Loading…

The effectiveness and efficiency of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies for patient and healthcare workers within acute NHS hospitals during an omicron-like period

Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 testing of hospitalised patients began in April-2020, with twice weekly healthcare worker (HCW) testing introduced in November-2020. Guidance recommending asymptomatic testing was withdrawn in August-2022. Assessing the impact of this decision from data alone is challenging d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC infectious diseases 2024-01, Vol.24 (1), p.64-13, Article 64
Main Authors: Evans, Stephanie, Naylor, Nichola R, Fowler, Tom, Hopkins, Susan, Robotham, Julie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c583t-ee4e25fadfcc456d5abde370ad4387591ceceec4e2f0d691851c1bad0be87d13
container_end_page 13
container_issue 1
container_start_page 64
container_title BMC infectious diseases
container_volume 24
creator Evans, Stephanie
Naylor, Nichola R
Fowler, Tom
Hopkins, Susan
Robotham, Julie
description Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 testing of hospitalised patients began in April-2020, with twice weekly healthcare worker (HCW) testing introduced in November-2020. Guidance recommending asymptomatic testing was withdrawn in August-2022. Assessing the impact of this decision from data alone is challenging due to concurrent changes in infection prevention and control practices, community transmission rates, and a reduction in ascertainment rate from reduced testing. Computational modelling is an effective tool for estimating the impact of this change. Using a computational model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in an English hospital we estimate the effectiveness of several asymptomatic testing strategies, namely; (1) Symptomatic testing of patients and HCWs, (2) testing of all patients on admission with/without repeat testing on days 3 and 5-7, and (3) symptomatic testing plus twice weekly asymptomatic HCW testing with 70% compliance. We estimate the number of patient and HCW infections, HCW absences, number of tests, and tests per case averted or absence avoided, with differing community prevalence rates over a 12-week period. Testing asymptomatic patients on admission reduces the rate of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection by 8.1-21.5%. Additional testing at days 3 and 5-7 post admission does not significantly reduce infection rates. Twice weekly asymptomatic HCW testing can reduce the proportion of HCWs infected by 1.0-4.4% and monthly absences by 0.4-0.8%. Testing asymptomatic patients repeatedly requires up to 5.5 million patient tests over the period, and twice weekly asymptomatic HCW testing increases the total tests to almost 30 million. The most efficient patient testing strategy (in terms of tests required to prevent a single patient infection) was testing asymptomatic patients on admission across all prevalence levels. The least efficient was repeated testing of patients with twice weekly asymptomatic HCW testing in a low prevalence scenario, and in all other prevalence levels symptomatic patient testing with regular HCW testing was least efficient. Testing patients on admission can reduce the rate of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection but there is little benefit of additional post-admission testing. Asymptomatic HCW testing has little incremental benefit for reducing patient cases at low prevalence but has a potential role at higher prevalence or with low community transmission. A full health-economic evaluation is required to determine the cost-effectiveness of th
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12879-023-08948-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bf1b0ebd56d44b1a9d6665c27d14b6dd</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A778819515</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_bf1b0ebd56d44b1a9d6665c27d14b6dd</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A778819515</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c583t-ee4e25fadfcc456d5abde370ad4387591ceceec4e2f0d691851c1bad0be87d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk89u1DAQxiMEoqXwAhyQJS7lkBI7cf6c0GoFdKWKSt1Vr5ZjTxK3iR1sp2VfiafE2S2lizggH2yNf_PZ_jwTRW9xcoZxmX90mJRFFSckjZOyysq4ehYd46zAMUnT7PmT9VH0yrmbJMFFSaqX0VFa4gqnJDuOfm46QNA0ILy6Aw3OIa7lHFFCgRZbZBrE3XYYvRm4VwKtF1freGmuY4I8OK90i5y33EOrwKHGWDQGDrTfCXXAe98JbgHdG3sL1qF75TulEReTB_TtfI0640blee-QnOysxzUygxLW6LhXt4BGsMrI19GLJkDw5mE-iTZfPm-W5_HF5dfVcnERC1qmPgbIgNCGy0aIjOaS8lpCWiRcZmlZ0AoLEAAiQE0i8wqXFAtcc5nUUBYSpyfRai8rDb9ho1UDt1tmuGK7gLEt4zYY0QOrG1wnUMtwSpbVmFcyz3MqSJDJ6lzKoPVprzVO9QBSBFcs7w9ED3e06lhr7hhOioJm6Xyb0wcFa75PwW82KCeg77kGMzlGKkwooTRPA_r-L_TGTFYHq2YqI0VVYfqHanl4gdKNCQeLWZQtiqIMhUF31Nk_qDAkhI8xGhoV4gcJHw4SAuPhh2_55Bxbra_-n728PmTJng3V4JyF5tE8nLC5C9i-C1joArbrAlaFpHdPbX9M-V326S8MZQTa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2914279915</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effectiveness and efficiency of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies for patient and healthcare workers within acute NHS hospitals during an omicron-like period</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Evans, Stephanie ; Naylor, Nichola R ; Fowler, Tom ; Hopkins, Susan ; Robotham, Julie</creator><creatorcontrib>Evans, Stephanie ; Naylor, Nichola R ; Fowler, Tom ; Hopkins, Susan ; Robotham, Julie</creatorcontrib><description>Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 testing of hospitalised patients began in April-2020, with twice weekly healthcare worker (HCW) testing introduced in November-2020. Guidance recommending asymptomatic testing was withdrawn in August-2022. Assessing the impact of this decision from data alone is challenging due to concurrent changes in infection prevention and control practices, community transmission rates, and a reduction in ascertainment rate from reduced testing. Computational modelling is an effective tool for estimating the impact of this change. Using a computational model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in an English hospital we estimate the effectiveness of several asymptomatic testing strategies, namely; (1) Symptomatic testing of patients and HCWs, (2) testing of all patients on admission with/without repeat testing on days 3 and 5-7, and (3) symptomatic testing plus twice weekly asymptomatic HCW testing with 70% compliance. We estimate the number of patient and HCW infections, HCW absences, number of tests, and tests per case averted or absence avoided, with differing community prevalence rates over a 12-week period. Testing asymptomatic patients on admission reduces the rate of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection by 8.1-21.5%. Additional testing at days 3 and 5-7 post admission does not significantly reduce infection rates. Twice weekly asymptomatic HCW testing can reduce the proportion of HCWs infected by 1.0-4.4% and monthly absences by 0.4-0.8%. Testing asymptomatic patients repeatedly requires up to 5.5 million patient tests over the period, and twice weekly asymptomatic HCW testing increases the total tests to almost 30 million. The most efficient patient testing strategy (in terms of tests required to prevent a single patient infection) was testing asymptomatic patients on admission across all prevalence levels. The least efficient was repeated testing of patients with twice weekly asymptomatic HCW testing in a low prevalence scenario, and in all other prevalence levels symptomatic patient testing with regular HCW testing was least efficient. Testing patients on admission can reduce the rate of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection but there is little benefit of additional post-admission testing. Asymptomatic HCW testing has little incremental benefit for reducing patient cases at low prevalence but has a potential role at higher prevalence or with low community transmission. A full health-economic evaluation is required to determine the cost-effectiveness of these strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2334</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2334</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08948-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38191324</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Asymptomatic ; Computer applications ; Computer industry ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - diagnosis ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 Testing ; COVID-19 vaccines ; Cross Infection - diagnosis ; Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control ; Disease transmission ; Effectiveness ; Efficiency ; Health care ; Health Personnel ; Hospital patients ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Infection ; Lateral flow testing ; Length of stay ; Management ; Medical examination ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Medical tests ; Medicine, Experimental ; Methods ; Modelling ; Nosocomial infection ; Nosocomial infections ; Pandemics ; Patients ; Prevention ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Simulation ; State Medicine ; United Kingdom ; United States</subject><ispartof>BMC infectious diseases, 2024-01, Vol.24 (1), p.64-13, Article 64</ispartof><rights>2024. Crown.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Crown 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c583t-ee4e25fadfcc456d5abde370ad4387591ceceec4e2f0d691851c1bad0be87d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10775431/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2914279915?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25733,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38191324$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Evans, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naylor, Nichola R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robotham, Julie</creatorcontrib><title>The effectiveness and efficiency of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies for patient and healthcare workers within acute NHS hospitals during an omicron-like period</title><title>BMC infectious diseases</title><addtitle>BMC Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 testing of hospitalised patients began in April-2020, with twice weekly healthcare worker (HCW) testing introduced in November-2020. Guidance recommending asymptomatic testing was withdrawn in August-2022. Assessing the impact of this decision from data alone is challenging due to concurrent changes in infection prevention and control practices, community transmission rates, and a reduction in ascertainment rate from reduced testing. Computational modelling is an effective tool for estimating the impact of this change. Using a computational model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in