Loading…

Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with Prosthesis and Acellular Dermal Matrix: A New Technique of ADM Implantation and Fixation

Direct-to-implant (DTI) immediate breast reconstruction has proven to be an oncologically safe technique and linked to better overall results. The introduction of new surgical techniques has prompted us to develop an acellular dermal matrix fixation technique that reduces the rate of complications a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open 2024-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e5895-e5895
Main Authors: Tettamanzi, Matilde, Arrica, Giovanni, Ziani, Federico, Manconi, Anna, Beatrici, Edoardo, Trignano, Claudia, Rubino, Corrado, Trignano, Emilio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-3def32296984ca198e50f6dfe952a0e0903b01b4ff38ca21384c90eea02a92973
container_end_page e5895
container_issue 6
container_start_page e5895
container_title Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
container_volume 12
creator Tettamanzi, Matilde
Arrica, Giovanni
Ziani, Federico
Manconi, Anna
Beatrici, Edoardo
Trignano, Claudia
Rubino, Corrado
Trignano, Emilio
description Direct-to-implant (DTI) immediate breast reconstruction has proven to be an oncologically safe technique and linked to better overall results. The introduction of new surgical techniques has prompted us to develop an acellular dermal matrix fixation technique that reduces the rate of complications and implant loss. We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent DTI prepectoral breast reconstruction with two different techniques of acellular dermal matrix fixation to the chest wall. Descriptive statistics were reported using frequencies and percentages for categorical variables, and means and SDs for continuous variables. Pearson chi-square test was used to compare differences in categorical variables. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to investigate the predictors of complications. From October 2019 to March 2023, 90 DTI breast reconstructions were performed, 43 using the standard technique and 47 using the new technique. The new technique demonstrated a significant reduction of major complications ( = 0.010), namely seroma (13.9% versus 2.3%), skin necrosis (9.3% versus 2.3%), implant loss (7% versus 0%), wound dehiscence (9.3% versus 0%), and infection (4.7% versus 0%). Compared with the standard technique, the new one reduced the risk of complications by 76% (OR 0.24; 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.68; = 0.007) and 73% (aOR 0.27; 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.92; = 0.037), at univariable and multivariable regression models. No other significant predictor of complications was identified. The procedure performed with the proposed modality proved to be advantageous. Careful fixation of the prosthetic implant and the placement of two drains, were the keys to a drastic reduction in complications.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005895
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bf3461299e95457a84c9a4945173bf0d</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_bf3461299e95457a84c9a4945173bf0d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3069176700</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-3def32296984ca198e50f6dfe952a0e0903b01b4ff38ca21384c90eea02a92973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkl9vFCEUxSdGY5vab2AMj75shQEG8MWsra2btLYxNfGNsMylSzMzbIGx9cmvLrNbm6288O-cH-TcW1VvCT4iWIkPZ5c_j_DO4FLxF9V-TRo1E1ywlzvrveowpdtJJSUjgr-u9qiUkiiu9qs_VxHWYHOIpkOfI5iU0XewYUg5jjb7MKB7n1foKoaUV5B8QmZo0dxC142diegEYl-sFyZH__ARzdE3uEfXYFeDvxsBBYfmJxdo0a87M2SzAU6AU_-w2bypXjnTJTh8nA-qH6dfro-_zs4vzxbH8_OZpZzlGW3B0bpWjZLMGqIkcOya1oHitcGAFaZLTJbMOSqtqQktMoUBDK6NqpWgB9Viy22DudXr6HsTf-tgvN4chHijTczedqCXjrKG1EoVOOPCTCjDFONE0KXDbWF92rLW47KH1sKQS3rPoM9vBr_SN-GXJoQIIbEshPePhBhKSinr3qcpUjNAGJOmuFFENALjImVbqS0VSBHc0zsE66kXdOkF_X8vFNu73T8-mf5Vnv4FKdCwYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3069176700</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with Prosthesis and Acellular Dermal Matrix: A New Technique of ADM Implantation and Fixation</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tettamanzi, Matilde ; Arrica, Giovanni ; Ziani, Federico ; Manconi, Anna ; Beatrici, Edoardo ; Trignano, Claudia ; Rubino, Corrado ; Trignano, Emilio</creator><creatorcontrib>Tettamanzi, Matilde ; Arrica, Giovanni ; Ziani, Federico ; Manconi, Anna ; Beatrici, Edoardo ; Trignano, Claudia ; Rubino, Corrado ; Trignano, Emilio</creatorcontrib><description>Direct-to-implant (DTI) immediate breast reconstruction has proven to be an oncologically safe technique and linked to better overall results. The introduction of new surgical techniques has prompted us to develop an acellular dermal matrix fixation technique that reduces the rate of complications and implant loss. We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent DTI prepectoral breast reconstruction with two different techniques of acellular dermal matrix fixation to the chest wall. Descriptive statistics were reported using frequencies and percentages for categorical variables, and means and SDs for continuous variables. Pearson chi-square test was used to compare differences in categorical variables. