Loading…

Assessing Cast Aluminum Alloys with Computed Tomography Defect Metrics: A Gurson Porous Plasticity Approach

Aluminum alloys have inherent tendencies to produce casting defects caused by alloying or metal melt flow inside the mold. The traditional detection method for these defects includes reduced pressure tests, which assess metal quality in a destructive manner. This leaves a gap between metal quality a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Metals (Basel ) 2023-04, Vol.13 (4), p.752
Main Authors: Gul, Armağan, Aslan, Ozgur, Kayali, Eyüp Sabri, Bayraktar, Emin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-5552be7911d0c141f0b30b143af131407c982e6e788734bc7fd034ac5ecdf99b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-5552be7911d0c141f0b30b143af131407c982e6e788734bc7fd034ac5ecdf99b3
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 752
container_title Metals (Basel )
container_volume 13
creator Gul, Armağan
Aslan, Ozgur
Kayali, Eyüp Sabri
Bayraktar, Emin
description Aluminum alloys have inherent tendencies to produce casting defects caused by alloying or metal melt flow inside the mold. The traditional detection method for these defects includes reduced pressure tests, which assess metal quality in a destructive manner. This leaves a gap between metal quality assessments and tensile test correlations. Computed tomography (CT) scans offer crucial assistance in evaluating the internal quality of castings without damaging the structure. This provides a valuable opportunity to couple mechanical tests with numerical methods such as finite element analysis to predict the mechanical performance of the alloy. The present study aims to evaluate the internal quality of cast aluminum alloys using CT scans and to correlate the defect metrics obtained from CT scans with mechanical test results. The Gurson-type material model and finite element methodology have been used to validate the correlation studies. Therefore, we propose a more holistic approach to predicting the behavior of metals by coupling damage models with CT scans and mechanical tests. The study investigates several CT metrics such as the defect volume, total defect surface, biggest defect surface, and projected area of defects. The conclusion reveals that CT scans provide crucial assistance in evaluating the internal quality of castings, and CT defect metrics can be used to build correlations between mechanical tests and CT evaluations. The study also suggests that the concept of adjusted representative material yield parameter (ARMY) or computed representative material yield parameter (CRMY) can be used to correlate CT metrics with mechanical strength in cast materials and parts for a given aluminum alloy. Overall, the study proposes a more comprehensive methodology to assess the quality of cast aluminum alloys and couple the quality to mechanical performance.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/met13040752
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bfea0e2fb3934d6683ded2d38cdfd7e9</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A747465007</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_bfea0e2fb3934d6683ded2d38cdfd7e9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A747465007</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-5552be7911d0c141f0b30b143af131407c982e6e788734bc7fd034ac5ecdf99b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUsFq3DAQNaWFhjSn_ICgp1I2lSxZsnoz2zYJbGgOyVnI0mhXW9tyJTll_75Kt7QJRDrM8HjzeG-Yqjon-IJSiT-NkAnFDIumflWd1KWumMDk9ZP-bXWW0h6X19YcS3lS_ehSgpT8tEVrnTLqhmX00zKWZgiHhH75vEPrMM5LBovuwhi2Uc-7A_oCDkxGN5CjN-kz6tDlElOY0G2IYUnodihy3vh8QN08x6DN7l31xukhwdnfelrdf_t6t75abb5fXq-7zcow3uRV0zR1D0ISYrEhjDjcU9wTRrUjlJR8RrY1cBBtKyjrjXAWU6ZNA8Y6KXt6Wl0fdW3QezVHP-p4UEF79QcIcat0LN4GUL0DjaF2PZWUWc5basHWlrZFygqQRevDUWunh2dSV91GPWJl4VwUxw-kcN8fuSXuzwVSVvuwxKlEVXWLecO5ZM1_1lYXA35yIUdtRp-M6gQTZQUYi8K6eIFVvoXRmzCB8wV_NvDxOGBiSCmC--eWYPV4H-rJfdDfBuKraQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2806566945</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Cast Aluminum Alloys with Computed Tomography Defect Metrics: A Gurson Porous Plasticity Approach</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Gul, Armağan ; Aslan, Ozgur ; Kayali, Eyüp Sabri ; Bayraktar, Emin</creator><creatorcontrib>Gul, Armağan ; Aslan, Ozgur ; Kayali, Eyüp Sabri ; Bayraktar, Emin</creatorcontrib><description>Aluminum alloys have inherent tendencies to produce casting defects caused by alloying or metal melt flow inside the mold. The traditional detection method for these defects includes reduced pressure tests, which assess metal quality in a destructive manner. This leaves a gap between metal quality assessments and tensile test correlations. Computed tomography (CT) scans offer crucial assistance in evaluating the internal quality of castings without damaging the structure. This provides a valuable opportunity to couple mechanical tests with numerical methods such as finite element analysis to predict the mechanical performance of the alloy. The present study aims to evaluate the internal quality of cast aluminum alloys using CT scans and to correlate the defect metrics obtained from CT scans with mechanical test results. The Gurson-type material model and finite element methodology have been used to validate the correlation studies. Therefore, we propose a more holistic approach to predicting the behavior of metals by coupling damage models with CT scans and mechanical tests. The study investigates several CT metrics such as the defect volume, total defect surface, biggest defect surface, and projected area of defects. The conclusion reveals that CT scans provide crucial assistance in evaluating the internal quality of castings, and CT defect metrics can be used to build correlations between mechanical tests and CT evaluations. The study also suggests that the concept of adjusted representative material