Loading…
In Vitro Evaluation of Some Endophytic Bacillus to Potentially Inhibit Grape and Grapevine Fungal Pathogens
Romania has a long history of grapevine culturing and winemaking. However, like any agricultural sector, viticulture faces devastating biological threats. Fungi responsible for grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) and grape spoilage lead to considerable yield losses and a decline in grapevine quality. In...
Saved in:
Published in: | Plants (Basel) 2023-07, Vol.12 (13), p.2553 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ca30924b8c1ffa2df023346e45cc90a47e1ee109fe578f125d4cc289125ff1e93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ca30924b8c1ffa2df023346e45cc90a47e1ee109fe578f125d4cc289125ff1e93 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | 2553 |
container_title | Plants (Basel) |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Boiu-Sicuia, Oana-Alina Toma, Radu Cristian Diguță, Camelia Filofteia Matei, Florentina Cornea, Călina Petruța |
description | Romania has a long history of grapevine culturing and winemaking. However, like any agricultural sector, viticulture faces devastating biological threats. Fungi responsible for grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) and grape spoilage lead to considerable yield losses and a decline in grapevine quality. In the actual context, many countries, including Romania, have reoriented their approaches to minimize chemical inputs, which have been proven to be toxic and to have negative impacts on the environment, and to replace them with sustainable biocontrol strategies for the wine-growing sector. Within biocontrol strategies,
spp. is a well-known plant-protective bacteria with antifungal properties. Within this paper, six endophytic bacteria from various plant sources were studied. The bacterial strains were identified as
,
, and
by sequencing their 16S rDNA region. Regardless of the in vitro test methods (using living bacterial cells, bacterial-cell-free supernatant (CFS), and volatile active compounds (VOCs)),
strains revealed strong and broad antifungal activity against grape and grapevine fungal pathogens such as
spp.,
,
,
,
,
spp.,
,
, and
. The functional antifungal genes encoding for difficidin, fengycin, iturins, macrolactin, and mycosubtilin were molecularly detected, which could support the proven antifungal activity of the endophytic strains. Lytic enzymes involved in fungal growth inhibition, such as chitinase, cellulase, and proteases, were also revealed to be produced by some of these bacterial strains. Various other in vitro tests, such as phosphate and phytate solubilization, phytohormone synthesis, the production of enzymes involved in the polyamine biosynthetic pathway, and pH as well as temperature tolerance tests were carried out to reveal the plant-beneficial potential of these bacterial strains. These results revealed that the
strains, especially BAHs1, are the most suitable endophytes for grapevine biologic control, which could lead to the future development of sustainable management strategies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/plants12132553 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bfa40ef7e375445184230f72fdb74c80</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_bfa40ef7e375445184230f72fdb74c80</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2836437541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ca30924b8c1ffa2df023346e45cc90a47e1ee109fe578f125d4cc289125ff1e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkktrGzEUhYfS0oQ02y6LoJtunOppzaxKG5zUEGigj63QaK5subI0lTQG__vIdRriCoEO0tHHPdJtmrcEXzHW4Y-j16FkQgmjQrAXzTmllM2k5PLlM33WXOa8wXW0dZL56-aMSc4lIfy8-b0M6JcrKaLFTvtJFxcDihZ9j1tAizDEcb0vzqAv2jjvp4xKRPexQChOe79Hy7B2vSvoNukRkA7DUe1cAHQzhZX26F6XdVxByG-aV1b7DJeP60Xz82bx4_rr7O7b7fL6893M8FaUmdEMd5T3rSHWajpYTBnjc-DCmA5rLoEAENxZELK1hIqBG0PbriprCXTsolkeuUPUGzUmt9Vpr6J26u9GTCulUw3lQfVWcwxWApOCc0FaThm2ktqhl9y0uLI-HVnj1G9hMDV40v4EenoS3Fqt4k4RzLikjFfCh0dCin8myEVtXTbg699BnLKiLWspF60U1fr-P-smTinUtzq45vxQJKmuq6PLpJhzAvtUDcHq0BfqtC_qhXfPMzzZ_3UBewD1lbTS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2836437541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Vitro Evaluation of Some Endophytic Bacillus to Potentially Inhibit Grape and Grapevine Fungal Pathogens</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Boiu-Sicuia, Oana-Alina ; Toma, Radu Cristian ; Diguță, Camelia Filofteia ; Matei, Florentina ; Cornea, Călina Petruța</creator><creatorcontrib>Boiu-Sicuia, Oana-Alina ; Toma, Radu Cristian ; Diguță, Camelia Filofteia ; Matei, Florentina ; Cornea, Călina Petruța</creatorcontrib><description>Romania has a long history of grapevine culturing and winemaking. However, like any agricultural sector, viticulture faces devastating biological threats. Fungi responsible for grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) and grape spoilage lead to considerable yield losses and a decline in grapevine quality. In the actual context, many countries, including Romania, have reoriented their approaches to minimize chemical inputs, which have been proven to be toxic and to have negative impacts on the environment, and to replace them with sustainable biocontrol strategies for the wine-growing sector. Within biocontrol strategies,
