Loading…

Assessment of Selected Machine Learning Models for Intelligent Classification of Flyrock Hazard in an Open Pit Mine

This paper presents an alternative methodology for the study of flyrock hazards in mining, utilizing Artificial Intelligence (AI) through machine learning by classification. By using distance as a delineator to denote the consequences of a blast, the models generated two classes of blasts: safe and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE access 2024-01, Vol.12, p.8585-8608
Main Authors: Krop, Ian, Takahashi, Yoshiaki, Sasaoka, Takashi, Shimada, Hideki, Hamanaka, Akihiro, Onyango, Joan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-2a5eaeecca081c106652def391c70f99415e58051053180607ba9a0c66f48a9b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-2a5eaeecca081c106652def391c70f99415e58051053180607ba9a0c66f48a9b3
container_end_page 8608
container_issue
container_start_page 8585
container_title IEEE access
container_volume 12
creator Krop, Ian
Takahashi, Yoshiaki
Sasaoka, Takashi
Shimada, Hideki
Hamanaka, Akihiro
Onyango, Joan
description This paper presents an alternative methodology for the study of flyrock hazards in mining, utilizing Artificial Intelligence (AI) through machine learning by classification. By using distance as a delineator to denote the consequences of a blast, the models generated two classes of blasts: safe and unsafe. In this study, statistical learning models best suited for classification, that is, K Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), were used, and their classification abilities were assessed. Machine performance was evaluated using a Confusion Matrix (sensitivity and specificity) and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. A higher weight was assigned to the minority class (unsafe blasts). Overfitting assessment was also performed. The Wide Neural Network (WNN) demonstrated the highest classification superiority. During training and validation, 75% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and an ROC of 0.9853 were achieved. In the test phase, perfect stratification (100 %) was maintained, with an ROC of 1. The Cubic SVM exhibited 50% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and an ROC of 0.9412 during training and validation. In the test set, it achieved 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and a ROC of 1. Fine KNN showed 50% sensitivity, 94.1% specificity, and an ROC of 0.7206 in the validation set. The test set displayed 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and an ROC of 1. Conversely, Coarse DT had a higher misclassification rate, resulting in a 25% sensitivity, 76.5% specificity, and an ROC of 0.5221 during the validation phase. In the test set, it showed 50% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and an ROC of 0.75. A feedforward neural network (FNN) was designed, trained, and demonstrated to be a highly flexible classification tool. The FNN achieved an excellent classification score of 100%. These findings demonstrate the potential for the broad applicability of machine learning through classification in addressing flyrock challenges in open-pit mines.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3352733
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bca5df45ab0a4ed6a74f9b03980c3804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_bca5df45ab0a4ed6a74f9b03980c3804</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2916480438</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-2a5eaeecca081c106652def391c70f99415e58051053180607ba9a0c66f48a9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU9r4zAQxc2yhS1tP0Evgj0nK1l_bB2DSdpAQgvZPYuxPEqVOlJWcg7tp197U0rnMsPjzW8GXlHcMzpnjOpfi6ZZ7nbzkpZizrksK86_FdclU3rGJVffv8w_irucD3SsepRkdV3kRc6Y8xHDQKIjO-zRDtiRLdgXH5BsEFLwYU-2scM-ExcTWYcB-97vp52mh5y98xYGH8OEWPVvKdpX8gjvkDriA4FAnk4YyLMfyHaE3hZXDvqMdx_9pvizWv5uHmebp4d1s9jMrODlMCtBIiBaC-O3llGlZNmh45rZijqtBZMoayoZlZzVVNGqBQ3UKuVEDbrlN8X6wu0iHMwp-SOkNxPBm_9CTHsDafC2R9NakJ0TEloKAjsFlXC6pVzX1PKaipH188I6pfj3jHkwh3hOYXzflJopMXnq0cUvLptizgnd51VGzRSWuYRlprDMR1j8H_vShx0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2916480438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of Selected Machine Learning Models for Intelligent Classification of Flyrock Hazard in an Open Pit Mine</title><source>IEEE Open Access Journals</source><creator>Krop, Ian ; Takahashi, Yoshiaki ; Sasaoka, Takashi ; Shimada, Hideki ; Hamanaka, Akihiro ; Onyango, Joan</creator><creatorcontrib>Krop, Ian ; Takahashi, Yoshiaki ; Sasaoka, Takashi ; Shimada, Hideki ; Hamanaka, Akihiro ; Onyango, Joan</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents an alternative methodology for the study of flyrock hazards in mining, utilizing Artificial Intelligence (AI) through machine learning by classification. By using distance as a delineator to denote the consequences of a blast, the models generated two classes of blasts: safe and unsafe. In this study, statistical learning models best suited for classification, that is, K Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), were used, and their classification abilities were assessed. Machine performance was evaluated using a Confusion Matrix (sensitivity and specificity) and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. A higher weight was assigned to the minority class (unsafe blasts). Overfitting assessment was also performed. The Wide Neural Network (WNN) demonstrated the highest classification superiority. During training and validation, 75% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and an ROC of 0.9853 were achieved. In the test phase, perfect stratification (100 %) was maintained, with an ROC of 1. The Cubic SVM exhibited 50% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and an ROC of 0.9412 during training and validation. In the test set, it achieved 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and a ROC of 1. Fine KNN showed 50% sensitivity, 94.1% specificity, and an ROC of 0.7206 in the validation set. The test set displayed 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and an ROC of 1. Conversely, Coarse DT had a higher misclassification rate, resulting in a 25% sensitivity, 76.5% specificity, and an ROC of 0.5221 during the validation phase. In the test set, it showed 50% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and an ROC of 0.75. A feedforward neural network (FNN) was designed, trained, and demonstrated to be a highly flexible classification tool. The FNN achieved an excellent classification score of 100%. These findings demonstrate the potential for the broad applicability of machine learning through classification in addressing flyrock challenges in open-pit mines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3352733</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</publisher><subject>Algorithm ; Artificial intelligence ; Artificial neural networks ; Classification ; Decision trees ; flyrocks ; Machine learning ; Neural networks ; Open pit mining ; Support vector machines ; Test sets</subject><ispartof>IEEE access, 2024-01, Vol.12, p.8585-8608</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-2a5eaeecca081c106652def391c70f99415e58051053180607ba9a0c66f48a9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-2a5eaeecca081c106652def391c70f99415e58051053180607ba9a0c66f48a9b3</cites><orcidid>0009-0009-4698-1530 ; 0000-0001-7600-417X ; 0000-0002-4328-2824</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krop, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaoka, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, Hideki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamanaka, Akihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onyango, Joan</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of Selected Machine Learning Models for Intelligent Classification of Flyrock Hazard in an Open Pit Mine</title><title>IEEE access</title><description>This paper presents an alternative methodology for the study of flyrock hazards in mining, utilizing Artificial Intelligence (AI) through machine learning by classification. By using distance as a delineator to denote the consequences of a blast, the models generated two classes of blasts: safe and unsafe. In this study, statistical learning models best suited for classification, that is, K Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), were used, and their classification abilities were assessed. Machine performance was evaluated using a Confusion Matrix (sensitivity and specificity) and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. A higher weight was assigned to the minority class (unsafe blasts). Overfitting assessment was also performed. The Wide Neural Network (WNN) demonstrated the highest classification superiority. During training and validation, 75% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and an ROC of 0.9853 were achieved. In the test phase, perfect stratification (100 %) was maintained, with an ROC of 1. The Cubic SVM exhibited 50% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and an ROC of 0.9412 during training and validation. In the test set, it achieved 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and a ROC of 1. Fine KNN showed 50% sensitivity, 94.1% specificity, and an ROC of 0.7206 in the validation set. The test set displayed 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and an ROC of 1. Conversely, Coarse DT had a higher misclassification rate, resulting in a 25% sensitivity, 76.5% specificity, and an ROC of 0.5221 during the validation phase. In the test set, it showed 50% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and an ROC of 0.75. A feedforward neural network (FNN) was designed, trained, and demonstrated to be a highly flexible classification tool. The FNN achieved an excellent classification score of 100%. These findings demonstrate the potential for the broad applicability of machine learning through classification in addressing flyrock challenges in open-pit mines.</description><subject>Algorithm</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>flyrocks</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Open pit mining</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Test sets</subject><issn>2169-3536</issn><issn>2169-3536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU9r4zAQxc2yhS1tP0Evgj0nK1l_bB2DSdpAQgvZPYuxPEqVOlJWcg7tp197U0rnMsPjzW8GXlHcMzpnjOpfi6ZZ7nbzkpZizrksK86_FdclU3rGJVffv8w_irucD3SsepRkdV3kRc6Y8xHDQKIjO-zRDtiRLdgXH5BsEFLwYU-2scM-ExcTWYcB-97vp52mh5y98xYGH8OEWPVvKdpX8gjvkDriA4FAnk4YyLMfyHaE3hZXDvqMdx_9pvizWv5uHmebp4d1s9jMrODlMCtBIiBaC-O3llGlZNmh45rZijqtBZMoayoZlZzVVNGqBQ3UKuVEDbrlN8X6wu0iHMwp-SOkNxPBm_9CTHsDafC2R9NakJ0TEloKAjsFlXC6pVzX1PKaipH188I6pfj3jHkwh3hOYXzflJopMXnq0cUvLptizgnd51VGzRSWuYRlprDMR1j8H_vShx0</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Krop, Ian</creator><creator>Takahashi, Yoshiaki</creator><creator>Sasaoka, Takashi</creator><creator>Shimada, Hideki</creator><creator>Hamanaka, Akihiro</creator><creator>Onyango, Joan</creator><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><general>IEEE</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4698-1530</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7600-417X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4328-2824</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Assessment