Loading…
Binding mode information improves fragment docking
Docking is commonly used in drug discovery to predict how ligand binds to protein target. Best programs are generally able to generate a correct solution, yet often fail to identify it. In the case of drug-like molecules, the correct and incorrect poses can be sorted by similarity to the crystallogr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of cheminformatics 2019-03, Vol.11 (1), p.24-15, Article 24 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c671t-c19d6c9364327231c6f70c77cee8c9f68d80b888d2f269404d21deec7c2a1b063 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c671t-c19d6c9364327231c6f70c77cee8c9f68d80b888d2f269404d21deec7c2a1b063 |
container_end_page | 15 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 24 |
container_title | Journal of cheminformatics |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Jacquemard, Célien Drwal, Malgorzata N. Desaphy, Jérémy Kellenberger, Esther |
description | Docking is commonly used in drug discovery to predict how ligand binds to protein target. Best programs are generally able to generate a correct solution, yet often fail to identify it. In the case of drug-like molecules, the correct and incorrect poses can be sorted by similarity to the crystallographic structure of the protein in complex with reference ligands. Fragments are particularly sensitive to scoring problems because they are weak ligands which form few interactions with protein. In the present study, we assessed the utility of binding mode information in fragment pose prediction. We compared three approaches: interaction fingerprints, 3D-matching of interaction patterns and 3D-matching of shapes. We prepared a test set composed of high-quality structures of the Protein Data Bank. We generated and evaluated the docking poses of 586 fragment/protein complexes. We observed that the best approach is twice as accurate as the native scoring function, and that post-processing is less effective for smaller fragments. Interestingly, fragments and drug-like molecules both proved to be useful references. In the discussion, we suggest the best conditions for a successful pose prediction with the three approaches. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13321-019-0346-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bceb8abe771d475abf03e5f26d5f6a6f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A581383293</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_bceb8abe771d475abf03e5f26d5f6a6f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A581383293</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c671t-c19d6c9364327231c6f70c77cee8c9f68d80b888d2f269404d21deec7c2a1b063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk9v1DAQxSMEoqXwAbiglbjQQ4rHTmzngrStgK60EhJ_zpZjj1Mvm7jY2RV8exxS2m4F8iHW-PdePONXFC-BnAFI_jYBYxRKAk1JWMVL8ag4BlHLkjYVf3xvf1Q8S2lDCK8FEU-LI0Yawhipjgt67gfrh27RB4sLP7gQez36MCx8fx3DHtPCRd31OIwLG8z3jD4vnji9Tfji5ntSfPvw_uvFZbn-9HF1sVyXhgsYSwON5aZhvGJUUAaGO0GMEAZRmsZxaSVppZSWOsqbilSWgkU0wlANLeHspFjNvjbojbqOvtfxlwraqz-FEDul4-jNFlVrsJW6RSHAVqLWrSMM6-xra8c1d9nr3ex1vWt7tCa3E_X2wPTwZPBXqgt7lW8PRNTZ4HQ2uHogu1yu1VQjjFCaH2EPmX1z87MYfuwwjar3yeB2qwcMu6QoNLymksNk-_oBugm7OOSxTlQtCcha3lGdzs1Oj5TvaCZTtawlMMlowzJ19g8qL4u9N2FA53P9QHB6IMjMiD_HTu9SUqsvnw9ZmFkTQ0oR3e0QgKgpjGoOo8phVFMYlciaV_eHfqv4m74M0BlI-WjoMN51_3_X34sQ5k0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2195801858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Binding mode information improves fragment docking</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access </source><creator>Jacquemard, Célien ; Drwal, Malgorzata N. ; Desaphy, Jérémy ; Kellenberger, Esther</creator><creatorcontrib>Jacquemard, Célien ; Drwal, Malgorzata N. ; Desaphy, Jérémy ; Kellenberger, Esther</creatorcontrib><description>Docking is commonly used in drug discovery to predict how ligand binds to protein target. Best programs are generally able to generate a correct solution, yet often fail to identify it. In the case of drug-like molecules, the correct and incorrect poses can be sorted by similarity to the crystallographic structure of the protein in complex with reference ligands. Fragments are particularly sensitive to scoring problems because they are weak ligands which form few interactions with protein. In the present study, we assessed the utility of binding mode information in fragment pose prediction. We compared three approaches: interaction fingerprints, 3D-matching of interaction patterns and 3D-matching of shapes. We prepared a test set composed of high-quality structures of the Protein Data Bank. We generated and evaluated the docking poses of 586 fragment/protein complexes. We observed that the best approach is twice as accurate as the native scoring function, and that post-processing is less effective for smaller fragments. Interestingly, fragments and drug-like molecules both proved to be useful references. In the discussion, we suggest the best conditions for a successful pose prediction with the three approaches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-2946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-2946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13321-019-0346-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30903304</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Banks (Finance) ; Binding ; Chemical Sciences ; Cheminformatics ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Comparative