Loading…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of fesoterodine flexible dose in newly diagnosed patients with overactive bladder in routine clinical practice in Spain

To carry out cost-effectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Health System perspective, of treating overactive bladder (OAB), in newly diagnosed patients with two flexible doses of fesoterodine in routine clinical practice. Economic evaluation of flexible-dose fesoterodine in newly diagnosed p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research 2016-01, Vol.8, p.541-550
Main Authors: Peral, Carmen, Sánchez-Ballester, Francisco, García-Mediero, José M, Ramos, Jaime, Rejas, Javier
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-47a64495870a6d256bc58222a8505b54b4e5bc07d664825e7c8d769383e788843
cites
container_end_page 550
container_issue
container_start_page 541
container_title ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research
container_volume 8
creator Peral, Carmen
Sánchez-Ballester, Francisco
García-Mediero, José M
Ramos, Jaime
Rejas, Javier
description To carry out cost-effectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Health System perspective, of treating overactive bladder (OAB), in newly diagnosed patients with two flexible doses of fesoterodine in routine clinical practice. Economic evaluation of flexible-dose fesoterodine in newly diagnosed patients, including two treatment groups: standard escalating from 4 to 8 mg or fast escalating to 8 mg. Costs were estimated from health care resources utilization related to OAB, and were expressed in 2015 Euros. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were obtained from overactive bladder questionnaire-short form. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out. Three hundred and ninety symptomatic OAB patients treated with fesoterodine and newly diagnosed (141 in fast escalating group and 249 in standard escalating) were analyzed. Adjusted health care total costs were not statistically different; difference -€4.1 (confidence interval: -153.3; 25.1) =0.842. QALYs were higher in fast escalating to high dose vs standard escalating group, resulting in a cost of -€16,020/QALY gained for fast escalating vs standard escalating group. When the cost-effectiveness threshold is set at a maximum value of €30,000/QALY gained, fesoterodine fast escalating group was cost-effective vs standard escalating group 67.6% of the time. The treatment with fesoterodine, in female patients newly diagnosed, fast escalating to 8 mg was a cost-effective option relative to escalating traditionally from 4 to 8 mg, in the management of OAB in routine clinical practice, from the Spanish National Health System perspective.
doi_str_mv 10.2147/CEOR.S111646
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bef08e57591c478aa64ade4ab65baa29</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A506622889</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_bef08e57591c478aa64ade4ab65baa29</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A506622889</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-47a64495870a6d256bc58222a8505b54b4e5bc07d664825e7c8d769383e788843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkktvEzEQx1cIRKvSG2dkCQn1QMI-_NoLUhUVqFSpEoWzNWvPJo4cO9iblHwOvjDOg5Ig7IOt8X9-43kUxeuqHNcVFR8mN_dfxw9VVXHKnxXnVSXkiLeyen50PysuU5qXedG2qWX7sjirhaia7HJe_JqENIyw71EPdo0eUyLgwW2STST0pMcUBozBWI-kd_jTdg6JCQmJ9cTjo9sQY2Hqs8WQJQwW_ZDIox1mJKwxwg5LOgfGYNz6xLAatjDtrLcaHFnuRHoHfFiC9a-KFz24hJeH86L4_unm2-TL6O7-8-3k-m6kmeDDiArglLZMihK4qRnvNJN1XYNkJesY7SiyTpfCcE5lzVBoaQRvG9mgkFLS5qK43XNNgLlaRruAuFEBrNoZQpwqiPlnDlWHfSmRCdZWmgoJOTIYpNBx1gHUbWZ93LOWq26BRucqRHAn0NMXb2dqGtaKlTkHuQVcHQAx_FhhGtTCJo3OgcewSqqSDWtEyxjL0rf_SOdhFXPTksrpM5H7LOhf1RRyAtb3IcfVW6i6ZiXndS13Ycf_UeVtcGF18NjbbD9xeHfkMENwwywFl3safDoVvt8LdQwpReyfilGVaju8aju86jC8Wf7muIBP4j-j2vwG_FjqSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2225704974</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-effectiveness analysis of fesoterodine flexible dose in newly diagnosed patients with overactive bladder in routine clinical practice in Spain</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Peral, Carmen ; Sánchez-Ballester, Francisco ; García-Mediero, José M ; Ramos, Jaime ; Rejas, Javier</creator><creatorcontrib>Peral, Carmen ; Sánchez-Ballester, Francisco ; García-Mediero, José M ; Ramos, Jaime ; Rejas, Javier</creatorcontrib><description>To carry out cost-effectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Health System perspective, of treating overactive bladder (OAB), in newly diagnosed patients with two flexible doses of fesoterodine in routine clinical practice. Economic evaluation of flexible-dose fesoterodine in newly diagnosed patients, including two treatment groups: standard escalating from 4 to 8 mg or fast escalating to 8 mg. Costs were estimated from health care resources utilization related to OAB, and were expressed in 2015 Euros. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were obtained from overactive bladder questionnaire-short form. