Loading…
Would you believe an intoxicated witness? The impact of witness alcohol intoxication status on credibility judgments and suggestibility
Memory conformity may occur when a person’s belief in another’s memory report outweighs their belief in their own. Witnesses might be less likely to believe and therefore take on false information from intoxicated co-witnesses, due to the common belief that alcohol impairs memory performance. This p...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in psychology 2022-09, Vol.13, p.983681-983681 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-a9dbb21ec536cc396db19a2a01b82681c2239faee72eeeff09ef8c1f056fc3413 |
container_end_page | 983681 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 983681 |
container_title | Frontiers in psychology |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Bartlett, Georgina Gawrylowicz, Julie Frings, Daniel Albery, Ian P. |
description | Memory conformity may occur when a person’s belief in another’s memory report outweighs their belief in their own. Witnesses might be less likely to believe and therefore take on false information from intoxicated co-witnesses, due to the common belief that alcohol impairs memory performance. This paper presents an online study in which participants (
n
= 281) watched a video of a mock crime taking place outside a pub that included a witness either visibly consuming wine or a soft drink. Participants then read a statement from the witness that varied in the number of false details it contained before being asked to recall the crime. We found that the intoxicated witness was regarded as significantly less credible, but participants were not less likely to report misinformation from them. This suggests that intoxication status impacts one’s perception of how credible a source is, but not one’s ability to reject false suggestions from this source. Our findings reinforce the importance of minimizing co-witness discussion prior to interview, and not to assume that people automatically (correctly or not) discount information provided by intoxicated co-witnesses. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983681 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_be8d6f9053d14faa9ddc4bd28ee62e65</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_be8d6f9053d14faa9ddc4bd28ee62e65</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2725444457</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-a9dbb21ec536cc396db19a2a01b82681c2239faee72eeeff09ef8c1f056fc3413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUslu2zAQJYIWSeDmA3LjsRc7XCSauqQogrYJEKCXFD0SXIYyDUp0RSqNv6C_XSZ2l8xlBm9m3ix4CF1SsuJcdld-l_f9ihHGVp3kQtITdE6FaJaUrOWb_-IzdJHzllRrCCOEnaIzLlgjWynP0a_vaY4O79OMDcQAj4D1iMNY0lOwuoDDP0MZIecP-GEDOAw7bQtO_g-MdbRpk-K_lpBGnIsuc8Y1shO4YEIMZY-3s-sHGEttGh3Oc99DLsfkO_TW65jh4ugX6NvnTw83t8v7r1_ubj7eLy3vmrLUnTOGUbAtF7ZCwhnaaaYJNZLVH1jGeOc1wJoBgPekAy8t9aQV3vKG8gW6O_C6pLdqN4VBT3uVdFAvQJp6pacSbARlQDrhO9JyRxuv62hnG-OYBBAMRFu5rg9cu9kM4Gw9bdLxFenrzBg2qk-PqmsFo3XTBXp_JJjSj7k-Qw0hW4hRj5DmrNiatU21dl1L6aHUTinnCfzfMZSoZz2oFz2oZz2ogx74b-IFrnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2725444457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Would you believe an intoxicated witness? The impact of witness alcohol intoxication status on credibility judgments and suggestibility</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bartlett, Georgina ; Gawrylowicz, Julie ; Frings, Daniel ; Albery, Ian P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Georgina ; Gawrylowicz, Julie ; Frings, Daniel ; Albery, Ian P.</creatorcontrib><description>Memory conformity may occur when a person’s belief in another’s memory report outweighs their belief in their own. Witnesses might be less likely to believe and therefore take on false information from intoxicated co-witnesses, due to the common belief that alcohol impairs memory performance. This paper presents an online study in which participants (
n
= 281) watched a video of a mock crime taking place outside a pub that included a witness either visibly consuming wine or a soft drink. Participants then read a statement from the witness that varied in the number of false details it contained before being asked to recall the crime. We found that the intoxicated witness was regarded as significantly less credible, but participants were not less likely to report misinformation from them. This suggests that intoxication status impacts one’s perception of how credible a source is, but not one’s ability to reject false suggestions from this source. Our findings reinforce the importance of minimizing co-witness discussion prior to interview, and not to assume that people automatically (correctly or not) discount information provided by intoxicated co-witnesses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983681</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36248588</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>alcohol intoxication ; eyewitness memory ; intoxicated witness ; memory conformity ; Psychology ; witness credibility</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2022-09, Vol.13, p.983681-983681</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 Bartlett, Gawrylowicz, Frings and Albery. 2022 Bartlett, Gawrylowicz, Frings and Albery</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-a9dbb21ec536cc396db19a2a01b82681c2239faee72eeeff09ef8c1f056fc3413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562122/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9562122/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27900,27901,53765,53767</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Georgina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gawrylowicz, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frings, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albery, Ian P.</creatorcontrib><title>Would you believe an intoxicated witness? The impact of witness alcohol intoxication status on credibility judgments and suggestibility</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><description>Memory conformity may occur when a person’s belief in another’s memory report outweighs their belief in their own. Witnesses might be less likely to believe and therefore take on false information from intoxicated co-witnesses, due to the common belief that alcohol impairs memory performance. This paper presents an online study in which participants (
