Loading…
Rethinking urinary antibiotic breakpoints: analysis of urinary antibiotic concentrations to treat multidrug resistant organisms
The present study analyzed whether renally eliminated antibiotics achieve sufficient urinary concentrations based on their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles to effectively eradicate organisms deemed resistant by automated susceptibility testing. Lower median minimum inhibitory concentration...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC research notes 2018-07, Vol.11 (1), p.497-497, Article 497 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5098-b964d2785ece45f5a70fdb8a3359fb6225a9e58020c8b9f5a1a1acce65fed3b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5098-b964d2785ece45f5a70fdb8a3359fb6225a9e58020c8b9f5a1a1acce65fed3b3 |
container_end_page | 497 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 497 |
container_title | BMC research notes |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Chastain, Daniel B King, S Travis Stover, Kayla R |
description | The present study analyzed whether renally eliminated antibiotics achieve sufficient urinary concentrations based on their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles to effectively eradicate organisms deemed resistant by automated susceptibility testing.
Lower median minimum inhibitory concentrations against enterobacteriaceae were noted for ceftriaxone, cefepime, and doripenem when comparing Etest
to Vitek
. All Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to cefepime, ciprofloxacin, and doripenem with both susceptibility methods, but higher median minimum inhibitory concentrations were observed with Etest
. Urine concentrations/time profiles were calculated for standard doses of ceftriaxone, cefepime, doripenem, and ciprofloxacin. The data presented in the current study suggests high urine concentrations of antibiotics may effectively eradicate bacteria which were determined to be resistant per in vitro susceptibility testing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13104-018-3599-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bf4dd990fb6d45278ce93368ab67028c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A547140745</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_bf4dd990fb6d45278ce93368ab67028c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A547140745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5098-b964d2785ece45f5a70fdb8a3359fb6225a9e58020c8b9f5a1a1acce65fed3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl9r1jAUxosobk4_gDdS8EYvOpOmSRMvhDH888JgIMPbkKRpl3dt8pqk4q721XdeO-cqIxctJ7_nOXmSUxSvMTrGmLMPCROMmgphXhEqRMWfFIe4paxCFKGnD_4PihcpbRFimHP8vDggCNWCYXxY3Hy3-dL5K-eHco7Oq3hdKp-ddiE7U-po1dUuOJ_TR6ir8Tq5VIb-MdYEb6zPUWUXfCpzKDOocznNY3ZdnIcyWlBnkJQhDsq7NKWXxbNejcm-uvseFRdfPl-cfqvOzr9uTk_OKkOR4JUWrOnqllNrbEN7qlrUd5orArl7zeqaKmEpRzUyXAvYx7CMsYz2tiOaHBWbxbYLait30U1weBmUk38KcBypIoQYrdR903VCILDtGgo9jRWEMK40a1HNDXh9Wrx2s55st2QeV6brHe8u5RB-SYYo4YSBwbs7gxh-zjZlOblk7Dgqb8OcZI1aAh0J5oC-_Q_dhjnCOwDVCkzqmrfNP2pQEMD5PkBfszeVJ7RpcYPahgJ1_AgFq7OTg8ezvYP6SvB-JQAm2995UHNKcnP-Y83ihTUxpBRtf38fGMn9sMplWCUMq9wPq9yHe_PwIu8Vf6eT3AIFc-cZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2791322874</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rethinking urinary antibiotic breakpoints: analysis of urinary antibiotic concentrations to treat multidrug resistant organisms</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Chastain, Daniel B ; King, S Travis ; Stover, Kayla R</creator><creatorcontrib>Chastain, Daniel B ; King, S Travis ; Stover, Kayla R</creatorcontrib><description>The present study analyzed whether renally eliminated antibiotics achieve sufficient urinary concentrations based on their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles to effectively eradicate organisms deemed resistant by automated susceptibility testing.