spp. is a well-known plant-protective bacteria with antifungal properties. Within this paper, six endophytic bacteria from various plant sources were studied. The bacterial strains were identified as
,
, and
by sequencing their 16S rDNA region. Regardless of the in vitro test methods (using living bacterial cells, bacterial-cell-free supernatant (CFS), and volatile active compounds (VOCs)),
strains revealed strong and broad antifungal activity against grape and grapevine fungal pathogens such as
spp.,
,
,
,
,
spp.,
,
, and
. The functional antifungal genes encoding for difficidin, fengycin, iturins, macrolactin, and mycosubtilin were molecularly detected, which could support the proven antifungal activity of the endophytic strains. Lytic enzymes involved in fungal growth inhibition, such as chitinase, cellulase, and proteases, were also revealed to be produced by some of these bacterial strains. Various other in vitro tests, such as phosphate and phytate solubilization, phytohormone synthesis, the production of enzymes involved in the polyamine biosynthetic pathway, and pH as well as temperature tolerance tests were carried out to reveal the plant-beneficial potential of these bacterial strains. These results revealed that the
strains, especially BAHs1, are the most suitable endophytes for grapevine biologic control, which could lead to the future development of sustainable management strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2223-7747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2223-7747</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/plants12132553</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37447114</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural industry ; Antifungal activity ; Bacillus ; Bacillus spp ; Bacteria ; biocontrol ; Biological control ; Cellulase ; Chitinase ; Disease management ; Endophytes ; Environmental impact ; Enzymes ; Fungi ; Fungicides ; Genes ; Grapes ; grapevine ; Grapevines ; In vitro methods and tests ; Lytic enzymes ; molds ; Pathogens ; Phylogenetics ; Plant diseases ; Plant resistance ; Polyamines ; Ribosomal DNA ; rRNA 16S ; Solubilization ; Spoilage ; Strains (organisms) ; Sustainability management ; Sustainable development ; Temperature tolerance ; trunk diseases ; Viticulture ; VOCs ; Volatile organic compounds ; Wineries & vineyards ; Wines</subject><ispartof>Plants (Basel), 2023-07, Vol.12 (13), p.2553</ispartof><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ca30924b8c1ffa2df023346e45cc90a47e1ee109fe578f125d4cc289125ff1e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ca30924b8c1ffa2df023346e45cc90a47e1ee109fe578f125d4cc289125ff1e93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2275-9141 ; 0000-0002-3912-1120 ; 0000-0001-7830-4109 ; 0000-0002-7568-9952</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2836437541/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2836437541?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,74998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37447114$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boiu-Sicuia, Oana-Alina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toma, Radu Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diguță, Camelia Filofteia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matei, Florentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornea, Călina Petruța</creatorcontrib><title>In Vitro Evaluation of Some Endophytic Bacillus to Potentially Inhibit Grape and Grapevine Fungal Pathogens</title><title>Plants (Basel)</title><addtitle>Plants (Basel)</addtitle><description>Romania has a long history of grapevine culturing and winemaking. However, like any agricultural sector, viticulture faces devastating biological threats. Fungi responsible for grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) and grape spoilage lead to considerable yield losses and a decline in grapevine quality. In the actual context, many countries, including Romania, have reoriented their approaches to minimize chemical inputs, which have been proven to be toxic and to have negative impacts on the environment, and to replace them with sustainable biocontrol strategies for the wine-growing sector. Within biocontrol strategies,
spp. is a well-known plant-protective bacteria with antifungal properties. Within this paper, six endophytic bacteria from various plant sources were studied. The bacterial strains were identified as
,
, and
by sequencing their 16S rDNA region. Regardless of the in vitro test methods (using living bacterial cells, bacterial-cell-free supernatant (CFS), and volatile active compounds (VOCs)),
strains revealed strong and broad antifungal activity against grape and grapevine fungal pathogens such as
