Loading…
Cost-effectiveness analysis of fesoterodine flexible dose in newly diagnosed patients with overactive bladder in routine clinical practice in Spain
To carry out cost-effectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Health System perspective, of treating overactive bladder (OAB), in newly diagnosed patients with two flexible doses of fesoterodine in routine clinical practice. Economic evaluation of flexible-dose fesoterodine in newly diagnosed p...
Saved in:
Published in: | ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research 2016-01, Vol.8, p.541-550 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-47a64495870a6d256bc58222a8505b54b4e5bc07d664825e7c8d769383e788843 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 550 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 541 |
container_title | ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Peral, Carmen Sánchez-Ballester, Francisco García-Mediero, José M Ramos, Jaime Rejas, Javier |
description | To carry out cost-effectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Health System perspective, of treating overactive bladder (OAB), in newly diagnosed patients with two flexible doses of fesoterodine in routine clinical practice.
Economic evaluation of flexible-dose fesoterodine in newly diagnosed patients, including two treatment groups: standard escalating from 4 to 8 mg or fast escalating to 8 mg. Costs were estimated from health care resources utilization related to OAB, and were expressed in 2015 Euros. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were obtained from overactive bladder questionnaire-short form. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out.
Three hundred and ninety symptomatic OAB patients treated with fesoterodine and newly diagnosed (141 in fast escalating group and 249 in standard escalating) were analyzed. Adjusted health care total costs were not statistically different; difference -€4.1 (confidence interval: -153.3; 25.1)
=0.842. QALYs were higher in fast escalating to high dose vs standard escalating group, resulting in a cost of -€16,020/QALY gained for fast escalating vs standard escalating group.
When the cost-effectiveness threshold is set at a maximum value of €30,000/QALY gained, fesoterodine fast escalating group was cost-effective vs standard escalating group 67.6% of the time. The treatment with fesoterodine, in female patients newly diagnosed, fast escalating to 8 mg was a cost-effective option relative to escalating traditionally from 4 to 8 mg, in the management of OAB in routine clinical practice, from the Spanish National Health System perspective. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2147/CEOR.S111646 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bef08e57591c478aa64ade4ab65baa29</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A506622889</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_bef08e57591c478aa64ade4ab65baa29</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A506622889</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-47a64495870a6d256bc58222a8505b54b4e5bc07d664825e7c8d769383e788843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkktvEzEQx1cIRKvSG2dkCQn1QMI-_NoLUhUVqFSpEoWzNWvPJo4cO9iblHwOvjDOg5Ig7IOt8X9-43kUxeuqHNcVFR8mN_dfxw9VVXHKnxXnVSXkiLeyen50PysuU5qXedG2qWX7sjirhaia7HJe_JqENIyw71EPdo0eUyLgwW2STST0pMcUBozBWI-kd_jTdg6JCQmJ9cTjo9sQY2Hqs8WQJQwW_ZDIox1mJKwxwg5LOgfGYNz6xLAatjDtrLcaHFnuRHoHfFiC9a-KFz24hJeH86L4_unm2-TL6O7-8-3k-m6kmeDDiArglLZMihK4qRnvNJN1XYNkJesY7SiyTpfCcE5lzVBoaQRvG9mgkFLS5qK43XNNgLlaRruAuFEBrNoZQpwqiPlnDlWHfSmRCdZWmgoJOTIYpNBx1gHUbWZ93LOWq26BRucqRHAn0NMXb2dqGtaKlTkHuQVcHQAx_FhhGtTCJo3OgcewSqqSDWtEyxjL0rf_SOdhFXPTksrpM5H7LOhf1RRyAtb3IcfVW6i6ZiXndS13Ycf_UeVtcGF18NjbbD9xeHfkMENwwywFl3safDoVvt8LdQwpReyfilGVaju8aju86jC8Wf7muIBP4j-j2vwG_FjqSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2225704974</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-effectiveness analysis of fesoterodine flexible dose in newly diagnosed patients with overactive bladder in routine clinical practice in Spain</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Peral, Carmen ; Sánchez-Ballester, Francisco ; García-Mediero, José M ; Ramos, Jaime ; Rejas, Javier</creator><creatorcontrib>Peral, Carmen ; Sánchez-Ballester, Francisco ; García-Mediero, José M ; Ramos, Jaime ; Rejas, Javier</creatorcontrib><description>To carry out cost-effectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Health System perspective, of treating overactive bladder (OAB), in newly diagnosed patients with two flexible doses of fesoterodine in routine clinical practice.
Economic evaluation of flexible-dose fesoterodine in newly diagnosed patients, including two treatment groups: standard escalating from 4 to 8 mg or fast escalating to 8 mg. Costs were estimated from health care resources utilization related to OAB, and were expressed in 2015 Euros. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were obtained from overactive bladder questionnaire-short form. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out.
