Loading…
Assessment of gingival contours for esthetic diagnosis and treatment: A clinical study
Background: The purposes of this study were to quantify some clinical parameters that are useful as esthetic guidelines when the gingival contour is modified and to compare the left and right sides of the six maxillary anterior teeth. Materials and Methods: Two hundred and forty interdental papilla...
Saved in:
Published in: | Indian journal of dental research 2013-05, Vol.24 (3), p.394-395 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476e-bd15e4d1b3cadf558f3b231fd74fb8c7f96b2bfbce9f8ca7da8b32f9b846c38d3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 395 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 394 |
container_title | Indian journal of dental research |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Patil, Veena Desai, Manthan |
description | Background: The purposes of this study were to quantify some clinical parameters that are useful as esthetic guidelines when the gingival contour is modified and to compare the left and right sides of the six maxillary anterior teeth.
Materials and Methods: Two hundred and forty interdental papilla sites in 20 healthy patients were evaluated. Interdental papilla heights of maxillary anterior teeth were measured from the gingival zenith, along with clinical crown lengths. Percentages of papilla height to crown length were computed and defined as papilla proportion, mesial papilla proportion (MPP) and distal papilla proportion (DPP).
Results: Mean interdental papilla heights of maxillary teeth was 3.83 mm mesially and 3.8 mm distally. Mean MPP was 43.69% ( n = 120) and DPP was 44.57% ( n = 120). No significant differences were found between MPP and DPP for maxillary incisors ( P ≥ 0.5).
Conclusion: Papilla proportions were approximately 44% for all tooth groups. Canines demonstrated a trend toward increased distal papilla heights. In the present study the average MPP and DPP of the central incisor (CI), lateral incisor (LI) and canine (CA) measured were 43%, 41%, 46%, 40%, and 42% 51% respectively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/0970-9290.118005 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bcb6cd804d78478fa28261d2716d5226</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A343598527</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_bcb6cd804d78478fa28261d2716d5226</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A343598527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476e-bd15e4d1b3cadf558f3b231fd74fb8c7f96b2bfbce9f8ca7da8b32f9b846c38d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUlvFDEQhS0EEkPIPUdLnHvirds2tyFiiRSJC3C1vDaedNvB7mGUf48nDVEiIR8sVb3vqaoeABcYbRlG9BJJjjpJJNpiLBDqX4ANllJ0dED0Jdg8tl-DN7Xum4CKgW_Aj12tvtbZpwXmAMeYxvhbT9DmtORDqTDkAn1dfvolWuiiHlOusUKdHFyK18uJfA930E4xRdvIuhzc_VvwKuip-vO__xn4_unjt6sv3c3Xz9dXu5vOMj74zjjce-awoVa70PciUEMoDo6zYITlQQ6GmGCsl0FYzZ0WhpIgjWCDpcLRM3C9-rqs9-quxFmXe5V1VA-FXEalS5t88spYM1gnEHNcMC6CJoIM2BGOB9cTMjSvd6vXXcm_Dm1ntW8XSG18hRltwwnSP1GNupnGFPJStJ1jtWpHm0yKnvCm2v5H1Z7zc2y39SG2-jMArYAtudbiw-MyGKlTwOqUoDolqNaAG_JhRY55Wnypt9Ph6IuavbtN-fiM655wikqm_qVO_wCmTK0G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1435588256</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of gingival contours for esthetic diagnosis and treatment: A clinical study</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Patil, Veena ; Desai, Manthan</creator><creatorcontrib>Patil, Veena ; Desai, Manthan</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The purposes of this study were to quantify some clinical parameters that are useful as esthetic guidelines when the gingival contour is modified and to compare the left and right sides of the six maxillary anterior teeth.
Materials and Methods: Two hundred and forty interdental papilla sites in 20 healthy patients were evaluated. Interdental papilla heights of maxillary anterior teeth were measured from the gingival zenith, along with clinical crown lengths. Percentages of papilla height to crown length were computed and defined as papilla proportion, mesial papilla proportion (MPP) and distal papilla proportion (DPP).
Results: Mean interdental papilla heights of maxillary teeth was 3.83 mm mesially and 3.8 mm distally. Mean MPP was 43.69% ( n = 120) and DPP was 44.57% ( n = 120). No significant differences were found between MPP and DPP for maxillary incisors ( P ≥ 0.5).
Conclusion: Papilla proportions were approximately 44% for all tooth groups. Canines demonstrated a trend toward increased distal papilla heights. In the present study the average MPP and DPP of the central incisor (CI), lateral incisor (LI) and canine (CA) measured were 43%, 41%, 46%, 40%, and 42% 51% respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0970-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3603</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.118005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mangalore: Medknow Publications</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Gingival zenith ; interdental papilla ; papilla proportion</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of dental research, 2013-05, Vol.24 (3), p.394-395</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476e-bd15e4d1b3cadf558f3b231fd74fb8c7f96b2bfbce9f8ca7da8b32f9b846c38d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1435588256?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,25736,27907,27908,36995,44573</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patil, Veena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desai, Manthan</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of gingival contours for esthetic diagnosis and treatment: A clinical study</title><title>Indian journal of dental research</title><description>Background: The purposes of this study were to quantify some clinical parameters that are useful as esthetic guidelines when the gingival contour is modified and to compare the left and right sides of the six maxillary anterior teeth.