spp.,
,
,
,
,
spp.,
,
, and
. The functional antifungal genes encoding for difficidin, fengycin, iturins, macrolactin, and mycosubtilin were molecularly detected, which could support the proven antifungal activity of the endophytic strains. Lytic enzymes involved in fungal growth inhibition, such as chitinase, cellulase, and proteases, were also revealed to be produced by some of these bacterial strains. Various other in vitro tests, such as phosphate and phytate solubilization, phytohormone synthesis, the production of enzymes involved in the polyamine biosynthetic pathway, and pH as well as temperature tolerance tests were carried out to reveal the plant-beneficial potential of these bacterial strains. These results revealed that the
strains, especially BAHs1, are the most suitable endophytes for grapevine biologic control, which could lead to the future development of sustainable management strategies.</description><subject>Agricultural industry</subject><subject>Antifungal activity</subject><subject>Bacillus</subject><subject>Bacillus spp</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>biocontrol</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Cellulase</subject><subject>Chitinase</subject><subject>Disease management</subject><subject>Endophytes</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Grapes</subject><subject>grapevine</subject><subject>Grapevines</subject><subject>In vitro methods and tests</subject><subject>Lytic enzymes</subject><subject>molds</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Plant diseases</subject><subject>Plant resistance</subject><subject>Polyamines</subject><subject>Ribosomal DNA</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Solubilization</subject><subject>Spoilage</subject><subject>Strains (organisms)</subject><subject>Sustainability management</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Temperature tolerance</subject><subject>trunk diseases</subject><subject>Viticulture</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><subject>Wineries & vineyards</subject><subject>Wines</subject><issn>2223-7747</issn><issn>2223-7747</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkktrGzEUhYfS0oQ02y6LoJtunOppzaxKG5zUEGigj63QaK5subI0lTQG__vIdRriCoEO0tHHPdJtmrcEXzHW4Y-j16FkQgmjQrAXzTmllM2k5PLlM33WXOa8wXW0dZL56-aMSc4lIfy8-b0M6JcrKaLFTvtJFxcDihZ9j1tAizDEcb0vzqAv2jjvp4xKRPexQChOe79Hy7B2vSvoNukRkA7DUe1cAHQzhZX26F6XdVxByG-aV1b7DJeP60Xz82bx4_rr7O7b7fL6893M8FaUmdEMd5T3rSHWajpYTBnjc-DCmA5rLoEAENxZELK1hIqBG0PbriprCXTsolkeuUPUGzUmt9Vpr6J26u9GTCulUw3lQfVWcwxWApOCc0FaThm2ktqhl9y0uLI-HVnj1G9hMDV40v4EenoS3Fqt4k4RzLikjFfCh0dCin8myEVtXTbg699BnLKiLWspF60U1fr-P-smTinUtzq45vxQJKmuq6PLpJhzAvtUDcHq0BfqtC_qhXfPMzzZ_3UBewD1lbTS</recordid><startdate>20230705</startdate><enddate>20230705</enddate><creator>Boiu-Sicuia, Oana-Alina</creator><creator>Toma, Radu Cristian</creator><creator>Diguță, Camelia Filofteia</creator><creator>Matei, Florentina</creator><creator>Cornea, Călina Petruța</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2275-9141</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3912-1120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7830-4109</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7568-9952</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230705</creationdate><title>In Vitro Evaluation of Some Endophytic Bacillus to Potentially Inhibit Grape and Grapevine Fungal Pathogens</title><author>Boiu-Sicuia, Oana-Alina ; Toma, Radu Cristian ; Diguță, Camelia Filofteia ; Matei, Florentina ; Cornea, Călina Petruța</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ca30924b8c1ffa2df023346e45cc90a47e1ee109fe578f125d4cc289125ff1e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agricultural industry</topic><topic>Antifungal activity</topic><topic>Bacillus</topic><topic>Bacillus spp</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>biocontrol</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Cellulase</topic><topic>Chitinase</topic><topic>Disease management</topic><topic>Endophytes</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Grapes</topic><topic>grapevine</topic><topic>Grapevines</topic><topic>In vitro methods and tests</topic><topic>Lytic enzymes</topic><topic>molds</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Plant diseases</topic><topic>Plant resistance</topic><topic>Polyamines</topic><topic>Ribosomal DNA</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Solubilization</topic><topic>Spoilage</topic><topic>Strains (organisms)</topic><topic>Sustainability management</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Temperature tolerance</topic><topic>trunk diseases</topic><topic>Viticulture</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><topic>Wineries & vineyards</topic><topic>Wines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boiu-Sicuia, Oana-Alina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toma, Radu Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diguță, Camelia