Three hundred and ninety symptomatic OAB patients treated with fesoterodine and newly diagnosed (141 in fast escalating group and 249 in standard escalating) were analyzed. Adjusted health care total costs were not statistically different; difference -€4.1 (confidence interval: -153.3; 25.1)
=0.842. QALYs were higher in fast escalating to high dose vs standard escalating group, resulting in a cost of -€16,020/QALY gained for fast escalating vs standard escalating group.
When the cost-effectiveness threshold is set at a maximum value of €30,000/QALY gained, fesoterodine fast escalating group was cost-effective vs standard escalating group 67.6% of the time. The treatment with fesoterodine, in female patients newly diagnosed, fast escalating to 8 mg was a cost-effective option relative to escalating traditionally from 4 to 8 mg, in the management of OAB in routine clinical practice, from the Spanish National Health System perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1178-6981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1178-6981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S111646</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27713646</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand: Dove Medical Press Limited</publisher><subject>Activities of daily living ; Antimuscarinic ; Bladder ; Clinical medicine ; Cost analysis ; Cost benefit analysis ; Drug dosages ; Economic aspects ; Fesoterodine ; Flexible-dose ; Gynecology ; Health care costs ; Hospitals ; Medical care quality ; Medical care utilization ; Original Research ; Overactive bladder ; Patient compliance ; Patients ; Primary care ; Quality of life ; Questionnaires ; Task forces ; Urinary incontinence ; Urogenital system ; Urology</subject><ispartof>ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research, 2016-01, Vol.8, p.541-550</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Dove Medical Press Limited</rights><rights>2016. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Peral et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-47a64495870a6d256bc58222a8505b54b4e5bc07d664825e7c8d769383e788843</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2225704974/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2225704974?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25751,27922,27923,37010,37011,44588,53789,53791,74896</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27713646$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peral, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Ballester, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Mediero, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rejas, Javier</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-effectiveness analysis of fesoterodine flexible dose in newly diagnosed patients with overactive bladder in routine clinical practice in Spain</title><title>ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research</title><addtitle>Clinicoecon Outcomes Res</addtitle><description>To carry out cost-effectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Health System perspective, of treating overactive bladder (OAB), in newly diagnosed patients with two flexible doses of fesoterodine in routine clinical practice.
Economic evaluation of flexible-dose fesoterodine in newly diagnosed patients, including two treatment groups: standard escalating from 4 to 8 mg or fast escalating to 8 mg. Costs were estimated from health care resources utilization related to OAB, and were expressed in 2015 Euros. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were obtained from overactive bladder questionnaire-short form. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out.
Three hundred and ninety symptomatic OAB patients treated with fesoterodine and newly diagnosed (141 in fast escalating group and 249 in standard escalating) were analyzed. Adjusted health care total costs were not statistically different; difference -€4.1 (confidence interval: -153.3; 25.1)
=0.842. QALYs were higher in fast escalating to high dose vs standard escalating group, resulting in a cost of -€16,020/QALY gained for fast escalating vs standard escalating group.
When the cost-effectiveness threshold is set at a maximum value of €30,000/QALY gained, fesoterodine fast escalating group was cost-effective vs standard escalating group 67.6% of the time. The treatment with fesoterodine, in female patients newly diagnosed, fast escalating to 8 mg was a cost-effective option relative to escalating traditionally from 4 to 8 mg, in the management of OAB in routine clinical practice, from the Spanish National Health System perspective.</description><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Antimuscarinic</subject><subject>Bladder</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Fesoterodine</subject><subject>Flexible-dose</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health care costs</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Medical care quality</subject><subject>Medical care utilization</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Overactive bladder</subject><subject>Patient compliance</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Task forces</subject><subject>Urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urogenital system</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1178-6981</issn><issn>1178-6981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkktvEzEQx1cIRKvSG2dkCQn1QMI-_NoLUhUVqFSpEoWzNWvPJo4cO9iblHwOvjDOg5Ig7IOt8X9-43kUxeuqHNcVFR8mN_dfxw9VVXHKnxXnVSXkiLeyen50PysuU5qXedG2qWX7sjirhaia7HJe_JqENIyw71EPdo0eUyLgwW2STST0pMcUBozBWI-kd_jTdg6JCQmJ9cTjo9sQY2Hqs8WQJQwW_ZDIox1mJKwxwg5LOgfGYNz6xLAatjDtrLcaHFnuRHoHfFiC9a-KFz24hJeH86L4_unm2-TL6O7-8-3k-m6kmeDDiArglLZMihK4qRnvNJN1XYNkJesY7SiyTpfCcE5lzVBoaQRvG9mgkFLS5qK43XNNgLlaRruAuFEBrNoZQpwqiPlnDlWHfSmRCdZWmgoJOTIYpNBx1gHUbWZ93LOWq26BRucqRHAn0NMXb2dqGtaKlTkHuQVcHQAx_FhhGtTCJo3OgcewSqqSDWtEyxjL0rf_SOdhFXPTksrpM5H7LOhf1RRyAtb3IcfVW6i6ZiXndS13Ycf_UeVtcGF18NjbbD9xeHfkMENwwywFl3safDoVvt8LdQwpReyfilGVaju8aju86jC8Wf7muIBP4j-j2vwG_FjqSQ</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Peral, Carmen</creator><creator>Sánchez-Ballester, Francisco</creator><creator>García-Mediero, José