Loading…

Effects of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic with and without feed restriction on performance, hematological indices and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic with and without feed restriction on broilers performance, blood parameters, carcass characteristics, and feed cost of production from 1 to 56 days of age. Two hundred and forty unsexed one day-old chicks of Ar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal bioscience 2017, 30(5), , pp.672-682
Main Authors: Abdel-Hafeez, Hassan M, Saleh, Elham S E, Tawfeek, Samar S, Youssef, Ibrahim M I, Abdel-Daim, Asmaa S A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-fd61f00149230745e7e15a218b896a66a404c40bfa424a4f61242e918929970f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-fd61f00149230745e7e15a218b896a66a404c40bfa424a4f61242e918929970f3
container_end_page 682
container_issue 5
container_start_page 672
container_title Animal bioscience
container_volume 30
creator Abdel-Hafeez, Hassan M
Saleh, Elham S E
Tawfeek, Samar S
Youssef, Ibrahim M I
Abdel-Daim, Asmaa S A
description This study was conducted to investigate the effects of probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic with and without feed restriction on broilers performance, blood parameters, carcass characteristics, and feed cost of production from 1 to 56 days of age. Two hundred and forty unsexed one day-old chicks of Arbor Acres breed were used. Two trials, I and II, were conducted, with 120 birds in both. Each trial was divided into 4 equal groups. The birds in trial I were fed throughout the experiment, while the chicks in trial II were fed during the first week of age, then subjected to 5 hours/d of feed restriction from the beginning of the second week up to the end of the experiment. In both trials, the birds in group 1 were fed on a control diet while the other groups were given the same control diet supplemented either with a probiotic in group 2, prebiotic in group 3, or synbiotic in group 4. It was found that chicks fed diets supplemented with probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic (with and without feed restriction) exhibited higher body weight and feed efficiency than chicks fed the control diets. The feed additives in both trials did not affect hemoglobin, serum total protein, albumin, globulin, glucose, and total cholesterol, except the packed cell volume which was increased in the additive treatments with restriction at the end of the experiment. Moreover, the dietary treatments did not influence the carcass yield. However, the relative weights of liver, gizzard and proventriculus, small intestine and bursa of fabricius were found to be increased. The additives decreased the visible fat in the carcass, with more decreasing effect in the additive groups with restriction. The lowest feed cost per kg of weight gain was observed in the birds fed diets supplemented with synbiotic, probiotic and prebiotic. Feed restriction improved the feed conversion ratio, economic return, but decreased the feed intake, serum total cholesterol and visible fat in comparison with non-restricted groups. The biological feed additives could be routinely added to broiler diets, especially when a feed restriction program is followed. Finally, it can be recommended to restrict feed, and add probiotic or synbiotic to increase weight, improve feed conversion rate and reduce feed cost of production.
doi_str_mv 10.5713/ajas.16.0535
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_nrf_k</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bd75b4abadbf40b8bae29e0cbe1d2b91</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A497178384</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_bd75b4abadbf40b8bae29e0cbe1d2b91</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A497178384</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-fd61f00149230745e7e15a218b896a66a404c40bfa424a4f61242e918929970f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUlFv0zAQjhCIjcEbzyiPIK3Fdhw7eUGqpgGVJiGh8WydnXPrNrWLnQ7tD_E7cZJtYrKlO5-_--7O_oriPSXLWtLqM-wgLalYkrqqXxTntJViUddUvsw-oXTBKiHPijcp7QipOZPN6-KMScFI09Lz4u-1tWiGVAZbHmPQLgzOXGYXH13wXZnu_Xws_7hhO4VGJ5yG0iJ2ZcQ0RGcGF3yZ9xGjDfEA3uBlucUDDKEPG2egL53vnME0URiIBlIqzRYimAGjS7nE1IqOwfUY85Uze_TpbfHKQp_w3YO9KH59vb69-r64-fFtfbW6WZiaVcPCdoJaQihvWUUkr1EirYHRRjetACGAE2440RY448CtoIwzbGnTsraVxFYXxaeZ10er9sapAG6ym6D2Ua1-3q4VrQRhgmfsesZ2AXbqGN0B4v2UMAVC3CiIeaAele5krTlo6LTN5RsNyFokRiPtmG5p5voycx1P-oCdQT9E6J-RPr_xbpt7ulM1p7RhMhN8fCCI4fcpf4c6uGSw78FjOCVFm7qVVBIqMnQ5QzeQW3Pehsxo8urw4EzwaPPTqxUf8U3VjINezgkmhpQi2qe-KFGjBtWoQUWFGjWY4R_-n-UJ_Ci66h_FZNux</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1859717016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic with and without