of Selected Machine Learning Models for Intelligent Classification of Flyrock Hazard in an Open Pit Mine</title><author>Krop, Ian ; Takahashi, Yoshiaki ; Sasaoka, Takashi ; Shimada, Hideki ; Hamanaka, Akihiro ; Onyango, Joan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-2a5eaeecca081c106652def391c70f99415e58051053180607ba9a0c66f48a9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithm</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>flyrocks</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Open pit mining</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Test sets</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krop, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaoka, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, Hideki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamanaka, Akihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onyango, Joan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krop, Ian</au><au>Takahashi, Yoshiaki</au><au>Sasaoka, Takashi</au><au>Shimada, Hideki</au><au>Hamanaka, Akihiro</au><au>Onyango, Joan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of Selected Machine Learning Models for Intelligent Classification of Flyrock Hazard in an Open Pit Mine</atitle><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>8585</spage><epage>8608</epage><pages>8585-8608</pages><issn>2169-3536</issn><eissn>2169-3536</eissn><abstract>This paper presents an alternative methodology for the study of flyrock hazards in mining, utilizing Artificial Intelligence (AI) through machine learning by classification. By using distance as a delineator to denote the consequences of a blast, the models generated two classes of blasts: safe and unsafe. In this study, statistical learning models best suited for classification, that is, K Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), were used, and their classification abilities were assessed. Machine performance was evaluated using a Confusion Matrix (sensitivity and specificity) and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. A higher weight was assigned to the minority class (unsafe blasts). Overfitting assessment was also performed. The Wide Neural Network (WNN) demonstrated the highest classification superiority. During training and validation, 75% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and an ROC of 0.9853 were achieved. In the test phase, perfect stratification (100 %) was maintained, with an ROC of 1. The Cubic SVM exhibited 50% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and an ROC of 0.9412 during training and validation. In the test set, it achieved 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and a ROC of 1. Fine KNN showed 50% sensitivity, 94.1% specificity, and an ROC of 0.7206 in the validation set. The test set displayed 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and an ROC of 1. Conversely, Coarse DT had a higher misclassification rate, resulting in a 25% sensitivity, 76.5% specificity, and an ROC of 0.5221 during the validation phase. In the test set, it showed 50% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and an ROC of 0.75. A feedforward neural network (FNN) was designed, trained, and demonstrated to be a highly flexible classification tool. The FNN achieved an excellent classification score of 100%. These findings demonstrate the potential for the broad applicability of machine learning through classification in addressing flyrock challenges in open-pit mines.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</pub><doi>10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3352733</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4698-1530</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7600-417X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4328-2824</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-3536
ispartof IEEE access, 2024-01, Vol.12, p.8585-8608
issn 2169-3536
2169-3536
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bca5df45ab0a4ed6a74f9b03980c3804
source IEEE Open Access Journals
subjects Algorithm
Artificial intelligence
Artificial neural networks
Classification
Decision trees
flyrocks
Machine learning
Neural networks
Open pit mining
Support vector machines
Test sets
title Assessment of Selected Machine Learning Models for Intelligent Classification of Flyrock Hazard in an Open Pit Mine
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T09%3A43%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20Selected%20Machine%20Learning%20Models%20for%20Intelligent%20Classification%20of%20Flyrock%20Hazard%20in%20an%20Open%20Pit%20Mine&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20access&rft.au=Krop,%20Ian&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=8585&rft.epage=8608&rft.pages=8585-8608&rft.issn=2169-3536&rft.eissn=2169-3536&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3352733&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2916480438%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-2a5eaeecca081c106652def391c70f99415e58051053180607ba9a0c66f48a9b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2916480438&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true