Probability Distribution of Soil Suction of Engineered Turf Cover and Compacted Clay Cover

• Main Authors: Alam, Md Jobair Bin, Aggarwal, Maalvika
• Format: Conference Proceeding
• Language: English
• Subjects: Clay; Climatic conditions; Compacted soils; Data collection; Data logging; engineered turf; Geotechnical fabrics; instrumentation; Kurtosis; Landfill; landfill cover; Landfills; Low density polyethylenes; Matric suction; Moisture content; Outliers (statistics); Polypropylene; Probabilistic analysis; Probability distribution; Sensors; Soil compaction; Soil conditions; Soil layers; Soil suction; Soil water; Soil water potential; Statistical analysis; Turf; unsaturated soil; Waste disposal sites; Water potential
• ISSN: 2267-1242; 2555-0403; 2267-1242
• DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202338224002

It is unlikely to predict the distribution of soil suction in the field deterministically. It is well established that there are various sources of uncertainty in the measurement of matric suction, and the suction measurements in the field are even more critical because of the heterogeneities in the field conditions. Hence it becomes necessary to probabilistically characterize the suction in the field for enhanced reliability. The objective of this study was to conduct a probabilistic analysis of measured soil suction of two different test landfill covers, compacted clay cover (CC) and engineered turf cover (ETC), under similar meteorological events. The size of the two test landfill covers was 3 m × 3 m (10 ft. × 10 ft.) and 1.2 m (4ft.) in depth. The covers were constructed by excavating the existing subgrade, placing 6-mil plastic sheets, and backfilling the excavated soil, followed by layered compaction. Then the covers were instrumented identically with soil water potential sensors up to specified depths. One of the covers acted as the CC, and the other cover was ETC. In ETC, engineered turf was laid over the compacted soil. The engineered turf consisted of a structured LLDPE geomembrane overlain by synthetic turf (polyethylene fibers tufted through a double layer of woven polypropylene geotextiles). The sensors were connected to an automated data logging system and the collected data were probabilistically analyzed using the R program. There were significant inconsistencies in the descriptive statistical parameters of the measured soil suction at both covers under the same climatic conditions. Soil suction measured in the field ranged between almost 12 to 44 kPa in ETC, while it was in the range of almost 1 to 2020 kPa in the CC. The histogram and quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plot showed the data to be non-normally distributed in the field. A heavy-tailed leptokurtic (Kurtosis=13) distribution of suction was observed in the ETC with substantial outliers. In contrast, the suction distribution in CC was observed skewed to the right containing a thinner tail indicating an almost platykurtic distribution. The distribution of suction in the field under engineered turf was observed to be reasonably consistent with time compared to bare soil under the same meteorological events. The results obtained from this study revealed the engineered turf system to be an effective barrier to inducing changes in soil suction against climatic events.