feed restriction on performance, hematological indices and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Abdel-Hafeez, Hassan M ; Saleh, Elham S E ; Tawfeek, Samar S ; Youssef, Ibrahim M I ; Abdel-Daim, Asmaa S A</creator><creatorcontrib>Abdel-Hafeez, Hassan M ; Saleh, Elham S E ; Tawfeek, Samar S ; Youssef, Ibrahim M I ; Abdel-Daim, Asmaa S A</creatorcontrib><description>This study was conducted to investigate the effects of probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic with and without feed restriction on broilers performance, blood parameters, carcass characteristics, and feed cost of production from 1 to 56 days of age. Two hundred and forty unsexed one day-old chicks of Arbor Acres breed were used. Two trials, I and II, were conducted, with 120 birds in both. Each trial was divided into 4 equal groups. The birds in trial I were fed throughout the experiment, while the chicks in trial II were fed during the first week of age, then subjected to 5 hours/d of feed restriction from the beginning of the second week up to the end of the experiment. In both trials, the birds in group 1 were fed on a control diet while the other groups were given the same control diet supplemented either with a probiotic in group 2, prebiotic in group 3, or synbiotic in group 4. It was found that chicks fed diets supplemented with probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic (with and without feed restriction) exhibited higher body weight and feed efficiency than chicks fed the control diets. The feed additives in both trials did not affect hemoglobin, serum total protein, albumin, globulin, glucose, and total cholesterol, except the packed cell volume which was increased in the additive treatments with restriction at the end of the experiment. Moreover, the dietary treatments did not influence the carcass yield. However, the relative weights of liver, gizzard and proventriculus, small intestine and bursa of fabricius were found to be increased. The additives decreased the visible fat in the carcass, with more decreasing effect in the additive groups with restriction. The lowest feed cost per kg of weight gain was observed in the birds fed diets supplemented with synbiotic, probiotic and prebiotic. Feed restriction improved the feed conversion ratio, economic return, but decreased the feed intake, serum total cholesterol and visible fat in comparison with non-restricted groups. The biological feed additives could be routinely added to broiler diets, especially when a feed restriction program is followed. Finally, it can be recommended to restrict feed, and add probiotic or synbiotic to increase weight, improve feed conversion rate and reduce feed cost of production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1011-2367</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2765-0189</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1976-5517</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2765-0235</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5713/ajas.16.0535</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27620891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): Asian - Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies</publisher><subject>Broilers ; Broilers (Chickens) ; Feed Restriction ; Health aspects ; Physiological aspects ; Prebiotic ; Probiotic ; Probiotics ; Synbiotic ; 축산학</subject><ispartof>Animal Bioscience, 2017, 30(5), , pp.672-682</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Asian - Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-fd61f00149230745e7e15a218b896a66a404c40bfa424a4f61242e918929970f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-fd61f00149230745e7e15a218b896a66a404c40bfa424a4f61242e918929970f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5411827/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5411827/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27620891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002216395$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abdel-Hafeez, Hassan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Elham S E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tawfeek, Samar S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youssef, Ibrahim M I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel-Daim, Asmaa S A</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic with and without feed restriction on performance, hematological indices and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens</title><title>Animal bioscience</title><addtitle>Asian-Australas J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>This study was conducted to investigate the effects of probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic with and