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to investigate the predictors of complications. From October 2019 to March 2023, 90 DTI breast reconstructions were performed, 43 using the standard technique and 47 using the new technique. The new technique demonstrated a significant reduction of major complications ( = 0.010), namely seroma (13.9% versus 2.3%), skin necrosis (9.3% versus 2.3%), implant loss (7% versus 0%), wound dehiscence (9.3% versus 0%), and infection (4.7% versus 0%). Compared with the standard technique, the new one reduced the risk of complications by 76% (OR 0.24; 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.68; = 0.007) and 73% (aOR 0.27; 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.92; = 0.037), at univariable and multivariable regression models. No other significant predictor of complications was identified. The procedure performed with the proposed modality proved to be advantageous. Careful fixation of the prosthetic implant and the placement of two drains, were the keys to a drastic reduction in complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-7574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-7574</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005895</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38881959</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Breast ; Original</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e5895-e5895</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-3def32296984ca198e50f6dfe952a0e0903b01b4ff38ca21384c90eea02a92973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11177808/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11177808/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38881959$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tettamanzi, Matilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arrica, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziani, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manconi, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beatrici, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trignano, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubino, Corrado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trignano, Emilio</creatorcontrib><title>Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with Prosthesis and Acellular Dermal Matrix: A New Technique of ADM Implantation and Fixation</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open</addtitle><description>Direct-to-implant (DTI) immediate breast reconstruction has proven to be an oncologically safe technique and linked to better overall results. The introduction of new surgical techniques has prompted us to develop an acellular dermal matrix fixation technique that reduces the rate of complications and implant loss. We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent DTI prepectoral breast reconstruction with two different techniques of acellular dermal matrix fixation to the chest wall. Descriptive statistics were reported using frequencies and percentages for categorical variables, and means and SDs for continuous variables. Pearson chi-square test was used to compare differences in categorical variables. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to investigate the predictors of complications. From October 2019 to March 2023, 90 DTI breast reconstructions were performed, 43 using the standard technique and 47 using the new technique. The new technique demonstrated a significant reduction of major complications ( = 0.010), namely seroma (13.9% versus 2.3%), skin necrosis (9.3% versus 2.3%), implant loss (7% versus 0%), wound dehiscence (9.3% versus 0%), and infection (4.7% versus 0%). Compared with the standard technique, the new one reduced the risk of complications by 76% (OR 0.24; 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.68; = 0.007) and 73% (aOR 0.27; 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.92; = 0.037), at univariable and multivariable regression models. No other significant predictor of complications was identified. The procedure performed with the proposed modality proved to be advantageous. Careful fixation of the prosthetic implant and the placement of two drains, were the keys to a drastic reduction in complications.