Loading…

Would you believe an intoxicated witness? The impact of witness alcohol intoxication status on credibility judgments and suggestibility

Memory conformity may occur when a person’s belief in another’s memory report outweighs their belief in their own. Witnesses might be less likely to believe and therefore take on false information from intoxicated co-witnesses, due to the common belief that alcohol impairs memory performance. This p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology 2022-09, Vol.13, p.983681-983681
Main Authors: Bartlett, Georgina, Gawrylowicz, Julie, Frings, Daniel, Albery, Ian P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-a9dbb21ec536cc396db19a2a01b82681c2239faee72eeeff09ef8c1f056fc3413
container_end_page 983681
container_issue
container_start_page 983681
container_title Frontiers in psychology
container_volume 13
creator Bartlett, Georgina
Gawrylowicz, Julie
Frings, Daniel
Albery, Ian P.
description Memory conformity may occur when a person’s belief in another’s memory report outweighs their belief in their own. Witnesses might be less likely to believe and therefore take on false information from intoxicated co-witnesses, due to the common belief that alcohol impairs memory performance. This paper presents an online study in which participants ( n  = 281) watched a video of a mock crime taking place outside a pub that included a witness either visibly consuming wine or a soft drink. Participants then read a statement from the witness that varied in the number of false details it contained before being asked to recall the crime. We found that the intoxicated witness was regarded as significantly less credible, but participants were not less likely to report misinformation from them. This suggests that intoxication status impacts one’s perception of how credible a source is, but not one’s ability to reject false suggestions from this source. Our findings reinforce the importance of minimizing co-witness discussion prior to interview, and not to assume that people automatically (correctly or not) discount information provided by intoxicated co-witnesses.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983681
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_be8d6f9053d14faa9ddc4bd28ee62e65</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_be8d6f9053d14faa9ddc4bd28ee62e65</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2725444457</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-a9dbb21ec536cc396db19a2a01b82681c2239faee72eeeff09ef8c1f056fc3413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUslu2zAQJYIWSeDmA3LjsRc7XCSauqQogrYJEKCXFD0SXIYyDUp0RSqNv6C_XSZ2l8xlBm9m3ix4CF1SsuJcdld-l_f9ihHGVp3kQtITdE6FaJaUrOWb_-IzdJHzllRrCCOEnaIzLlgjWynP0a_vaY4O79OMDcQAj4D1iMNY0lOwuoDDP0MZIecP-GEDOAw7bQtO_g-MdbRpk-K_lpBGnIsuc8Y1shO4YEIMZY-3s-sHGEttGh3Oc99DLsfkO_TW65jh4ugX6NvnTw83t8v7r1_ubj7eLy3vmrLUnTOGUbAtF7ZCwhnaaaYJNZLVH1jGeOc1wJoBgPekAy8t9aQV3vKG8gW6O_C6pLdqN4VBT3uVdFAvQJp6pacSbARlQDrhO9JyRxuv62hnG-OYBBAMRFu5rg9cu9kM4Gw9bdLxFenrzBg2qk-PqmsFo3XTBXp_JJjSj7k-Qw0hW4hRj5DmrNiatU21dl1L6aHUTinnCfzfMZSoZz2oFz2oZz2ogx74b-IFrnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2725444457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Would you believe an intoxicated witness? The impact of witness alcohol intoxication status on credibility judgments and suggestibility</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bartlett, Georgina ; Gawrylowicz, Julie ; Frings, Daniel ; Albery, Ian P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Georgina ; Gawrylowicz, Julie ; Frings, Daniel ; Albery, Ian P.</creatorcontrib><description>Memory conformity may occur when a person’s belief in another’s memory report outweighs their belief in their own. Witnesses might be less likely to believe and therefore take on false information from intoxicated co-witnesses, due to the common belief that alcohol impairs memory performance. This paper presents an online study in which participants ( n  = 281) watched a video of a mock crime taking place outside a pub that included a witness either visibly consuming wine or a soft drink. Participants then read a statement from the witness that varied in the number of false details it contained before being asked to recall the crime. We found that the intoxicated witness was regarded as significantly less credible, but participants were not less likely to report misinformation from them. This suggests that intoxication status impacts one’s perception of how credible a source is, but not one’s ability to reject false suggestions from this source. Our findings reinforce the importance of minimizing co-witness discussion prior to interview, and not to assume that people automatically (correctly or not) discount information provided by intoxicated co-witnesses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983681</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36248588</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>alcohol intoxication ; eyewitness memory ; intoxicated witness ; memory conformity ; Psychology ; witness credibility</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2022-09, Vol.13, p.983681-983681</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 Bartlett, Gawrylowicz, Frings and Albery. 2022 Bartlett, Gawrylowicz, Frings and Albery</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-a9dbb21ec536cc396db19a2a01b82681c2239faee72eeeff09ef8c1f056fc3413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562122/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562122/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27900,27901,53765,53767</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Georgina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gawrylowicz, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frings, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albery, Ian P.