Filofteia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matei, Florentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornea, Călina Petruța</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Plants (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boiu-Sicuia, Oana-Alina</au><au>Toma, Radu Cristian</au><au>Diguță, Camelia Filofteia</au><au>Matei, Florentina</au><au>Cornea, Călina Petruța</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Vitro Evaluation of Some Endophytic Bacillus to Potentially Inhibit Grape and Grapevine Fungal Pathogens</atitle><jtitle>Plants (Basel)</jtitle><addtitle>Plants (Basel)</addtitle><date>2023-07-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>2553</spage><pages>2553-</pages><issn>2223-7747</issn><eissn>2223-7747</eissn><abstract>Romania has a long history of grapevine culturing and winemaking. However, like any agricultural sector, viticulture faces devastating biological threats. Fungi responsible for grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) and grape spoilage lead to considerable yield losses and a decline in grapevine quality. In the actual context, many countries, including Romania, have reoriented their approaches to minimize chemical inputs, which have been proven to be toxic and to have negative impacts on the environment, and to replace them with sustainable biocontrol strategies for the wine-growing sector. Within biocontrol strategies,
spp. is a well-known plant-protective bacteria with antifungal properties. Within this paper, six endophytic bacteria from various plant sources were studied. The bacterial strains were identified as
,
, and
by sequencing their 16S rDNA region. Regardless of the in vitro test methods (using living bacterial cells, bacterial-cell-free supernatant (CFS), and volatile active compounds (VOCs)),
strains revealed strong and broad antifungal activity against grape and grapevine fungal pathogens such as
spp.,
,
,
,
,
spp.,
,
, and
. The functional antifungal genes encoding for difficidin, fengycin, iturins, macrolactin, and mycosubtilin were molecularly detected, which could support the proven antifungal activity of the endophytic strains. Lytic enzymes involved in fungal growth inhibition, such as chitinase, cellulase, and proteases, were also revealed to be produced by some of these bacterial strains. Various other in vitro tests, such as phosphate and phytate solubilization, phytohormone synthesis, the production of enzymes involved in the polyamine biosynthetic pathway, and pH as well as temperature tolerance tests were carried out to reveal the plant-beneficial potential of these bacterial strains. These results revealed that the
strains, especially BAHs1, are the most suitable endophytes for grapevine biologic control, which could lead to the future development of sustainable management strategies.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>37447114</pmid><doi>10.3390/plants12132553</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2275-9141</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3912-1120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7830-4109</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7568-9952</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2223-7747 |
ispartof | Plants (Basel), 2023-07, Vol.12 (13), p.2553 |
issn | 2223-7747 2223-7747 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bfa40ef7e375445184230f72fdb74c80 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central |
subjects | Agricultural industry Antifungal activity Bacillus Bacillus spp Bacteria biocontrol Biological control Cellulase Chitinase Disease management Endophytes Environmental impact Enzymes Fungi Fungicides Genes Grapes grapevine Grapevines In vitro methods and tests Lytic enzymes molds Pathogens Phylogenetics Plant diseases Plant resistance Polyamines Ribosomal DNA rRNA 16S Solubilization Spoilage Strains (organisms) Sustainability management Sustainable development Temperature tolerance trunk diseases Viticulture VOCs Volatile organic compounds Wineries & vineyards Wines |
title | In Vitro Evaluation of Some Endophytic Bacillus to Potentially Inhibit Grape and Grapevine Fungal Pathogens |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A45%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Vitro%20Evaluation%20of%20Some%20Endophytic%20Bacillus%20to%20Potentially%20Inhibit%20Grape%20and%20Grapevine%20Fungal%20Pathogens&rft.jtitle=Plants%20(Basel)&rft.au=Boiu-Sicuia,%20Oana-Alina&rft.date=2023-07-05&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=2553&rft.pages=2553-&rft.issn=2223-7747&rft.eissn=2223-7747&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/plants12132553&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2836437541%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ca30924b8c1ffa2df023346e45cc90a47e1ee109fe578f125d4cc289125ff1e93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2836437541&rft_id=info:pmid/37447114&rfr_iscdi=true |