The CONFIDENT study protocol: a randomized controlled trial comparing two methods to increase long-term care worker confidence in the COVID-19 vaccines

• Published in: BMC public health 2023-02, Vol.23 (1), p.384-15, Article 384
• Main Authors: Stevens, Gabrielle, Johnson, Lisa C, Saunders, Catherine H, Schmidt, Peter, Sierpe, Ailyn, Thomeer, Rachael P, Little, N Ruth, Cantrell, Matthew, Yen, Renata W, Pogue, Jacqueline A, Holahan, Timothy, Schubbe, Danielle C, Forcino, Rachel C, Fillbrook, Branden, Sheppard, Rowena, Wooten, Celeste, Goldmann, Don, O'Malley, A James, Dubé, Eve, Durand, Marie-Anne, Elwyn, Glyn
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Applications programs; Clinical decision making; Clinical trials; Confidence; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; COVID-19 - prevention & control; COVID-19 Vaccines; Disease transmission; Effectiveness; False information; Humans; Hypotheses; Immunization; Intervention; Life Sciences; Long term health care; Long-Term Care; Long-term care workers; Mortality; Nursing homes; Pandemics; Public health; Randomization; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retirement communities; Santé publique et épidémiologie; SARS-CoV-2; Social networks; Unemployment; Vaccine confidence; Vaccine hesitancy; Vaccines
• ISSN: 1471-2458; 1471-2458
• DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15266-x

Clinical and real-world effectiveness data for the COVID-19 vaccines have shown that they are the best defense in preventing severe illness and death throughout the pandemic. However, in the US, some groups remain more hesitant than others about receiving COVID-19 vaccines. One important group is long-term care workers (LTCWs), especially because they risk infecting the vulnerable and clinically complex populations they serve. There is a lack of research about how best to increase vaccine confidence, especially in frontline LTCWs and healthcare staff. Our aims are to: (1) compare the impact of two interventions delivered online to enhanced usual practice on LTCW COVID-19 vaccine confidence and other pre-specified secondary outcomes, (2) determine if LTCWs' characteristics and other factors mediate and moderate the interventions' effect on study outcomes, and (3) explore the implementation characteristics, contexts, and processes needed to sustain a wider use of the interventions. We will conduct a three-arm randomized controlled effectiveness-implementation hybrid (type 2) trial, with randomization at the participant level. Arm 1 is a dialogue-based webinar intervention facilitated by a LTCW and a medical expert and guided by an evidence-based COVID-19 vaccine decision tool. Arm 2 is a curated social media web application intervention featuring interactive, dynamic content about COVID-19 and relevant vaccines. Arm 3 is enhanced usual practice, which directs participants to online public health information about COVID-19 vaccines. Participants will be recruited via online posts and advertisements, email invitations, and in-person visits to care settings. Trial data will be collected at four time points using online surveys. The primary outcome is COVID-19 vaccine confidence. Secondary outcomes include vaccine uptake, vaccine and booster intent for those unvaccinated, likelihood of recommending vaccination (both initial series and booster), feeling informed about the vaccines, identification of vaccine information and misinformation, and trust in COVID-19 vaccine information provided by different people and organizations. Exploration of intervention implementation will involve interviews with study participants and other stakeholders, an in-depth process evaluation, and testing during a subsequent sustainability phase. Study findings will contribute new knowledge about how to increase COVID-19 vaccine confidence and effective informational modalities for LTC