</creatorcontrib><title>Would you believe an intoxicated witness? The impact of witness alcohol intoxication status on credibility judgments and suggestibility</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><description>Memory conformity may occur when a person’s belief in another’s memory report outweighs their belief in their own. Witnesses might be less likely to believe and therefore take on false information from intoxicated co-witnesses, due to the common belief that alcohol impairs memory performance. This paper presents an online study in which participants ( n  = 281) watched a video of a mock crime taking place outside a pub that included a witness either visibly consuming wine or a soft drink. Participants then read a statement from the witness that varied in the number of false details it contained before being asked to recall the crime. We found that the intoxicated witness was regarded as significantly less credible, but participants were not less likely to report misinformation from them. This suggests that intoxication status impacts one’s perception of how credible a source is, but not one’s ability to reject false suggestions from this source. Our findings reinforce the importance of minimizing co-witness discussion prior to interview, and not to assume that people automatically (correctly or not) discount information provided by intoxicated co-witnesses.</description><subject>alcohol intoxication</subject><subject>eyewitness memory</subject><subject>intoxicated witness</subject><subject>memory conformity</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>witness credibility</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUslu2zAQJYIWSeDmA3LjsRc7XCSauqQogrYJEKCXFD0SXIYyDUp0RSqNv6C_XSZ2l8xlBm9m3ix4CF1SsuJcdld-l_f9ihHGVp3kQtITdE6FaJaUrOWb_-IzdJHzllRrCCOEnaIzLlgjWynP0a_vaY4O79OMDcQAj4D1iMNY0lOwuoDDP0MZIecP-GEDOAw7bQtO_g-MdbRpk-K_lpBGnIsuc8Y1shO4YEIMZY-3s-sHGEttGh3Oc99DLsfkO_TW65jh4ugX6NvnTw83t8v7r1_ubj7eLy3vmrLUnTOGUbAtF7ZCwhnaaaYJNZLVH1jGeOc1wJoBgPekAy8t9aQV3vKG8gW6O_C6pLdqN4VBT3uVdFAvQJp6pacSbARlQDrhO9JyRxuv62hnG-OYBBAMRFu5rg9cu9kM4Gw9bdLxFenrzBg2qk-PqmsFo3XTBXp_JJjSj7k-Qw0hW4hRj5DmrNiatU21dl1L6aHUTinnCfzfMZSoZz2oFz2oZz2ogx74b-IFrnQ</recordid><startdate>20220930</startdate><enddate>20220930</enddate><creator>Bartlett, Georgina</creator><creator>Gawrylowicz, Julie</creator><creator>Frings, Daniel</creator><creator>Albery, Ian P.</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220930</creationdate><title>Would you believe an intoxicated witness? The impact of witness alcohol intoxication status on credibility judgments and suggestibility</title><author>Bartlett, Georgina ; Gawrylowicz, Julie ; Frings, Daniel ; Albery, Ian P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-a9dbb21ec536cc396db19a2a01b82681c2239faee72eeeff09ef8c1f056fc3413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>alcohol intoxication</topic><topic>eyewitness memory</topic><topic>intoxicated witness</topic><topic>memory conformity</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>witness credibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Georgina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gawrylowicz, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frings, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albery, Ian P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bartlett, Georgina</au><au>Gawrylowicz, Julie</au><au>Frings, Daniel</au><au>Albery, Ian P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Would you believe an intoxicated witness? The impact of witness alcohol intoxication status on credibility judgments and suggestibility</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><date>2022-09-30</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><spage>983681</spage><epage>983681</epage><pages>983681-983681</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>Memory conformity may occur when a person’s belief in another’s memory report outweighs their belief in their own. Witnesses might be less likely to believe and therefore take on false information from intoxicated co-witnesses, due to the common belief that alcohol impairs memory performance. This paper presents an online study in which participants ( n  = 281) watched a video of a mock crime taking place outside a pub that included a witness either visibly consuming wine or a soft drink. Participants then read a statement from the witness that varied in the number of false details it contained before being asked to recall the crime. We found that the intoxicated witness was regarded as significantly less credible, but participants were not less likely to report misinformation from them. This suggests that intoxication status impacts one’s perception of how credible a source is, but not one’s ability to reject false suggestions from this source. Our findings reinforce the importance of minimizing co-witness discussion prior to interview, and not to assume that people automatically (correctly or not) discount information provided by intoxicated co-witnesses.</abstract><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>36248588</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983681</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-1078
ispartof Frontiers in psychology, 2022-09, Vol.13, p.983681-983681
issn 1664-1078
1664-1078
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_be8d6f9053d14faa9ddc4bd28ee62e65
source PubMed Central
subjects alcohol intoxication
eyewitness memory
intoxicated witness
memory conformity
Psychology
witness credibility
title Would you believe an intoxicated witness? The impact of witness alcohol intoxication status on credibility judgments and suggestibility
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T13%3A38%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Would%20you%20believe%20an%20intoxicated%20witness?%20The%20impact%20of%20witness%20alcohol%20intoxication%20status%20on%20credibility%20judgments%20and%20suggestibility&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Bartlett,%20Georgina&rft.date=2022-09-30&rft.volume=13&rft.spage=983681&rft.epage=983681&rft.pages=983681-983681&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983681&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2725444457%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-a9dbb21ec536cc396db19a2a01b82681c2239faee72eeeff09ef8c1f056fc3413%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2725444457&rft_id=info:pmid/36248588&rfr_iscdi=true