an English hospital we estimate the effectiveness of several asymptomatic testing strategies, namely; (1) Symptomatic testing of patients and HCWs, (2) testing of all patients on admission with/without repeat testing on days 3 and 5-7, and (3) symptomatic testing plus twice weekly asymptomatic HCW testing with 70% compliance. We estimate the number of patient and HCW infections, HCW absences, number of tests, and tests per case averted or absence avoided, with differing community prevalence rates over a 12-week period. Testing asymptomatic patients on admission reduces the rate of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection by 8.1-21.5%. Additional testing at days 3 and 5-7 post admission does not significantly reduce infection rates. Twice weekly asymptomatic HCW testing can reduce the proportion of HCWs infected by 1.0-4.4% and monthly absences by 0.4-0.8%. Testing asymptomatic patients repeatedly requires up to 5.5 million patient tests over the period, and twice weekly asymptomatic HCW testing increases the total tests to almost 30 million. The most efficient patient testing strategy (in terms of tests required to prevent a single patient infection) was testing asymptomatic patients on admission across all prevalence levels. The least efficient was repeated testing of patients with twice weekly asymptomatic HCW testing in a low prevalence scenario, and in all other prevalence levels symptomatic patient testing with regular HCW testing was least efficient. Testing patients on admission can reduce the rate of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection but there is little benefit of additional post-admission testing. Asymptomatic HCW testing has little incremental benefit for reducing patient cases at low prevalence but has a potential role at higher prevalence or with low community transmission. A full health-economic evaluation is required to determine the cost-effectiveness of these strategies.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Asymptomatic</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Computer industry</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 Testing</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>Cross Infection - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Hospital patients</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Lateral flow testing</subject><subject>Length of stay</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical examination</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical tests</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Nosocomial infection</subject><subject>Nosocomial infections</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>State Medicine</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1471-2334</issn><issn>1471-2334</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk89u1DAQxiMEoqXwAhyQJS7lkBI7cf6c0GoFdKWKSt1Vr5ZjTxK3iR1sp2VfiafE2S2lizggH2yNf_PZ_jwTRW9xcoZxmX90mJRFFSckjZOyysq4ehYd46zAMUnT7PmT9VH0yrmbJMFFSaqX0VFa4gqnJDuOfm46QNA0ILy6Aw3OIa7lHFFCgRZbZBrE3XYYvRm4VwKtF1freGmuY4I8OK90i5y33EOrwKHGWDQGDrTfCXXAe98JbgHdG3sL1qF75TulEReTB_TtfI0640blee-QnOysxzUygxLW6LhXt4BGsMrI19GLJkDw5mE-iTZfPm-W5_HF5dfVcnERC1qmPgbIgNCGy0aIjOaS8lpCWiRcZmlZ0AoLEAAiQE0i8wqXFAtcc5nUUBYSpyfRai8rDb9ho1UDt1tmuGK7gLEt4zYY0QOrG1wnUMtwSpbVmFcyz3MqSJDJ6lzKoPVprzVO9QBSBFcs7w9ED3e06lhr7hhOioJm6Xyb0wcFa75PwW82KCeg77kGMzlGKkwooTRPA_r-L_TGTFYHq2YqI0VVYfqHanl4gdKNCQeLWZQtiqIMhUF31Nk_qDAkhI8xGhoV4gcJHw4SAuPhh2_55Bxbra_-n728PmTJng3V4JyF5tE8nLC5C9i-C1joArbrAlaFpHdPbX9M-V326S8MZQTa</recordid><startdate>20240108</startdate><enddate>20240108</enddate><creator>Evans, Stephanie</creator><creator>Naylor, Nichola R</creator><creator>Fowler, Tom</creator><creator>Hopkins, Susan</creator><creator>Robotham, Julie</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240108</creationdate><title>The effectiveness and efficiency of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies for patient and healthcare workers within acute NHS hospitals during an omicron-like period</title><author>Evans, Stephanie ; Naylor, Nichola R ; Fowler, Tom ; Hopkins, Susan ; Robotham, Julie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c583t-ee4e25fadfcc456d5abde370ad4387591ceceec4e2f0d691851c1bad0be87d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Asymptomatic</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Computer industry</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - diagnosis</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 Testing</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>Cross Infection - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Hospital patients</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Lateral flow testing</topic><topic>Length of stay</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical examination</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical tests</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Nosocomial infection</topic><topic>Nosocomial infections</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>State Medicine</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Evans, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naylor, Nichola R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robotham, Julie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Evans, Stephanie</au><au>Naylor, Nichola