without feed restriction on broilers performance, blood parameters, carcass characteristics, and feed cost of production from 1 to 56 days of age. Two hundred and forty unsexed one day-old chicks of Arbor Acres breed were used. Two trials, I and II, were conducted, with 120 birds in both. Each trial was divided into 4 equal groups. The birds in trial I were fed throughout the experiment, while the chicks in trial II were fed during the first week of age, then subjected to 5 hours/d of feed restriction from the beginning of the second week up to the end of the experiment. In both trials, the birds in group 1 were fed on a control diet while the other groups were given the same control diet supplemented either with a probiotic in group 2, prebiotic in group 3, or synbiotic in group 4. It was found that chicks fed diets supplemented with probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic (with and without feed restriction) exhibited higher body weight and feed efficiency than chicks fed the control diets. The feed additives in both trials did not affect hemoglobin, serum total protein, albumin, globulin, glucose, and total cholesterol, except the packed cell volume which was increased in the additive treatments with restriction at the end of the experiment. Moreover, the dietary treatments did not influence the carcass yield. However, the relative weights of liver, gizzard and proventriculus, small intestine and bursa of fabricius were found to be increased. The additives decreased the visible fat in the carcass, with more decreasing effect in the additive groups with restriction. The lowest feed cost per kg of weight gain was observed in the birds fed diets supplemented with synbiotic, probiotic and prebiotic. Feed restriction improved the feed conversion ratio, economic return, but decreased the feed intake, serum total cholesterol and visible fat in comparison with non-restricted groups. The biological feed additives could be routinely added to broiler diets, especially when a feed restriction program is followed. Finally, it can be recommended to restrict feed, and add probiotic or synbiotic to increase weight, improve feed conversion rate and reduce feed cost of production.</description><subject>Broilers</subject><subject>Broilers (Chickens)</subject><subject>Feed Restriction</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Prebiotic</subject><subject>Probiotic</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Synbiotic</subject><subject>축산학</subject><issn>1011-2367</issn><issn>2765-0189</issn><issn>1976-5517</issn><issn>2765-0235</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUlFv0zAQjhCIjcEbzyiPIK3Fdhw7eUGqpgGVJiGh8WydnXPrNrWLnQ7tD_E7cZJtYrKlO5-_--7O_oriPSXLWtLqM-wgLalYkrqqXxTntJViUddUvsw-oXTBKiHPijcp7QipOZPN6-KMScFI09Lz4u-1tWiGVAZbHmPQLgzOXGYXH13wXZnu_Xws_7hhO4VGJ5yG0iJ2ZcQ0RGcGF3yZ9xGjDfEA3uBlucUDDKEPG2egL53vnME0URiIBlIqzRYimAGjS7nE1IqOwfUY85Uze_TpbfHKQp_w3YO9KH59vb69-r64-fFtfbW6WZiaVcPCdoJaQihvWUUkr1EirYHRRjetACGAE2440RY448CtoIwzbGnTsraVxFYXxaeZ10er9sapAG6ym6D2Ua1-3q4VrQRhgmfsesZ2AXbqGN0B4v2UMAVC3CiIeaAele5krTlo6LTN5RsNyFokRiPtmG5p5voycx1P-oCdQT9E6J-RPr_xbpt7ulM1p7RhMhN8fCCI4fcpf4c6uGSw78FjOCVFm7qVVBIqMnQ5QzeQW3Pehsxo8urw4EzwaPPTqxUf8U3VjINezgkmhpQi2qe-KFGjBtWoQUWFGjWY4R_-n-UJ_Ci66h_FZNux</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Abdel-Hafeez, Hassan M</creator><creator>Saleh, Elham S E</creator><creator>Tawfeek, Samar S</creator><creator>Youssef, Ibrahim M I</creator><creator>Abdel-Daim, Asmaa S A</creator><general>Asian - Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies</general><general>Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)</general><general>Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies</general><general>아세아·태평양축산학회</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Effects of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic with and without feed restriction on performance, hematological indices and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens</title><author>Abdel-Hafeez, Hassan M ; Saleh, Elham S E ; Tawfeek, Samar S ; Youssef, Ibrahim M I ; Abdel-Daim, Asmaa S A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-fd61f00149230745e7e15a218b896a66a404c40bfa424a4f61242e918929970f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Broilers</topic><topic>Broilers (Chickens)</topic><topic>Feed Restriction</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Prebiotic</topic><topic>Probiotic</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Synbiotic</topic><topic>축산학</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abdel-Hafeez, Hassan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Elham S E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tawfeek, Samar