M</creator><creator>Ramos, Jaime</creator><creator>Rejas, Javier</creator><general>Dove Medical Press Limited</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Dove Medical Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Cost-effectiveness analysis of fesoterodine flexible dose in newly diagnosed patients with overactive bladder in routine clinical practice in Spain</title><author>Peral, Carmen ; Sánchez-Ballester, Francisco ; García-Mediero, José M ; Ramos, Jaime ; Rejas, Javier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-47a64495870a6d256bc58222a8505b54b4e5bc07d664825e7c8d769383e788843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Antimuscarinic</topic><topic>Bladder</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Fesoterodine</topic><topic>Flexible-dose</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health care costs</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Medical care quality</topic><topic>Medical care utilization</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Overactive bladder</topic><topic>Patient compliance</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Task forces</topic><topic>Urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urogenital system</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peral, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Ballester, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Mediero, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rejas, Javier</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database (ProQuest Medical & Health Databases)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peral, Carmen</au><au>Sánchez-Ballester, Francisco</au><au>García-Mediero, José M</au><au>Ramos, Jaime</au><au>Rejas, Javier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-effectiveness analysis of fesoterodine flexible dose in newly diagnosed patients with overactive bladder in routine clinical practice in Spain</atitle><jtitle>ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research</jtitle><addtitle>Clinicoecon Outcomes Res</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>8</volume><spage>541</spage><epage>550</epage><pages>541-550</pages><issn>1178-6981</issn><eissn>1178-6981</eissn><abstract>To carry out cost-effectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Health System perspective, of treating overactive bladder (OAB), in newly diagnosed patients with two flexible doses of fesoterodine in routine clinical practice.
Economic evaluation of flexible-dose fesoterodine in newly diagnosed patients, including two treatment groups: standard escalating from 4 to 8 mg or fast escalating to 8 mg. Costs were estimated from health care resources utilization related to OAB, and were expressed in 2015 Euros. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were obtained from overactive bladder questionnaire-short form. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out.
Three hundred and ninety symptomatic OAB patients treated with fesoterodine and newly diagnosed (141 in fast escalating group and 249 in standard escalating) were analyzed. Adjusted health care total costs were not statistically different; difference -€4.1 (confidence interval: -153.3; 25.1)
=0.842. QALYs were higher in fast escalating to high dose vs standard escalating group, resulting in a cost of -€16,020/QALY gained for fast escalating vs standard escalating group.
When the cost-effectiveness threshold is set at a maximum value of €30,000/QALY gained, fesoterodine fast escalating group was cost-effective vs standard escalating group 67.6% of the time. The treatment with fesoterodine, in female patients newly diagnosed, fast escalating to 8 mg was a cost-effective option relative to escalating traditionally from 4 to 8 mg, in the management of OAB in routine clinical practice, from the Spanish National Health System perspective.</abstract><cop>New Zealand</cop><pub>Dove Medical Press Limited</pub><pmid>27713646</pmid><doi>10.2147/CEOR.S111646</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1178-6981 |
ispartof | ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research, 2016-01, Vol.8, p.541-550 |
issn | 1178-6981 1178-6981 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bef08e57591c478aa64ade4ab65baa29 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Activities of daily living Antimuscarinic Bladder Clinical medicine Cost analysis Cost benefit analysis Drug dosages Economic aspects Fesoterodine Flexible-dose Gynecology Health care costs Hospitals Medical care quality Medical care utilization Original Research Overactive bladder Patient compliance Patients Primary care Quality of life Questionnaires Task forces Urinary incontinence Urogenital system Urology |
title | Cost-effectiveness analysis of fesoterodine flexible dose in newly diagnosed patients with overactive bladder in routine clinical practice in Spain |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T14%3A28%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-effectiveness%20analysis%20of%20fesoterodine%20flexible%20dose%20in%20newly%20diagnosed%20patients%20with%20overactive%20bladder%20in%20routine%20clinical%20practice%20in%20Spain&rft.jtitle=ClinicoEconomics%20and%20outcomes%20research&rft.au=Peral,%20Carmen&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.spage=541&rft.epage=550&rft.pages=541-550&rft.issn=1178-6981&rft.eissn=1178-6981&rft_id=info:doi/10.2147/CEOR.S111646&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA506622889%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-47a64495870a6d256bc58222a8505b54b4e5bc07d664825e7c8d769383e788843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2225704974&rft_id=info:pmid/27713646&rft_galeid=A506622889&rfr_iscdi=true |