R</au><au>Fowler, Tom</au><au>Hopkins, Susan</au><au>Robotham, Julie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effectiveness and efficiency of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies for patient and healthcare workers within acute NHS hospitals during an omicron-like period</atitle><jtitle>BMC infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2024-01-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>64</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>64-13</pages><artnum>64</artnum><issn>1471-2334</issn><eissn>1471-2334</eissn><abstract>Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 testing of hospitalised patients began in April-2020, with twice weekly healthcare worker (HCW) testing introduced in November-2020. Guidance recommending asymptomatic testing was withdrawn in August-2022. Assessing the impact of this decision from data alone is challenging due to concurrent changes in infection prevention and control practices, community transmission rates, and a reduction in ascertainment rate from reduced testing. Computational modelling is an effective tool for estimating the impact of this change. Using a computational model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in an English hospital we estimate the effectiveness of several asymptomatic testing strategies, namely; (1) Symptomatic testing of patients and HCWs, (2) testing of all patients on admission with/without repeat testing on days 3 and 5-7, and (3) symptomatic testing plus twice weekly asymptomatic HCW testing with 70% compliance. We estimate the number of patient and HCW infections, HCW absences, number of tests, and tests per case averted or absence avoided, with differing community prevalence rates over a 12-week period. Testing asymptomatic patients on admission reduces the rate of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection by 8.1-21.5%. Additional testing at days 3 and 5-7 post admission does not significantly reduce infection rates. Twice weekly asymptomatic HCW testing can reduce the proportion of HCWs infected by 1.0-4.4% and monthly absences by 0.4-0.8%. Testing asymptomatic patients repeatedly requires up to 5.5 million patient tests over the period, and twice weekly asymptomatic HCW testing increases the total tests to almost 30 million. The most efficient patient testing strategy (in terms of tests required to prevent a single patient infection) was testing asymptomatic patients on admission across all prevalence levels. The least efficient was repeated testing of patients with twice weekly asymptomatic HCW testing in a low prevalence scenario, and in all other prevalence levels symptomatic patient testing with regular HCW testing was least efficient. Testing patients on admission can reduce the rate of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection but there is little benefit of additional post-admission testing. Asymptomatic HCW testing has little incremental benefit for reducing patient cases at low prevalence but has a potential role at higher prevalence or with low community transmission. A full health-economic evaluation is required to determine the cost-effectiveness of these strategies.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>38191324</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12879-023-08948-9</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2334
ispartof BMC infectious diseases, 2024-01, Vol.24 (1), p.64-13, Article 64
issn 1471-2334
1471-2334
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bf1b0ebd56d44b1a9d6665c27d14b6dd
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Analysis
Asymptomatic
Computer applications
Computer industry
COVID-19
COVID-19 - diagnosis
COVID-19 - epidemiology
COVID-19 Testing
COVID-19 vaccines
Cross Infection - diagnosis
Cross Infection - prevention & control
Disease transmission
Effectiveness
Efficiency
Health care
Health Personnel
Hospital patients
Hospitals
Humans
Infection
Lateral flow testing
Length of stay
Management
Medical examination
Medical personnel
Medical research
Medical tests
Medicine, Experimental
Methods
Modelling
Nosocomial infection
Nosocomial infections
Pandemics
Patients
Prevention
SARS-CoV-2
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Simulation
State Medicine
United Kingdom
United States
title The effectiveness and efficiency of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies for patient and healthcare workers within acute NHS hospitals during an omicron-like period
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A26%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effectiveness%20and%20efficiency%20of%20asymptomatic%20SARS-CoV-2%20testing%20strategies%20for%20patient%20and%20healthcare%20workers%20within%20acute%20NHS%20hospitals%20during%20an%20omicron-like%20period&rft.jtitle=BMC%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Evans,%20Stephanie&rft.date=2024-01-08&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=64&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=64-13&rft.artnum=64&rft.issn=1471-2334&rft.eissn=1471-2334&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12879-023-08948-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA778819515%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c583t-ee4e25fadfcc456d5abde370ad4387591ceceec4e2f0d691851c1bad0be87d13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2914279915&rft_id=info:pmid/38191324&rft_galeid=A778819515&rfr_iscdi=true