yield parameter (ARMY) or computed representative material yield parameter (CRMY) can be used to correlate CT metrics with mechanical strength in cast materials and parts for a given aluminum alloy. Overall, the study proposes a more comprehensive methodology to assess the quality of cast aluminum alloys and couple the quality to mechanical performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-4701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-4701</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/met13040752</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Alloying ; Alloys ; Aluminum ; Aluminum alloys ; Aluminum base alloys ; Analysis ; casting ; Casting defects ; Castings ; Computed tomography ; constitutive modeling ; Crack initiation ; CT imaging ; Damage assessment ; Defects ; Engineering Sciences ; Finite element method ; Gurson plasticity ; Kinematics ; Localization ; Mechanical properties ; Mechanical tests ; Mechanics ; Medical imaging ; Metal fatigue ; Numerical methods ; Parameters ; Quality assessment ; Research methodology ; Specialty metals industry ; Tensile tests ; Tomography ; Yield stress</subject><ispartof>Metals (Basel ), 2023-04, Vol.13 (4), p.752</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-5552be7911d0c141f0b30b143af131407c982e6e788734bc7fd034ac5ecdf99b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-5552be7911d0c141f0b30b143af131407c982e6e788734bc7fd034ac5ecdf99b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9073-6948 ; 0000-0003-0644-5249 ; 0000-0002-1042-0805</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2806566945/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2806566945?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04067552$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gul, Armağan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aslan, Ozgur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kayali, Eyüp Sabri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayraktar, Emin</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Cast Aluminum Alloys with Computed Tomography Defect Metrics: A Gurson Porous Plasticity Approach</title><title>Metals (Basel )</title><description>Aluminum alloys have inherent tendencies to produce casting defects caused by alloying or metal melt flow inside the mold. The traditional detection method for these defects includes reduced pressure tests, which assess metal quality in a destructive manner. This leaves a gap between metal quality assessments and tensile test correlations. Computed tomography (CT) scans offer crucial assistance in evaluating the internal quality of castings without damaging the structure. This provides a valuable opportunity to couple mechanical tests with numerical methods such as finite element analysis to predict the mechanical performance of the alloy. The present study aims to evaluate the internal quality of cast aluminum alloys using CT scans and to correlate the defect metrics obtained from CT scans with mechanical test results. The Gurson-type material model and finite element methodology have been used to validate the correlation studies. Therefore, we propose a more holistic approach to predicting the behavior of metals by coupling damage models with CT scans and mechanical tests. The study investigates several CT metrics such as the defect volume, total defect surface, biggest defect surface, and projected area of defects. The conclusion reveals that CT scans provide crucial assistance in evaluating the internal quality of castings, and CT defect metrics can be used to build correlations between mechanical tests and CT evaluations. The study also suggests that the concept of adjusted representative material yield parameter (ARMY) or computed representative material yield parameter (CRMY) can be used to correlate CT metrics with mechanical strength in cast materials and parts for a given aluminum alloy. Overall, the study proposes a more comprehensive methodology to assess the quality of cast aluminum alloys and couple the quality to mechanical performance.</description><subject>Alloying</subject><subject>Alloys</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Aluminum alloys</subject><subject>Aluminum base alloys</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>casting</subject><subject>Casting defects</subject><subject>Castings</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>constitutive modeling</subject><subject>Crack initiation</subject><subject>CT imaging</subject><subject>Damage assessment</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Gurson plasticity</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Mechanical tests</subject><subject>Mechanics</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Metal fatigue</subject><subject>Numerical methods</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Specialty metals industry</subject><subject>Tensile tests</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Yield stress</subject><issn>2075-4701</issn><issn>2075-4701</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUsFq3DAQNaWFhjSn_ICgp1I2lSxZsnoz2zYJbGgOyVnI0mhXW9tyJTll_75Kt7QJRDrM8HjzeG-Yqjon-IJSiT-NkAnFDIumflWd1KWumMDk9ZP-bXWW0h6X19YcS3lS_ehSgpT8tEVrnTLqhmX00zKWZgiHhH75vEPrMM5LBovuwhi2Uc-7A_oCDkxGN5CjN-kz6tDlElOY0G2IYUnodihy3vh8QN08x6DN7l31xukhwdnfelrdf_t6t75abb5fXq-7zcow3uRV0zR1D0ISYrEhjDjcU9wTRrUjlJR8RrY1cBBtKyjrjXAWU6ZNA8Y6KXt6Wl0fdW3QezVHP-p4UEF79QcIcat0LN4GUL0DjaF2PZWUWc5basHWlrZFygqQRevDUWunh2dSV91GPWJl4VwUxw-kcN8fuSXuzwVSVvuwxKlEVXWLecO5ZM1_1lYXA35yIUdtRp-M6gQTZQUYi8K6eIFVvoXRmzCB8wV_NvDxOGBiSCmC--eWYPV4H-rJfdDfBuKraQ</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Gul, Armağan</creator><creator>Aslan, Ozgur</creator><creator>Kayali, Eyüp Sabri</creator><creator>Bayraktar, Emin</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9073-6948</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0644-5249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1042-0805</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Assessing