Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in Brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008)

• Published in: The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases 2009-04, Vol.13 (2), p.90-98
• Main Authors: Gales, Ana C, Sader, Helio S, Ribeiro, Julival, Zoccoli, Cassia, Barth, Afonso, Pignatari, Antonio C
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology; Antimicrobial resistance; Brazil; Causes of; Cross infection; Demographic aspects; Disease susceptibility; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Gram-positive bacteria; Gram-Positive Bacteria - drug effects; Gram-Positive Bacteria - isolation & purification; Health aspects; Hospitals; Humans; INFECTIOUS DISEASES; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Nosocomial infections; Population Surveillance - methods; SENTRY; Staphylococcus aureus
• ISSN: 1678-4391; 1413-8670; 1678-4391
• DOI: 10.1590/S1413-86702009000200004

We report the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the most frequently isolated Gram-positive bacteria in the Brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. The strains were consecutively collected (one per patient) between January 2005 and September 2008 and susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution methods at the JMI Laboratories (North Liberty, Iowa, USA). A total of 3,907 Gram-positive cocci were analyzed. The Gram-positive organisms most frequently isolated from bloodstream infections were Staphylococcus aureus (2,218 strains; 20.2% of total), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 812 strains [14.7%]), and Enterococcus spp. (754 strains; 5.0%). S. aureus ranked first (28.1%) and Enterococcus faecalis ranked 7th (4.5%) among cases of skin and soft tissue infections. S. aureus was also the second most frequently isolated pathogen from patients with lower respiratory tract infections (24.9% of cases) after Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.5%). Resistance to oxacillin was observed in 31.0% of S. aureus and the vast majority of oxacillin-resistant (MRSA) strains were also resistant to clindamycin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin were all very active against S. aureus strains tested (>99.9-100.0% susceptible), but daptomycin (MIC(50), 0.25 g/mL and MIC(90), 0.5 g/mL) was four- to eight-fold more potent than vancomycin (MIC(50) and MIC(90) of 1 g/mL) and linezolid (MIC(50), 1 g/mL and MIC(90), 2 g/mL). Vancomycin resistance increased significantly among enterococci during the study period, but it was restrict to only one medical center until 2007 and emerged in a second medical center in 2008. Daptomycin was the most active antimicrobial tested against enterococci in general (100.0% susceptible), followed by linezolid (99.9% susceptible), ampicillin (87.4%) and vancomycin (84.6%). In conclusion, daptomycin and linezolid showed excellent in vitro activity against contemporary Gram-positive organisms (3,907) collected in Brazilian hospitals monitored by the SENTRY Program, including MRSA, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and other multi-drug-resistant organisms. Although vancomycin resistance rates in Brazil appears to be relatively low compared to those reported in the USA, VRE has emerged and rapidly disseminated in some Brazilian medical centers.