Contributions of Philosophy of Science, in the Perspective of Popper and Lakatos, for the Study of Innovation: An Analysis of the Neoclassical Schumpeterian and Neo-schumpeterian Theories

The Schumpeterian and neo-schumpeterian theories represent pillars on which the subject of innovation developed and gained expression. Moreover, innovation is an independent area both in national and international congresses. The objective of this essay is to investigate – from two criteria of delim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista de la facultad de ciencias económicas 2018-01, Vol.26 (1)
Main Authors: Fabrício Baron Mussi, Andre da Silva Zembro, Aline Alvares Melo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Criteria for Scientific Demarcation
Falsificationism
Research Programs
Schumpeter
Theories of innovation
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2680-2201853578229508577c2866f9699386a9f31173bc628b18f08ea91719d632103
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Revista de la facultad de ciencias económicas
container_volume 26
creator Fabrício Baron Mussi
Andre da Silva Zembro
Aline Alvares Melo
description The Schumpeterian and neo-schumpeterian theories represent pillars on which the subject of innovation developed and gained expression. Moreover, innovation is an independent area both in national and international congresses. The objective of this essay is to investigate – from two criteria of delimitation (Popper and Lakatos) – the scientificity of innovation theory. Innovation is analyzed from three macro themes: (1) the neoclassical current of economic theory; (2) the introduction of innovation theory and reviews of the more recent Schumpeter manuscripts; (3) the contributions brought by the neo-chumpeterian innovation current. In concluding that the subject of innovation as analyzed meets the criteria listed to categorize the scientificity according to Popper and Lakatos, implications for the field of innovation studies are discussed, such as the construction/transmission of knowledge, the escape from “common sense”, and the use of the “method” as a resource for building scientific knowledge.
doi_str_mv 10.18359/rfce.2740
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c00be8d3fae94912877d5de13edfdc8e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c00be8d3fae94912877d5de13edfdc8e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_c00be8d3fae94912877d5de13edfdc8e</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2680-2201853578229508577c2866f9699386a9f31173bc628b18f08ea91719d632103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUNtKAzEUDKJgrb74BfkAt-bibhLfpHgpFBXU5yVNTtzUbbIk20K_zZ9zu_oiHDicmWGGOQhdUjKjkpfqOjkDMyZuyBGaUEVUIQRVx2hCKKNFJUl5is5yXhNSSVlVE_Q9j6FPfrXtfQwZR4dfG9_GHLtmf7jejIdg4Ar7gPsG8Cuk3IHp_Q5Gcew6SFgHi5f6S_cxX2EX0yh967d29FiEEHf6EHCL78Iwut1nP4YddM8QTatz9ka3Q16z3XTQQ_I6jL4DXeR_6HsDMXnI5-jE6TbDxd-eoo-H-_f5U7F8eVzM75aFYUPjgjFCZclLIRlTJZGlEIYN5Z2qlOKy0spxSgVfmYrJFZWOSNCKDn-zFWeU8Cla_PraqNd1l_xGp30dta9HIKbPWqfemxZqQ8gKpOVOg7pRlEkhbGmBcrDOGgn8ByLTgx0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contributions of Philosophy of Science, in the Perspective of Popper and Lakatos, for the Study of Innovation: An Analysis of the Neoclassical Schumpeterian and Neo-schumpeterian Theories</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>EBSCO_EconLit with Full Text（美国经济学会全文数据库）</source><creator>Fabrício Baron Mussi ; Andre da Silva Zembro ; Aline Alvares Melo</creator><creatorcontrib>Fabrício Baron Mussi ; Andre da Silva Zembro ; Aline Alvares Melo</creatorcontrib><description>The Schumpeterian and neo-schumpeterian theories represent pillars on which the subject of innovation developed and gained expression. Moreover, innovation is an independent area both in national and international congresses. The objective of this essay is to investigate – from two criteria of delimitation (Popper and Lakatos) – the scientificity of innovation theory. Innovation is analyzed from three macro themes: (1) the neoclassical current of economic theory; (2) the introduction of innovation theory and reviews of the more recent Schumpeter manuscripts; (3) the contributions brought by the neo-chumpeterian innovation current. In concluding that the subject of innovation as analyzed meets the criteria listed to categorize the scientificity according to Popper and Lakatos, implications for the field of innovation studies are discussed, such as the construction/transmission of knowledge, the escape from “common sense”, and the use of the “method” as a resource for building scientific knowledge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0121-6805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1909-7719</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18359/rfce.2740</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Editorial Neogranadina</publisher><subject>Criteria for Scientific Demarcation ; Falsificationism ; Research Programs ; Schumpeter ; Theories of innovation</subject><ispartof>Revista de la facultad de ciencias económicas, 2018-01, Vol.26 (1)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2680-2201853578229508577c2866f9699386a9f31173bc628b18f08ea91719d632103</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fabrício Baron Mussi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andre da Silva Zembro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aline Alvares Melo</creatorcontrib><title>Contributions of Philosophy of Science, in the Perspective of Popper and Lakatos, for the Study of Innovation: An Analysis of the Neoclassical Schumpeterian and Neo-schumpeterian Theories</title><title>Revista de la facultad de ciencias económicas</title><description>The Schumpeterian and neo-schumpeterian theories represent pillars on which the subject of innovation developed and gained expression. Moreover, innovation is an independent area both in national and international congresses. The objective of this essay is to investigate – from two criteria of delimitation (Popper and Lakatos) – the scientificity of innovation theory. Innovation is analyzed from three macro themes: (1) the neoclassical current of economic theory; (2) the introduction of innovation theory and reviews of the more recent Schumpeter manuscripts; (3) the contributions brought by the neo-chumpeterian innovation current. In concluding that the subject of innovation as analyzed meets the criteria listed to categorize the scientificity according to Popper and Lakatos, implications for the field of innovation studies are discussed, such as the construction/transmission of knowledge, the escape from “common sense”, and the use of the “method” as a resource for building scientific knowledge.