Weight loss with or without intragastric balloon causes divergent effects on ghrelin cell expression

Objective The mechanism of action of intragastric balloons in the treatment of obesity is not fully understood. One of the hypotheses is that balloons might have an effect on the fundus, the area of ghrelin production. Methods Participants were randomized to a 13‐week period of sham or balloon treat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Obesity science & practice 2021-04, Vol.7 (2), p.199-207
Main Authors: Mathus‐Vliegen, Elisabeth, Spångeus, Anna, Walter, Susanna, Ericson, Ann‐Charlott
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Balloon treatment
Biopsy
Body weight loss
Drug therapy
Endoscopy
Esophagus
Fasting
Food
Gastrointestinal surgery
Ghrelin
ghrelin cell
ghrelin secretion
grelin
Hormones
Hypothalamus
Immunohistochemistry
intragastric balloon
Original
Stomach
Weight control
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective The mechanism of action of intragastric balloons in the treatment of obesity is not fully understood. One of the hypotheses is that balloons might have an effect on the fundus, the area of ghrelin production. Methods Participants were randomized to a 13‐week period of sham or balloon treatment followed by a 13‐week period of balloon therapy in everyone. Blood samples for ghrelin levels were taken in the fasting state and after a breakfast at the start, after 13 and 26 weeks. Biopsies for ghrelin cell immunohistochemistry were taken from the fundus at endoscopy. Results Seven participants entered the balloon–balloon (BB) group and 11 the sham–balloon (SB) group. Despite a considerable weight loss, a median −17.9 kg (interquartile ranges −23.8 to −0.5) in the BB group and −18.3 kg (−22.7 to −14.7) in the SB group, fasting ghrelin and meal‐induced ghrelin response did not change. In the SB group, the number of ghrelin cells increased significantly (p 0.001) from 110.6 (83.6–118.9) to 160.2 (128.5–223.0) while on sham treatment and returned to initial levels, 116.3 (91.7–146.9) (p 0.001), when they received their first balloon. No significant changes in ghrelin cell numbers were observed in the BB group. Conclusion In participants without a balloon, weight loss induced an increase in ghrelin cell numbers in the fundus, which was annulled by the subsequent placement of a balloon. The effect of a balloon might be explained by effects on ghrelin cell numbers or ghrelin cell activity.
ISSN:2055-2238
2055-2238
DOI:10.1002/osp4.478