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out. Three hundred and ninety symptomatic OAB patients treated with fesoterodine and newly diagnosed (141 in fast escalating group and 249 in standard escalating) were analyzed. Adjusted health care total costs were not statistically different; difference -€4.1 (confidence interval: -153.3; 25.1) =0.842. QALYs were higher in fast escalating to high dose vs standard escalating group, resulting in a cost of -€16,020/QALY gained for fast escalating vs standard escalating group. When the cost-effectiveness threshold is set at a maximum value of €30,000/QALY gained, fesoterodine fast escalating group was cost-effective vs standard escalating group 67.6% of the time. The treatment with fesoterodine, in female patients newly diagnosed, fast escalating to 8 mg was a cost-effective option relative to escalating traditionally from 4 to 8 mg, in the management of OAB in routine clinical practice, from the Spanish National Health System perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1178-6981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1178-6981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S111646</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27713646</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand: Dove Medical Press Limited</publisher><subject>Activities of daily living ; Antimuscarinic ; Bladder ; Clinical medicine ; Cost analysis ; Cost benefit analysis ; Drug dosages ; Economic aspects ; Fesoterodine ; Flexible-dose ; Gynecology ; Health care costs ; Hospitals ; Medical care quality ; Medical care utilization ; Original Research ; Overactive bladder ; Patient compliance ; Patients ; Primary care ; Quality of life ; Questionnaires ; Task forces ; Urinary incontinence ; Urogenital system ; Urology</subject><ispartof>ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research, 2016-01, Vol.8, p.541-550</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Dove Medical Press Limited</rights><rights>2016. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Peral et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-47a64495870a6d256bc58222a8505b54b4e5bc07d664825e7c8d769383e788843</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2225704974/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2225704974?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25751,27922,27923,37010,37011,44588,53789,53791,74896</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27713646$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peral, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Ballester, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Mediero, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rejas, Javier</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-effectiveness analysis of fesoterodine flexible dose in newly diagnosed patients with overactive bladder in routine clinical practice in Spain</title><title>ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research</title><addtitle>Clinicoecon Outcomes Res</addtitle><description>To carry out cost-effectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Health System perspective, of treating overactive bladder (OAB), in newly diagnosed patients with two flexible doses of fesoterodine in routine clinical practice. Economic evaluation of flexible-dose fesoterodine in newly diagnosed patients, including two treatment groups: standard escalating from 4 to 8 mg or fast escalating to 8 mg. Costs were estimated from health care resources utilization related to OAB, and were expressed in 2015 Euros. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were obtained from overactive bladder questionnaire-short form. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out. Three hundred and ninety symptomatic OAB patients treated with fesoterodine and newly diagnosed (141 in fast escalating group and 249 in standard escalating) were analyzed. Adjusted health care total costs were not statistically different; difference -€4.1 (confidence interval: -153.3; 25.1) =0.842. QALYs were higher in fast escalating to high dose vs standard escalating group, resulting in a cost of -€16,020/QALY gained for fast escalating vs standard escalating group. When the cost-effectiveness threshold is set at a maximum value of €30,000/QALY gained, fesoterodine fast escalating group was cost-effective vs standard escalating group 67.6% of the time. The treatment with fesoterodine, in female patients newly diagnosed, fast escalating to 8 mg was a cost-effective option relative to escalating traditionally from 4 to 8 mg, in the management of OAB in routine clinical practice, from the Spanish National Health System perspective.</description><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Antimuscarinic</subject><subject>Bladder</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Fesoterodine</subject><subject>Flexible-dose</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health care costs</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Medical care quality</subject><subject>Medical care utilization</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Overactive bladder</subject><subject>Patient compliance</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Task forces</subject><subject>Urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urogenital system</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1178-6981</issn><issn>1178-6981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkktvEzEQx1cIRKvSG2dkCQn1QMI-_NoLUhUVqFSpEoWzNWvPJo4cO9iblHwOvjDOg5Ig7IOt8X9-43kUxeuqHNcVFR8mN_dfxw9VVXHKnxXnVSXkiLeyen50PysuU5qXedG2qWX7sjirhaia7HJe_JqENIyw71EPdo0eUyLgwW2STST0pMcUBozBWI-kd_jTdg6JCQmJ9cTjo9sQY2Hqs8WQJQwW_ZDIox1mJKwxwg5LOgfGYNz6xLAatjDtrLcaHFnuRHoHfFiC9a-KFz24hJeH86L4_unm2-TL6O7-8-3k-m6kmeDDiArglLZMihK4qRnvNJN1XYNkJesY7SiyTpfCcE5lzVBoaQRvG9mgkFLS5qK43XNNgLlaRruAuFEBrNoZQpwqiPlnDlWHfSmRCdZWmgoJOTIYpNBx1gHUbWZ93LOWq26BRucqRHAn0NMXb2dqGtaKlTkHuQVcHQAx_FhhGtTCJo3OgcewSqqSDWtEyxjL0rf_SOdhFXPTksrpM5H7LOhf1RRyAtb3IcfVW6i6ZiXndS13Ycf_UeVtcGF18NjbbD9xeHfkMENwwywFl3safDoVvt8LdQwpReyfilGVaju8aju86jC8Wf7muIBP4j-j2vwG_FjqSQ</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Peral, Carmen</creator><creator>Sánchez-Ballester, Francisco</creator><creator>García-Mediero, José M</creator><creator>Ramos, Jaime</creator><creator>Rejas, Javier</creator><general>Dove