Lower median minimum inhibitory concentrations against enterobacteriaceae were noted for ceftriaxone, cefepime, and doripenem when comparing Etest
to Vitek
. All Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to cefepime, ciprofloxacin, and doripenem with both susceptibility methods, but higher median minimum inhibitory concentrations were observed with Etest
. Urine concentrations/time profiles were calculated for standard doses of ceftriaxone, cefepime, doripenem, and ciprofloxacin. The data presented in the current study suggests high urine concentrations of antibiotics may effectively eradicate bacteria which were determined to be resistant per in vitro susceptibility testing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-0500</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-0500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3599-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30029611</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Antibiotic ; Antibiotics ; Breakpoints ; Care and treatment ; Cefepime ; Ceftriaxone ; Ciprofloxacin ; Drug dosages ; Drug resistance ; Health aspects ; Laboratories ; Multi-drug resistant ; Multidrug resistance ; Multidrug resistant organisms ; Organisms ; Pharmacodynamics ; Pharmacokinetics ; Research Note ; Urinary tract infections ; Urine ; Urine concentration ; Values</subject><ispartof>BMC research notes, 2018-07, Vol.11 (1), p.497-497, Article 497</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5098-b964d2785ece45f5a70fdb8a3359fb6225a9e58020c8b9f5a1a1acce65fed3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5098-b964d2785ece45f5a70fdb8a3359fb6225a9e58020c8b9f5a1a1acce65fed3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6053836/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2791322874?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30029611$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chastain, Daniel B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, S Travis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stover, Kayla R</creatorcontrib><title>Rethinking urinary antibiotic breakpoints: analysis of urinary antibiotic concentrations to treat multidrug resistant organisms</title><title>BMC research notes</title><addtitle>BMC Res Notes</addtitle><description>The present study analyzed whether renally eliminated antibiotics achieve sufficient urinary concentrations based on their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles to effectively eradicate organisms deemed resistant by automated susceptibility testing.
Lower median minimum inhibitory concentrations against enterobacteriaceae were noted for ceftriaxone, cefepime, and doripenem when comparing Etest
to Vitek
. All Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to cefepime, ciprofloxacin, and doripenem with both susceptibility methods, but higher median minimum inhibitory concentrations were observed with Etest
. Urine concentrations/time profiles were calculated for standard doses of ceftriaxone, cefepime, doripenem, and ciprofloxacin. The data presented in the current study suggests high urine concentrations of antibiotics may effectively eradicate bacteria which were determined to be resistant per in vitro susceptibility testing.</description><subject>Antibiotic</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Breakpoints</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cefepime</subject><subject>Ceftriaxone</subject><subject>Ciprofloxacin</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Multi-drug resistant</subject><subject>Multidrug resistance</subject><subject>Multidrug resistant organisms</subject><subject>Organisms</subject><subject>Pharmacodynamics</subject><subject>Pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Research Note</subject><subject>Urinary tract infections</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Urine concentration</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>1756-0500</issn><issn>1756-0500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl9r1jAUxosobk4_gDdS8EYvOpOmSRMvhDH888JgIMPbkKRpl3dt8pqk4q721XdeO-cqIxctJ7_nOXmSUxSvMTrGmLMPCROMmgphXhEqRMWfFIe4paxCFKGnD_4PihcpbRFimHP8vDggCNWCYXxY3Hy3-dL5K-eHco7Oq3hdKp-ddiE7U-po1dUuOJ_TR6ir8Tq5VIb-MdYEb6zPUWUXfCpzKDOocznNY3ZdnIcyWlBnkJQhDsq7NKWXxbNejcm-uvseFRdfPl-cfqvOzr9uTk_OKkOR4JUWrOnqllNrbEN7qlrUd5orArl7zeqaKmEpRzUyXAvYx7CMsYz2tiOaHBWbxbYLait30U1weBmUk38KcBypIoQYrdR903VCILDtGgo9jRWEMK40a1HNDXh9Wrx2s55st2QeV6brHe8u5RB-SYYo4YSBwbs7gxh-zjZlOblk7Dgqb8OcZI1aAh0J5oC-_Q_dhjnCOwDVCkzqmrfNP2pQEMD5PkBfszeVJ7RpcYPahgJ1_AgFq7OTg8ezvYP6SvB-JQAm2995UHNKcnP-Y83ihTUxpBRtf38fGMn9sMplWCUMq9wPq9yHe_PwIu8Vf6eT3AIFc-cZ</recordid><startdate>20180720</startdate><enddate>20180720</enddate><creator>Chastain, Daniel