</description><subject>Criteria for Scientific Demarcation</subject><subject>Falsificationism</subject><subject>Research Programs</subject><subject>Schumpeter</subject><subject>Theories of innovation</subject><issn>0121-6805</issn><issn>1909-7719</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUNtKAzEUDKJgrb74BfkAt-bibhLfpHgpFBXU5yVNTtzUbbIk20K_zZ9zu_oiHDicmWGGOQhdUjKjkpfqOjkDMyZuyBGaUEVUIQRVx2hCKKNFJUl5is5yXhNSSVlVE_Q9j6FPfrXtfQwZR4dfG9_GHLtmf7jejIdg4Ar7gPsG8Cuk3IHp_Q5Gcew6SFgHi5f6S_cxX2EX0yh967d29FiEEHf6EHCL78Iwut1nP4YddM8QTatz9ka3Q16z3XTQQ_I6jL4DXeR_6HsDMXnI5-jE6TbDxd-eoo-H-_f5U7F8eVzM75aFYUPjgjFCZclLIRlTJZGlEIYN5Z2qlOKy0spxSgVfmYrJFZWOSNCKDn-zFWeU8Cla_PraqNd1l_xGp30dta9HIKbPWqfemxZqQ8gKpOVOg7pRlEkhbGmBcrDOGgn8ByLTgx0</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Fabrício Baron Mussi</creator><creator>Andre da Silva Zembro</creator><creator>Aline Alvares Melo</creator><general>Editorial Neogranadina</general><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Contributions of Philosophy of Science, in the Perspective of Popper and Lakatos, for the Study of Innovation: An Analysis of the Neoclassical Schumpeterian and Neo-schumpeterian Theories</title><author>Fabrício Baron Mussi ; Andre da Silva Zembro ; Aline Alvares Melo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2680-2201853578229508577c2866f9699386a9f31173bc628b18f08ea91719d632103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Criteria for Scientific Demarcation</topic><topic>Falsificationism</topic><topic>Research Programs</topic><topic>Schumpeter</topic><topic>Theories of innovation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fabrício Baron Mussi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andre da Silva Zembro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aline Alvares Melo</creatorcontrib><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Revista de la facultad de ciencias económicas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fabrício Baron Mussi</au><au>Andre da Silva Zembro</au><au>Aline Alvares Melo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contributions of Philosophy of Science, in the Perspective of Popper and Lakatos, for the Study of Innovation: An Analysis of the Neoclassical Schumpeterian and Neo-schumpeterian Theories</atitle><jtitle>Revista de la facultad de ciencias económicas</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0121-6805</issn><eissn>1909-7719</eissn><abstract>The Schumpeterian and neo-schumpeterian theories represent pillars on which the subject of innovation developed and gained expression. Moreover, innovation is an independent area both in national and international congresses. The objective of this essay is to investigate – from two criteria of delimitation (Popper and Lakatos) – the scientificity of innovation theory. Innovation is analyzed from three macro themes: (1) the neoclassical current of economic theory; (2) the introduction of innovation theory and reviews of the more recent Schumpeter manuscripts; (3) the contributions brought by the neo-chumpeterian innovation current. In concluding that the subject of innovation as analyzed meets the criteria listed to categorize the scientificity according to Popper and Lakatos, implications for the field of innovation studies are discussed, such as the construction/transmission of knowledge, the escape from “common sense”, and the use of the “method” as a resource for building scientific knowledge.</abstract><pub>Editorial Neogranadina</pub><doi>10.18359/rfce.2740</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0121-6805
ispartof Revista de la facultad de ciencias económicas, 2018-01, Vol.26 (1)
issn 0121-6805
1909-7719
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c00be8d3fae94912877d5de13edfdc8e
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); EBSCO_EconLit with Full Text（美国经济学会全文数据库）
subjects Criteria for Scientific Demarcation
Falsificationism
Research Programs
Schumpeter
Theories of innovation
title Contributions of Philosophy of Science, in the Perspective of Popper and Lakatos, for the Study of Innovation: An Analysis of the Neoclassical Schumpeterian and Neo-schumpeterian Theories
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T11%3A28%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contributions%20of%20Philosophy%20of%20Science,%20in%20the%20Perspective%20of%20Popper%20and%20Lakatos,%20for%20the%20Study%20of%20Innovation:%20An%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Neoclassical%20Schumpeterian%20and%20Neo-schumpeterian%20Theories&rft.jtitle=Revista%20de%20la%20facultad%20de%20ciencias%20econ%C3%B3micas&rft.au=Fabr%C3%ADcio%20Baron%20Mussi&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0121-6805&rft.eissn=1909-7719&rft_id=info:doi/10.18359/rfce.2740&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_c00be8d3fae94912877d5de13edfdc8e%3C/doaj%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2680-2201853578229508577c2866f9699386a9f31173bc628b18f08ea91719d632103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true