Materials and Methods: Two hundred and forty interdental papilla sites in 20 healthy patients were evaluated. Interdental papilla heights of maxillary anterior teeth were measured from the gingival zenith, along with clinical crown lengths. Percentages of papilla height to crown length were computed and defined as papilla proportion, mesial papilla proportion (MPP) and distal papilla proportion (DPP).
Results: Mean interdental papilla heights of maxillary teeth was 3.83 mm mesially and 3.8 mm distally. Mean MPP was 43.69% ( n = 120) and DPP was 44.57% ( n = 120). No significant differences were found between MPP and DPP for maxillary incisors ( P ≥ 0.5).
Conclusion: Papilla proportions were approximately 44% for all tooth groups. Canines demonstrated a trend toward increased distal papilla heights. In the present study the average MPP and DPP of the central incisor (CI), lateral incisor (LI) and canine (CA) measured were 43%, 41%, 46%, 40%, and 42% 51% respectively.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Gingival zenith</subject><subject>interdental papilla</subject><subject>papilla proportion</subject><issn>0970-9290</issn><issn>1998-3603</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkUlvFDEQhS0EEkPIPUdLnHvirds2tyFiiRSJC3C1vDaedNvB7mGUf48nDVEiIR8sVb3vqaoeABcYbRlG9BJJjjpJJNpiLBDqX4ANllJ0dED0Jdg8tl-DN7Xum4CKgW_Aj12tvtbZpwXmAMeYxvhbT9DmtORDqTDkAn1dfvolWuiiHlOusUKdHFyK18uJfA930E4xRdvIuhzc_VvwKuip-vO__xn4_unjt6sv3c3Xz9dXu5vOMj74zjjce-awoVa70PciUEMoDo6zYITlQQ6GmGCsl0FYzZ0WhpIgjWCDpcLRM3C9-rqs9-quxFmXe5V1VA-FXEalS5t88spYM1gnEHNcMC6CJoIM2BGOB9cTMjSvd6vXXcm_Dm1ntW8XSG18hRltwwnSP1GNupnGFPJStJ1jtWpHm0yKnvCm2v5H1Z7zc2y39SG2-jMArYAtudbiw-MyGKlTwOqUoDolqNaAG_JhRY55Wnypt9Ph6IuavbtN-fiM655wikqm_qVO_wCmTK0G</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Patil, Veena</creator><creator>Desai, Manthan</creator><general>Medknow Publications</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Assessment of gingival contours for esthetic diagnosis and treatment: A clinical study</title><author>Patil, Veena ; Desai, Manthan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476e-bd15e4d1b3cadf558f3b231fd74fb8c7f96b2bfbce9f8ca7da8b32f9b846c38d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Gingival zenith</topic><topic>interdental papilla</topic><topic>papilla proportion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patil, Veena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desai, Manthan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of dental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patil, Veena</au><au>Desai, Manthan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of gingival contours for esthetic diagnosis and treatment: A clinical study</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of dental research</jtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>394</spage><epage>395</epage><pages>394-395</pages><issn>0970-9290</issn><eissn>1998-3603</eissn><abstract>Background: The purposes of this study were to quantify some clinical parameters that are useful as esthetic guidelines when the gingival contour is modified and to compare the left and right sides of the six maxillary anterior teeth.
Materials and Methods: Two hundred and forty interdental papilla sites in 20 healthy patients were evaluated. Interdental papilla heights of maxillary anterior teeth were measured from the gingival zenith, along with clinical crown lengths. Percentages of papilla height to crown length were computed and defined as papilla proportion, mesial papilla proportion (MPP) and distal papilla proportion (DPP).
Results: Mean interdental papilla heights of maxillary teeth was 3.83 mm mesially and 3.8 mm distally. Mean MPP was 43.69% ( n = 120) and DPP was 44.57% ( n = 120). No significant differences were found between MPP and DPP for maxillary incisors ( P ≥ 0.5).
Conclusion: Papilla proportions were approximately 44% for all tooth groups. Canines demonstrated a trend toward increased distal papilla heights. In the present study the average MPP and DPP of the central incisor (CI), lateral incisor (LI) and canine (CA) measured were 43%, 41%, 46%, 40%, and 42% 51% respectively.</abstract><cop>Mangalore</cop><pub>Medknow Publications</pub><doi>10.4103/0970-9290.118005</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0970-9290 |
ispartof | Indian journal of dental research, 2013-05, Vol.24 (3), p.394-395 |
issn | 0970-9290 1998-3603 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bcb6cd804d78478fa28261d2716d5226 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Clinical trials Gingival zenith interdental papilla papilla proportion |
title | Assessment of gingival contours for esthetic diagnosis and treatment: A clinical study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T21%3A11%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20gingival%20contours%20for%20esthetic%20diagnosis%20and%20treatment:%20A%20clinical%20study&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20dental%20research&rft.au=Patil,%20Veena&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=394&rft.epage=395&rft.pages=394-395&rft.issn=0970-9290&rft.eissn=1998-3603&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/0970-9290.118005&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA343598527%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476e-bd15e4d1b3cadf558f3b231fd74fb8c7f96b2bfbce9f8ca7da8b32f9b846c38d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1435588256&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A343598527&rfr_iscdi=true |