S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youssef, Ibrahim M I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel-Daim, Asmaa S A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Animal bioscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abdel-Hafeez, Hassan M</au><au>Saleh, Elham S E</au><au>Tawfeek, Samar S</au><au>Youssef, Ibrahim M I</au><au>Abdel-Daim, Asmaa S A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic with and without feed restriction on performance, hematological indices and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens</atitle><jtitle>Animal bioscience</jtitle><addtitle>Asian-Australas J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>672</spage><epage>682</epage><pages>672-682</pages><issn>1011-2367</issn><issn>2765-0189</issn><eissn>1976-5517</eissn><eissn>2765-0235</eissn><abstract>This study was conducted to investigate the effects of probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic with and without feed restriction on broilers performance, blood parameters, carcass characteristics, and feed cost of production from 1 to 56 days of age. Two hundred and forty unsexed one day-old chicks of Arbor Acres breed were used. Two trials, I and II, were conducted, with 120 birds in both. Each trial was divided into 4 equal groups. The birds in trial I were fed throughout the experiment, while the chicks in trial II were fed during the first week of age, then subjected to 5 hours/d of feed restriction from the beginning of the second week up to the end of the experiment. In both trials, the birds in group 1 were fed on a control diet while the other groups were given the same control diet supplemented either with a probiotic in group 2, prebiotic in group 3, or synbiotic in group 4. It was found that chicks fed diets supplemented with probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic (with and without feed restriction) exhibited higher body weight and feed efficiency than chicks fed the control diets. The feed additives in both trials did not affect hemoglobin, serum total protein, albumin, globulin, glucose, and total cholesterol, except the packed cell volume which was increased in the additive treatments with restriction at the end of the experiment. Moreover, the dietary treatments did not influence the carcass yield. However, the relative weights of liver, gizzard and proventriculus, small intestine and bursa of fabricius were found to be increased. The additives decreased the visible fat in the carcass, with more decreasing effect in the additive groups with restriction. The lowest feed cost per kg of weight gain was observed in the birds fed diets supplemented with synbiotic, probiotic and prebiotic. Feed restriction improved the feed conversion ratio, economic return, but decreased the feed intake, serum total cholesterol and visible fat in comparison with non-restricted groups. The biological feed additives could be routinely added to broiler diets, especially when a feed restriction program is followed. Finally, it can be recommended to restrict feed, and add probiotic or synbiotic to increase weight, improve feed conversion rate and reduce feed cost of production.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>Asian - Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies</pub><pmid>27620891</pmid><doi>10.5713/ajas.16.0535</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1011-2367
ispartof Animal Bioscience, 2017, 30(5), , pp.672-682
issn 1011-2367
2765-0189
1976-5517
2765-0235
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bd75b4abadbf40b8bae29e0cbe1d2b91
source PubMed Central
subjects Broilers
Broilers (Chickens)
Feed Restriction
Health aspects
Physiological aspects
Prebiotic
Probiotic
Probiotics
Synbiotic
축산학
title Effects of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic with and without feed restriction on performance, hematological indices and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T14%3A38%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_nrf_k&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20probiotic,%20prebiotic,%20and%20synbiotic%20with%20and%20without%20feed%20restriction%20on%20performance,%20hematological%20indices%20and%20carcass%20characteristics%20of%20broiler%20chickens&rft.jtitle=Animal%20bioscience&rft.au=Abdel-Hafeez,%20Hassan%20M&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=672&rft.epage=682&rft.pages=672-682&rft.issn=1011-2367&rft.eissn=1976-5517&rft_id=info:doi/10.5713/ajas.16.0535&rft_dat=%3Cgale_nrf_k%3EA497178384%3C/gale_nrf_k%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-fd61f00149230745e7e15a218b896a66a404c40bfa424a4f61242e918929970f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1859717016&rft_id=info:pmid/27620891&rft_galeid=A497178384&rfr_iscdi=true