analysis ; Computational Biology/Bioinformatics ; Computer Applications in Chemistry ; Coordination compounds ; Crystal structure ; Crystallography ; Data banks ; Docking ; Docking pose ; Documentation and Information in Chemistry ; Drug discovery ; Fragment-based drug design (FBDD) ; Fragmentation ; Fragments ; Ligand/protein complex ; Ligands ; Matching ; Post-processing ; Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Chemical Structures ; Protein binding ; Protein structure ; Proteins ; Research Article ; Scoring ; Shape recognition ; Theoretical and Computational Chemistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of cheminformatics, 2019-03, Vol.11 (1), p.24-15, Article 24</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Journal of Cheminformatics is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c671t-c19d6c9364327231c6f70c77cee8c9f68d80b888d2f269404d21deec7c2a1b063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c671t-c19d6c9364327231c6f70c77cee8c9f68d80b888d2f269404d21deec7c2a1b063</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9320-4840</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2195801858/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2195801858?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30903304$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03022346$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jacquemard, Célien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drwal, Malgorzata N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desaphy, Jérémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kellenberger, Esther</creatorcontrib><title>Binding mode information improves fragment docking</title><title>Journal of cheminformatics</title><addtitle>J Cheminform</addtitle><addtitle>J Cheminform</addtitle><description>Docking is commonly used in drug discovery to predict how ligand binds to protein target. Best programs are generally able to generate a correct solution, yet often fail to identify it. In the case of drug-like molecules, the correct and incorrect poses can be sorted by similarity to the crystallographic structure of the protein in complex with reference ligands. Fragments are particularly sensitive to scoring problems because they are weak ligands which form few interactions with protein. In the present study, we assessed the utility of binding mode information in fragment pose prediction. We compared three approaches: interaction fingerprints, 3D-matching of interaction patterns and 3D-matching of shapes. We prepared a test set composed of high-quality structures of the Protein Data Bank. We generated and evaluated the docking poses of 586 fragment/protein complexes. We observed that the best approach is twice as accurate as the native scoring function, and that post-processing is less effective for smaller fragments. Interestingly, fragments and drug-like molecules both proved to be useful references. In the discussion, we suggest the best conditions for a successful pose prediction with the three approaches.</description><subject>Banks (Finance)</subject><subject>Binding</subject><subject>Chemical Sciences</subject><subject>Cheminformatics</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Computational Biology/Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Computer Applications in Chemistry</subject><subject>Coordination compounds</subject><subject>Crystal structure</subject><subject>Crystallography</subject><subject>Data banks</subject><subject>Docking</subject><subject>Docking pose</subject><subject>Documentation and Information in Chemistry</subject><subject>Drug discovery</subject><subject>Fragment-based drug design (FBDD)</subject><subject>Fragmentation</subject><subject>Fragments</subject><subject>Ligand/protein complex</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Matching</subject><subject>Post-processing</subject><subject>Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Chemical Structures</subject><subject>Protein binding</subject><subject>Protein structure</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Scoring</subject><subject>Shape recognition</subject><subject>Theoretical and Computational Chemistry</subject><issn>1758-2946</issn><issn>1758-2946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk9v1DAQxSMEoqXwAbiglbjQQ4rHTmzngrStgK60EhJ_zpZjj1Mvm7jY2RV8exxS2m4F8iHW-PdePONXFC-BnAFI_jYBYxRKAk1JWMVL8ag4BlHLkjYVf3xvf1Q8S2lDCK8FEU-LI0Yawhipjgt67gfrh27RB4sLP7gQez36MCx8fx3DHtPCRd31OIwLG8z3jD4vnji9Tfji5ntSfPvw_uvFZbn-9HF1sVyXhgsYSwON5aZhvGJUUAaGO0GMEAZRmsZxaSVppZSWOsqbilSWgkU0wlANLeHspFjNvjbojbqOvtfxlwraqz-FEDul4-jNFlVrsJW6RSHAVqLWrSMM6-xra8c1d9nr3ex1vWt7tCa3E_X2wPTwZPBXqgt7lW8PRNTZ4HQ2uHogu1yu1VQjjFCaH2EPmX1z87MYfuwwjar3yeB2qwcMu6QoNLymksNk-_oBugm7OOSxTlQtCcha3lGdzs1Oj5TvaCZTtawlMMlowzJ19g8qL4u9N2FA53P9QHB6IMjMiD_HTu9SUqsvnw9ZmFkTQ0oR3e0QgKgpjGoOo8phVFMYlciaV_eHfqv4m74M0BlI-WjoMN51_3_X34sQ5k0</recordid><startdate>20190322</startdate><enddate>20190322</enddate><creator>Jacquemard, Célien</creator><creator>Drwal, Malgorzata N.