</description><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Original</subject><issn>2169-7574</issn><issn>2169-7574</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkl9vFCEUxSdGY5vab2AMj75shQEG8MWsra2btLYxNfGNsMylSzMzbIGx9cmvLrNbm6288O-cH-TcW1VvCT4iWIkPZ5c_j_DO4FLxF9V-TRo1E1ywlzvrveowpdtJJSUjgr-u9qiUkiiu9qs_VxHWYHOIpkOfI5iU0XewYUg5jjb7MKB7n1foKoaUV5B8QmZo0dxC142diegEYl-sFyZH__ARzdE3uEfXYFeDvxsBBYfmJxdo0a87M2SzAU6AU_-w2bypXjnTJTh8nA-qH6dfro-_zs4vzxbH8_OZpZzlGW3B0bpWjZLMGqIkcOya1oHitcGAFaZLTJbMOSqtqQktMoUBDK6NqpWgB9Viy22DudXr6HsTf-tgvN4chHijTczedqCXjrKG1EoVOOPCTCjDFONE0KXDbWF92rLW47KH1sKQS3rPoM9vBr_SN-GXJoQIIbEshPePhBhKSinr3qcpUjNAGJOmuFFENALjImVbqS0VSBHc0zsE66kXdOkF_X8vFNu73T8-mf5Vnv4FKdCwYA</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Tettamanzi, Matilde</creator><creator>Arrica, Giovanni</creator><creator>Ziani, Federico</creator><creator>Manconi, Anna</creator><creator>Beatrici, Edoardo</creator><creator>Trignano, Claudia</creator><creator>Rubino, Corrado</creator><creator>Trignano, Emilio</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>Wolters Kluwer</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with Prosthesis and Acellular Dermal Matrix: A New Technique of ADM Implantation and Fixation</title><author>Tettamanzi, Matilde ; Arrica, Giovanni ; Ziani, Federico ; Manconi, Anna ; Beatrici, Edoardo ; Trignano, Claudia ; Rubino, Corrado ; Trignano, Emilio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-3def32296984ca198e50f6dfe952a0e0903b01b4ff38ca21384c90eea02a92973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tettamanzi, Matilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arrica, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziani, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manconi, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beatrici, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trignano, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubino, Corrado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trignano, Emilio</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tettamanzi, Matilde</au><au>Arrica, Giovanni</au><au>Ziani, Federico</au><au>Manconi, Anna</au><au>Beatrici, Edoardo</au><au>Trignano, Claudia</au><au>Rubino, Corrado</au><au>Trignano, Emilio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with Prosthesis and Acellular Dermal Matrix: A New Technique of ADM Implantation and Fixation</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open</addtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e5895</spage><epage>e5895</epage><pages>e5895-e5895</pages><issn>2169-7574</issn><eissn>2169-7574</eissn><abstract>Direct-to-implant (DTI) immediate breast reconstruction has proven to be an oncologically safe technique and linked to better overall results. The introduction of new surgical techniques has prompted us to develop an acellular dermal matrix fixation technique that reduces the rate of complications and implant loss. We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent DTI prepectoral breast reconstruction with two different techniques of acellular dermal matrix fixation to the chest wall. Descriptive statistics were reported using frequencies and percentages for categorical variables, and means and SDs for continuous variables. Pearson chi-square test was used to compare differences in categorical variables. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to investigate the predictors of complications. From October 2019 to March 2023, 90 DTI breast reconstructions were performed, 43 using the standard technique and 47 using the new technique. The new technique demonstrated a significant reduction of major complications ( = 0.010), namely seroma (13.9% versus 2.3%), skin necrosis (9.3% versus 2.3%), implant loss (7% versus 0%), wound dehiscence (9.3% versus 0%), and infection (4.7% versus 0%). Compared with the standard technique, the new one reduced the risk of complications by 76% (OR 0.24; 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.68; = 0.007) and 73% (aOR 0.27; 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.92; = 0.037), at univariable and multivariable regression models. No other significant predictor of complications was identified. The procedure performed with the proposed modality proved to be advantageous. Careful fixation of the prosthetic implant and the placement of two drains, were the keys to a drastic reduction in complications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>38881959</pmid><doi>10.1097/GOX.0000000000005895</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-7574
ispartof Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e5895-e5895
issn 2169-7574
2169-7574
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bf3461299e95457a84c9a4945173bf0d
source HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; PubMed Central
subjects Breast
Original
title Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with Prosthesis and Acellular Dermal Matrix: A New Technique of ADM Implantation and Fixation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T10%3A42%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prepectoral%20Breast%20Reconstruction%20with%20Prosthesis%20and%20Acellular%20Dermal%20Matrix:%20A%20New%20Technique%20of%20ADM%20Implantation%20and%20Fixation&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery.%20Global%20open&rft.au=Tettamanzi,%20Matilde&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e5895&rft.epage=e5895&rft.pages=e5895-e5895&rft.issn=2169-7574&rft.eissn=2169-7574&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005895&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3069176700%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-3def32296984ca198e50f6dfe952a0e0903b01b4ff38ca21384c90eea02a92973%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3069176700&rft_id=info:pmid/38881959&rfr_iscdi=true