Medical Press Limited</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>Dove Medical Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Cost-effectiveness analysis of fesoterodine flexible dose in newly diagnosed patients with overactive bladder in routine clinical practice in Spain</title><author>Peral, Carmen ; Sánchez-Ballester, Francisco ; García-Mediero, José M ; Ramos, Jaime ; Rejas, Javier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-47a64495870a6d256bc58222a8505b54b4e5bc07d664825e7c8d769383e788843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Antimuscarinic</topic><topic>Bladder</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Fesoterodine</topic><topic>Flexible-dose</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health care costs</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Medical care quality</topic><topic>Medical care utilization</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Overactive bladder</topic><topic>Patient compliance</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Task forces</topic><topic>Urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urogenital system</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peral, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Ballester, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Mediero, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rejas, Javier</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database (ProQuest Medical &amp; Health Databases)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peral, Carmen</au><au>Sánchez-Ballester, Francisco</au><au>García-Mediero, José M</au><au>Ramos, Jaime</au><au>Rejas, Javier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-effectiveness analysis of fesoterodine flexible dose in newly diagnosed patients with overactive bladder in routine clinical practice in Spain</atitle><jtitle>ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research</jtitle><addtitle>Clinicoecon Outcomes Res</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>8</volume><spage>541</spage><epage>550</epage><pages>541-550</pages><issn>1178-6981</issn><eissn>1178-6981</eissn><abstract>To carry out cost-effectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Health System perspective, of treating overactive bladder (OAB), in newly diagnosed patients with two flexible doses of fesoterodine in routine clinical practice. Economic evaluation of flexible-dose fesoterodine in newly diagnosed patients, including two treatment groups: standard escalating from 4 to 8 mg or fast escalating to 8 mg. Costs were estimated from health care resources utilization related to OAB, and were expressed in 2015 Euros. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were obtained from overactive bladder questionnaire-short form. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out. Three hundred and ninety symptomatic OAB patients treated with fesoterodine and newly diagnosed (141 in fast escalating group and 249 in standard escalating) were analyzed. Adjusted health care total costs were not statistically different; difference -€4.1 (confidence interval: -153.3; 25.1) =0.842. QALYs were higher in fast escalating to high dose vs standard escalating group, resulting in a cost of -€16,020/QALY gained for fast escalating vs standard escalating group. When the cost-effectiveness threshold is set at a maximum value of €30,000/QALY gained, fesoterodine fast escalating group was cost-effective vs standard escalating group 67.6% of the time. The treatment with fesoterodine, in female patients newly diagnosed, fast escalating to 8 mg was a cost-effective option relative to escalating traditionally from 4 to 8 mg, in the management of OAB in routine clinical practice, from the Spanish National Health System perspective.</abstract><cop>New Zealand</cop><pub>Dove Medical Press Limited</pub><pmid>27713646</pmid><doi>10.2147/CEOR.S111646</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1178-6981
ispartof ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research, 2016-01, Vol.8, p.541-550
issn 1178-6981
1178-6981
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bef08e57591c478aa64ade4ab65baa29
source Taylor & Francis Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Activities of daily living
Antimuscarinic
Bladder
Clinical medicine
Cost analysis
Cost benefit analysis
Drug dosages
Economic aspects
Fesoterodine
Flexible-dose
Gynecology
Health care costs
Hospitals
Medical care quality
Medical care utilization
Original Research
Overactive bladder
Patient compliance
Patients
Primary care
Quality of life
Questionnaires
Task forces
Urinary incontinence
Urogenital system
Urology
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of fesoterodine flexible dose in newly diagnosed patients with overactive bladder in routine clinical practice in Spain
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T14%3A28%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-effectiveness%20analysis%20of%20fesoterodine%20flexible%20dose%20in%20newly%20diagnosed%20patients%20with%20overactive%20bladder%20in%20routine%20clinical%20practice%20in%20Spain&rft.jtitle=ClinicoEconomics%20and%20outcomes%20research&rft.au=Peral,%20Carmen&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.spage=541&rft.epage=550&rft.pages=541-550&rft.issn=1178-6981&rft.eissn=1178-6981&rft_id=info:doi/10.2147/CEOR.S111646&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA506622889%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-47a64495870a6d256bc58222a8505b54b4e5bc07d664825e7c8d769383e788843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2225704974&rft_id=info:pmid/27713646&rft_galeid=A506622889&rfr_iscdi=true