</creator><creator>Desaphy, Jérémy</creator><creator>Kellenberger, Esther</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Chemistry Central Ltd. and BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9320-4840</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190322</creationdate><title>Binding mode information improves fragment docking</title><author>Jacquemard, Célien ; Drwal, Malgorzata N. ; Desaphy, Jérémy ; Kellenberger, Esther</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c671t-c19d6c9364327231c6f70c77cee8c9f68d80b888d2f269404d21deec7c2a1b063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Banks (Finance)</topic><topic>Binding</topic><topic>Chemical Sciences</topic><topic>Cheminformatics</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Computational Biology/Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Computer Applications in Chemistry</topic><topic>Coordination compounds</topic><topic>Crystal structure</topic><topic>Crystallography</topic><topic>Data banks</topic><topic>Docking</topic><topic>Docking pose</topic><topic>Documentation and Information in Chemistry</topic><topic>Drug discovery</topic><topic>Fragment-based drug design (FBDD)</topic><topic>Fragmentation</topic><topic>Fragments</topic><topic>Ligand/protein complex</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Matching</topic><topic>Post-processing</topic><topic>Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Chemical Structures</topic><topic>Protein binding</topic><topic>Protein structure</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Scoring</topic><topic>Shape recognition</topic><topic>Theoretical and Computational Chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jacquemard, Célien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drwal, Malgorzata N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desaphy, Jérémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kellenberger, Esther</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer_OA刊</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of cheminformatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jacquemard, Célien</au><au>Drwal, Malgorzata N.</au><au>Desaphy, Jérémy</au><au>Kellenberger, Esther</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Binding mode information improves fragment docking</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cheminformatics</jtitle><stitle>J Cheminform</stitle><addtitle>J Cheminform</addtitle><date>2019-03-22</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>24-15</pages><artnum>24</artnum><issn>1758-2946</issn><eissn>1758-2946</eissn><abstract>Docking is commonly used in drug discovery to predict how ligand binds to protein target. Best programs are generally able to generate a correct solution, yet often fail to identify it. In the case of drug-like molecules, the correct and incorrect poses can be sorted by similarity to the crystallographic structure of the protein in complex with reference ligands. Fragments are particularly sensitive to scoring problems because they are weak ligands which form few interactions with protein. In the present study, we assessed the utility of binding mode information in fragment pose prediction. We compared three approaches: interaction fingerprints, 3D-matching of interaction patterns and 3D-matching of shapes. We prepared a test set composed of high-quality structures of the Protein Data Bank. We generated and evaluated the docking poses of 586 fragment/protein complexes. We observed that the best approach is twice as accurate as the native scoring function, and that post-processing is less effective for smaller fragments. Interestingly, fragments and drug-like molecules both proved to be useful references. In the discussion, we suggest the best conditions for a successful pose prediction with the three approaches.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>30903304</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13321-019-0346-7</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9320-4840</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1758-2946 |
ispartof | Journal of cheminformatics, 2019-03, Vol.11 (1), p.24-15, Article 24 |
issn | 1758-2946 1758-2946 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bceb8abe771d475abf03e5f26d5f6a6f |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access |
subjects | Banks (Finance) Binding Chemical Sciences Cheminformatics Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Comparative analysis Computational Biology/Bioinformatics Computer Applications in Chemistry Coordination compounds Crystal structure Crystallography Data banks Docking Docking pose Documentation and Information in Chemistry Drug discovery Fragment-based drug design (FBDD) Fragmentation Fragments Ligand/protein complex Ligands Matching Post-processing Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Chemical Structures Protein binding Protein structure Proteins Research Article Scoring Shape recognition Theoretical and Computational Chemistry |
title | Binding mode information improves fragment docking |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A24%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Binding%20mode%20information%20improves%20fragment%20docking&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cheminformatics&rft.au=Jacquemard,%20C%C3%A9lien&rft.date=2019-03-22&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=24-15&rft.artnum=24&rft.issn=1758-2946&rft.eissn=1758-2946&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13321-019-0346-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA581383293%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c671t-c19d6c9364327231c6f70c77cee8c9f68d80b888d2f269404d21deec7c2a1b063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2195801858&rft_id=info:pmid/30903304&rft_galeid=A581383293&rfr_iscdi=true |