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bc9646b773b44a2cb3eefecdab40e264 |
source | PubMed Central Free |
subjects | BRCA CDC Tier 1 EHR familial hypercholesterolemia Genetics HBOC Lynch |
title | Incomplete Penetrance of Population-Based Genetic Screening Results in Electronic Health Record |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T20%3A17%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incomplete%20Penetrance%20of%20Population-Based%20Genetic%20Screening%20Results%20in%20Electronic%20Health%20Record&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20genetics&rft.au=Elhanan,%20Gai&rft.date=2022-04-27&rft.volume=13&rft.spage=866169&rft.epage=866169&rft.pages=866169-866169&rft.issn=1664-8021&rft.eissn=1664-8021&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fgene.2022.866169&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2665107884%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-d879a25474b7fa0a3a68ed95c4d294668e1259fed9bd2373c84be39b854114793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2665107884&rft_id=info:pmid/35571025&rfr_iscdi=true |