n
= 281) watched a video of a mock crime taking place outside a pub that included a witness either visibly consuming wine or a soft drink. Participants then read a statement from the witness that varied in the number of false details it contained before being asked to recall the crime. We found that the intoxicated witness was regarded as significantly less credible, but participants were not less likely to report misinformation from them. This suggests that intoxication status impacts one’s perception of how credible a source is, but not one’s ability to reject false suggestions from this source. Our findings reinforce the importance of minimizing co-witness discussion prior to interview, and not to assume that people automatically (correctly or not) discount information provided by intoxicated co-witnesses.</description><subject>alcohol intoxication</subject><subject>eyewitness memory</subject><subject>intoxicated witness</subject><subject>memory conformity</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>witness credibility</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUslu2zAQJYIWSeDmA3LjsRc7XCSauqQogrYJEKCXFD0SXIYyDUp0RSqNv6C_XSZ2l8xlBm9m3ix4CF1SsuJcdld-l_f9ihHGVp3kQtITdE6FaJaUrOWb_-IzdJHzllRrCCOEnaIzLlgjWynP0a_vaY4O79OMDcQAj4D1iMNY0lOwuoDDP0MZIecP-GEDOAw7bQtO_g-MdbRpk-K_lpBGnIsuc8Y1shO4YEIMZY-3s-sHGEttGh3Oc99DLsfkO_TW65jh4ugX6NvnTw83t8v7r1_ubj7eLy3vmrLUnTOGUbAtF7ZCwhnaaaYJNZLVH1jGeOc1wJoBgPekAy8t9aQV3vKG8gW6O_C6pLdqN4VBT3uVdFAvQJp6pacSbARlQDrhO9JyRxuv62hnG-OYBBAMRFu5rg9cu9kM4Gw9bdLxFenrzBg2qk-PqmsFo3XTBXp_JJjSj7k-Qw0hW4hRj5DmrNiatU21dl1L6aHUTinnCfzfMZSoZz2oFz2oZz2ogx74b-IFrnQ</recordid><startdate>20220930</startdate><enddate>20220930</enddate><creator>Bartlett, Georgina</creator><creator>Gawrylowicz, Julie</creator><creator>Frings, Daniel</creator><creator>Albery, Ian P.</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220930</creationdate><title>Would you believe an intoxicated witness? The impact of witness alcohol intoxication status on credibility judgments and suggestibility</title><author>Bartlett, Georgina ; Gawrylowicz, Julie ; Frings, Daniel ; Albery, Ian P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-a9dbb21ec536cc396db19a2a01b82681c2239faee72eeeff09ef8c1f056fc3413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>alcohol intoxication</topic><topic>eyewitness memory</topic><topic>intoxicated witness</topic><topic>memory conformity</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>witness credibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Georgina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gawrylowicz, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frings, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albery, Ian P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bartlett, Georgina</au><au>Gawrylowicz, Julie</au><au>Frings, Daniel</au><au>Albery, Ian P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Would you believe an intoxicated witness? The impact of witness alcohol intoxication status on credibility judgments and suggestibility</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><date>2022-09-30</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><spage>983681</spage><epage>983681</epage><pages>983681-983681</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>Memory conformity may occur when a person’s belief in another’s memory report outweighs their belief in their own. Witnesses might be less likely to believe and therefore take on false information from intoxicated co-witnesses, due to the common belief that alcohol impairs memory performance. This paper presents an online study in which participants (
n
= 281) watched a video of a mock crime taking place outside a pub that included a witness either visibly consuming wine or a soft drink. Participants then read a statement from the witness that varied in the number of false details it contained before being asked to recall the crime. We found that the intoxicated witness was regarded as significantly less credible, but participants were not less likely to report misinformation from them. This suggests that intoxication status impacts one’s perception of how credible a source is, but not one’s ability to reject false suggestions from this source. Our findings reinforce the importance of minimizing co-witness discussion prior to interview, and not to assume that people automatically (correctly or not) discount information provided by intoxicated co-witnesses.</abstract><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>36248588</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983681</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1664-1078 |
ispartof | Frontiers in psychology, 2022-09, Vol.13, p.983681-983681 |
issn | 1664-1078 1664-1078 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_be8d6f9053d14faa9ddc4bd28ee62e65 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | alcohol intoxication eyewitness memory intoxicated witness memory conformity Psychology witness credibility |
title | Would you believe an intoxicated witness? The impact of witness alcohol intoxication status on credibility judgments and suggestibility |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T13%3A38%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Would%20you%20believe%20an%20intoxicated%20witness?%20The%20impact%20of%20witness%20alcohol%20intoxication%20status%20on%20credibility%20judgments%20and%20suggestibility&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Bartlett,%20Georgina&rft.date=2022-09-30&rft.volume=13&rft.spage=983681&rft.epage=983681&rft.pages=983681-983681&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983681&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2725444457%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-a9dbb21ec536cc396db19a2a01b82681c2239faee72eeeff09ef8c1f056fc3413%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2725444457&rft_id=info:pmid/36248588&rfr_iscdi=true |