B</creator><creator>King, S Travis</creator><creator>Stover, Kayla R</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180720</creationdate><title>Rethinking urinary antibiotic breakpoints: analysis of urinary antibiotic concentrations to treat multidrug resistant organisms</title><author>Chastain, Daniel B ; King, S Travis ; Stover, Kayla R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5098-b964d2785ece45f5a70fdb8a3359fb6225a9e58020c8b9f5a1a1acce65fed3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Antibiotic</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Breakpoints</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cefepime</topic><topic>Ceftriaxone</topic><topic>Ciprofloxacin</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Multi-drug resistant</topic><topic>Multidrug resistance</topic><topic>Multidrug resistant organisms</topic><topic>Organisms</topic><topic>Pharmacodynamics</topic><topic>Pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Research Note</topic><topic>Urinary tract infections</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Urine concentration</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chastain, Daniel B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, S Travis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stover, Kayla R</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC research notes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chastain, Daniel B</au><au>King, S Travis</au><au>Stover, Kayla R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rethinking urinary antibiotic breakpoints: analysis of urinary antibiotic concentrations to treat multidrug resistant organisms</atitle><jtitle>BMC research notes</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Res Notes</addtitle><date>2018-07-20</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>497</spage><epage>497</epage><pages>497-497</pages><artnum>497</artnum><issn>1756-0500</issn><eissn>1756-0500</eissn><abstract>The present study analyzed whether renally eliminated antibiotics achieve sufficient urinary concentrations based on their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles to effectively eradicate organisms deemed resistant by automated susceptibility testing.
Lower median minimum inhibitory concentrations against enterobacteriaceae were noted for ceftriaxone, cefepime, and doripenem when comparing Etest
to Vitek
. All Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to cefepime, ciprofloxacin, and doripenem with both susceptibility methods, but higher median minimum inhibitory concentrations were observed with Etest
. Urine concentrations/time profiles were calculated for standard doses of ceftriaxone, cefepime, doripenem, and ciprofloxacin. The data presented in the current study suggests high urine concentrations of antibiotics may effectively eradicate bacteria which were determined to be resistant per in vitro susceptibility testing.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>30029611</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13104-018-3599-8</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1756-0500 |
ispartof | BMC research notes, 2018-07, Vol.11 (1), p.497-497, Article 497 |
issn | 1756-0500 1756-0500 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bf4dd990fb6d45278ce93368ab67028c |
source | PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Antibiotic Antibiotics Breakpoints Care and treatment Cefepime Ceftriaxone Ciprofloxacin Drug dosages Drug resistance Health aspects Laboratories Multi-drug resistant Multidrug resistance Multidrug resistant organisms Organisms Pharmacodynamics Pharmacokinetics Research Note Urinary tract infections Urine Urine concentration Values |
title | Rethinking urinary antibiotic breakpoints: analysis of urinary antibiotic concentrations to treat multidrug resistant organisms |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T11%3A10%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rethinking%20urinary%20antibiotic%20breakpoints:%20analysis%20of%20urinary%20antibiotic%20concentrations%20to%20treat%20multidrug%20resistant%20organisms&rft.jtitle=BMC%20research%20notes&rft.au=Chastain,%20Daniel%20B&rft.date=2018-07-20&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=497&rft.epage=497&rft.pages=497-497&rft.artnum=497&rft.issn=1756-0500&rft.eissn=1756-0500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13104-018-3599-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA547140745%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5098-b964d2785ece45f5a70fdb8a3359fb6225a9e58020c8b9f5a1a1acce65fed3b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2791322874&rft_id=info:pmid/30029611&rft_galeid=A547140745&rfr_iscdi=true |