Cast Aluminum Alloys with Computed Tomography Defect Metrics: A Gurson Porous Plasticity Approach</title><author>Gul, Armağan ; Aslan, Ozgur ; Kayali, Eyüp Sabri ; Bayraktar, Emin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-5552be7911d0c141f0b30b143af131407c982e6e788734bc7fd034ac5ecdf99b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Alloying</topic><topic>Alloys</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Aluminum alloys</topic><topic>Aluminum base alloys</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>casting</topic><topic>Casting defects</topic><topic>Castings</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>constitutive modeling</topic><topic>Crack initiation</topic><topic>CT imaging</topic><topic>Damage assessment</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Gurson plasticity</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Mechanical tests</topic><topic>Mechanics</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Metal fatigue</topic><topic>Numerical methods</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Specialty metals industry</topic><topic>Tensile tests</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Yield stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gul, Armağan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aslan, Ozgur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kayali, Eyüp Sabri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayraktar, Emin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Metals (Basel )</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gul, Armağan</au><au>Aslan, Ozgur</au><au>Kayali, Eyüp Sabri</au><au>Bayraktar, Emin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Cast Aluminum Alloys with Computed Tomography Defect Metrics: A Gurson Porous Plasticity Approach</atitle><jtitle>Metals (Basel )</jtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>752</spage><pages>752-</pages><issn>2075-4701</issn><eissn>2075-4701</eissn><abstract>Aluminum alloys have inherent tendencies to produce casting defects caused by alloying or metal melt flow inside the mold. The traditional detection method for these defects includes reduced pressure tests, which assess metal quality in a destructive manner. This leaves a gap between metal quality assessments and tensile test correlations. Computed tomography (CT) scans offer crucial assistance in evaluating the internal quality of castings without damaging the structure. This provides a valuable opportunity to couple mechanical tests with numerical methods such as finite element analysis to predict the mechanical performance of the alloy. The present study aims to evaluate the internal quality of cast aluminum alloys using CT scans and to correlate the defect metrics obtained from CT scans with mechanical test results. The Gurson-type material model and finite element methodology have been used to validate the correlation studies. Therefore, we propose a more holistic approach to predicting the behavior of metals by coupling damage models with CT scans and mechanical tests. The study investigates several CT metrics such as the defect volume, total defect surface, biggest defect surface, and projected area of defects. The conclusion reveals that CT scans provide crucial assistance in evaluating the internal quality of castings, and CT defect metrics can be used to build correlations between mechanical tests and CT evaluations. The study also suggests that the concept of adjusted representative material yield parameter (ARMY) or computed representative material yield parameter (CRMY) can be used to correlate CT metrics with mechanical strength in cast materials and parts for a given aluminum alloy. Overall, the study proposes a more comprehensive methodology to assess the quality of cast aluminum alloys and couple the quality to mechanical performance.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/met13040752</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9073-6948</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0644-5249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1042-0805</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2075-4701
ispartof Metals (Basel ), 2023-04, Vol.13 (4), p.752
issn 2075-4701
2075-4701
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bfea0e2fb3934d6683ded2d38cdfd7e9
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Alloying
Alloys
Aluminum
Aluminum alloys
Aluminum base alloys
Analysis
casting
Casting defects
Castings
Computed tomography
constitutive modeling
Crack initiation
CT imaging
Damage assessment
Defects
Engineering Sciences
Finite element method
Gurson plasticity
Kinematics
Localization
Mechanical properties
Mechanical tests
Mechanics
Medical imaging
Metal fatigue
Numerical methods
Parameters
Quality assessment
Research methodology
Specialty metals industry
Tensile tests
Tomography
Yield stress
title Assessing Cast Aluminum Alloys with Computed Tomography Defect Metrics: A Gurson Porous Plasticity Approach
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T04%3A40%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Cast%20Aluminum%20Alloys%20with%20Computed%20Tomography%20Defect%20Metrics:%20A%20Gurson%20Porous%20Plasticity%20Approach&rft.jtitle=Metals%20(Basel%20)&rft.au=Gul,%20Arma%C4%9Fan&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=752&rft.pages=752-&rft.issn=2075-4701&rft.eissn=2075-4701&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/met13040752&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA747465007%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-5552be7911d0c141f0b30b143af131407c982e6e788734bc7fd034ac5ecdf99b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2806566945&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A747465007&rfr_iscdi=true